RF Synchronization Activity at SPARC A.Gallo and D. Alesini, M. Bellaveglia, R. Boni, G. Di Pirro, A. Drago, A.Ghigo P. Baldini, L. Cacciotti, M. Scampati,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cascina, January 25th, Coupling of the IMC length noise into the recombined ITF output Raffaele Flaminio EGO and CNRS/IN2P3 Summary - Recombined.
Advertisements

Progress of the sub-harmonic bunching system (i.e. upgrading progress of BEPCII present bunching system) Pei Shilun for the SHBS team Accelerator center,
Lock-in amplifiers Signals and noise Frequency dependence of noise Low frequency ~ 1 / f –example: temperature (0.1 Hz), pressure.
Particle Accelerator Engineering, London, October 2014 Phase Synchronisation Systems Dr A.C. Dexter Overview Accelerator Synchronisation Examples Categories.
Test of LLRF at SPARC Marco Bellaveglia INFN – LNF Reporting for:
R. Akre, P. Emma, P. Krejcik LCLS April 29, 2004 LCLS RF Stability Requirements LCLS Requirements The SLAC Linac.
Laser to RF synchronisation A.Winter, Aachen University and DESY Miniworkshop on XFEL Short Bunch Measurement and Timing.
RF Stability Working Group Jorn Jacob (ESRF), John Byrd (LBNL) General Issues RF phase and amplitude noise –filtered by cavity and translate into timing.
RF Synchronisation Issues
RF Systems and Stability Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
SLAC XFEL Short Bunch Measurement and Timing Workshop 1 Current status of the FERMI project (slides provided by Rene Bakker) Photoinjector laser system.
Stefan Simrock 3 rd LC School, Oak Brook, IL, USA, 2008, Radio Frequency Systems 1 Timing and Synchronization S. Simrock and Axel Winter DESY, Hamburg,
RF SYSTEM DESIGN FOR THE TOP-IMPLART ACCELERATOR V. Surrenti, G. Bazzano, P. Nenzi, L. Picardi,C. Ronsivalle, ENEA,Frascati, Italy ; F. Ambrosini, La Sapienza.
Overview of the LLRF Activities at SLAC
Status of MicroTCA LLRF Development Zheqiao Geng On behalf of the LLRF AIP team 6/4/2012.
Demonstration of the Beam loading compensation (Preparation status for ILC beam loading compensation experiments at ATF injector in this September) (PoP.
Additional RF system issues: Amplifier linearization Reference Phase distribution Master Clock Anders J Johansson Lund University.
LLRF Phase Reference System The LCLS linac is broken down into 4 separate linac sections. The LCLS injector will reside in an off axis tunnel at the end.
Phase noise measurements in TRIUMF ISAC 2 cryomodule K. Fong, M. Laverty TRIUMF.
Wir schaffen Wissen – heute für morgen 24 August 2015PSI,24 August 2015PSI, Paul Scherrer Institut Status WP 8.2 RF Low Level Electronic Manuel Brönnimann.
Siegfried Schreiber, DESY The TTF Laser System Laser Material Properties Conclusion? Issues on Longitudinal Photoinjector.
LLRF System for Pulsed Linacs (modeling, simulation, design and implementation) Hooman Hassanzadegan ESS, Beam Instrumentation Group 1.
PULSE SHAPING ISSUES FOR THE PETS TESTING PROGRAM AT SLAC A.Cappelletti SLAC, Oct 2008.
Progress in CW-Timing Distribution for Future Light Sources RUSSELL WILCOX, GANG HUANG, LARRY DOOLITTLE, JOHN BYRD ICFA WORKSHOP ON FUTURE LIGHT SOURCES.
SPIE, PA-IVKrzysztof Czuba1 Improved fiber-optic link for the phase reference distribution system for the TESLA technology based projects Krzysztof.
Longitudinal transfer function a.k.a. (M 55 ) measurements at the JLab FEL Pavel Evtushenko, JLab  Jlab IR/UV upgrade longitudinal phase space evolution.
SPPS, Beam stability and pulse-to-pulse jitter Patrick Krejcik For the SPPS collaboration Zeuthen Workshop on Start-to-End Simulations of X-ray FEL’s August.
Digital Phase Control System for SSRF LINAC C.X. Yin, D.K. Liu, L.Y. Yu SINAP, China
Digital Phase Control System for SSRF LINAC C.X. Yin, D.K. Liu, L.Y. Yu SINAP, China
LLRF for EUCARD Crab Cavities Graeme Burt (on behalf of Amos Dexter) Paris May 2011.
LCLS_II High Rep Rate Operation and Femtosecond Timing J. Frisch 7/22/15.
WELCOME TO IHEP. RF Phase Control for BEPCII Linac Accelerator Wenchun Gao.
Beam Loading experiment at KEK ATF ( Multi-train acceleration at KEK-ATF Injector ) KEK Masafumi Fukuda and Junji Urakawa LCWS /10/052 train acceleration.
On the Synchronization of lasers for FEL facility M.Danailov Electronic versus direct optical locking Direct optical locking in master-slave configuration.
LCLS LLRF System October 10-13, 2005 LLRF05 B. Hong, R. Akre, A. Hill, D. Kotturi, H. Schwarz SLAC, Stanford, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA Work supported.
Femtosecond phase measurement Alexandra Andersson CLIC Beam Instrumentation workshop.
BEPC II TIMING SYSTEM EPICS Seminar Presented by Ma zhenhan IHEP 20.August 2002.
February 17-18, 2010 R&D ERL Brian Sheehy R&D ERL Laser and laser light transport Brian Sheehy February 17-18, 2010 Laser and Laser Light Transport.
High precision phase monitoring Alexandra Andersson, CERN Jonathan Sladen, CERN This work is supported by the Commission of the European Communities under.
RF low level control & synchronization A. Gallo, M. Bellaveglia, L. Cacciotti SPARC review committee – ENEA Frascati – 16/11/2005.
FLASH RF gun developments. Sven Pfeiffer for the LLRF team FEL Seminar Hamburg,
April 12 | Comparison of Sophisticated Synthesizer Concepts and Modern Step Attenuator Implementations | 2 Comparison of Sophisticated Synthesizer Concepts.
Date of download: 6/2/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Dye ring laser control, spectroscopic, and locking feedback system showing overlapping,
Matthias Liepe. Matthias Liepe – High loaded Q cavity operation at CU – TTC Topical Meeting on CW-SRF
LLRF 15 Daresbury Andrew Moss ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory.
1 st TIARA Steering Committee A. Gallo – INFN Frascati deputy of TIARA WP8 leader STATUS OF TIARA WP8.
Sub-10 fs RF Regulation at REGAE Matthias Hoffmann for the LLRF team Low Level Radio Frequency Workshop 2015 Shanghai,
CarterFest 14 th July 2010 Stabilised Magnetrons Presentation to mark Professor Richard Carter’s contributions to Vacuum Electronics Delivered by Amos.
Status of SPARC synchronization system and possible upgrades
RF acceleration and transverse damper systems
Dither Luminosity feedback versus Fast IP feedback
Summary of SPARC first-phase operations
RF Synchronization Activity
Timing and synchronization at SPARC
RF Synchronisation Issues
WP02 PRR: Master Oscillator and RF Reference Distribution
Electronics: Demod + 4Q FE
LLRF and Beam-based Longitudinal Feedback Readiness
CEPC RF Power Sources System
LLRF Control System Outline Scope Requirements Design Considerations
LCLS Longitudinal Feedback and Stability Requirements
RF Pulse Shaping.
LCLS RF Stability Requirements
Device test stations Multi-probe electrical DC injection and optical input/output Near-field measurement Analogue characteristics 1) 50GHz Network analyzer,
Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) LLRF Preliminary Design Review LLRF Monitor and Control System September 26, 2005 Ron Akre.
Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) Low Level RF Status
Talk prepared by Stefan Hild AEI Hannover for the GEO-team
Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) Low Level RF Status
Undulator Cavity BPM Status
Breakout Session SC3 – Undulator
Presentation transcript:

RF Synchronization Activity at SPARC A.Gallo and D. Alesini, M. Bellaveglia, R. Boni, G. Di Pirro, A. Drago, A.Ghigo P. Baldini, L. Cacciotti, M. Scampati, A. Sprecacenere, S. Quaglia EUROFEL DS3 Meeting, CEA-Saclay May 17 th 2005

SPARC PHASE STABILITY SPECIFICATIONS: SPARC phase I: ± 3° between the Laser pulse and the Linac RF (RF gun mainly) SPARC phase II: ± 0.5° between the Laser pulse and the Linac RF (RF gun and RF compressor mainly)

SPARC RF DISTRIBUTION: SCHEMATIC LAYOUT

All the Linac RF signals will be phase-monitored respect to the RF ref. Line. The slow phase phase variations will be sampled at 10 Hz (the Linac rep. rate) and corrected acting on the phase shifters (included those placed in the high power waveguide branches). The fast phase variations (i.e. the jitter with spectral components beyond 10 Hz) can be hardly corrected. The possibility of implementing intra-pulse, fast phase lock to correct the fast phase jitter introduced by the RF stations (klystrons + drivers) is under study. Phase Lock to the RF Reference Line

1 I&Q Demodulator0.5 k€ ½ PCI Sampling Board0.6 k€ 1 RF Isolator 0.2 k€ RF Attenuators0.1 k€ 1.4 k€ 1/4 PCI Samp. Board0.3 k€ 1 Peak Detector 0.2 k€ 1 Directional Coup.0.2 k€ RF Attenuators0.1 k€ 0.8 k€ Total cost: 2.2 k€/channel (High Quality) 1.4 k€/channel (Standard) RF Demodulation Channel based on I&Q Detector passive, low cost, 4 quadrants, amplitude independent RF Isolator CW RF Pulsed RF

PULSAR I&Q DEMODULATOR MODEL ID I (custom)

PULSAR I&Q DEMODULATOR MODEL ID I : CALIBRATION

PULSAR ID I Long Term Acquisition

PULSAR ID I ADLINK MS/s PCI Sampling Board Phase Resolution

LASER to RF Line Syncronization The phase of the Laser pulse respect to the Linac RF reference line will be continuously monitored and the “slow drifts” (i.e. the phase noise in a frequency band limited to ½ of the Linac rep. rate) will be compensated (shifting the phase of the RF ref. Line seems the simplest way to do it). The “fast phase jitter” (i.e. the noise in a band larger than ½ of the rep. rate) of the Laser pulse can’t be compensated and must be kept inside the acceptable limits by specifications (1°nrequested to the manufacturer).

Monitoring the synchronization of the bunch from the Gun and of the laser pulse

HOMDYN Time-of-Flight Simulations

TM010 – 2856 MHz R/Q = 28.5  Q 0 = (Al) Q ext = V p 1 nC) = 4 V  = 0.5  s  f tun  10 kHz TE111 – 2985 MHz R/Q = 0.5  Q 0 = (Al) Bunch Monitor Cavity

Bench measurements of short pulse synchronization

Results of the bench measurements of short pulse synchronization

KLYSTRON PHASE LOCK

FAST PHASE LOCK FEEDBACK SYSTEM Sketch of the Experimental Set-up “Noisy” RF Station

PULSAR ST-G9-411 Phase Shifter CALIBRATION FREQUENCY RESPONSE

Fast Phase Lock Feedback System: Open Loop Gain (amplitude and phase) Lock Amp: Circuit sketch

 10° pp Open/Closed Loop Phase Pulses 256 frames with  10° pp, 10 kHz phase noise Single shot phase pulses

DA  NE LINAC KLYSTRON MEASUREMENTS The phase jitter at the output of one of the DA  NE TH2128C Linac klystrons has been measured to figure out the amount of expected noise in the SPARC case and to gain some experience in this subject.

PHASE STABILITY MEASUREMENTS DAFNE LINAC – STATION B August 2003 mixer sensitivity = 5.6 mV/Deg

Long Term (90 min) phase variation: ± 2.5° Short Term (16 shots) phase variation: ± 1°

KLYSTRON PHASE NOISE MEASUREMENTS CONCLUSIONS The measured phase jitter at the output of the Linac station-B klystron is about ± 2.5° in long term and and ± 1° in short term. The main contribution seems to come from the driver amplifiers (planar triode technology). In the SPARC case the driver amplifiers will be of a different and better performing technology (pure class A, solid state) with tight phase jitter specification (1° rms). The expected phase jitter values of the SPARC RF stations are consequently lower.

BENCH MEASUREMENTS OF A FAST INTRA-PULSE PHASE-LOCK CONTROL An intra-pulse phase-lock system is under study to actively correct the fast phase jitter coming from the RF stations. Since the RF pulse is about 4.5  s long, the rise time of such a system should be of the order of 1  s, corresponding to a bandwidth of about 1 MHz. Consequently a fast phase modulator is needed, while the overall delay of the connections (including the group delay of the RF station) should be limited to  100 ns. The speed of the OpAmps manipulating the signal has also to be adequate.