0 2013 NASUCA Meeting Integration of Intermittent Renewable Resources Panel Michael McMullen MISO June 10, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ENERGY VALUE. Summary  Operational Value is a primary component in the Net Market Value (NMV) calculation used to rank competing resources in the RPS.
Advertisements

PV Market Trends and Technical Details. All of US has Suitable Solar Resource for Large Scale PV Deployment.
WinDS-H2 MODEL Wind Deployment Systems Hydrogen Model Workshop on Electrolysis Production of Hydrogen from Wind and Hydropower Walter Short Nate Blair.
Wind and Solar Integration in Colorado: Challenges and Solutions Colorado Rural Energy Agency Energy Innovations Summit Energy Storage for Intermittent.
Energy Storage Definitions/Definitions ETWG 18 Feb 2013.
Resource Adequacy in PJM
Challenge of Large Scale Wind Power Integration - Introduction to the Workshop Pradeep Perera Principal Energy Specialist Asian Development Bank.
1 The Midwest ISO At the Crossroads of America International Meeting of Very Large Power Grid Operators October 24 & 25, 2005 Beijing, China.
MISO’s Midwest Market Initiative APEX Ron McNamara October 31, 2005.
Citizens League Electrical Energy: Affordability and Competitive Pricing Working Team Electric Transmission.
Planning challenges for RE Deployment North African perspective Addressing Variable Renewables in Long-Term Energy Planning (AVRIL) : 2-3 March 2015 Rim.
EStorage First Annual Workshop Arnhem, NL 30, Oct Olivier Teller.
Jim Mcintosh Director, Executive Operations Advisor California ISO Independent Energy Producers 2011 Annual Meeting - October 5, 2011 Stanford Sierra Conference.
Presentation to WECC Market Interface Committee March 24, 2015
Methodologies for Quantifying Energy Security in the Power Sector William Blyth 24 th April 2005.
Preliminary Analysis of the SEE Future Infrastructure Development Plan and REM Benefits.
1 The Effects of Integrating Wind Power on Transmission System Planning, Reliability, and Operations Phase 1 Preliminary Overall Reliability Assessment.
Power Utilities in the Telecom Business in the USA: Past Failures and Future Trends Mike Oldak Vice President & General Counsel Utilities Telecom Council.
Demand Response in MISO Markets NASUCA Panel on DR November 12, 2012.
The Transmission Imperative November 3, 2011 Jay Caspary.
1 Transmission Development at Ameren and in the Midwest ISO Mid-America Regulatory Conference Maureen A. Borkowski June 8, 2010.
Lynn Coles, PE National Wind Technology Center National Renewable Energy Laboratory Golden, Colorado USA 10 FAQ’s (Frequently Asked Questions) About Wind.
Wind Energy Development In Illinois William S. Haas Energy Division Representative.
Reaching the Next Level of the State’s Environmental Policy Goals Panel: Energy Procurement, Infrastructure and Policy: Climate Challenges Beyond 2020.
Overview of the North American and Canadian Markets 2008 APEX Conference in Sydney, Australia October 13, 2008 Hung-po Chao Director, Market Strategy and.
Network Customer Meeting Access Metric Update November 16, 2006.
1 New England Demand Response Resources: Present Observations and Future Challenges Henry Yoshimura Demand Resources Department ISO New England, Inc. Holyoke,
Ontario Electricity Supply Forum PEO Mississauga Chapter - September 6, 2007 Rhonda Wright-Hilbig, P.Eng Market Analysis - IESO.
1 Mid-Continent Area Power Pool Wind Integration Studies Edward P. Weber August 16, 2007.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Draft Wholesale Power Price Forecasts Maury Galbraith Northwest Power and Conservation Council Generating.
Klondike Wind Power Project, Oregon Donald Furman Senior Vice President - Business Policy and Development December 3, 2009 Energy Bar Association Mid-Year.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
1 Demand Response: A Reliability Tool Today; A Renewable Integration Tool Tomorrow Dave Waller, VP Customer Service Hawaiian Electric Company.
RGGI Workshop on Electricity Markets, Reliability and Planning Topic Session 3: RGGI Design, Markets and Reliability – Issues Relating to System Operations.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
Investing Our Energy In You Traverse City Light & Power Electric Generation TCL&P Study Session December 1, 2009.
Demand Response: What It Is and Why It’s Important 2007 APPA National Conference San Antonio, Texas June 26, :00 a.m. to Noon Glenn M. Wilson Director.
IWWG Annual Conference Wind Management at MISO July 22, 2011.
Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) A Success Story… In Progress Ingmar Sterzing United States Association of Energy Economics (USAEE) Pittsburgh.
Power Association of Northern California Maintaining Grid Reliability In An Uncertain Era May 16, 2011 PG&E Conference Center Jim Mcintosh Director, Executive.
The Role of Energy Storage as a Renewable Integration Solution under a 50% RPS Joint California Energy Commission and California Public Utilities Commission.
October 29, Organizational role of Short-Term Planning and Hydro Duty Scheduling Relationship to other groups in BPA Planning and analysis job.
Designing Energy Solutions without Borders National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners.
STaR Symposium October 22, 2013 A Realistic View of Renewables Christine Risch.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Overview of Draft Sixth Power Plan Council Meeting Whitefish, MT June 9-11, 2009.
John Norden, Manager, Renewable Resource Integration ISO New England Inc NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Roadmap to Renewable Integration in.
1 NAUSCA Summer Meeting Boston June 30, 3009 David W. Hadley Vice President State Regulatory Relations Midwest ISO.
Monterey Plaza Hotel October 8-10, 2007
1. Non-Dispatchable Resources and EIS Market Carrie Simpson May 30,
ERCOT Public 1 Project Panel 1 Dan Woodfin Director, System Operations August 15, 2014.
January 14, 2016 PacifiCorp-CAISO-NVE EIM Initiative Overview.
PacifiCorp and CAISO Expanding Regional Energy Partnerships
©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Draft Wholesale Power Price Forecasts Maury Galbraith Generating Resource Advisory Committee Meeting.
The Midwest ISO – Platform to Meet Tomorrow’s Challenges Wisconsin Industrial Energy Group August 7, 2008.
Pan-Canadian Wind Integration Study (PCWIS) Prepared by: GE Energy Consulting, Vaisala , EnerNex, Electranix, Knight Piésold Olga Kucherenko.
Wind Management at MISO
Analysis of the Effects of a Flexible Ramping Ancillary Service Product on Power System Operations Ibrahim Krad Eduardo Ibanez Erik Ela.
GENESYS Redevelopment Strawman Proposal
Grid Integration of Intermittent Resources
Integrating Distributed Energy Resource into Grid Operations
penetration of wind power
Evolving Economic Dispatch in SPP
MRES Resource Operations in SPP
MIT tour of the California ISO Control Center March 31, 2015
Mid-Continent Area Power Pool
PacifiCorp-CAISO-NVE EIM Initiative Overview
Forecasting and Operations CAISO Case
Wholesale Electricity Costs
Jim Mcintosh Director, Executive Operations Advisor California ISO
Presentation transcript:

NASUCA Meeting Integration of Intermittent Renewable Resources Panel Michael McMullen MISO June 10, 2013

1 MISO is one of the largest and most technologically advanced grid operators in the world Current MISO MISO w/ Entergy High Voltage Transmission - miles 49,67065,170 Installed Generation - MW 132,296162,296 Installed Generation - # of Units 1,2591,431 Peak System Demand - MW 98,576133,576

2 MISO’s role is focused on a few key value-added areas Provide independent transmission system access Equal and non-discriminatory access Compliance with FERC requirements Improved regional coordination Enhanced system reliability Lowest cost unit commitment, dispatch and congestion management Deliver improved reliability coordination through efficient market operations Integrated system planning Broader incorporation of renewables Coordinate regional planning Market price / value discovery Encourage prudent infrastructure investment Provide wholesale alignment for retail policy implementation Provide price information transparency What We Do Implications

3 MISO was formed to address federal requirements, but growth has been based on value creation 2013 Entergy Region

4 MISO’s capacity is comprised primarily of coal and natural gas units… MISO Nameplate Capacity 132,296 MW Gas / Oil (32%) Renewables (14%) Nuclear (6%) Hydro (30%) Biomass (3%) MISO Nameplate Capacity – Renewables 18,734 MW Other (2%)

5 …but wind resources are growing rapidly Registered nameplate wind capacity in the MISO region (in MWs) ACTUALSFORECAST MISO RPS Mandates by 2021 = ~20,770 MW

6 Wind’s rapid growth is fueled by MISO’s rich wind resource base... Annual Average Wind Speed at 80 m Source: Wind resource estimates developed by AWS Truepower

7 7 …and renewable portfolio standards and goals adopted in MISO states MT 15% by 2025 ND 10% by 2015 SD 10% by 2015 MN Xcel: 30% by % by 2025 WI 10% by 2015 MI 10% by 2015 IA 105 MW MO 15% by 2021 IL 25% by 2025 IN 10% by 2025 KY No RPS State with RPS Mandate State with RPS Goal State with RPS Mandate or Goal MISO Existing Wind = 12,270 MW MISO RPS Mandates by 2021 = ~20,770 MW Source: MISO, DSIRE – Database of State Incentives for Renewables & Efficiency

8 Inherent characteristics of wind have significant operational impacts on MISO Variability of wind Poor correlation of wind and load Transmission congestion caused by wind location Congestion management Over and under commitment Ramp management Surplus generation events Market dispatch of intermittent units (DIRs) Enhanced wind forecasting Future ramp capability enhancement Driver Market Issue Tools

9 Wind is variable by month… Source: MISO Real-Time Operations and Transmission Asset Management Departments 9.5%7.9%5.8%3.2%4.0%5.9%9.3%8.5%7.4%9.4%8.1%8.0%9.8% Wind Energy as a % of MISO Energy Source: MISO Monthly Operations Report for the Informational Forum, April 2013

10 Note: Weekends and holidays are considered off-peak and are excluded from the graph. Source: MISO Monthly Operations Report for the Informational Forum, January April 2013 …and wind is variable day-to-day and doesn’t reliably correlate with load Daily Wind Capacity Factor % for Peak Hours 1/1/2013 – 4/30/2013

11 Improved wind forecasting will allow for improved operations, but wind forecasting is not likely to become an exact science Day Ahead4 hours AheadHour Ahead Standard Deviation765 MW612 MW486 MW Mean Absolute Error587 MW476 MW390 MW Mean Absolute Percentage Error 5.3%4.3%3.5% MISO Forecasting Accuracy: 1/1/2012 – 5/13/2013

12 Challenges prior to MISO dispatching intermittent resources (DIRs) Rapid increase in wind penetration –Transmission expansion lagged wind expansion –Deployment in areas with little transmission –Increasing need for manual curtailments to manage congestion Challenges of manual curtailments –Highly manual process; time consuming for reliability coordinator –Tracking firm vs. non-firm transmission service –Manual curtailments not accounted for in security constrained economic dispatch resulting in loss of price transparency –Manual curtailments less economic than automated security constrained economic dispatch –Adverse settlement impacts on wind participants

13 Renewable generation is treated like any other generation resource in the market DIRs can participate in the real-time energy market DIRs can automatically be dispatched up to a forecasted limit based on an offer price and system conditions. –Participants submit a short term wind forecast instead of a hourly economic maximum like other generation resources –This enables wind to submit offers and receive dispatch instructions rather than be manually curtailed when transmission constraints limit renewable energy generation to reach the broader market region Dispatchable Intermittent Resources (DIRs) design features Dispatchable Intermittent Resources enhance system wide operational and market efficiency and improve market transparency

14 DIRs launched on June 1, 2011 Registration required as of March, 2013 with limited exceptions Dispatchable Intermittent Resources (DIRs) registration Wind Nameplate Capacity (MW) Registered as DIRsWind Nameplate Capacity (MW) Jun-11Sep-11Jan-12Mar-12Jun-12Sep-12Dec-12Mar-13

15 MISO is able to capture ~95% of wind’s potential through economic dispatch DIR Dispatch Below Economic Maximum (Left Axis)DIR Dispatched Energy (Left Axis) % of DIR Dispatched Down (Right Axis)

16 Wind variability has the potential to create a ramping challenge which may require improved tools and new market products to manage The current wind variability and profile impact ramp requirements as significantly as net scheduled interchange –Wind capacity levels expected from the region’s Renewable Portfolio Standards will dramatically increase the operational difficulties –However, MISO’s large balancing area and geographic diversity help minimize the issue at current wind penetration levels Current operational methods to manage this ramp include –Load and wind forecasting –Pre-commitment of units –Use of fast-start units and spinning reserves to manage unexpected variability Improved operational and market methods under development –Improved load and wind forecasting –30-minute reserve products –Ramping service product

17 MISO’s regional planning enables more economic placement of wind resources in the region Combination design of wind generation build-out Local design of wind generation build-out Local Design = Renewable energy requirements and goals will be met with resources within the same state as the load Combination Design = Renewable energy requirements and goals will be met with a combination of local resources and resources outside of the state with high ranking renewable energy zones ILLUSTRATIVE The economic benefit of optimizing wind into MISO’s footprint is $244 to $285 million in annual benefits Source: MISO’s 2012 Value Proposition Study which was based on the results of the Regional Generation Outlet Study II