0902CZR01NL537SS0901 RENAAL Altering the Course of Renal Disease in Hypertensive Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy with the A II Antagonist.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RENAAL Baseline Characteristics (I) Age, years Male, % Female, % Race, % Asian Black Caucasian Hispanic Other Systolic (mmHg) Diastolic (mmHg) BMI (kg/m.
Advertisements

The PREVEND Study: Screening for micro-albuminuria
THE ACTION TO CONTROL CARDIOVASCULAR RISK IN DIABETES STUDY (ACCORD)
K Fox, W Remme, C Daly, M Bertrand, R Ferrari, M Simoons On behalf of the EUROPA investigators. The diabetic sub study of.
Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-Term Use Evaluation Results
Losartan Heart Failure Survival Study ELITE II Losartan Heart Failure Survival Study ELITE II A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel, Captopril-Controlled.
TROPHY TRial Of Preventing HYpertension. High-normal BP increases CV risk Vasan RS et al. N Engl J Med. 2001;345: Incidence of CV events in women.
Dick de Zeeuw Department of Clinical Pharmacology University Medical Center Groningen The Netherlands Early detection, prediction and potential treatment.
Slide Source: Lipids Online Slide Library Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy (PROVE IT): Design Cannon CP.
The Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease (LIPID) The LIPID Study Group N Engl J Med 1998;339:
RENAAL Altering the Course of Renal Disease in Hypertensive Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy with the AII Antagonist Losartan Slide 1: RENAAL:
1 COZAAR™ (losartan) in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy Michael C. Elia, PhD Director, Regulatory Affairs Merck Research Laboratories.
COURAGE: Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation Purpose To compare the efficacy of optimal medical therapy (OMT)
CHARM-Alternative: Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity - Alternative Purpose To determine whether the angiotensin.
CHARM-Preserved: Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity - Preserved Purpose To determine whether the angiotensin.
BEAUTI f UL: morBidity-mortality EvAlUaTion of the I f inhibitor ivabradine in patients with coronary disease and left ventricULar dysfunction Purpose.
The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial ALLHAT study overview Double-blind, randomized trial to determine whether.
Randomized, double-blind, multicenter, controlled trial.
VBWG CHARISMA Clopidogrel for High Atherothrombotic Risk and Ischemic Stabilization, Management, and Avoidance trial.
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents
1 The Study of Trandolapril- verapamil And insulin Resistance STAR determined whether glycaemic control was maintained to a greater degree by an RAS inhibitor/non-DHP.
1513 Patients; 250 Centers; 28 Countries
Slide 1 RENAAL Altering the Course of Renal Disease in Hypertensive Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy with the A II Antagonist Losartan.
PPAR  activation Clinical evidence. Evolution of clinical evidence supporting PPAR  activation and beyond Surrogate outcomes studies Large.
Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT) Collaborative Study Group N Eng J Med 345: , 2001 Edmund J. Lewis, M.D. Muehrcke Family Professor of.
ORIGIN Outcome Reduction with an Initial Glargine Intervention (ORIGIN) Trial Overview Large international randomized controlled trial in patients with.
Avoiding Cardiovascular Events through COMbination Therapy in Patients LIving with Systolic Hypertension The First Outcomes Trial of Initial Therapy With.
William C. Cushman, MD, FACP, FAHA Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Memphis, TN For The ACCORD Study Group.
Copyleft Clinical Trial Results. You Must Redistribute Slides HYVET Trial The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
Dick de Zeeuw Department of Clinical Pharmacology University Medical Center Groningen The Netherlands Albuminuria; a tool for measuring non-blood pressure.
Dr M Sivalingam Renal Unit, Lister Hospital, Stevenage.
Aim To determine the effects of a Coversyl- based blood pressure lowering regimen on the risk of recurrent stroke among patients with a history of stroke.
WOSCOPS: West Of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Purpose To determine whether pravastatin reduces combined incidence of nonfatal MI and death due to.
BEST: Beta-blocker Evaluation Survival Trial Purpose To determine whether the β-blocker bucindolol reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with advanced.
SPARCL Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels trial.
LIPID: Long-term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease Purpose To determine whether pravastatin will reduce coronary mortality and morbidity.
VBWG PROactive: Study design Dormandy JA et al. Lancet. 2005;366: Charbonnel B et al. Diabetes Care. 2004;27: Objective: Assess the effects.
HOPE: Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation study Purpose To evaluate whether the long-acting ACE inhibitor ramipril and/or vitamin E reduce the incidence.
Enrollment and Outcomes Fan Fan Hou, et al. N Engl J Med 2006;354:
ALLHAT Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial JAMA 2002;288:
COMET: Carvedilol Or Metoprolol European Trial Purpose To compare the effects of carvedilol (a β 1 -, β 2 - and α 1 -receptor blocker) and short-acting.
Baseline characteristics. Patient flow Completed Completed Perindopril Placebo Randomised Not randomised Registered.
ALLHAT 6/5/ CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE OUTCOMES IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS STRATIFIED BY BASELINE GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE (3 GROUPS by GFR)
Change in SBP (mmHg) OmapatrilatEnalapril HCTZ (n = 2476) Change in Systolic BP at Week 24 for Patients Receiving Adjuncts After Week 8 (All Randomized.
4S: Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents FDA-Mandated CV Safety Trials 1.
Long-term Cardiovascular Effects of 4.9 Years of Intensive Blood Pressure Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk.
Early Eplerenone Treatment in Patients with Acute ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction without Heart Failure REMINDER* Gilles Montalescot, Bertram Pitt,
COPERNICUS: Carvedilol Prospective Randomized Cumulative Survival trial Purpose To assess the effect of carvedilol, a β 1 -, β 2 - and α 1 -receptor blocker,
Diabetes and the Kidney Richard Kingston Department of Renal Medicine Kent and Canterbury Hospital.
The JUPITER Trial Reference Ridker PM. Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2195–2207.
Ten Year Outcome of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Versus Medical Therapy in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Results of the Surgical Treatment.
1 Effect of Ramipril on the Incidence of Diabetes The DREAM Trial Investigators N Engl J Med 2006;355 FM R1 윤나리.
Cardiovascular Disease and Antihypertensives The RENAAL Trial Reference Brunner BM, and the RENAAL study group. Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular.
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents
What should the Systolic BP treatment goal be in patients with CKD?
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents
Nephrology Journal Club The SPRINT Trial Parker Gregg
Section 4: Managing progression of CKD
Baseline characteristics and effectiveness results
HOPE: Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation study
The Anglo Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial
CANTOS: The Canakinumab Anti-Inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes Study
Summary of Design Aim: Effect of Ramipril (up to 10mg/d) or Vit E (400 IU/d) vs its placebo on CV death, M I or stroke (primary) Design: Randomized double.
The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
Recent studies of ACE inhibition in renal disease
Effects of Intensive Blood Pressure Control on Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes.
Avoiding Cardiovascular Events through COMbination Therapy in Patients LIving with Systolic Hypertension The First Outcomes Trial of Initial Therapy With.
The Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) Study was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.
Clinical renoprotection trials involving angiotensin II-receptor antagonists and angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors  Barry M. Brenner, Joann Zagrobelny 
Presentation transcript:

0902CZR01NL537SS0901 RENAAL Altering the Course of Renal Disease in Hypertensive Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy with the A II Antagonist Losartan

0902CZR01NL537SS0901 An investigator initiated, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the renal protective effects of losartan in hypertensive patients with Type 2 diabetes and nephropathy 1513 Patients; 250 Centers; 28 Countries RENAAL Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the A II Antagonist Losartan Steering CommitteeChairB. M. Brenner, MD Data and Safety Monitoring CommitteeChairC.E. Mogensen, MD Clinical Endpoint Adjudication Committee ChairS. Haffner, MD Coordinating Center: Merck Research LabsStudy DirectorS. Shahinfar, MD Brenner BM et al New Engl J Med 2001;345(12):

0902CZR01NL537SS0901 RENAAL Primary Hypothesis Long-term treatment with losartan versus placebo (alone or in combination with conventional anti hypertensive therapy*) in Type 2 diabetic patients with hypertension and nephropathy will increase the time to first event and decrease the incidence of doubling of sCr, ESRD or death. Brenner BM et al New Engl J Med 2001;345(12): * Excluding ACEIs and other AIIAs

0902CZR01NL537SS0901 Losartan compared to placebo (alone or in combination with conventional antihypertensive therapy*) in hypertensive patients with Type 2 diabetes and nephropathy will: increase the time to first event and decrease the incidence of cardiovascular morbidity/mortality reduce proteinuria decrease the rate of progression of renal disease RENAAL Secondary Hypothesis Brenner BM et al New Engl J Med 2001;345(12): * Excluding ACEIs and other AIIAs

0902CZR01NL537SS0901 RENAAL Study Design *CT=conventional therapy: Open-label calcium-channel blocker, diuretic, beta blocker, alpha blocker, or centrally acting agents. 4 Wks Losartan 100 mg qd (+CT) Maintain conventional antihypertensive therapy (CT)* (excluding ACEI, AIIA) Losartan 100 mg qd (+CT) Placebo (+CT) Goal trough BP: < 140/<90 mmHg n=1513 Placebo (+CT) Losartan 50 mg qd (+CT) Placebo (+CT) 8 Wks 6 Wks Mean follow-up 3.4 years Brenner BM et al J Renin-Angio-Aldo System 2000;1(4):

0902CZR01NL537SS0901 RENAAL Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria Inclusion criteria Type 2 diabetes Age years Proteinuria: urine alb:cr >300 mg/g, >25 mg/mmol Serum Creatinine: mg/dl, µmol/L* Exclusion criteria Type 1 diabetes Known non-diabetic renal disease or renal artery stenosis Recent history of MI, CABG, PTCA, CVA, TIA History of heart failure HbA 1c >12% *Lower limit 1.5 mg/dl (133 µmol/L) in male patients >60 kg Brenner BM et al J Renin-Angio-Aldo System 2000;1(4): Brenner BM et al New Engl J Med 2001;345(12):

0902CZR01NL537SS0901 RENAAL Enrollment by Region n=1513 Europe 19% Latin America 18% North America 46% Asia 17% Brenner BM et al New Engl J Med 2001;345(12):

0902CZR01NL537SS0901 RENAAL Baseline Characteristics (I) Age, years Male, % Female, % Race, % Asian Black Caucasian Hispanic Other Systolic (mmHg) Diastolic (mmHg) BMI (kg/m 2 ) % Losartan (+CT) (n=751) Placebo (+CT) (n=762) Brenner BM et al New Engl J Med 2001;345(12):

0902CZR01NL537SS0901 RENAAL Primary Composite Endpoint and Components DsCr, ESRD, Death Doubling of sCr ESRD Death ESRD or Death Losartan (+CT) (n=751) n (%) 327 (43.5) 162 (21.6) 147 (19.6) 158 (21.0) 255 (34.0) 359 (47.1) 198 (26.0) 194 (25.5) 155 (20.3) 300 (39.4) P-Value % Risk Reduction % CI (2, 28) (8, 39) (11, 42) (-27, 19) (5, 32) Composite and Components Placebo (+CT) (n=762) n (%) Brenner BM et al New Engl J Med 2001;345(12):

RENAAL Primary Components ESRD Months % with event p=0.002 Risk Reduction: 28% P L ESRD or Death P (+ CT) L (+ CT) Months % with event P L p=0.01 Risk Reduction: 20% Doubling of Serum Creatinine Months % with event p=0.006 Risk Reduction: 25% P (+ CT) L (+ CT) P L P (+ CT) L (+ CT) Brenner BM et al New Engl J Med 2001;345(12): CZR01NL537SS0901

RENAAL Blood Pressures (mmHg) BaselineYear 1Year 2Study End L (+CT) S/D152/82146/78143/77140/74 P (+CT) S/D153/82150/80144/77142/74 L (+CT) MAP P (+CT) MAP L (+CT) PP P (+CT) PP S/D: Systolic/Diastolic MAP: Mean arterial pressure PP: Pulse pressure Brenner BM et al New Engl J Med 2001;345(12): L = losartan P = placebo CT = conventional therapy

0902CZR01NL537SS0901 RENAAL Dose of Losartan 100 mg QD Losartan* n=751 % 71 * Patients who took the dose more than 50% of the time. Brenner BM et al New Engl J Med 2001;345(12):  The daily dose of losartan ranged from mg

0902CZR01NL537SS0901 RENAAL Concurrent Antihypertensive Medications Therapeutic Class Calcium-Channel Blocker (%) - Dihydropyridine (%) Diuretic (%) Alpha blocker (%) Beta blocker (%) Centrally acting agents (%) Losartan n= Placebo n= Brenner BM et al New Engl J Med 2001;345(12):

0902CZR01NL537SS0901 CV Morbidity/Mortality Heart Failure MI RENAAL Secondary Composite Endpoint and Components Losartan (+CT) (N=751) n (%) 247 (32.9) 89 (11.9) 50 (6.7) Placebo (+CT) (N=762) n (%) 268 (35.2) 127 (16.7) 68 (8.9) P-Value % Risk Reduction Composite and Components Brenner BM et al New Engl J Med 2001;345(12):

0902CZR01NL537SS0901 RENAAL First Hospitalization for Heart Failure Months % with event Risk Reduction: 32% p=0.005 P (+CT) L (+CT) P L Brenner BM et al New Engl J Med 2001;345(12): L = losartan P = placebo CT = conventional therapy

0902CZR01NL537SS0901 RENAAL Change from Baseline in Proteinuria Proteinuria measured as the urine albumin:creatinine ratio from a first morning void Months Median Percent Change p<0.001 P (+CT) L (+CT) P L 35% Overall Reduction Brenner BM et al New Engl J Med 2001;345(12): L = losartan P = placebo CT = conventional therapy

0902CZR01NL537SS0901 RENAAL Rate of Progression of Renal Disease (median 1/sCr Slope) LosartanPlacebo dl/mg/yr p= % reduction (+CT) Brenner BM et al New Engl J Med 2001;345(12): sCr=serum creatinine

0902CZR01NL537SS0901 RENAAL Summary ( I )  In hypertensive patients with Type 2 diabetes and nephropathy: –losartan delayed the onset of the primary composite endpoint (DsCr/ESRD/Death) and delayed the progression to ESRD. –losartan reduced proteinuria and the rate of decline in renal function (1/sCr slope). –losartan reduced the incidence of hospitalization for heart failure. –these benefits were largely independent of achieved blood pressure. Brenner BM et al New Engl J Med 2001;345(12):

0902CZR01NL537SS0901 RENAAL Summary ( II )  In hypertensive patients with Type 2 diabetes and nephropathy: –losartan and placebo, on a background of conventional therapy, showed no significant difference on all-cause mortality, MI, stroke, revascularization, hospitalizations for unstable angina, and death due to CV disease. –losartan was generally well tolerated in this patient population. Brenner BM et al New Engl J Med 2001;345(12):

0902CZR01NL537SS0901 RENAAL Conclusions  Losartan confers significant benefits on renal outcomes in Type 2 diabetic patients with hypertension and nephropathy.  Losartan therapy results in a significant reduction in hospitalizations for heart failure.  Losartan is generally well tolerated.  Benefits of losartan seen in RENAAL complement many previous losartan studies which demonstrate a reduction in microalbuminuria and macroalbuminuria. Brenner BM et al New Engl J Med 2001;345(12):