DART II Once Daily Regimen for Treatment-naïve HIV+ Patients with Stavudine XR + Lamivudine + Efavirenz 24 Week Interim Efficacy and Safety Results D aily.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Comparison of INSTI vs PI  FLAMINGO  GS  ACTG A5257.
Advertisements

Phase 2 of new ARVs TAF (TFV prodrug) - Study Study
Phase 2 of new ARVs BMS (maturation inhibitor)
Comparison of INSTI vs EFV  STARTMRK  GS-US  SINGLE.
Phase 2 of new ARVs BMS , prodrug of BMS (attachment inhibitor) - AI Study.
De Luca A 1,2, Bracciale L 1, Doino M 1, Fabbiani M 1, Sidella L 1, Marzocchetti A 1, Farina S 1, D’Avino A 1, Cauda R 1, Di Giambenedetto S 1 Safety and.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r  EFV vs LPV/r vs EFV + LPV/r –A5142 –Mexican Study  NVP vs ATV/r –ARTEN  EFV vs ATV/r –A5202.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Comparison of RTV vs Cobi  GS-US Gallant JE. JID 2013;208:32-9 GS-US  Design  Objective –Non inferiority of COBI compared with RTV.
IAS 2011_ Abstract # WEPDB0102 Sustained Efficacy and Tolerability of Raltegravir after 240 Weeks of Combination ART in Treatment- Naive HIV-1 Infected.
Phase 2 of new ARVs  Fostemsavir, prodrug of temsavir (attachment inhibitor) –AI Study  TAF (TFV prodrug) –Study –Study  Doravirine.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Switch to ATV/r-containing regimen  ATAZIP. Mallolas J, JAIDS 2009;51:29-36 ATAZIP ATAZIP Study: Switch LPV/r to ATV/r  Design  Endpoints –Primary:
Switch to RAL-containing regimen  Canadian Study  CHEER  Montreal Study  EASIER  SWITCHMRK  SPIRAL  Switch ER.
Clinical Aspects of Treatment with Tipranavir Dr Kevin Curry Boehringer Ingelheim, Bracknell, UK.
Switch NNRTI to NNRTI  Switch EFV to ETR –CNS toxicity study –Patient’s preference study.
TO EVALUATE EARLY ANTIVIRAL RESPONSE AND SAFETY OF A DUAL BOOSTED PROTEASE INHIBITORS REGIMEN INCLUDING LOPINAVIR/r (LPV) PLUS AMPRENAVIR (AMP) OR FORTOVASE.
Comparison of NRTI combinations  ZDV/3TC vs TDF + FTC –Study 934  ABC/3TC vs TDF/FTC –HEAT Study –ACTG A5202 Study –ASSERT Study  FTC/TDF vs FTC/TAF.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Switch to ATV-containing regimen  ARIES Study  INDUMA Study  ASSURE Study.
1 Atazanavir (ATV) With Ritonavir (RTV) or Saquinavir (SQV) vs Lopinavir/Ritonavir (LPV/RTV) in Patients With Multiple Virologic Failures 24-Week Results.
Randomisation* 2 : 1 Double blind *Randomisation was stratified on genotype (1a or 1b or other) and IL28B genotype (CC, CT or TT) N = 133 N = 260 W24W48.
Simplification from Protease Inhibitors to Once or Twice Daily Raltegravir: the ODIS trial Eugenia Vispo, Pablo Barreiro, Francisco Blanco, Sonia Rodríguez-Novoa*,
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI  QDMRK  SPRING-2. Eron JJ, Lancet Infect Dis 2011;11: QDMRK  Design  Objective –Non inferiority of RAL QD: % HIV.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r  EFV vs LPV/r vs EFV + LPV/r –A5142 –Mexican Study  NVP vs ATV/r –ARTEN  EFV vs ATV/r –A5202.
Brett-Smith, ATAC, 2/24/02 Stavudine Extended Release (Zerit ® XR; d4T XR) Stavudine Prolonged Release Capsules ATAC Meeting 2/24/02.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
Agenda  Update on Darunavir: Perry Mohammed  Update on Etravirine: Rekha Sinha  Update on TMC278: Peter Williams  Update on TMC207: Karel De Beule.
DIONE – 24 week efficacy, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of DRV/r QD in treatment-naïve adolescents, 12 to
Switch to ATV- or ATV/r-containing regimen Switch to ATV/r-containing regimen  ATAZIP Switch to ATV ± r-containing regimen  SWAN Study  SLOAT Study.
Comparison of EFV vs MVC  MERIT Study.  Design N = 361 N = 360  Objective –Non inferiority of MVC vs EFV: % HIV RNA < 400 c/mL and < 50 c/mL (co-primary.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Comparison of NRTI combinations  ZDV/3TC vs TDF + FTC –Study 934  ABC/3TC vs TDF/FTC –HEAT Study –ACTG A5202 Study –ASSERT Study  FTC/TDF vs FTC/TAF.
Comparison of RTV vs Cobi  GS-US Gallant JE. JID 2013;208:32-9 GS-US  Design  Objective –Non inferiority of COBI compared with RTV.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Slideset on: Gathe J, da Silva BA, Cohen DE, et al. A once-daily lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimen is noninferior to twice-daily dosing and results in.
ACTG 5142: First-line Antiretroviral Therapy With Efavirenz Plus NRTIs Has Greater Antiretroviral Activity Than Lopinavir/Ritonavir Plus NRTIs Slideset.
Switch to low dose ATV/r  LASA Study.  Design  Endpoints –Primary: proportion of patients with HIV RNA < 200 c/mL at W48 (ITT-E) ; non-inferiority.
EPZICOM ® Virologic Response in ART-Naïve Patients with Baseline Viral Loads Above and Below 100,000c/mL Using the A5202 Endpoint K. Pappa, J. Hernandez,
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
ARV-trial.com Switch to TDF/FTC/EFV AI Study 1.
NRTI-sparing SPARTAN PROGRESS RADAR NEAT001/ANRS 143 A VEMAN
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Phase 3 Treatment Naïve HIV Coinfection
Switch to BIC/FTC/TAF GS-US GS-US GS-US
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Switch to BIC/FTC/TAF GS-US GS-US GS-US
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Switch to BIC/FTC/TAF GS-US GS-US GS-US
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Comparison of NRTI combinations
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of INSTI vs EFV
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Comparison of NRTI combinations
Switch to RAL-containing regimen
Switch to BIC/FTC/TAF GS-US GS-US GS-US
ARV-trial.com Switch to TDF/FTC/EFV AI Study 1.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Comparison of NRTI combinations
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
ARV-trial.com Switch to FTC + ddI + EFV ALIZE 1.
DTG + 3TC vs DTG + TDF/FTC GEMINI.
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Presentation transcript:

DART II Once Daily Regimen for Treatment-naïve HIV+ Patients with Stavudine XR + Lamivudine + Efavirenz 24 Week Interim Efficacy and Safety Results D aily A nti R etroviral T herapy II D. Jayaweera 1, S. Becker 2, F. Felizarta 3, M. Sands 4, L. Slater 5 S. Gothelf 6, J. Maa 6, C. Dezii 6, S. Hodder 6, J. Tudor 6 1 University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA. 2 Pacific Horizon Medical Group, San Francisco, CA, USA. 3 34th Street Community Health Center, Bakersfield, CA, USA. 4 University of Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA. 5 University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, USA. 6 Bristol-Myers Squibb, Plainsboro, NJ, USA.

DART II AI and -099 Study Outlines ARV-naive patients Randomized d4T XR 100mg QD d4T IR 40mg BID Patients <60 kg: d4T XR 75 mg QD; d4T IR 30 mg BID NFV substitution permitted if EFV-intolerant Adapted from: Brett-Smith H et al. 43rd ICAAC, September, Poster H-843 Study 096n=74n=76 Study 099n=392 (d4T IR placebo BID) 3TC 150mg BID EFV 600mg QD (d4T XR placebo QD) 3TC 150mg BID EFV 600mg QD

DART II Selected Adverse Events of Interest for Patients on Therapy for  2 Years Any Lipoatrophy (Any Grade) 64 (14%)36 (8%) Any Lipodystrophy (Any Grade) 73 (16%)52 (11%) Lactic Acidosis Syndrome Pancreatitis Peripheral Neurologic Symptoms (Grades 2-4) 1 (<1%) 4 (1%) 38 (8%) 1 (<1%) 17 (4%) Symptomatic Hyperlactatemia 5 (<1%)2 (<1%) d4T XR arm n=466 d4T IR arm n= 468 Study 096/099/110 * P-Value Adapted from: Brett-Smith H et al. 43rd ICAAC, September, Poster H-843 * Median follow up is 116 weeks XR and 114 weeks for IR

DART II d4T XR 100 mg Once Daily Comparable Drug Exposure to d4T IR 40 mg BID TIME [h] PLASMA CONCENTRATION [ng/mL] d4T IR d4T XR Peak (C max ) for d4T XR is ~50% of the IR formulation d4T XR formulation has 2-3 times higher trough plasma levels than d4T IR * Parallel groups for XR and IR formulations in HIV patients

DART II Prospective, once-daily, open-label, ARV-Naïve patients, VL > 1000 c/mL, CD4 > 100 Planned N= 70 Patients <60 kg: d4T XR 75 mg QD DART II: Study Design d4T XR 100 mg QD 3TC 300 mg QD EFV 600 mg QD + + Epivir ® (lamivudine, 3TC) is a registered trademark and manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline

DART II DART II: OBJECTIVES Efficacy of once daily d4T XR + 3TC + EFV as determined by proportion of patients with plasma HIV-RNA <400 copies/mL at 48-weeks Primary Objective: Secondary Objective: Proportion of patients with plasma HIV-RNA <400 and <50 copies/mL at Weeks 24, 48, 72, and 96 Patient adherence using pill counts and Antiviral Medication Adherence Form (AMAF) Safety and tolerability

DART II Baseline Characteristics d4T XR QD 3TC QD + EFV QD (N=64) Median Age, (years) Male White Black Other 83% 42% 45% 13% Median HIV RNA (log 10 copies/mL)4.7  100,000 copies/mL 30% Median CD4 Counts (cells/  L) 315 Demography Clinical 37

DART II Patient Disposition at Week 24 Evaluable Total Discontinuations, n (%) Reasons for Discontinuation Adverse Event Serious Adverse Event Death 10 (16%) 3 (5%) 0 0 Withdrew Consent4 (6%) 64 Lost to Follow-up2 (3%) Virologic Failure1 (2%) d4T XR QD 3TC QD + EFV QD

DART II Virologic Response HIV RNA <400 copies/mL : Baseline to Week Weeks Percent of Patients 94.3% 78.1% As Treated (n=54) ITT (NC=F) (n=64)

DART II Virologic Response HIV RNA <50 copies/mL: Baseline to Week Weeks Percent of Patients 94.3% 78.1% As Treated (n=54) ITT (NC=F) (n=64)

DART II Mean Change in HIV RNA Level: Baseline to Week 24 HIV RNA Change (log 10 copies/mL) Weeks

DART II CD4 Cell Mean Change: Baseline to Week 24 CD4 Mean Change (cells/mm 3 ) Weeks CD4 cell count Baseline: 354 Week 24:

DART II Grade Treatment Related Adverse Events (>2%) d4T XR + 3TC + EFV n=64 Vomiting2 (3.1%) Nausea Diarrhea Somnolence 4 (6.3%) 2 (3.1%) Grade 2-4 Hypoaesthesia3 (4.7%) Peripheral Neuropathy2 (3.1%)

DART II Treatment Related Adverse Events of Interest d4T XR + 3TC + EFV n=64 Pancreatitis0 Peripheral Neuropathy Lipodystrophy Symptomatic Hyperlactatemia Lactic Acidosis Syndrome 2 (3.1%) All Grades

DART II Grade 3-4 New Onset Laboratory Abnormalities d4T XR + 3TC + EFV n=64 Lipase Creatine Kinase ALT ANC 3 (4.7%) 2 (3.1%) 1 (1.6%) Grade 3-4 * No report of Grade 3-4 triglyceride levels

DART II Fasting Lipid Values Median Change from Baseline Baseline Total Cholesterol (mg/dL) 162 Median Change (%) (17%) LDL Cholesterol (mg/dL) (11%) Triglycerides (mg/dL) (-0.9%) HDL Cholesterol (mg/dL) ( 25%) P-value TC:HDL Ratio (- 8%) Median Values (N=32) Overall Results

DART II Summary of Adherence and Compliance at 24 Weeks d4T XR + 3TC +EFV Did not miss any dose during the past 4 days. 82.3% (51/62) Any time took fewer pills per dose 5.6% (3/54) Follow specific schedule 80.8% (42/52) d4T XR n=53  80% Compliance at Week 24 89% 3TC n=53 91% EFV n=53 89% Adherence (by AMAF * questionnaire) Compliance (by pill count)  90% Compliance at Week 24 70% 72% * Antiviral Medication Adherence Form

DART II Conclusions: 24 Weeks Demonstrated a significant reduction in viral load and excellent efficacy: 78.1% of patients achieved viral loads <400 copies/mL and <50 copies/mL (ITT: NC=F) 94.3% of patients achieved viral loads <400 copies/mL and <50 copies/mL (As Treated analysis) Is well tolerated Minimal discontinuations due to adverse events (n=3) Increase in HDL cholesterol, and decrease in TC:HDL ratio, with minimal effects on triglyceride levels In this treatment-naive population, d4T XR + 3TC + EFV administered once daily:

DART II TO ALL THE PATIENTS AND STUDY CENTER PARTICIPANTS Acknowledgments Stephen Becker, MD. San Francisco, CA Coordinator: Sunita Lundy Nicholaos Bellos, MD. Dallas, TX Coordinators: Christopher Hayes Dawn Chaney Paul Cook, MD. Greenville, NC Coordinator: Grace Wilkins, RN Franco Felizarta, MD. Bakersfield, CA Coordinator: Jennifer Kuhach Dushyantha Jayaweera, MD. Miami, FL Coordinator: Rose Lalanne, RN Gary Richmond, MD. Ft. Lauderdale, FL Coordinator: Vernon Appleby, RN Michael Sands, MD. Jacksonville, FL Coordinator: Debbie Aragon, RN Kunthavi Sathasivam, MD. Washington, DC Coordinator: Takada Harris Leonard Slater, MD. Oklahoma City, OK Coordinator: Brenda Verel, LPN