Revlimid ® (lenalidomide), Melphalan and Prednisone (R-MP) Gimema: Italian Myeloma Network Antonio Palumbo Dept. Hematology, University of Torino Multicenter.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 536.
Advertisements

What is the Optimal Approach to CLL, BR vs. FCR/FR?
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Maintenance Therapy in Multiple Myeloma
Facon T et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 2.
Should Alkylators be used Upfront in Transplant-Ineligible Patients? NO!! Lymphoma-Myeloma October 2013 Scottsdale, Arizona Rochester, Minnesota Jacksonville,
Update on transplant-ineligible patients: Which regimens are best?
Ravi Vij MD Associate Professor Section of BMT and Leukemia
1. 2 Lenalidomide in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Clinical Update EHA 2010 DR. OUSSAMA JRADI.
Richardson PG et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 535.
Multiple Myeloma: ASH 2005 Steven Coutre, M.D. Associate Professor of Medicine Division of Hematology Stanford University School of Medicine.
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 446.
Carfilzomib, Rituximab and Dexamethasone (CaRD) Is Highly Active and Offers a Neuropathy Sparing Approach for Proteasome-Inhibitor Based Therapy in Waldenstrom’s.
Effect of Age on Efficacy and Safety Outcomes in Patients (Pts) with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) Receiving Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone.
Treatment with Bendamustine- Bortezomib-Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Shows Significant Activity and Is Well Tolerated Ludwig H.
Strategies for front-line treatment of Multiple Myeloma
Arsenic Trioxide (ATO) in the Consolidation Treatment of Newly Diagnosed APL — First Interim Analysis of a Randomized Trial (APL 2006) by the French Belgian.
Weekly MLN9708, an Investigational Oral Proteasome Inhibitor, in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Results from a Phase I Study After Full Enrollment.
Carfilzomib, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone (CCd) for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients: Initial Results of a Multicenter, Open Label.
Long-Term Ixazomib Maintenance Is Tolerable and Improves Depth of Response Following Ixazomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone Induction in Patients with Previously.
A Phase Ib Dose Escalation Trial of SAR (Anti-CD-38 mAb) in Combination with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 175.
Phase I/II Trial of Docetaxel plus Oxaliplatin and 5-Fluorouracil (D-FOX) in Patients with Untreated, Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Cancer Jaffer.
1 Nowakowski GS et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 689.
Second Primary Malignancies in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated with Lenalidomide: Analysis of Pooled Data in 2459 Patients Palumbo A.
A Phase II Study with Carfilzomib, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone (CCd) for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Bringhen S et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract.
A Phase II Study of Lenalidomide as Initial Treatment of Elderly Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Xavier Badoux, William Wierda, Susan O'Brien,
Terapia nei pazienti non candidati
Lenalidomide Is Safe and Active in Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM) 1 Updated Results from a Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Phase 1b/2 Study.
A phase III trial comparing R-CHOP 14 and R-CHOP 21 for the treatment of newly diagnosed diffuse large B cell lymphoma Results from a UK NCRI Lymphoma.
A Phase 3 Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide Combined with Melphalan and Prednisone Followed by Continuous Lenalidomide Maintenance.
Relapsed and Refractory Myeloma Case 1 James R. Berenson, MD Medical & Scientific Director Institute for Myeloma & Bone Cancer Research Los Angeles, CA.
A Phase 2 Study of Elotuzumab in Combination with Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Lonial.
Long Term Follow-up on the Treatment of High Risk Smoldering Myeloma with Lenalidomide plus Low Dose Dex (Rd) (Phase III Spanish Trial): Persistent Benefit.
Maintenance Therapy with Bortezomib plus Thalidomide (VT) or Bortezomib plus Prednisone (VP) in Elderly Myeloma Patients Included in the GEM2005MAS65 Spanish.
Disclosures for Palumbo Antonio, MD
ClaPD (Clarithromycin, Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone) Therapy in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Mark TM et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 77.
A Phase II Study of Lenalidomide for Previously Untreated Deletion (del) 5q Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Patients Age 60 or Older Who Are Not Candidates.
Low Dose Decitabine Versus Best Supportive Care in Elderly Patients with Intermediate or High Risk MDS Not Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: Final Results.
Lenalidomide Maintenance After Stem-Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma: Follow-Up Analysis of the IFM Trial Attal M et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract.
Phase II Multicenter Study of Single-Agent Lenalidomide in Subjects with Mantle Cell Lymphoma Who Relapsed or Progressed After or Were Refractory to Bortezomib:
Brentuximab Vedotin in Combination with RCHOP as Front-Line Therapy in Patients with DLBCL: Interim Results from a Phase 2 Study Yasenchak CA et al. Proc.
Michel Attal, M.D., Valerie Lauwers-Cances, M.D., Gerald Marit, M.D., Denis Caillot, M.D., Philippe Moreau, M.D., Thierry Facon, M.D., Anne Marie Stoppa,
MM-005: A Phase 1, Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Study to Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose for the Combination of Pomalidomide, Bortezomib,
Slideset on: Jakubowiak AJ, Dytfeld D, Griffith KA, et al. A phase 1/2 study of carfilzomib in combination with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone.
Romidepsin in Association with CHOP in Patients with Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma: Final Results of the Phase Ib/II Ro-CHOP Study Dupuis J et al. Proc ASH.
IFM Phase II Study: KRd Induction and Consolidation Before Len Maintenance Highly Effective in Newly Diagnosed MM New Findings in Hematology: Independent.
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 200.
ELOQUENT-2: Elotuzumab + Len/Dex in R/R MM
Multiple Myeloma in the Non-transplant Setting
Inge M. van Schouwenburg
Reeder CB et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Poster)
Attal M et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 310.
Phase III EMN02/HO95 MM Trial: Upfront ASCT Prolongs PFS vs Bortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone in Newly Diagnosed MM CCO Independent Conference Coverage*
December 7-10, 2013 New Orleans, Louisiana
Mateos MV et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 403.
Phase Ib MMY1001: Daratumumab Plus Pom/Dex for Patients With R/R MM
Elotuzumab, Lenalidomide, and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma Slideset on: Lonial S, Vij R, Harousseau JL, et al. Elotuzumab in combination.
San Miguel JF et al. 1 Proc EHA 2013;Abstract S1151.
Dimopoulos MA et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract LBA-6.
Fowler NH et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 8036.
Rossi A et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 8008.
Niesvizky R et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 619.
Jakubowiak AJ et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 862.
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 8007.
Badoux X et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 6508.
Vesole DH et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 308.
Final Results of a Frontline Phase 1/2 Study of Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Low-Dose Dexamethasone (CRd) in Multiple Myeloma (MM)1 Final Results from.
Phase III MAIA: Daratumumab + Len/Dex vs Len/Dex in Transplantation-Ineligible Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Integrating New Malignant Hematology Findings.
Boccadoro M et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 8020.
Presentation transcript:

Revlimid ® (lenalidomide), Melphalan and Prednisone (R-MP) Gimema: Italian Myeloma Network Antonio Palumbo Dept. Hematology, University of Torino Multicenter Phase I/II Trial Newly Diagnosed Patients Newly Diagnosed Patients Age >65 Years

Disclosures for (Antonio Palumbo, M.D.) N/A = Not Applicable (no conflicts listed) Presentation includes discussion of the following off-label use of a drug or medical device. Celgene. Pharmion. Scientific Advisory Board Celgene, Pharmion. Speakers’ Bureau (N/A for no conflict or name of company) Major Stockholder Celgene, Pharmion. Consultant (N/A for no conflict or name of company) Employee Research Support/P.I. In compliance with ACCME policy, the ASCO requires the following disclosures to the activity audience:

Rationale 54% MP 5.0 DEX 12.2 DEX MPTDiagnosis (3) P< EFS (months) REV-DEXRelapse (2) P<0.001*21.1EFS (months) 27% MP 2 years Diagnosis (1) *P<0.001 for pts not receiving Melphalan (1) Facon T et al. Blood. 2006;107:1292. (2) Palumbo A et al. Lancet. 2006;367:825. (3) Dimopoulos M et al. Blood. 2005;106:6a [abstract 6]

Dept. Hematology, University of Torino Revlimid ® 5–10 mg/day, continuously until relapse Mel 0.18–0.25 mg/Kg Prednisone 2 mg/Kg Every 4–6 weeks for a maximum of 9 cycles day Melphalan mg/Kg/d Revlimid ® mg/d Patients Cohort Cohort Cohort Cohort patients in each cohort with additional 15 pts in cohort 3 and 4 Treatment Schedule

Dept. Hematology, University of Torino Patient Characteristics No. of patients53 Median age (range) 71 (57–77) 65–70 years 43% 71–75 years 51% Chromosome Deletion (13 q) 38% ß2-microglobulin mg/L (median) 3.4 Hemoglobin g/L (median) 12.0 Creatinine mg/dL (median) 1.0 Ca++ mmol/L (median) 2.41

Dept. Hematology, University of Torino Dose Limiting Toxicity3/61/60/60/6 Pts with DLT 1/6 Cutaneous GR 3 Thrombosis GR 4 Metabolic GR 3 2/6Delay at cycle 2 1/6Neutropenia fever 1/6 Severe Neutropenia Cohort –10 Cohort –10 Cohort –5 Cohort –5DLT at Cycle 1

Dept. Hematology, University of Torino Cohort 3 ( ) [N=21] Cohort 4 ( ) [N=20] % Patients Neutropenia Thrombocytopenia Anemia G-CSF Hematologic Toxicity Grade 3–4 Adverse Events70

Dept. Hematology, University of Torino % Patients Cohort 3 ( ) [N=21] Cohort 4 ( ) [N=20] Non-Hematologic Toxicity Grade 3–4 Adverse Events

Dept. Hematology, University of Torino Cycle 1-2 [N=41] Cycle 5-6 [N=34] % Patients Neutropenia Thrombocytopenia Anemia Infection and neutropenic fever Cutaneous Thrombosis Grade 3–4 Adverse Events50

Dept. Hematology, University of Torino Thromboembolism R-MP (n=41) MPT (n=64) MPT (n=65) Aspirin 100 mg/d Enoxaparin 40 mg/d No Prophylaxis DVT2.4%*3%18.4% Pulmonary Thromboembolis 2.4%0%4.6% Arterial Occlusion0% 1.5% Total4.8%3%24.5% *DVT occurred after aspirin discontinuation

Dept. Hematology, University of Torino R-MP vs MP: Response Rate After 1 cycle R-MP (N=41)After 6 cycles MP (N=126)* Historical control 17.5% 27.5% 62.5% 2.5% 0% CRVGPRPRMRSD-PD %92.5%64.4% 31.8% 16.7% 35.7% 2.4% CRVGPRPRMRSD-PD 9.6% % *Lancet 2006;367:825

Dept. Hematology, University of Torino R-MP vs MPT: Response Rate R-MP (N=41)* Median 7 cycles (2-9) MPT (N=129)*^ Historical control 81.3%100% 0% 14.6% 43.9% 24.4% 17.1% CRVGPRPRMRSD-PD % 13.2% 5.4% 39.5% 20.9% 15.5% CRVGPRPRMRSD-PD % *Best response ^Lancet 2006;367:825

Dept. Hematology, University of Torino R-MP: Response Rate Cohort 3 ( ) [N=21]* Median 7 cycles (4-9) Cohort 4 ( ) [N=20]* Median 5 cycles (2-9) 0% 14.3% 33.3% 28.5% 23.8% CRVGPRPRMRSD-PD % 100%100% 0% 15% 55% 20% 10% CRVGPRPRMRSD-PD % *Best response

Dept. Hematology, University of Torino Event-Free SurvivalR-MP MPT Historical control months months % of patients MPT: median follow-up 17.6 months ( ) [N=129] R-MP: median follow-up 9.6 months ( ) [N=53] months

Dept. Hematology, University of Torino Conclusions Early deaths 0% Grade 3/4 Adverse Events (incidence >5%) –Neutropenia66% –Thrombocytopenia34 % –Anemia17 % –Cutaneous10 % –Neutropenic Fever 8% Response Rate (median 7 cycles) –CR + VGPR 41% –CR + PR 85 % –CR + PR + MR100 %

Dept. Hematology, University of Torino BRESCIADr. Rossi, Dr. Crippa CATANIAProf. Giustolisi, Prof. Di Raimondo COSENZAProf. Morabito GENOVAProf. Gobbi, Dr. Canepa MILANOProf. Corradini, Dr. Montefusco PARMAProf. Rizzoli, Dr. Giuliani ROMA 1Prof. Foà, Dr. Petrucci S. G. ROTONDODr. Musto, Dr. Falcone SIENAProf. Lauria, Dr. Gozzetti TORINO 1Prof. Boccadoro, Dr. Falco We Are Grateful to all Patients, Nurses and Physicians of the Participating Centers