1 May 7, 2013. MTS at a Glance 25,000 miles of navigable waterways 25,000 miles of navigable waterways 18,000 bridges 18,000 bridges 78 million recreational.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TEN-T support for Port projects under 2012 Annual Call INFO DAY 2012: Ports (AP) Jose Anselmo, DG MOVE Morten Jensen, TEN-T Executive Agency Brussels,
Advertisements

E-navigation, and IHO’s role IHO, Monaco, October 2014 John Erik Hagen, Regional Director NCA Coordinator of the completed IMO Correspondence Group on.
The Trade Growth Challenge Liner Shipping Responses to the Growth of Global Freight.
Returning to Our National Waterways Dabney Hegg U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation.
Michael Fastenbauer March 21, 2007 M-TRADE Final Conference, Tecnopolo Tiburtino, Rome (IT) Integration of River Information Services in Multimodal Information.
1 Ports and Harbors – Transitions and Challenges Ms. Doris J. Bautch Commissioner, U.S. Section of PIANC U.S. Maritime Administration Presented at the.
CMTS e-Navigation IAT E-Navigation Online Dialog Outreach Activity Report CMTS e-Navigation Integrated Action Team.
Marine Transportation System Common Assessment & Reporting Tool (CART) Mr. Thomas Kalisz, USCG “The nation needs a coordinated, integrated approach to.
Federal Aviation Administration Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen) Briefing to COMSTAC Kelvin Coleman May 16, 2008.
2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan Final Approval GVMC Board May 7, 2015.
On board equipment for Sea traffic Management What will be needed?
Maritime Domain Awareness The Key to Maritime Security
Planning for One Transportation System – Marine Highways Kevin Schoeben Deputy Director Office of Planning and Programming Illinois Department of Transportation.
Justice Information Network Strategic Plan Development Justice Information Network Board March 18, 2008 Mo West, JIN Program Manager.
CETMEF Common Shore-Based e-Navigation Architecture
“Multi-Purpose Missions and the Government Balancing Act” WHAT HAT DO YOU WEAR?
Research & Development Integrated Action Team Co-Chairs Dr. Sandra Knight, NOAA Jeffrey Lillycrop, USACE.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION BORDER WAIT TIME WORKING GROUP.
APPROVED JULY 2014 GACAG Overview APPROVED JULY 2014 Role of GACAG GACAG Overview Priorities and position statements GACAG Priorities GACAG's.
Børge Hetland Director Sales Digital Ship Hamburg, 19 th March 2015 e-navigation from concept to reality.
October 2009 Klaus Grensemann, Division WS 23 St. Petersburg 1 Development and Implementation of an Overall E-Navigation Strategy.
“SAFETY THROUGH QUALITY” Vessel Traffic Management and Information System on Romanian Danube ( Ro – RIS )
The IALA Vision for e-Navigation Nordic Navigation Conference Oslo 16 & 17 October 2007.
Central Baltic Area in the EU Baltic Sea Strategy
USDOT, RITA RITA: Oversight of USDOT’s R&D programs  University Transportation Centers $100M  UTC Consortia $80M  UTC Multimodal R&D $40M  Intelligent.
CVFPB Executive Committee Meeting – Agenda Item No. 8A Central Valley Flood Protection Board.
Maritime Safety – Unit D2
e-Navigation and it’s applicability to inland waterways
The GLAs’ e-Navigation Programme Dr Sally Basker & Dr Nick Ward Presented at CGSIC, 22 nd September 2009.
BUILDING STRONG ® US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® PIANC USA MEETING RICH LOCKWOOD HQUSACE Operations and Regulatory Division 29 AUGUST 2012.
Physical Oceanographic Real-Time System (PORTS ® ) Pilots’ Perspective American Pilots’ Association.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® The US Committee on the Marine Transportation System and e-Navigation PIANC Annual Meeting 27 August 2012.
Harbor Safety Committee of the San Francisco Bay Region Established by state law to prevent oil spills in San Francisco Bay by planning “for the safe navigation.
1 INDRIS Inland Navigation Demonstrator for River Information Services Cas Willems Transport Research Centre Ministry of Transport The Netherlands.
Martitime Traffic Monitoring Baltic Master midterm conference Snekkersten October 2006 Łukasz Bibik, Maritime Office Gdynia.
ESIP Federation Air Quality Cluster Partner Agencies.
ITS Standards Program Strategic Plan Summary June 16, 2009 Blake Christie Principal Engineer, Noblis for Steve Sill Project Manager, ITS Standards Program.
CoRiNav Coastal River and Port Navigation A Research Proposal to meet DG Transport Task 2.3.1/12.
Technology and the National Freight Action Agenda U.S. Department of Transportation Richard M. Biter Deputy Director US DOT, Office of Intermodalism November.
Maritime Navigation and Information Services MarNIS FP6 - Integrated Project C. Willems, C. Glansdorp.
International Hydrographic Organization MSDI OPEN FORUM IHO MSDIWG Vision and Deliverables to the IHO London, Tuesday 3rd March 2015 Jens Peter Hartmann.
An Overview of the Philippine Ports Authority Atty. Oscar M. Sevilla Philippines 2008/TPTWG30/MEG/02 Agenda Item 12.
Data Standards and Data Sharing The Foundation for Inland Waterways E-Navigation Success (USA) Wednesday September 14, 2011 Doug McDonald Navigation Data.
American Fisheries Society Incoming Governing Board Breakfast Scott Rayder Chief of Staff National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration September 15,
PRESENTATION TO SELECT COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT 13 OCTOBER 2015 RATIFICATION OF THE AFRICAN MARITIME TRANSPORT CHARTER 1.
Short term research to support European Transport policy European Transport policypart DG for Energy and Transport DG for Energy and Transport Outline.
MarNIS Maritime Navigation and Information Services FP6 - Integrated Project.
CVFPB Executive Committee Meeting – Agenda Item No. 8A Central Valley Flood Protection Board.
IALA -AISM  International Association of Marine Aids to Navigation and Lighthouse Authorities  Association International de Signalisation Maritime Welcome!
2013 SCOWT WASHINGTON MEETING/ WASHINGTON, DC 20 JUNE2013 AASHTO Waterborne Freight Bottom Line Report Chris Smith Intermodal Policy and Program Manager.
National Waterways Conference 7-9 Nov 2007 Mobile, AL
Canada Border Services Agency Update Transportation Border Working Group Niagara Falls, Ontario October 24, 2006.
Executive Order Environmental Stewardship and Transportation Infrastructure Project Reviews Priority Issues.
Goals and ObjectivesFeb. 20, 2014 TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN: FACILITATING TEXAS’ ECONOMIC GROWTH AND GLOBAL COMPETIVENESS Regional Freight Advisory Council.
River-Net Information System for Port of Pittsburgh Inland Waterway Transportation : with a Particular Focus on Industries and U.S. Coast Guard.
PORT OF TACOMA. Request adoption of Resolution , developing a Port of Tacoma Drayage Truck Improvement Program to improve the local and regional.
Statewide Transportation Planning Oklahoma DOT Planning Process Statewide Long Range Transportation Plan Statewide Freight Transportation Plan Arkansas.
Oregon State Rail Plan Update
RATIFICATION OF THE AFRICAN MARITIME TRANSPORT CHARTER
Associate Director for Research, Education and Marine Operations
SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION & ECONOMIC EXPANSION
The shore based AIS Service as an e-navigation service
Aiding Navigation through Centralizing Information Dissemination
Data Impacts of Transportation Reauthorization: Data Community’s Plans and Strategies Pat Hu Chair, TRB National Transportation Data Requirements and Programs.
Reporting via Ship Reporting System versus Single Window reporting.
e-Navigation Overview
David M. Kennedy, Senior Advisor for the Arctic Region, NOAA
Projects is financed By South Baltic Cross-border
EAtHC Seminar Lagos, Nigeria, October 2018 Capacity Building
Roadmap for the S-100 Implementation Decade
Presentation transcript:

1 May 7, 2013

MTS at a Glance 25,000 miles of navigable waterways 25,000 miles of navigable waterways 18,000 bridges 18,000 bridges 78 million recreational boaters 78 million recreational boaters 135 million ferry passengers 135 million ferry passengers Over 350 ports Over 350 ports 3,700 marine terminals 3,700 marine terminals 238 lock chambers 238 lock chambers 97,000 aids to navigation 97,000 aids to navigation Intermodal connectors Intermodal connectors $649 billion annually to the US GDP $649 billion annually to the US GDP 2

3 What is the CMTS? 46 U.S.C (b), The CMTS is a federal interagency coordinating committee for the purpose of: 46 U.S.C (b), The CMTS is a federal interagency coordinating committee for the purpose of: Assessing the adequacy of the MTSAssessing the adequacy of the MTS Promoting integration of the MTS with other modes of transportation and other uses of the marine environmentPromoting integration of the MTS with other modes of transportation and other uses of the marine environment Coordinating, improving the coordination of, and making recommendations with regard to federal policies that impact the MTSCoordinating, improving the coordination of, and making recommendations with regard to federal policies that impact the MTS Chartered in 2005 in response to Presidential Directive (charter being updated)Chartered in 2005 in response to Presidential Directive (charter being updated) 28+ Departments, independent agencies and WH offices28+ Departments, independent agencies and WH offices SECDOT ChairSECDOT Chair

4 CMTS Vision of the MTS* Globally integrated network Globally integrated network Safe and secure Safe and secure In harmony with environment In harmony with environment Free-flowing Free-flowing Seamless Seamless Reliable movement of people and Reliable movement of people andcommerce * Adopted by CMTS Coordinating Board October 2006 Approved by CMTS Cabinet Members July 2008 in the National Strategy for the MTS.

5 Why the CMTS? Air Transportation System – FAA Air Transportation System – FAA Highway Transportation System – FHWA Highway Transportation System – FHWA Rail Transportation System - FRA Rail Transportation System - FRA Marine Transportation System – 25+ Federal MTS Agencies & Offices Marine Transportation System – 25+ Federal MTS Agencies & Offices

6

7

Interagency Teams 8 e - Navigation Integrated Action Team (e-Navigation Strategic Action Plan) Research & Development Integrated Action Team (Strategic Action Plan for R&D in the MTS) U.S. Arctic Maritime Shipping Integrated Action Team (Arctic MTS: Overview and Priorities Paper) Infrastructure Investment Integrated Action Team (Funding Handbook; Funding Data Map; Investment Decision Criteria) National Strategy Review Team (Update of the National Strategy on the Marine Transportation System) Executive Secretariat Led (Report to Congress; Environmental Stewardship DG; Compendium of Federal MTS Programs; Liaison to the National Ocean Council)

CMTS Priorities Execute E-Navigation Implementation Plan Execute E-Navigation Implementation Plan Coordinate Federal MTS infrastructure investments and provide support to the White House Ports Task Force and National Freight Policy Initiative Coordinate Federal MTS infrastructure investments and provide support to the White House Ports Task Force and National Freight Policy Initiative Approve and implement Arctic marine transportation policy recommendations Approve and implement Arctic marine transportation policy recommendations Enact CMTS authorization legislation (completed) Enact CMTS authorization legislation (completed) Develop MTS performance metrics Develop MTS performance metrics Reexamine MTS National Strategy, including environmental stewardship components Reexamine MTS National Strategy, including environmental stewardship components 9

10 e-Navigation Integrated Action Team (IAT) As defined by IMO, e-Navigation is "the harmonized collection, integration, exchange, presentation, and analysis of maritime information onboard and ashore by electronic means to enhance berth-to-berth navigation and related services for safety and security at sea and protection of the marine environment.“ Integrated Action Team Leads: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; U.S. Coast Guard Purpose: The e-Navigation IAT) has developed a work plan for the implementation of the CMTS e-Navigation Strategic Action Plan. This plan outlines how the CMTS will facilitate e-Navigation concepts and activities in a cross-agency manner, coordinated with industry and other stakeholders.e-Navigation Strategic Action Plan The CMTS e-Navigation IAT will facilitate the coordinated and integrated collection, processing, and dissemination of navigation data and information to provide services to stakeholders, eliminate duplication, and enhance the safety, reliability, and efficiency of our waterways and ports.

Request for Stakeholder Input on the Federal Role: The CMTS Integrated Action Team (IAT) on e-Navigation held a two-month online dialogue (ending 3/15/13) to receive stakeholder input regarding the federal role in providing e-Navigation standards, services, and architecture. The top five priorities from participating stakeholders included: Broadband connectivity at sea (to 30 miles offshore) PORTS data transmitted via AIS Navigation as a free web service Single window reporting Open source system architecture 11

1. Broadband Data and Communications Connectivity extended to 30 miles from shore Broadband Connectivity could support: Provision of real-time navigation information Single Window Reporting Navigation as a Web Service Alternative Communications to VHF Radio 12

2. PORTS Data Transmitted via AIS - Demonstrated Feasibility Currently operating Sault Ste. Marie, MI – 2002 Tampa Bay, FL – 2010 Lower Columbia River, OR, WA – late 2011 Current CMTS e-Nav IAT Action Item Task Team evaluating steps needed to operationalize transmission of PORTS Data over AIS in VTS Areas 13

Tide Aware ENC – Concept PORTS Electronic Navigational Charts Tidal Forecast Models Automatic Identification System

3. Navigation as a Free Web Service Provides common operating picture aboard all ships and ashore Supports distribution of real-time navigation information Tides and currents – “Tide Aware ENC” concept Vessel traffic Chart updates Notice to mariners 15

4. Single Window Reporting Enable one-time reporting of vessel, cargo and voyage data to Federal Government Data would be disseminated to various Federal Government Agencies Reduce reporting burden on industry 16

5. Open Source Architecture Adopted by automotive and avionics industries Proponents claim would facilitate:   Interoperability between diverse computing environments onboard and ashore   Accurate metadata for all information sources   Lower cost of ownership 17

18 CMTS 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC (202)