Innovative CFD tools for hydrodynamic design of IACC boats J. García-Espinosa, COMPASS IS, A. Souto, ETSIN,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
J. García-Espinosa, R. Luco-Salman, M. Salas2, M. López-Rodríguez,
Advertisements

J. García-Espinosa, E. Oñate. Motivation To develop a general environment for analysis of ship aero+hydro-dynamics. Main topics: Two fluids NS solver.
Steady-state heat conduction on triangulated planar domain May, 2002
SolidWorks Flow Simulation
Multidisciplinary Computation and Numerical Simulation V. Selmin.
Parameterizing a Geometry using the COMSOL Moving Mesh Feature
Advanced CFD Analysis of Aerodynamics Using CFX
Designing Tensile Structures Using Generic CAD Applications. Structural membranes 2007, Barcelona, September 2007 Javier Sánchez, Tecnun, University.
Coupling Continuum Model and Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Methods for Reactive Transport Yilin Fang, Timothy D Scheibe and Alexandre M Tartakovsky Pacific.
Chapter 17 Design Analysis using Inventor Stress Analysis Module
A Bezier Based Approach to Unstructured Moving Meshes ALADDIN and Sangria Gary Miller David Cardoze Todd Phillips Noel Walkington Mark Olah Miklos Bergou.
Coupled Fluid-Structural Solver CFD incompressible flow solver has been coupled with a FEA code to analyze dynamic fluid-structure coupling phenomena CFD.
1 Internal Seminar, November 14 th Effects of non conformal mesh on LES S. Rolfo The University of Manchester, M60 1QD, UK School of Mechanical,
Thermo-fluid Analysis of Helium cooling solutions for the HCCB TBM Presented By: Manmeet Narula Alice Ying, Manmeet Narula, Ryan Hunt and M. Abdou ITER.
Steady Aeroelastic Computations to Predict the Flying Shape of Sails Sriram Antony Jameson Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics Stanford University First.
Chamber Dynamic Response Modeling Zoran Dragojlovic.
Image courtesy of National Optical Astronomy Observatory, operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, under cooperative agreement.
1/36 Gridless Method for Solving Moving Boundary Problems Wang Hong Department of Mathematical Information Technology University of Jyväskyklä
DETAILED TURBULENCE CALCULATIONS FOR OPEN CHANNEL FLOW
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
Introduction to virtual engineering László Horváth Budapest Tech John von Neumann Faculty of Informatics Institute of Intelligent Engineering.
Lecture Objectives: Review discretization methods for advection diffusion equation Accuracy Numerical Stability Unsteady-state CFD Explicit vs. Implicit.
RF-Accelerating Structure: Cooling Circuit Modeling Riku Raatikainen
IMAM Institute of Mechanics and Advanced Materials

Finite Differences Finite Difference Approximations  Simple geophysical partial differential equations  Finite differences - definitions  Finite-difference.
AERODYNAMICS OF RACING YACHT:
Wind Energy Program School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Computational Studies of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR:
CENTRAL AEROHYDRODYNAMIC INSTITUTE named after Prof. N.E. Zhukovsky (TsAGI) Multigrid accelerated numerical methods based on implicit scheme for moving.
Numerical Prediction of Steady Flow Around High Speed Vessels with Transom Sterns S.X. Du 1,2, D.A. Hudson 2, W.G. Price 2, P. Temarel 2 and Y.S. Wu 1.
Global Analysis of Floating Structures – M.H. Kim
Numerical Investigation into Potential Flow Around High-speed Hydrofoil Assisted Craft ZHONGYU YANG supervised by Prof G.E HEARN and.
CFD Refinement By: Brian Cowley. Overview 1.Background on CFD 2.How it works 3.CFD research group on campus for which problem exists o Our current techniques.
A RANS Based Prediction Method of Ship Roll Damping Moment Kumar Bappaditya Salui Supervisors of study: Professor Dracos Vassalos and Dr. Vladimir Shigunov.
© Fluent Inc. 11/24/2015J1 Fluids Review TRN Overview of CFD Solution Methodologies.
CFX-10 Introduction Lecture 1.
Finite Element Analysis
Modeling of the Unsteady Separated Flow over Bilge Keels of FPSO Hulls under Heave or Roll Motions Yi-Hsiang Yu 09/23/04 Copies of movies/papers and today’s.
COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS (AE 2402) Presented by IRISH ANGELIN S AP/AERO.
FALL 2015 Esra Sorgüven Öner
Discretization Methods Chapter 2. Training Manual May 15, 2001 Inventory # Discretization Methods Topics Equations and The Goal Brief overview.
(*) CIMNE: International Center for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Barcelona, Spain Innovative Finite Element Methods For Aeroelastic Analysis Presented.
DLR Institute of Aerodynamics and Flow Technology 1 Simulation of Missiles with Grid Fins using an Unstructured Navier-Stokes solver coupled to a Semi-Experimental.
Lecture Objectives: Define 1) Reynolds stresses and
AIAA th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on MAO, 09/05/2002, Atlanta, GA 0 AIAA OBSERVATIONS ON CFD SIMULATION UNCERTAINTIES Serhat Hosder, Bernard.
A Fully Conservative 2D Model over Evolving Geometries Ricardo Canelas Master degree student IST Teton Dam 1976.
Lecture Objectives: - Numerics. Finite Volume Method - Conservation of  for the finite volume w e w e l h n s P E W xx xx xx - Finite volume.
Tony Arts Carlo Benocci Patrick Rambaud
An Introduction to Computational Fluids Dynamics Prapared by: Chudasama Gulambhai H ( ) Azhar Damani ( ) Dave Aman ( )
HAPTEX-Meeting Tampere, Feb , 2006 Haptic Rendering / Small Scale Model Guido Böttcher haptex.miralab.unige.ch Funded by: FET-IST-FP6 (IST-6549)
Computational Fluid Dynamics Lecture II Numerical Methods and Criteria for CFD Dr. Ugur GUVEN Professor of Aerospace Engineering.
A V&V Overview of the 31st Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics
EXPERIMENTAL AND NUMERICAL STUDIES ON TRIM EFFECTS George Tzabiras
CHAPTER 2 - EXPLICIT TRANSIENT DYNAMIC ANALYSYS
Chamber Dynamic Response Modeling
M. Z. Bezas, Th. N. Nikolaidis, C. C. Baniotopoulos
Fluid Structure Interactions Research Group
POSTPROCESSING Review analysis results and evaluate the performance
© Fluent Inc. 1/10/2018L1 Fluids Review TRN Solution Methods.
Fluid Flow Regularization of Navier-Stokes Equations
The application of an atmospheric boundary layer to evaluate truck aerodynamics in CFD “A solution for a real-world engineering problem” Ir. Niek van.
POSTPROCESSING Review analysis results and evaluate the performance
AIAA OBSERVATIONS ON CFD SIMULATION UNCERTAINITIES
AIAA OBSERVATIONS ON CFD SIMULATION UNCERTAINTIES
Konferanse i beregningsorientert mekanikk, Trondheim, Mai, 2005
AIAA OBSERVATIONS ON CFD SIMULATION UNCERTAINTIES
OVERVIEW OF FINITE ELEMENT METHOD
Software Cradle Releases SC/Tetra V8
14. Computational Fluid Dynamics
Realistic multiphysics analysis
Presentation transcript:

Innovative CFD tools for hydrodynamic design of IACC boats J. García-Espinosa, COMPASS IS, A. Souto, ETSIN,

CFD Computational Fluid Dynamics ► Techniques to solve problems in fluid mechanics on computers ► Algorithms to simulate real behavior of fluids ► Tools used to predict/understand real behavior of a system in a fluid flow

Numerical Simulation Model Testing  Numerical simulation + Validation  Model testing + Extrapolation

(Available) CFD Applications  Hull and appendages hydrodynamic resistance calculation / Wave pattern analysis  Lift forces calculation  2D profiles optimisation  Local phenomena analysis  Sails simulation  Mast profile optimisation  Aerodynamic resistance  Seakeeping analysis  Other (dynamic loads estimation, velocity prediction,...)

(Current) CFD Applications  Hull and appendages hydrodynamic resistance calculation / Wave pattern analysis.  Widely used: Linear/Nonlinear FS potential flow solver  Frequently used: Fully nonlinear FS RANSE solver  Lift forces calculation  Widely used: Linear/Nonlinear FS potential flow solver  Frequently used: Fully nonlinear FS RANSE solver  2D profiles optimisation  Widely used: RANSE solver  Local phenomena analysis  Widely used: Reynolds-averaged Navier Stokes (RANSE) solver.  Comming: LES turbulence models, direct simulations  Sails simulation  Widely used: Potential flow solver coupled to boundary layer solver  Coming: ALE RANSE solvers  Mast profile optimisation  Widely used: RANSE solver  Aerodynamic resistance  Widely used: RANSE solver  Seakeeping analysis  Widely used: Linear (frequency domain) solvers.  Comming: Non linear FS (time domain) solvers.  Other (dynamic loads estimation, velocity prediction,...)  Frequently used: RANSE VOF – Level Set methods  Comming: Lagrangean - Meshless methods

Tdyn: Main Characteristics ► Tdyn includes a fully integrated pre/postprocessor based on GiD system, incorporating advanced CAD tools (NURBS importation, creation and edition) ► Data insertion (control volume generation, physical properties, boundary conditions, etc) is guided by the use of specific wizard tools for naval applications ► Mesh can be automatically generated from the CAD information within the system. It also allows elements size assignment and quality check of the resulting mesh ► System also includes a great variety of postprocessing options and tools for fast report generation ► System includes a tool (procserver) which allows to perform Grid- Computing calculations ► The same environment includes tools for performing a variety of analysis (structural, heat transfer, transport of species, user defined problems, …)

Tdyn FEM Fluid Dynamics RANSE-NAVAL module

RANSE solver. Characteristics.  Implicit and accurate scheme: In most of the cases of interest for the naval architecture the time step imposed by the stability criteria (smallest elements) may be orders of magnitude smaller than the time step required to obtain time-accurate results (physical time step), rendering explicit schemes impractical. -> Developed a new Predictor-Corrector implicit- second-order-time-accurate method  Pressure-Velocity segregation: Pressure-Velocity coupled schemes are very expensive from a computational point of view (velocity and pressure discrete equations are coupled). However the use of standard Pressure- Velocity segregation schemes impose strong limitations to the stability of the algorithm. -> Developed a new implicit-second-order-time-accurate method based on a pressure-velocity segregation scheme  Stable algorithm: Stability of the numerical algorithm is still today an open issue. There is a need for an accurate, pressure and advection stable algorithm, based on the physics of the problem. -> Developed a new stabilization methodology: Finite Increment Calculus based on the discrete balance of the quantities  Coupled free surface solver: Free surface condition must be coupled to the fluid flow solver in a stable and accurate way. -> Use of the transpiration technique.

Numerical and Implementation Aspects RANSE-NAVAL module ► RANSE and FS equations are integrated by standard Finite Element Method (linear/quadratic tetrahedra, hexahedra, prisms, …) ► RANSE and FS solvers have been optimized for working with unstructured meshed of linear tetrahedra/triangles ► Implicit 2nd order time accurate fractional step algorithm is used to go faster to steady state ► Boundary conditions may be defined by analytical functions (i.e. allowing to run different drifts angles with the same geometry/mesh) ► RANSE-FS solver has been fully integrated within the multi-physics environment Tdyn

RANSE solver. Real Free Surface deformation and Sink and Trim treatment. Free surface deformation as well as dynamic sinkage and trim angle are calculated during the program execution being boundary conditions and mesh automatically updated. Finally a new calculation is performed with the real geometry. This is done in four steps: 1.New free surface NURBS definition, taking the resulting deformation into account, is generated: NURBS Cartesian support grid of MxN points is created. Z coordinate of the points, representing the wave elevation, is interpolated into the grid. Finally, the NURBS surface based on the support grid is generated. 2.Geometry of the vessel if moved according to calculated sinkage and trim angle. 3.New control volume and mesh are automatically generated. New mesh is generated with a quality criterion based on using an error estimator based on FIC technique. 4.New calculation is carried out with fixed mesh

Numerical and Implementation Aspects LINEAR module ► FS - Potential flow equations are integrated by panel method ► The algorithm uses structured meshes of quadrilateral panels for free surface calculations ► Boundary conditions are easily defined and automatically transferred to the mesh ► Potential solver has been fully integrated within the multi-physics environment Tdyn

9 kn Application: IACC example

9 kn Application: IACC example

Application: Rioja de España ► We present as example, the Spanish America’s Cup boat Rioja de España, participant in the races of 1995 ► POTENTIAL Flow simulations have been carried out with a symmetric full geometry ► RANSE simulations have been carried out at full scale, using a two layer k-e turbulence model, in combination with an extended law of the wall ► Results are compared to experimental data extrapolations performed at El Pardo towing tank with a model at scale 1/3.5

Application: Rioja de España Acknowledgements: Authors thank National Institute of Aerospace Technique (INTA) for permitting the publication of the towing tank tests of Rioja de España, and the model basin El Pardo (CEHIPAR) for sending the full documentation of the tests. Special gratefulness to IZAR shipbuilders for allowing the publication of the Rioja de España hull forms.

Application: Rioja de España Experimental data TestGeometry Heel angle Drift angle C0D0 Hull, no appendages 0º0º E0D0 Hull, bulb and keel 0º0º E15D2 Hull, bulb, keel and rudder 15º2º E15D4 15º4º E25D2 25º2º Every case was towed at equivalent velocities of 10, 9, 8.5, 8.0, 7.5 and 7.0 knots

9 kn Application: Rioja de España

TestSymmetry # Elements # Nodes C0D0Yes E0D0Yes E15D2No E15D4No E25D2No All grids used have been generated with the same quality criteria (in terms of size transition and minimum angle) and using element sizes from 5mm to 2000 mm.

All meshes have been generated with the same quality criteria (in terms of size transition and minimum angle) and using element sizes from 5mm to 2000 mm. Application: Rioja de España E15D2 keel-bulb union detail Final mesh E0D0 E25D2 Final Mesh E15D2 Initial mesh

Application: Rioja de España E25D2 Streamlines and velocity modulus contours (V = 9 Kn)

Application: Rioja de España E25D2 Wave profile 9Kn Experimental Simulation

Application: Rioja de España E25D2 Wave profiles and pressure contours 9Kn

Application: Rioja de España E0D0 Pressure contours 10Kn

Application: Rioja de España E25D2 Pressure contours and streamlines 9Kn

Application: Rioja de España E0D0E15D2 E15D4E25D2

Comments ► RANSE solver. Numerical results obtained in the analysis of America’s Cup Rioja de España boat indicate that Tdyn can be an useful tool for practical design purposes.  Evaluation of total resistance gives less that 5% difference with towing tank extrapolations in most part of the analysis range.  Evaluation of induced (lift) forces in non-symmetric cases gives even less differences.  Obtained wave profiles are also very close to those measured in towing tank.  Qualitative results including: wave maps, streamlines, pressure and velocity contours and turbulence distribution, show also reasonable patterns ► Numerical experience indicates that the RANSE formulation is very efficient for free surfaces flows, when the critical time step of the problem is some orders of magnitude smaller than the time step required to obtain time-accurate results - physical time step - (i.e. 4 CPU h / 1.5Mtetras standard PC single processor, including s&t final calculation – use of a integrated Grid Computing System “ProcServer”). ► Potential flow solver. Numerical results obtained in the analysis of America’s Cup Rioja de España boat indicate that the proposed method can be a useful tool for practical design purposes.  Evaluation of wave resistance gives less that 5% difference with towing tank estimation in most part of the analysis range.  Evaluation of induced (lift) forces in non-symmetric cases gives even less differences.  Obtained wave profiles are also very close to those measured in towing tank.  Qualitative results including: wave maps, pressure and velocity contours show also reasonable patterns ► Potential flow solver is a very efficient tool for free surfaces flows. It can be used instead of RANSE solver when local effect hasn’t interest for design (first stages of the design). Standard PC-CPU time required for one calculation is about 10 min. ► Tdyn system has been used in the design of ALIGNHI and GBR America’s Cup boats

(Future) CFD Applications  Highly accurate results  Automatic mesh generation.  Boundary layer simulation.  Accurate turbulence models.  Error estimation.  Mesh refinement.  Automatic optimization of design  Complex criteria (stability)  Parametric geometry definition  Automatic geometry/mesh update  Coupled fluid-structure calculation (hydro-elasticity)  VPP-CFD tool (coupled)  Hydrodynamic flow. Free surface.  Aerodynamic flow.  Structural (membrane) analysis.  Automatic mesh regeneration.  VPP-CFD tool in waves  Hydrodynamic flow. Free surface.  Aerodynamic flow.  Structural (membrane) analysis.  Small CPU time requirements

further information at...