Low Emittance Generation and Preservation: Damping Rings October 23 rd, 2012 Y. Papaphilippou (CERN) and J. Urakawa (KEK)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ILC Accelerator School Kyungpook National University
Advertisements

Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider.
Summary of the two-stream instability session G. Rumolo, R. Cimino Based on input from the presentations of G. Iadarola, H. Bartosik, R. Nagaoka, N. Wang,
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Damping ring K. Ohmi LC Layout Single tunnel Circumference 6.7 km Energy 5 GeV 2 km 35 km.
Global Design Effort 1 Summary of Technical and Collaboration Related Issues for the ILC Damping Rings N. Walker (for the Project Managers) INFN Frascati.
SuperB and the ILC Damping Rings Andy Wolski University of Liverpool/Cockcroft Institute 27 April, 2006.
ILC Damping rings G. Dugan PAC TDR review 12/13/12 Dec. 13, 2012 ILC Damping Rings 1.
Damping Ring issues Overall optimization, low emittance tuning and other beam tests February 2 nd, 2011 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN 6 th CLIC Advisory Committee.
Conceptual Design of the CLIC Damping Rings October 20 th, 2010 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010.
Damping Rings Y. Papaphilippou, CERN, D. Rubin, Cornell.
Report on the Damping Ring Meeting at CERN, Nov , 2005 J. Gao IHEP, Beijing, China Nov. 24, 2005, ILC-Asia Meeting.
ALCW at SLAC, January 7, 2004J. Rogers, A Damping Ring Primer1 A Damping Ring Primer J. Rogers Cornell University Linear collider emittance requirements.
The Overview of the ILC RTML Bunch Compressor Design Sergei Seletskiy LCWS 13 November, 2012.
Dream test facilities for Damping ring R&D October 25 th, 2012 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN.
Fast Ion Instability Studies in ILC Damping Ring Guoxing Xia DESY ILCDR07 meeting, Frascati, Mar. 5~7, 2007.
Comparison between NLC, ILC and CLIC Damping Ring parameters May 8 th, 2007 CLIC Parameter working group Y. Papaphilippou.
Update of 3.2 km ILC DR design (DMC3) Dou Wang, Jie Gao, Gang Xu, Yiwei Wang (IHEP) IWLC2010 Monday 18 October - Friday 22 October 2010 Geneva, Switzerland.
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
ILC damping ring options and their critical issues 12th July th ACFA MDI/POL/ACC Pohang Accelerator Lab. Eun-San Kim.
1 Flux concentrator for SuperKEKB Kamitani Takuya IWLC October.20.
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat HERA The Only Lepton-Hadron Collider Ever Been Built Worldwide Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
1 Simulations of fast-ion instability in ILC damping ring 12 April ECLOUD 07 workshop Eun-San Kim (KNU) Kazuhito Ohmi (KEK)
1 Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility M. Palmer & D.Rubin November 8, 2005.
Damping Ring S. Guiducci AAP Review Tsukuba 20 April 2009.
Working group on Damping rings, ATF and CESRTA October 20 th, 2010 S. Guiducci (INFN/LNF), M. Palmer (Cornell), Y. Papaphilippou (CERN), J. Urakawa (KEK/ATF)
Damping Ring Parameters and Interface to Sources S. Guiducci BTR, LNF 7 July 2011.
E-cloud studies at LNF T. Demma INFN-LNF. Plan of talk Introduction New feedback system to suppress horizontal coupled-bunch instability. Preliminary.
Motivation and Overview David Rubin Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
The SPS as a Damping Ring Test Facility for CLIC March 6 th, 2013 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN CLIC Collaboration Working meeting.
Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN
Emittances Normalised r.m.s. Emittances at Damping Ring Extraction Horizontal Emittance (  m) Vertical Emittance (  m)
ATF status M. Ross October 15, 2004 The ATF is the largest test facility built exclusively for linear collider RD –Utility not reduced by the selection.
2 February 8th - 10th, 2016 TWIICE 2 Workshop Instability studies in the CLIC Damping Rings including radiation damping A.Passarelli, H.Bartosik, O.Boine-Fankenheim,
Electron cloud study for ILC damping ring at KEKB and CESR K. Ohmi (KEK) ILC damping ring workshop KEK, Dec , 2007.
Global Design Effort ILC Damping Rings: R&D Plan and Organisation in the Technical Design Phase Andy Wolski University of Liverpool and the Cockcroft Institute,
Emittance reduction by a SC wiggler in the ATF-DR September 16 th, 2009 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU and Rogelio TOMAS ATF2 weekly meeting.
Low Emittance Rings 2014 Workshop INFN-LNF, 18. September 2014 Low Emittance Studies at 3 GeV at PETRA III Joachim Keil DESY.
Workshop on Accelerator R&D for Ultimate Storage Rings – Oct Nov.1 – Huairou, Beijing, China A compact low emittance lattice with superbends for.
Parameter scan for the CLIC damping rings July 23rd, 2008 Y. Papaphilippou Thanks to H. Braun, M. Korostelev and D. Schulte.
Characterization of the Fast Ion Instability at CesrTA David Rubin Cornell University.
V.Shiltsev 1 Comments on What Kind of Test Facility(ies) the ILC Needs Vladimir Shiltsev/ Fermilab.
Evaluation of 1GHz vs 2GHz RF frequency in the damping rings April 16 th, 2010 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU and Alexej Grudiev.
FCC-ee injector complex including Booster Yannis Papaphilippou, CERN Thanks to: M.Aiba (PSI), Ö.Etisken (Ankara Un.), K.Oide (KEK), L.Rinolfi (ESI-JUAS),
ESLS Workshop Nov 2015 MAX IV 3 GeV Ring Commissioning Pedro F. Tavares & Åke Andersson, on behalf of the whole MAX IV team.
Third ILC Damping Rings R&D Mini-Workshop KEK, Tsukuba, Japan December 2007 Choosing the Baseline Lattice for the Engineering Design Phase Andy Wolski.
Bocheng Jiang SSRF AP group
CLIC Damping ring beam transfer systems
CLIC damping rings overview
Update of Damping Ring parameters
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
CLIC DR EXTRACTION KICKER DESIGN, MANUFACTURE AND EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM
Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN
Follow-up on Damping Ring design
ANKA Seminar Ultra-low emittance for the CLIC damping rings using super-conducting wigglers Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU October 8th, 2007.
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
CLIC damping rings overview and open issues
The Proposed Conversion of CESR to an ILC Damping Ring Test Facility
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
CLIC damping rings working plan towards the CDR
Status of CTC activities for the Damping rings
Institute of High Energy Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences
Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility
Kicker and RF systems for Damping Rings
ANKA Seminar Ultra-low emittance for the CLIC damping rings using super-conducting wigglers Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU October 8th, 2007.
Kicker specifications for Damping Rings
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
Evaluation of 1GHz vs 2GHz RF frequency in the damping rings
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
Presentation transcript:

Low Emittance Generation and Preservation: Damping Rings October 23 rd, 2012 Y. Papaphilippou (CERN) and J. Urakawa (KEK)

Emittance Preservation in ILC Damping Ring Problems come from electron cloud and fast ion instability. Regarding with bunch-by-bunch extraction, we have to make a careful beam optical matching and a smooth impedance design. This issue was already confirmed by ATF extraction beam tuning (10pm, not 2pm. ) Wiggler RF Phase Trombone Chicane Extraction Injection ILC Damping Ring Layout

DTC lattice parameters for 5 Hz Low Power (baseline) and High Luminosity (upgrade) operating modes and 10 Hz repetition rate (baseline) operation Three ILC operating modes correspond to four DR configurations, Two utilize a 5 Hz repetition rate: low power baseline (1312 bunches/ring); and high luminosity upgrade (2625 bunches. Third operating mode is at 10 Hz and e- linac operated with alternating pulses: high energy for e+ production followed by low energy for collisions. Shorter damping times in necessary to achieve the same extracted vertical emittance in half the nominal storage time

Damping Ring Arc Magnet Layout Doubling of current in e+ DR for high luminosity upgrade poses concern for electron cloud effects. If mitigation techniques are not sufficient, possibility of installing a second e+ ring in the same tunnel.

Arc Cell and Damping Ring Lattice Functions

BPM, Magnet Alignment Tolerances and Dynamic Aperture, Specified Geometric Vertical Emittance of 2pm-rad

Electron Cloud Mitigations and Modeling Results Measurements in CESRTA, simulations with several codes for various bunch configurations, chamber geometries and coatings (ILC e-cloud WG). Recommendations for mitigations include coating, grooves, clearing electrodes, solenoids and antechambers

Simulation Codes based on week strong model predict confirmed by Experimental result very fast rise of vertical emittance due to FII. Growth rate reduced when introducing train mini-gaps Fast Ion Instability in Electron Damping Ring

Simulated Vertical Amplitude versus time due to Fast Ion Instability Simulation Codes confirmed by experimental results at ATF-DR, CesrTA, SPEAR3 and low emittance SR Rings predict that fast ion instability can be mitigated with good vacuum level less than 1nT, many train operation with train gap and b-by-b feedback system.

Vacuum System

Extraction Kicker Very tight kicker jitter tolerance performance (<5e-4) confirmed in ATF experimental results (single bunch extraction for train of 10 bunches with spacing of 5.6 ns). Need to address impedance issues for 42 strip-line kickers (30cm long, 30mm gap)

CLIC Damping Rings Complex layout e + Damping Ring e - Damping Ring e + linac to PDR transfer line e - linac to PDR transfer line e + PDR to DR transfer line e + DR to Booster linac transfer line e - PDR to DR transfer line e - DR to Booster linac transfer line e - Pre-damping Ring e + Pre-damping Ring X-ray dump Delay loop

High-bunch density in all three dimensions  Intrabeam Scattering effect reduced by choice of ring energy, lattice design, wiggler technology and alignment tolerances  Electron cloud in e + ring mitigated by chamber coatings and efficient photon absorption  Fast Ion Instability in the e - ring reduced by low vacuum pressure and large train gap  Space charge vertical tune-shift limited by energy choice, reduced circumference, bunch length increase  Other collective instabilities controlled by low – impedance requirements on machine components Repetition rate and bunch structure  Fast damping times achieved with SC wigglers  RF frequency 1GHz considered due to many 2GHz (power source, high peak and average current, transient beam loading) Output emittance stability  Tight jitter tolerance driving kicker technology Positron beam dimensions from source  Pre-damping ring challenges (energy acceptance, dynamic aperture) solved with lattice design Design ParametersCLIC DR Energy [GeV]2.86 Circumference [m]427.5 Energy loss/turn [MeV]4.0 RF voltage [MV] Compaction factor1.3x10 -4 Damping time x / s [ms]2.0/1.0 No bends / wigglers100/52 Dipole/ wiggler field [T]1.0/2.5 CLIC DR challenges and adopted solutions Target parametersCLIC Bunch population (10 9 )4.1 bunch spacing [ns]0.5 number of bunches312 Repetition rate [Hz]50 Norm. emit. h/v [nm]500/5 Norm. emit. l [keV.m]6 23/10/2012 LCWS201213

CLIC DR layout and parameters Racetrack shape with  96 TME arc cells (4 half cells for dispersion suppression)  26 Damping wiggler FODO cells in the long straight sections (LSS)  Space reserved upstream the LSS for injection/extraction elements (optics design ready) and RF cavities Circumference reduced (30% less wigglers) Parameters1GHz2GHz Energy [GeV]2.86 Circumference [m]427.5 Energy loss/turn [MeV]4.0 RF voltage [MV] Stationary phase [°]5162 Natural chromaticity x / y-115/-85 Momentum compaction factor1.3e-4 Damping time x / s [ms]2.0/1.0 Number of dipoles/wigglers100/52 Cell /dipole length [m]2.51 / 0.58 Dipole/Wiggler field [T]1.0/2.5 Bend gradient [1/m2]-1.1 Phase advance x / z0.408/0.05 Bunch population, [e9]4.1 IBS growth factor x/z/s1.5/1.4/1.2 Hor./ Ver Norm. Emittance [nm.rad] 456/4.8472/4.8 Bunch length [mm] Longitudinal emittance [keVm] Space charge tune shift /10/2012 LCWS201214

Intrabeam Scattering theory, simulations and measurements Energy choice and lattice design for reducing effect from IBS Monte-Carlo tracking codes developed based on Ratherford Coulomb scattering cross section  Code agreement for lower currents, more divergence at high currents First measurements at SLS- PSI with good agreement with theoretical predictions 23/10/2012 F. Antoniou, et al. 1mA, 10mA, 17mA LCWS201215

Other collective effects Space-charge reduced <0.1 with combined circumference reduction and bunch length increase e-cloud in the e + DR imposes limits in PEY (99.9%) and SEY (<1.3) achieved with wiggler absorption scheme and chamber coatings (amorphous carbon) Fast ion instability in e - DR constrains vacuum pressure to around 0.1nTorr (large train gap also helps) Single bunch instabilities avoided with smooth vacuum chamber design  Simulations for instability thresholds for resistive wall Resistive wall coupled bunch controlled with feedback  Conceptual design of 1-2GHz b-b-b feedback by T. Nakamura (SPring8) Impedance estimates for effect of multiple material layers Coherent synchrotron radiation estimates do not E. Koukovini-Platia, G. Rumolo, et al.

Wigglers’ effect with IBS Stronger wiggler fields and shorter wavelengths necessary to reach target emittance due to strong IBS effect Stronger field and moderate wavelength reduces IBS effect while reaching target emittance Current density can be increased by different conductor type Nb 3 Sn can sustain higher heat load (~10 times higher than NbTi) Two wiggler mock-ups  2.5T, 5cm period NbTi (CERN/BINP)  2.8T, 4cm period, Nb 3 Sn (CERN)  Magnetically tested achieving required performance F. Antoniou 500nm limit 23/10/2012 LCWS201217

SC wiggler development Two paths of R&D  NbTi wire, horizontal racetrack, conduction cooled (BINP/KIT collaboration)  Nb 3 Sn wire, vertical racetrack, conduction cooled (CERN) Full NbTi length prototype  Higher than 3T, 5.1cm period, magnetic gap of 18mm  Under production by BINP to be installed in 2014 in ANKA for beam tests  Operational performance, field quality, cooling concept First vertical racetrack magnet (3- period) tested in 2011  Reached 75% of max. current  Limited by short coil-to-structure  Still higher than NbTi (900 A vs. 700 A) A. Bernard, P. Ferracin, N. Mesentsev, D. Schoerling, et al. 23/10/2012 LCWS201218

Vacuum technology Amorphous-C coating shows maximum SEY starting from below 1 and gradually growing to slightly more than 1.1 after 23 days of air exposure  Peak of the SEY moves to lower energy Experimental tests  Huge amount of data at SPS  Run with 5 GeV positrons at CESRTA, for different intensities and bunch spacings  The total electron current reduced significantly (1 order of magnitude) as compared to Al  Continuing collaboration with ESRF for PEY tests in a dedicated beamline S. Calatroni, M.Palmer, G. Rumolo, M. Taboreli et al. 23/10/2012 LCWS Factor 4 less electron flux, to be multiplied by a factor 2 difference of photoelectron in 15W wrt 15E 15W is a C- coated chamber 15E is an Al chamber

RF system A. Grudiev Single train of 312 bunches spaced at 0.5ns necessitates 2GHz system  R&D needed for power source  Large average and peak current/power introduces important transient beam loading Considered 1GHz system  Straight-forward RF design but train recombination in a delay loop is needed RF design concepts1 GHz2 GHz no train interleaving after DR Classical RF system based on the NC ARES-type cavities Baseline P RF = 3.8 MW; L = 32 m; Cavity design: OK Alternative 2.0 P RF = 5.9 MW; L = 48 m; Cavity design: ok? Classical RF system based on the SCC cavities Alternative 1.1 P RF = 0.6 MW; L = 108 m; Cavity design: ok? Alternative 2.1 P RF = 0.6 MW; L = 800 m; Cavity design: NOT OK RF system with RF frequency mismatch Alternative 1.2 P RF = 1.3 MW; L = 16 m; Cavity design: OK Alternative 2.2 P RF = 2.1 MW; L = 24 m; Cavity design: OK “A-la-linac” RF system with strong input power modulations Alternative 1.3 P RF = 3.3 MW; L = 8 m; Cavity design: OK Alternative 2.3 P RF = 5.8 MW; L = 12 m; Cavity design: OK

Extraction kicker design Kicker jitter tolerance ~ few Striplines required for achieving low longitudinal coupling impedance Significant R&D needed for PFL (or alternative), switch, transmission cable, feed-throughs, stripline, terminator  Prototyped under the Spanish Program “Industry for Science”  Collaboration is set-up with ALBA synchrotron and ATF for beam tests LCWS /10/2012 M. Barnes, C. Belver- Aguilar, A. Faus Golfe et al. Inductive Adder

Reaching Quantum L imit O f V ertical E mittance K. Wootton, et al, PRL, accepted Tousheck lifetime vs. RF voltage in ASLS points to ε y = 1.24 ± 0.3pm  New technique for resolving ultra-low beam sizes using vertical undulator EU collaboration between PSI-SLS (Maxlab), INFN-LNF and CERN (TIARA-SVET) for low emittance tuning techniques and instrumentation  SLS achieved ε y record of 0.9 ± 0.4pm (confirmed with different techniques)  New emittance monitor for resolutions below 3 μ m (vertical polarized light) under installation for measurements in 2013 M. Aiba et al, NIM 2012

DR technology and experimental program Super-conducting wigglers  Demanding magnet technology combined with cryogenics and high heat load from synchrotron radiation (absorption) High frequency RF system  1-2GHz RF system in combination with high power and transient beam loading Coatings, chamber design and ultra-low vacuum  Electron cloud mitigation, low- impedance, fast-ion instability Kicker technology  Extracted beam stability Diagnostics for low emittance  Profile monitors, feedback system Experimental program set-up for measurements in storage rings and test facilities  ALBA (Spain), ANKA (Germany), ATF (Japan), Australia Synchrotron (Australia), CESRTA (USA), SOLEIL (France),… Ideas for a DR test facility within a future LC test facility

Low Emittance Rings’ Collaboration Initiated by the ILC-CLIC working group on damping rings and catalyzed by the organization of two workshops CERN, Heraklion)  Common beam dynamics and technology items for synchrotron light sources, linear collider damping rings, b-factories Formed a EU network within EUCARD2  Coordinated by EU labs  Extended collaboration board including colleagues from US and Japan  30 participating institutes world wide 23/10/ LCWS2012 Proposal approved with 330k€ allocated budget for 4 years starting 05/13