3D Finite Element Analysis for Ribbed Structure Vacuum Vessel By: Hamed Hosseini Advisor: Prof. Farrokh Najmabadi.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preliminary Stress Analysis of Vacuum Vessel By : Hamed Hosseini Advisor: Prof. Najmabadi.
Advertisements

INTRODUCTION TO PRESSURE VESSELS
The Birth of The Water Tuber Boiler and Christened as Steam Generator P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Generation of Unlimited.
1 By Terence James Haydock Pressure Vessel A simulated response in ANSYS.
Chapter 8 : Natural Convection
ME 450 Group Adrian Conrad Chris Cook Thomas Hylton Nathan Wagers High Pressure Water Fixture Conceptual Design Analysis December 10, 2007.
April 23-24, 2009/ARR 1 Proposed Effort Over the Next 1-2 Years on ARIES-DB DCLL A. René Raffray, Siegfried Malang, Xueren Wang University of California,
Study on supporting structures of magnets and blankets for a heliotron-type fusion reactors Study on supporting structures of magnets and blankets for.
Progress on the Configuration Design of the Fusion Power Core for the ACT (Draft) X.R. Wang M.S. Tillack S. Malang Sept. 29, 2011.
Mercury Marine Problem Basically what we are doing here is we are gluing a rubber seal on a painted aluminum part. It is sometimes difficult to keep the.
Magnet System Definition L. Bromberg P. Titus MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center ARIES meeting November 4-5, 2004.
The shield block is a modular system made up of austenitic steel SS316 LN-IG whose main function is to provide thermal and nuclear shielding of outer components.
Status of the Power Core Configuration Based on Modular Maintenance Presented by X.R. Wang Contributors: S. Malang, A.R. Raffray and the ARIES Team ARIES.
CHE/ME 109 Heat Transfer in Electronics LECTURE 8 – SPECIFIC CONDUCTION MODELS.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd
Computation of FREE CONVECTION P M V Subbarao Associate Professor Mechanical Engineering Department IIT Delhi Quantification of Free …….
US ITER TBM Meeting Idaho Fall, Idaho, Aug M Dagher P Fogarty 1.TBM/ITER General Arrangement 2.Equatorial Test port Configuration 3.Test Port.
March 20-21, 2000ARIES-AT Blanket and Divertor Design, ARIES Project Meeting/ARR Status ARIES-AT Blanket and Divertor Design The ARIES Team Presented.
Strength of Material Shear Strain Dr. Attaullah Shah.
General Design Guidelines
Prof. Carlos Montestruque
Chapter 6 Plate girder.
ZTF Cryostat Finite Element Analysis Andrew Lambert ZTF Technical Meeting 1.
M. Yoda, S. I. Abdel-Khalik, D. L. Sadowski and M. D. Hageman Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering Update on Thermal Performance of the Gas- Cooled.
1 Calorimeter Thermal Analysis with Increased Heat Loads September 28, 2009.
FOOTINGS. FOOTINGS Introduction Footings are structural elements that transmit column or wall loads to the underlying soil below the structure. Footings.
Ch Ch.15 Term 061. Ch-12  T061  Q16. The volume of a solid Aluminum sphere at the sea level is V = 1.0 m3. This sphere is placed at a depth of.
1 MME3360b Assignment 04 10% of final mark 6 problems, each worth 16.7% of assignment mark Due April 9 th, 2012.
U PDATED ARIES-ACT P OWER C ORE D EFINITION AND S I C B LANKET X.R. Wang, M. S. Tillack, S. Malang F. Najmabadi and L.A. El-Guebaly ARIES-Pathways Project.
CHAPTER OBJECTIVES Analyze the stress developed in thin-walled pressure vessels Review the stress analysis developed in previous chapters regarding axial.
Vacuum Vessel Recent Progress. Horizontal or Vertical Rib? Over-Stressed Spots We get over-stressed spots on the horizontal ribs (Very high stress spots)
ITER In-Vessel Coils (IVC) Interim Design Review Thermal Structural FEA of Feeders A Brooks July 27, 2010 July 26-28, 20101ITER_D_353BL2.
Update of Vacuum Vessel Analysis Hamed Hosseini, Farrokh Najmabadi, Xueren Wang ARIES Meeting Washington, DC, May 30-June 1, 2012.
An Analysis of Shell Structure for Dead Load H.M. Fan PPPL September 16, 2005.
UCLA - S.Sharafat: ITER TBM Dec. ’04 DCLL ITER-TBM: Design for Accident Relevant Loading Jaafar A. El-Awady, P. Rainsberry, S. Sharafat, and N. Ghoniem,
R EFINEMENT OF THE P OWER C ORE C ONFIGURATION OF THE ARIES-ACT SA X.R. Wang 1, M. S. Tillack 1, S. Malang 2 and F. Najmabadi 1 1 University of California,
Mechanical Designs of The Central Detector Jinyu Fu
56 MHz SRF Cavity Cryostat support system and Shielding C. Pai
ARIES-CS Power Core Configuration Presented by X.R. Wang Contributors: Laila A. Ei-Guebaly, S. Malang, T.K. Mau, Richard Peiperty, A.R. Raffray and L.
COMBINED LOADING.  Analyze the stress developed in thin-walled pressure vessels  Review the stress analysis developed in previous chapters regarding.
DCLL ½ port Test Blanket Module thermal-hydraulic analysis Presented by P. Calderoni March 3, 2004 UCLA.
Required Dimensions of HAPL Core System with Magnetic Intervention Mohamed Sawan Carol Aplin UW Fusion Technology Inst. Rene Raffray UCSD HAPL Project.
Nonlinear Analyses of Modular Coils and Shell structure for Coil Cool-down and EM Loads Part 1 – Results of Shell Structure and Modular Coils H.M. Fan.
1 PFC requirements  Basic requirements  Carbon based  Provisions for adding (interface design included in research prep budget)  NBI armor  Trim coil.
AWB NSTX TF Flag Joint Design Review April 10, 2003 Art Brooks.
A View of NCSX Structural System and Load Path for the Base Support Structure.
Combined Loadings Thin-Walled Pressure Vessels Stress caused by Combined Loadings.
PRESSURE VESSEL. 1.Determine the bursting steam pressure of a steel shell with diameter of 10 inches and made of ¼ in thick steel plate. The joint efficiency.
Shaping operations are generally divided into three groups based upon how the parent metal flows or deforms during the shaping process ,namely Bending.
Fredrik Fors Mechanical Engineering, JLab 04/22/2016
GOVERNMENT ENGINEERING COLLEGE, BHAVNAGAR TOPIC : INTRODUCTION TO PRESSURE VESSELS Prepared By :- 1.Aal Akash Ansari Aarif.
Present status of the flux return yoke design
Shear in Straight Members Shear Formula Shear Stresses in Beams
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
X.R. Wang, M. S. Tillack, S. Malang, F. Najmabadi and the ARIES Team
Example 6.04 SOLUTION: Determine the shear force per unit length along each edge of the upper plank. For the upper plank, Based on the spacing between.
Fredrik Fors Mechanical Engineering, JLab 09/29/2016
Thin-Walled Pressure Vessels Stress caused by Combined Loadings
Integrated Design: APEX-Solid Wall FW-Blanket
Chapter 8 : Natural Convection
INTRODUCTION TO PRESSURE VESSELS
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
Layer Thickness and Map Width
Effective bending moment method
Example 6.04 SOLUTION: Determine the shear force per unit length along each edge of the upper plank. For the upper plank, Based on the spacing between.
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
Monte Carlo simulations for the ODIN shielding at ESS
Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, All Rights Reserved
Mesh Morph 2.0 Tutorial 7/29/2019.
Analysis of Technical and Programmatic Tradeoffs with Systems Code
Presentation transcript:

3D Finite Element Analysis for Ribbed Structure Vacuum Vessel By: Hamed Hosseini Advisor: Prof. Farrokh Najmabadi

Introduction & Motivation Vacuum Vessel Geometry of the vacuum vessel is taken from CAD, considering the very thin vacuum vessel (5 cm) and 10 cm thick at the beginning Primary stress is performed by ANSYS Workbench to see if the thinner wall can accommodate the normal pressure loads and overpressure loads ( Motivation: How thin it can be based on the stress analysis). Double wall ribbed structure as a way to increase the strength of structure, reducing stress intensity and cooling the system is designed and analyzed. 1/16 of Sectors (Symmetry ) 10 (m) 11 (m) Material : SST 316, Yield Stress: 140 MPa, and Working Temperature: 550 K 5(cm), 10(cm) Solid Single WallDouble Wall Ribbed Structure

Boundary Condition Fixed BottomSymmetry (Frictionless)

Loads Outside Pressure (1 atm)Inside Pressure ( zero)Gravity

Solid Single Wall VV Very Thin VV (5-cm) There are lots of over stressed areas > 140 MPa 166 MPa 197 MPa 300 MPa

Solid Single Wall VV Thick VV (10-cm) Almost all the areas are less than the yield point < 140 MPa 40 MPa 100 MPa 123 MPa

Double Wall Ribbed Structure/ Sandwich Panels In the solid single wall, material should be added to those areas with high stress intensity to get the stress lower than the yield point Ribbed structure as a way to add material, increases the strength of structure which helps to reduce the stress intensity with a little increase in mass Ribbed structure is very similar to the sandwich panel technique Sandwich plate which is composed of three layers with two thin flat panel upper and lower and a core in between is a very efficient way of providing high bending stiffness and high strength at low weight ( Libove, Hubka 1951) It provides sufficient space for the He coolant to follow between the ribs Ribs attached to the Inner Sheet Ribs attached to the outer Sheet

Rib Configuration Vertical Ribs or Horizontal Ribs? Total Thickness of the Double Wall Ribbed Structure? Thickness of Each Wall (Sheets)? Thickness of Ribs? Distance Between Ribs? Total Number of Ribs?

Port Ribbed Structure Study Very Thin VV (5-cm)Fixed BC/5-cm Thick Port 149 MPa 123 MPa 143 MPa 116 MPa 143 MPa 116 MPa Less than 5% difference between similar points Fixed BC

Horizontal/ Vertical Ribbed Structure? 25cm 4cm 2cm Fixed BC Frictionless BC (Symmetry)

Over Stressed Spots Boundary ConditionsOver Stressed Spots on Ribs Fixed BC Frictionless BC (Symmetry) 400 MPa

Vertical Ribbed Structure Variety of vertical Ribbed Structures has been designed and analyzed (different Sheet thicknesses, Rib thicknesses, gap between sheets, distance between sheets)

Sheet (Wall) Thickness? Inner Sheet Over Stressed Outer Sheet Safe Adding 1cm to the Inner Sheet Removing 1cm from Outer Sheet 74 MPa Reasonable stress happens for inner sheet thickness above 3cm Outer sheet has less stress intensity than the Inner Sheet The high stress regions happen inside the inner sheet Outer sheet can be designed with thinner thickness than the inner sheet 200 MPa 3cm 2cm 4cm

Rib Thickness ? 2cm x 4cm Rib 2cm x 8cm Rib 2cm 4cm 3cm 2cm 8cm Reasonable stress intensity happens for Ribs around 4cm thickness and above Rib Length 200 MPa194 MPa Weak Parameter, less than 5%

Gap/Distance Between Ribs? Ratio Gap/Distance: 2/13 Ratio Gap/Distance: 4/20 13cm 20cm 2cm 4cm Reasonable stress happens for the distance between Ribs less than 25cm Bigger gap combined with larger distance between ribs gives better stress results 4cm gap combined with 20cm distance between ribs gives better stress distribution comparing the 2cm gap with 13cm distance between ribs Larger distance between ribs : Less number of ribs, more space for coolant, less computational time, faster convergence 130 MPa 110 MPa

Comparison Double wall (Vertical Ribbed) Very Thin Solid Single wall (5-cm) 142 MPa 100 MPa 116 MPa90 MPa 143 MPa 100 MPa Ribbed structure as a way to add material, increases the strength of structure which helps to reduce the stress intensity In the vertical ribbed structure, the stress amount gets 25-30% lower than its counterpart area on the very thin solid single wall VV (5-cm)

Mixed Ribbed Structure (Transition) 150 Mpa Mixed ribbed structure: Horizontal ribs on the top and bottom port wings are required to lead the He coolant throughout the port to the inboard Horizontal rib at the corner: Transition rib gets over stressed spot at contact regions

No Horizontal Rib at the Corner 140Mpa Vertical ribs cover the corner Solid sheet gets the yield point : 140 MPa

Totally/Partially Solid Corner Totally solid cornerPartially solid corner Top over stressed spots at contact points Top needs to be partially solid Corner Bottom over stressed spots at contact points Bottom needs to be totally solid corner 170 MPa 300 MPa

Safe Outer/Inner Sheets 94Mpa102Mpa108Mpa 74Mpa Bottom totally solid corner Top partially solid corner

Stress Distribution Safe Vertical/Horizontal RibsOuter Sheet 64MPa 100MPa 74 MPa

Final Port Design Parameters (Mixed Ribbed Structure) Design ParameterSize Distance between vertical ribs18-19cm Distance between horizontal ribs25cm Rib thickness4cm x 4cm Gap between inner and outer sheets4cm Outer wall (Sheet) thickness2cm Inner wall (Sheet) thickness4cm

Whole Vacuum Vessel All with ribbed structure (Inboard, Ports and doors) All the ribbed configurations are made based on the stress distribution results Not identical on the top and bottom (Stress Reasons) Door Ribbed Structure

Inboard 24cm 26cm Ribs with constant cross section : 4cm x 6 cm Matching between inboard & outboard rib channels 2cm 4cm

Solid wall Stress Distribution 113MPa 95MPa 100MPa All regions are less than 119MPa 90MPa 96MPa 86MPa

Ribbed Structure Stress Distribution All the ribs are less than 100MPa

Summary & Future Work  A preliminary structural analysis of the vacuum vessel was performed and the locations of high stresses were identified on the solid single wall vacuum vessel  Sandwich Panels theory was used to model the double wall ribbed structure  Sandwich panel/ Double wall ribbed structure as a way to add little material on the structure to increase the bending stiffness and eventually decreasing the stress intensity was considered  Double wall ribbed structure provides us with sufficient space for the He coolant  Mixed ribbed structure configuration was analyzed and designed  Double wall ribbed structure was analyzed and designed for the whole vacuum vessel including the inboard  Matching between coolant channels for the inboard and outboard was considered  Waiting for the disruption load data from UW to add it to the current load for further analysis.  Thermo-Mechanical analysis based on the nuclear heating data from UW