Empowering Companies Through Knowledge® Information Technology Trends and Spends September 2010 2010 AASCIF IT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cisco Confidential © 2012 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. 1 Cisco Partner Plus: Premium Enablement Accelerate Your Competitive Edge.
Advertisements

The Relationship between Cost & Quality Submitted by: Haya A. El-Agha Submitted to: Eng. Hani Abu Amr.
Supply Chain Management
1 Storage Today Victor Hatridge – CIO Nashville Electric Service (615)
Chapter 05 Human Resource Planning and Recruitment
NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION State of Minnesota Technology Summary February 24, 2011.
3 Dangerous Employment Trends “How to Avoid Them”
Regents Update New Business Architecture Project 2010 Jan00 meeting notes.doc March 17, 2004 Accelerating the New Business Architecture An Update for the.
UC San Diego EH&S Staff Meeting Project 2010 Jan00 meeting notes.doc May 5, 2004 Update on the New Business Architecture EH&S Staff Meeting.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
University of California New Business Architecture Project 2010 Jan00 meeting notes.doc April 15, 2004 Accelerating the New Business Architecture UC Employment.
Chapter 5 Human Resource Planning and Recruitment
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Chapter The Future of Training and Development.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
VENDORS, CONSULTANTS AND USERS
IT ASSET MANAGEMENT (From Booz-Allen & Hamilton).
IT Outsourcing Chad Doiron / Michael Saunders April, 2007.
Travis, Stephanie, Alex.  Cloud computing is a general term for anything that involves delivering hosted services over the Internet.  These services.
National Health Expenditure Projections, 2014–24: Spending Growth Faster Than Recent Trends Sean P. Keehan, Gigi A. Cuckler, Andrea M. Sisko, Andrew J.
MBA/MIS Class #3 September 2, 2008 IT Business Value Financial Justification 1.
1 October 24, 2006 Benchmarking For Excellence. 2 Presented by: Charles Gall Director, Benchmarking Services Ward Group
RSA – Accenture Insurance Solution
1 IT Governance 2006 Strategy/Business Case Presentation Department of Human Services.
© 2010 Plexent – All rights reserved. 1 Change –The addition, modification or removal of approved, supported or baselined CIs Request for Change –Record.
CredoGov VDI Introduction James Gunn
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada Human Resources Management and Technology (by Julie Bulmash) Dessler & Cole Human Resources Management in Canada.
™ Transforming the Cost Base: 2009 Update 22 October 2009 Finance and Strategy Practice Economic Analysis and Decision Support Group.
John M. White, Health Services 1 Building a Healthy Culture Key Elements of a Comprehensive Health Strategy John M. White, Ph.D. Global Health Promotion.
Small Steps to Healthier Employees
STAFFING & COMPENSATION STUDY How Organizations Staff Their Content Marketing Endeavors 2010.
PENSIONS IN TRANSITION: United States and Japan Robert L. Clark Professor of Economics North Carolina State University 19 September, 2002.
What is Enterprise Architecture?
"For distribution to Plan Sponsors only". How many third party administrators are involved with your benefits offering at this time? Do you have access.
July 6, 2014 This report is intended for the sole and exclusive use of IBS and is not to be copied or shared with other parties. International Biometric.
Chapter 13 Research and Metrics McGraw-Hill/Irwin Purchasing and Supply Management, 13/e © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.
Chapter 24 Responsibility Accounting and Performance Evaluation
A Glance Back  We have made significant progress in spite of significant financial challenges created from:  Declining state appropriations  Pressure.
Return to Work Programs Frequently Asked Questions.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 7-1 Defining Competitiveness Chapter 7.
Chapter 2 Measuring economic activity
ERP. What is ERP?  ERP stands for: Enterprise Resource Planning systems  This is what it does: attempts to integrate all data and processes of an organization.
5.01 Budget Planning & Control. Budget Planning Financial planning is one tool managers use to improve profitability. Planning the financial operations.
Grow your business... Protect their investment. Property Technologies International, LLC Presentation of PTI’s suite of web-based applications for real.
HRM Human Resource management. HRM Class Emphasis Show “best-in-class” HRM practices Understand how HRM practices support business strategy How to use,
Lecture 4. IS Planning & Acquisition To be covered: To be covered: – IS planning and its importance Cost-benefit analysis Cost-benefit analysis Funding.
Strategic Planning Workshop  Presented by: Jason P Aubee.
Managing IT as a Business Managing Organizations in the 21 st Century Organizations must become more agile, transparent, and innovative. There is great.
Robert L. Jacobs Over 20 years of solid IT experience Results-oriented, innovative solutions Diverse industry background.
Careers in Distribution, Copyright 2005, WERC Careers in Distribution Management Jobs.
Robert Mahowald August 26, 2015 VP, Cloud Software, IDC
Australia’s ICT Recruitment Sector Employment Market Update Q4, 2015 Beacham Group Summary.
Building Competitive Advantage Through Functional-Level Strategies
Info-Tech Research Group1 Manage the IT Portfolio World Class Operations - Impact Workshop.
1 Evolution and Revolution: Windows 7 and Desktop Virtualization Changing the Desktop Support Landscape Denise Harrison, CIO and Vice President.
Towards a GHG Reduction Strategy for Ontario: Industrial Competitiveness, Investment, Innovation, & Growth September 2010 Canadian Manufacturers.
1 Chapter 20 Bank Performance Financial Markets and Institutions, 7e, Jeff Madura Copyright ©2006 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All.
Ron Johnson, CFA Litman/Gregory Asset Management.
ERP vendor perspective
Financial Wellness with HelloWallet
MANAGING HUMAN RESOURCES
ESG 2010 IT Spending Intentions Survey
ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSTEMS
Contents A GENERIC IT BALANCED SCORECARD
Building Competitive advantage through functional level strategies
Chad Doiron / Michael Saunders April, 2007
Building Competitive advantage through functional level strategies
Departure View Glossary
Pharmacy – Fully Insured versus Self Funding
Building Competitive Advantage Through Functional-Level Strategies
Presentation transcript:

Empowering Companies Through Knowledge® Information Technology Trends and Spends September AASCIF IT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP

Empowering Companies Through Knowledge® Agenda About Ward Group Some Industry Perspective Information Technology Trends IT Expectations for 2010 New System Development Activity Questions

Empowering Companies Through Knowledge® About Ward Group Insurance Focus – most comprehensive operational benchmarking programs in the industry Performed nearly 2,000 benchmarking exercises for more than 350 North American insurance companies since Annual evaluation of every property/casualty and life/health company in the United States. 3 ©Copyright, Ward Group 2010 Benchmarking Consulting Research Center The recognized leader in insurance company benchmarking and best practices and a major sponsor of primary operational research studies.

Empowering Companies Through Knowledge® Industry Premium Growth Trends 4

Empowering Companies Through Knowledge® Declining Investment Returns 5

Empowering Companies Through Knowledge® Major Tasks in 2009 Staying profitable Managing economic conditions and expense control Control Information technology spend Improving claims handling abilities and systems Recovering from the loss of surplus in 2008 Mixed ©Copyright, Ward Group

Empowering Companies Through Knowledge® 2009 Surprises “Panic” in Q and Q Companies stopped thinking/planning like normal, many bad decisions made Stronger surplus recovery than expected – Few major storms; strong investment returns; most kept insurance Reserve releases, at greater levels by small – medium, mutual and personal lines carriers Commercial lines stays soft longer, workers compensation hit particularly hard Avoided major federal intervention Personal lines able to improve pricing Few major staffing reductions Lack of merger/acquisition activity ERM was not a priority ©Copyright, Ward Group

Empowering Companies Through Knowledge® Major Tasks for 2010 Staying profitable Managing economic conditions Preparing for hard market/balancing expenses Integrating new technology – make ROI work Improving customer services processes Understanding impact of healthcare regulation Increasing employee engagement ©Copyright, Ward Group

Empowering Companies Through Knowledge® Information Technology Trends How much are companies investing in IT? Where are they investing? What are the expectations for IT spending going forward? ©Copyright, Ward Group

Empowering Companies Through Knowledge® ©Copyright, Ward Group 2010 IT Spending Trends Information Technology as a % of Premiums Written For 2009, the overall benchmark spent 4.11% of GPW on IT spend, compared to an average spend of 3.54% in Ward’s 50 high performers benchmark performed 26% lower in IT expense to premium. The Ward’s 50 group has invested in technology at the same rate as the overall benchmark, they have not have been affected to the same degree by declining premiums as the overall benchmark. 10

Empowering Companies Through Knowledge® ©Copyright, Ward Group 2010 IT Spending Trends High Performers Make incremental, phased investments of technology. Tend to operate with custom developed systems (Many systems are legacy and have been incrementally updated.) Utilize less consulting resources. Lower expense in all functions. As a group, have minimal premium declines. AASCIF Benchmark Sharp increase in 2007 – 2009 in IT expense as a % of Gross Premium. Consistent with large premium declines in the same time period. Prior to 2007, AASCIF Benchmark compared slightly above the High Performer Benchmark. AASCIF companies have an advantage to the overall benchmark from a complexity standpoint (single line of business, single state). 11

Empowering Companies Through Knowledge® IT spend nearly the same as 2001 conditions BUT IT as % of total company budget 9.5% in 1998 and 10.63% in 2009 IT expense per FTE $15,116 in 1997 and $32,368 in 2009 More IT FTEs to support the business versus 10 years ago Are Companies Spending More? ©Copyright, Ward Group Will it Continue? Companies continue to invest in IT as a business enabler. Most common projects: System Replacement Business Intelligence Customer Capabilities

Empowering Companies Through Knowledge® IT Expense Distribution 13 ©Copyright, Ward Group 2010 Personnel Expense per FTE growth trends have slowed (lower merit increases, lower employer health premium contributions, and decreased bonus payout as a result of deteriorating performance). Consulting expense continues to grow despite recent efforts to minimize. 40% of hardware spend is depreciation expense and 25% of software spend is depreciation IT Expenses by Category

Empowering Companies Through Knowledge® IT Expense Distribution 14 ©Copyright, Ward Group 2010 Applications expense has grown from 46% of the budget in 2005 to 53% of the budget currently. The only functions to decrease in spend since 2005 are Desktop Support and Mainframe Support. All other functions increased in expense compared to premium IT Expenses by IT Function

Empowering Companies Through Knowledge® ©Copyright, Ward Group 2010 IT Staffing Trends Information Technology FTEs per $100M of GPW For 2009, the overall benchmark had IT employees per $100M in GPW. In addition, they had an average of 4.31 IT consulting FTEs. Ward’s 50 high performers benchmark performed 17% lower in IT FTEs, and 28% lower in IT consulting FTEs. IT continues to be one of the only areas in the insurance company experiencing resource growth. 15

Empowering Companies Through Knowledge® IT Staffing Distribution 16 ©Copyright, Ward Group 2010 Applications headcount is a greater percentage than the application expense. The distribution of headcount is consistent with Applications has seen the most hiring with employee growth, as it represents 62.58% of the IT employee base IT Employees by IT Function

Empowering Companies Through Knowledge® ©Copyright, Ward Group 2010 IT Staffing Trends High Performers Investments in technology are typically supported by employees. Tend to operate with custom developed systems (Many systems are legacy and have been incrementally updated.) Do not have a double legacy burden that is present in overall benchmark. Lower staffing in all functions. As a group, have minimal premium declines. AASCIF Benchmark Sharp increase in 2007 – 2009 in IT FTEs per $100M of Gross Premium. Consistent with large premium declines in the same time period. Applications functions represent the largest percentage of IT headcount. Prior to 2007, these functions allowed the AASCIF companies to benchmark below high performers based on the complexity advantages (single line of business, single state). 17

Empowering Companies Through Knowledge® IT Investment Observations Most companies are not realizing full technology benefits due to: – Poor Management – Dependence on Vendors – Unrealistic Expectations Over 50% more IT FTEs now than 10 years ago for average company IT consulting as % of total IT budgets up over 80% in last decade 18 ©Copyright, Ward Group 2010

Empowering Companies Through Knowledge® When asked to compare their 2009 and 2010 IT budgets, in terms of total dollars spent, only 24% of companies reported they expected the IT budget to decrease in % indicated they were increasing their IT budget in % of companies reported no change to the budget. On average, Ward Group expects a 3% increase to IT spend. ©Copyright, Ward Group Expectations for IT Spending 2010 IT Budget Percent Change Compared to 2009 (Including Capital Spend)

Empowering Companies Through Knowledge® ©Copyright, Ward Group 2010 User Support Functions Growth Expectations Staff GrowthExpense Growth 20 20% decreasing Desktop Support expenses -Equipment cost decreasing -Extending refresh periods -Evaluating virtual desktops/thin client devices. 16% increasing Help Desk expense -Self-service capabilities drive increased customer base and call volume -Software packages for additional call management

Empowering Companies Through Knowledge® ©Copyright, Ward Group 2010 Network Services Functions Staff Growth Expectations Minimal staffing changes to the network services functions 12% increasing server support staff – Virtualization – Conversion of systems to distributed environment 8% decreasing mainframe support staff 21

Empowering Companies Through Knowledge® ©Copyright, Ward Group 2010 Network Services Functions Expense Growth Expectations 24% reducing mainframe expenses Server support function is mixed with 24% increasing expenses and 20% decreasing expenses. Companies are in various stages of their server virtualization initiatives. 44% increasing telecommunications expense. Significant VOIP activity. 22

Empowering Companies Through Knowledge® ©Copyright, Ward Group 2010 Application Functions Staff Growth Expectations 24% increasing Application Architecture and Design staffing Volatility in projections for Application Development and Application Maintenance 20% adding staff to QA/Testing teams 23

Empowering Companies Through Knowledge® ©Copyright, Ward Group 2010 Application Functions Expense Growth Expectations 52% investing in Application Architecture and Design 44% of companies are increasing investment for Application development and 24% are reducing 24

Empowering Companies Through Knowledge® ©Copyright, Ward Group 2010 General Functions Staff Growth Expectations Few decreases in staff for General functions 28% increasing staff for data warehouse – Companies are in all stages of development, but almost no company is ignoring the need for better business intelligence – Increasing investment in data warehouse activities with the goal to leverage their information into actionable data 20% adding staff to Information Security – Large increases since

Empowering Companies Through Knowledge® ©Copyright, Ward Group 2010 General Functions Expense Growth Expectations More companies increasing external spend on General functions than increasing staff – Information Security – Disaster Recovery Trend of companies recovering their distributed environment internally rather than using a third party provider. This is more costly in the short term, but will provide additional reliability and flexibility. 26

Empowering Companies Through Knowledge® ©Copyright, Ward Group 2010 Anticipated Change Companies believe in the value provided through IT organizations and are choosing to make investments during these trying economic times. Yet, there is not a blank check. IT leaders have made reductions in certain functions to provide for investment in other functions. Desktop Support and Mainframe Support have the largest net decreases. Information Security and Application Architecture and Design have the largest net increases. 27 Net Anticipated Change to IT Functional Expense for 2010

Empowering Companies Through Knowledge® ©Copyright, Ward Group 2010 Anticipated Increase Evaluating only the companies that are investing in a function, the average investments range from 7- 10%. The applications and project driven functions tend to have greater investments than the user support and network services functions. 28 Average Increases to IT Functions for 2010

Empowering Companies Through Knowledge® New Systems Development Activity Are companies developing new systems? Are they using vendors? Why are they developing new systems? How do companies rate their project governance? 29 ©Copyright, Ward Group 2010

Empowering Companies Through Knowledge® ©Copyright, Ward Group 2010 New System Development Activity 71% of companies are participating in a policy administration system implementation and 50% of companies are implementing a new claims system. Only 8.3% of companies are not currently participating in a system implementation project. New system projects remain a high priority item for insurance carriers. Many of these projects are based on driving out costs of other parts of the organizations in order to meet the ROI’s promised. Ward Group has also noted steady increases in system replacements among its client base over the past 5 years. 30

Empowering Companies Through Knowledge® ©Copyright, Ward Group 2010 New System Development Activity Prior to the last years, it was common for many insurance companies to custom develop their systems with internal resources. With many available vendors in the marketplace and the need to accelerate timelines, the trend has shifted towards buying systems versus building them internally. As indicated, only 28% of companies are custom developing with internal resources. This trend was evident across all system types – policy administration, claims, billing and other. 31

Empowering Companies Through Knowledge® Only 1/3 of projects are in phase 2 with a product or location live on the new system. The other 2/3 of projects have significant milestones to achieve. This trend likely indicates the investment in new systems will not slow for 3-5 years since companies will need to continue to invest in these projects to get systems in production. 32 New System Development Activity Overall Project Status ©Copyright, Ward Group 2010

Empowering Companies Through Knowledge® A surprising metrics was that 35% of companies reported that their new system project was over budget. Comparing this over- budget statistic to the fact that only one-third of projects are in phase 2 does not provide a favorable picture for expense management issues. Companies are more likely to be over budget as the project continues into multiple phases. 33 New System Development Activity Overall Budget Status ©Copyright, Ward Group 2010

Empowering Companies Through Knowledge® ©Copyright, Ward Group 2010 New System Rational The number one reason for a new system was to improve the efficiency of the organization. This can be a challenge for IT organizations when budgets are tight. While a new system will generally add expenses to the IT budget, the IT department does not control staffing or expense reductions needed in other business units in order to justify the investment once efficiencies are achieved While it was in the minority of responses, 33% of companies reported rationale for the new system as the inability to maintain the current system. Companies are determining that they cannot ignore the long term viability of their system environment. 34

Empowering Companies Through Knowledge® 27% of companies are adding a new system to their maintenance environment without eliminating a system, Although 73% of companies are retiring legacy systems, the retirement is generally not simultaneous with the implementation which will cause maintenance costs to increase 35 System Replacement Projects Includes Legacy System Retirements ©Copyright, Ward Group 2010

Empowering Companies Through Knowledge® ©Copyright, Ward Group 2010 Governance Level of Governance (alignment of the business and IT) Governance Process in Relationship to the Process 5 Years Ago 36 Maintaining good or excellent governance can mean the difference between success and failure. 21% of companies rated their governance process as excellent and 71% reported it as good. Another positive metric regarding governance is that 92% of companies reported that their governance process is better than it was 5 years ago. There have been many initiatives focused on increasing communication to improve timelines, prioritization and improving the relationship between IT and the business units.

Empowering Companies Through Knowledge® Leah Hollstegge Manager, Ward Group