“... providing timely, accurate, and useful statistics in service to U.S. agriculture.” NASS Methodological, Operational, and Structural Transformation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ad Hoc Committee Meeting June 17, Meeting Topics State WIB Examples Brookings Update WIA Reauthorization.
Advertisements

Presentation for the Management Study of the Code Enforcement Process City of Little Rock, Arkansas August 3, 2006.
Alaska Native Education Program (ANEP) Technical Assistance Meeting September 2014 Sylvia E. Lyles Valerie Randall Almita Reed.
Update on the Impact of Corporate Business Architecture on IT at StatCan 2011 MSIS Meeting Karen Doherty May 2011.
Facilities Management 2013 Manager Enrichment Program U.Va.’s Strategic Planning Initiatives Colette Sheehy Vice President for Management and Budget December.
Budgeting for Results Outcomes Based Budgeting
Teachers’ Appraisal and Pay Pete Gaskin Julie Chow Alison Trehearn Paula Shaw 1 12 July 2013.
PHAB's Approach to Internal and External Evaluation Jessica Kronstadt | Director of Research and Evaluation | November 18, 2014 APHA 2014 Annual Meeting.
Center for Health Care Quality Licensing & Certification Program Evaluation 1 August 2014 rev.
Enterprise Financial System Project Overview & Update Council of Research Associate Deans March 22,
From the IT Assessment to the IT Roadmap ( )
Training and Learning Needs Analysis (TLNA) a tool to promote effective workplace learning & development Helen Mason, Project Worker, Unionlearn Representing.
“ Does Cloud Computing Offer a Viable Option for the Control of Statistical Data: How Safe Are Clouds” Federal Committee for Statistical Methodology (FCSM)
“... providing timely, accurate, and useful statistics in service to U.S. agriculture.” Achieving Innovation and Efficiencies through Organizational Change.
0 Module 2.3: Personnel Implications. 1 In this module, we’ll address several key areas. What are the proposed class specifications? How do they compare.
1 Joint ASIA / BIA / TRIBAL Data Management Committee A Proposed Centralized Data Management Function Sponsored by the Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs.
BALANCED SCORECARD WORKSHOP ROLLOUT FOR SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL PARKS.
Strategy for the Dissemination of 2010 Census Results for State of Qatar Dr. Ahmed Hussein Mark Grice Pervaiz Ahmad Malik Dr. Ahmed Hussein Mark Grice.
Building Community Partnerships to Serve Immigrant Workers Funded by the Ford Foundation Nonprofit and Community College Collaborations.
BALANCED SCORECARD WORKSHOP ROLLOUT
New York State Department of Health Office of Long Term Care Long Term Care Restructuring Annual Long Term Care Ombudsman Training Institute October 18,
Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act Task Force Wrap-Up Webinar August 27, 2015.
United We Ride: Where are we Going? December 11, 2013 Rik Opstelten United We Ride Program Analyst.
World Bank and Statistical Capacity Building PARIS21 Task Team Meeting Washington, DC September 10, 2001.
Enhancing Education Through Technology (Ed Tech) Title IID Competitive Grants Michigan Department of Education Information Briefing July 17 and.
Jun 2012 Phil Aungles Director, Performance and Analysis Unit Higher Education Group DIISRTE Department perspective on the AQHE initiative and the AGS.
Delaware Health and Social Services Fiscal Year 2014 JFC Hearing Legislative Hall Senate Hearing Room February , 2013 Rita Landgraf Cabinet Secretary.
Expanding the Dialogue: Consistency, Quality, and Responsibility in Accreditation | 2010 | 1 Expanding the Dialogue: Consistency, Quality,
Centralizing Data Collection at Statistics Canada Marc St-Denis Lise Rivais.
Kingdom of Morocco High Commision for Planning Bouazza BOUCHKHAR 1 European conference on quality in official statistics QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN THE STATISTICS.
Resourcing the Mission: The New Internal Financial Model.
RESTRUCTURING PROPOSAL
Objectives and Strategies of RRSF The RRSF has been prepared with an overall objective and four specific objectives to overcome the identified problems.
Presentation to the Chancellor’s Cabinet October 14, 2013 Inspiration. Innovation. Graduation. Presented by Mr. Roy Stutzman, RvStutzman Consulting.
The Value Driven Approach
Presented by: Utah Department of Human Services Utah Department of Workforce Services.
OIT Reorganization August 27, Today’s Agenda Principles of Reorganization Survey Feedback Organization Chart Leadership Team Structure Items to.
Organic Farming Research Foundation Organic Farming Research Foundation Silicon Valley Social Venture Fund March 21, 2011.
New Communities Meeting 2010 February 9, 2010 Washington, DC Only Connect! and Other Axioms of System Implementation Four Critical Lessons from Successful.
Transforming Census Bureau Operations Meeting on the Management of Statistical Information Systems (MSIS 2012) Streamlining Statistical Production.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
State Administration Staffing a report by the Office of Program Evaluation & Government Accountability FINAL REPORT May 2008 FISCAL OPPORTUNIT Y STUDY.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
Multistate Research Program Roles & Responsibilities Eric Young SAAESD Meeting Corpus Christi, TX April 3-6, 2005.
PERKINS IV AND THE WORKFORCE INNOVATION AND OPPORTUNITY ACT (WIOA): INTERSECTIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES.
U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program Smart Choice Pre-Select Phase Transition September 2002.
Structuring An Effective Project Management Office and IT Governance David Stokes, PMP Jane Matthews, PMP Florida Department of Health Division of Information.
United States Department of Agriculture Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration Office of Human Resources Management Presented by Dr. Zina.
A P LAN TO C ONNECT W EST V IRGINIA ’ S C OMMUNITIES.
Welcome to Workforce 3 One U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration Webinar Date: March 18, 2014 Presented by: National Office of.
Provost’s Report Global Penn State: Our Ongoing Efforts to Be a Truly Global University Dr. Nicholas P. Jones Meeting of the Board of Trustees Friday,
UTPA 2012: A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-PAN AMERICAN Approved by President Cárdenas November 21, 2005 Goals reordered January 31, 2006.
Procurement Development Programs
Today’s Agenda The importance of a conversation
CPIC at the General Services Administration (GSA)
Transforming The Way We Think and Work
Meryem Demirci United Nations Statistics Division
What does the State GIS Coordinator do?
Research Program Strategic Plan
Session 5: Statistical Capacity Initiatives
Knowledge Translation
Deloitte Consulting LLP SCOOPS Session
Capacity Building for HMIS Leads
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems
Agenda Introductions What is a Unified Shelter Model?
Implementing the 2030 Agenda in the Asia- Pacific region, January 2019, Shanghai Institutional arrangements to facilitate coherence in sustainable.
NIU’s Progress Toward Engagement
Regional Operations Forum Setting the Stage
Presentation transcript:

“... providing timely, accurate, and useful statistics in service to U.S. agriculture.” NASS Methodological, Operational, and Structural Transformation Dr. Cynthia Clark, Administrator National Agricultural Statistics Service

COPAFS December 7, 2012 Vision Transforming the USDA’s National Agricultural Statistics Service to a statistical agency utilizing defensible survey and statistical methodologies to serve the agricultural sector. 2

COPAFS December 7, 2012 Required Changes Methodological Operational Structural 3

COPAFS December 7, 2012 Timeline of Activities Research Planning (8/08) Continuing Resolution (10/08 – 2/09) OE Business Case Development (2/09) OE Business Cases Approved (7/09) OE Project Plans Complete (12/09) OE Implementation Begins (1/10) 4

COPAFS December 7, 2012 Timeline (cont’d) Continuing Resolution (10/10-3/11) Field Restructure Team Chartered (3/11) House and Senate Marks reflect a 12% cut in programs Field Restructure Plan Approved (7/11) Agency Reorganization Approved by Department (8/12) 5

COPAFS December 7, 2012 Sparking Transformational Change Creating the impetus for change Identifying change leaders Establishing momentum for change 6

COPAFS December 7, 2012 Creating the Impetus for Change Surviving reduced Federal budgets – Reduce programs – Reduce data quality – Become more efficient – Reduce staffing 7

COPAFS December 7, 2012 Creating the Impetus (cont’d) Improving Operational Efficiency – Reduce cost of data collection and processing activities – Improve data quality – Enhance career opportunities for staff 8

COPAFS December 7, 2012 Organizational Culture Changes to how and where business was conducted. Shift culture from status quo to innovation. 9

COPAFS December 7, 2012 Identifying Change Leaders Six operational efficiencies championed by Senior Leaders 1.Enhanced research initiatives 2.Centralized LAN Services 3.Centralized databases and generalized applications 4.Computer Assisted Personal Interviewing (CAPI) 5.Centralized frames maintenance, forms processing, training, and telephone data collection 6.Training via Video Teleconferencing (VTC) technology 10

COPAFS December 7, 2012 Creating Momentum for Change Increased focus on the principles of a Federal statistical agency Long Range Plan 11

COPAFS December 7, 2012 Focus on Statistical Principles Principles for a Federal Statistical Agency – Relevance to Policy Issues – Credibility Among Data Users – Trust Among Data Providers – A Strong Position of Independence Office of Management and Budget Statistical Standards – Transparency – Reproducibility – Quality Measures 12

COPAFS December 7, 2012 Long Range Plan (LRP) LRP focused on four main areas – More opportunities for staff development – Aligning programs with traditional and developing agricultural needs – Increasing data products to support changing agriculture – Enhancing statistical foundation of the operational programs through research, innovation, and quality management 13

COPAFS December 7, 2012 Required Organizational Changes Advanced the application of statistical and survey methodology Changed how and where we do business Resulting structural changes 14

COPAFS December 7, 2012 Application of Methodologies Administrator support of an enhanced research agenda Increased presence of statistical practitioners Use of paradata and metadata for data collection and dissemination Advanced adoption of standardized quality assurance practices 15

COPAFS December 7, 2012 How and Where NASS does Business Adopted the use of Video Teleconferencing technology Centralized LAN services allowing work to be done centrally and locally Deployed tablet technology with wireless broadband for field data collection Developed a centralized data collection and processing center 16

COPAFS December 7, 2012 Resulting Structural Changes Streamlined decision making process by flattening the management structure Centralized budget and human resources functions to the Office of the Administrator 17

COPAFS December 7, 2012 Benefits to the Organization Increased interviewer training and outreach efforts Increased dissemination capabilities Publication of quality measures for statistical reports More active research program with operational ties 18

COPAFS December 7, 2012 Maintaining the Momentum Internal Momentum External Momentum Resulting 2013 Reorganization 19

COPAFS December 7, 2012 Maintaining the Momentum - Internal Proposed 2013 Reorganization – Budget driven based on House and Senate budget cuts – Recommended by a team from within Field Operations – Initially called for 9 regions, and no changes in HQ 20

COPAFS December 7, 2012 Maintaining the Momentum - External Administrator briefed NASDA partners in the fall of 2011 Secretary Vilsack presented the proposal to NASDA in February 2012 NASS leadership renegotiated MOUs with all NASDA partners – accomplished in only 5 months 21

COPAFS December 7, Reorganization Field Office Methodology Division 22

COPAFS December 7, 2012 Redistributes Field Operations Redesigns into 12 regional centers – Three additional regions were identified through external negotiations Maintains a strong presence in all current locations to support relationships with local constituencies Centralizes the majority of field staff into 12 locations allowing for broader career opportunities 23

COPAFS December 7, 2012 Establishes a Methodology Division Centralizes all operational survey and statistical methodology based positions in one unit Allows staff to have a broader experience with the program that they support Aligns the operational methodology staff with their counterparts in the research program 24

COPAFS December 7, 2012 Methodology Division (cont’d) 25

COPAFS December 7, 2012 Impact on Costs Reduced cost of training and meetings with VTC Reduced cost of servers and eliminated need for IT staff in field Eliminated duplicative systems Reduced manual, non quality controlled processing and data review 26

COPAFS December 7, 2012 Impact on Data Quality Centralized data collection and processing facilitates formal quality control Standardized, centralized processes reduces variability Digitized data enables real time survey cost monitoring Published measures of survey quality from generalized systems 27

COPAFS December 7, 2012 Impact on Budget Required an initial investment for the NOC, equipment, systems development Return on Investment expected by 2016 Reduced salary expense (~100 FTEs), computer equipment, travel Required funds for the cost of additional space at NOC 28

COPAFS December 7, 2012 Impact on Staff Created jobs requiring different jobs skills Eliminated many support positions Changed balance of positions in FOs, HQ, and NOC Reduced staff in NASS individual FOs Reduced number of NASDA telephone enumerators 29

COPAFS December 7, 2012 Impact on Structure Staff reductions have occurred with buyouts offered to meet budget targets Staff in FO and HQ have transitioned to the NOC Individual Field Offices are transitioning to a reduced staffing model 30

COPAFS December 7, 2012 Implications for NASS Survived reduced budgets while maintaining successful programs Allowed for the development of a centralized Census Editing Unit at the NOC Adjusted organizational culture Allowed field staff to work in a virtual environment during the transition to the proposed regional structure 31

COPAFS December 7, 2012 Outcomes of Transformation Streamlined, centralized organization Positioned to provide flexibility in services Enhanced career opportunities for staff Higher quality data 32