This poster reports on the efforts of the SunBay Digital Mathematics Project (SunBay) to create the links needed to use collaborative digital technology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Charles F. Vanover & George J. Roy 1, Zafer Unal, Vivian Fueyo University of South Florida St. Petersburg, Phil Vahey, SRI International The SunBay Digital.
Advertisements

MYP (Middle Years Programme).  m7oU.
Collaborative Evaluation Communities in Urban Schools.
ESTEEMS (ESTablishing Excellence in Education of Mathematics and Science) Project Overview and Evaluation Dr. Deborah H. Cook, Director, NJ SSI MSP Regional.
Structuring Retreats to Share Findings and Discuss Recommendations Paul Cobb and the MIST Team.
Participants will be provided with general information regarding PARCC and MAP. Participants will gain an understanding of PARCC and MAP.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Learning Goals, Scales and Learning Activities
Evaluating Professional Development Debbie Junk, Coordinator for Mathematics Initiatives Mathematics Project Directors’ Meeting Tuesday, October 9th Austin,
PISA Partnership to Improve Student Achievement through Real World Learning in Engineering, Science, Mathematics and Technology.
Technology Standards for Language Learners TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS FOR LANGUAGE TEACHERS.
Effects of Technology on Learning and Teaching: What the research tells us.
Co-Teaching as Best Practice in Student Teaching Data Collection Information 1.
Teacher Professional Development Programs in Grades 3-8: Promoting Teachers’ and Students’ Content Knowledge in Science and Engineering Beth McGrath &
A New Era Begins Common Core: The Future Begins Now.
Dr. Albrecht Research Team EXAMPLE of EVALUATIO N RESEARCH SERVICE LEARNING
So What Can I Expect When I Serve on an NEASC/CPSS Visiting Team? A Primer for New Team Members.
Consortia of States Assessment Systems Instructional Leaders Roundtable November 18, 2010.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Experiences and requirements in teacher professional development: Understanding teacher change Sylvia Linan-Thompson, Ph.D. The University of Texas at.
Developing teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching Challenges in the implementation and sustainability of a new MSP Dr. Tara Stevens Department of.
Instruction aligned to Iowa Core: What does it look like? #CCSS.
Schoolwide Preparation for English Language Learners: Teacher Community and Inquiry-Based Professional Development.
Nicole Paulson CCSSO Webinar March 21, 2012 Transition to the Common Core State Standards in Elementary Math.
Outreach to Districts and Schools ?Is there a drop down menu with three items, or does it go to a page on outreach, or both?
ENHANCING PARENT INVOLVEMENT IN NC-CCSS FOR K-2 MATHEMATICS AT P.W. MOORE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
The Impact of the Maine Learning Technology Initiative on Teachers, Students, and Learning Maine’s Middle School 1-to-1 Laptop Program Dr. David L. Silvernail.
CHOLLA HIGH MAGNET SCHOOL Plc Workshop
The Science Content, Conceptual Change, and Collaboration (SC4) Mathematics and Science Partnership - Maine U.S. Department of Education MSP Regional Meeting.
Longitudinal Study to Measure Effects of MSP Professional Development on Improving Math and Science Instruction.
Professional Development Activity Log: A New Approach to Design, Measurement, Data Collection, and Analysis AERA Annual Meeting San Diego April 13, 2004.
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
K-12 Mathematics in Rapid City Longitudinal Findings from Project PRIME Ben Sayler & Susie Roth November 5, 2009.
Chapter 8 Assessing Active Science Learning
Ensuring that Professional Development Leads to Improved Mathematics Teaching & Learning Kristen Malzahn Horizon Research, Inc. TDG Leadership Seminar.
Twilight Training October 1, 2013 OUSD CCSS Transition Teams.
Cooperative Learning Statistical Significance and Effect Size By: Jake Eichten and Shorena Dolaberidze.
Dr. Lesley Farmer California State University Long Beach
DVC Essay #2. The Essay  Read the following six California Standards for Teachers.  Discuss each standard and the elements that follow them  Choose.
CMP3 – Services Tiered Packages* PD Essentials PackagePD Fidelity PackagePD Growth Package Product Implementation Essentials Plus Product Implementation.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Technology in Mathematics –Key Learning from Research & Practice Dr. Pamela J. Buffington Education Development Center maine.edc.orgedc.org Technology.
WORKING TOGETHER TO IMPROVE SCIENCE EDUCATION PRESENTED BY GIBSON & ASSOCIATES A CALIFORNIA MATH AND SCIENCE PARTNERSHIP RESEARCH GRANT WISE II Evaluation.
Using Common Core State Standards of Seventh Grade Mathematics in the Application of NXT LEGO® Robotics for CReSIS Middle School Students.
Research and Evaluation Team Lines of Work Andy Porter, Director Building a Partnership – Susan Millar District Case Studies – William Clune Targeted Studies.
Quality Jeanne M. Burns, Ph.D. Louisiana Board of Regents Qualitative State Research Team Kristin Gansle Louisiana State University and A&M College Value-Added.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
CMP3 – Services Tiered Packages* PD Essentials PackagePD Fidelity PackagePD Growth Package Product Implementation Essentials Plus Product Implementation.
Florida Charter School Conference Orlando, Florida November, 2009 Clark Dorman Project Leader Florida Statewide Problem-Solving/RtI Project University.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
Past, Present, & Key to our Future. * In 1995 a survey was conducted across DE and it was found that the predominant form of Science Education was textbook.
Technology in mathematics education: Implications for professional development Alison Clark-Wilson UCL Knowledge Lab, University College London.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
AUTHOR: NADIRAN TANYELI PRESENTER: SAMANTHA INSTRUCTOR: KATE CHEN DATE: MARCH 10, 2010 The Efficiency of Online English Language Instruction on Students’
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
Developed in partnership with the Montgomery County Public Schools (MD), Forward is a K–5 instructional system of services, tools, and curriculum. Forward.
CaMSP Science Assessment Webinar Public Works, Inc. Sharing Lessons Learned in the Development and Use of Science Assessments for CaMSP Teachers and Students.
Aims of the meeting: to inform you about Year 6 SATs to inform you about Year 6 SATs to encourage you to support your child and make a significant difference.
Instructional Practice Guide: Coaching Tool Making the Shifts in Classroom Instruction Ignite 2015 San Diego, CA February 20, 2015 Sandra
Action Research for School Leaders by Dr. Paul A. Rodríguez.
Computational Reasoning in High School Science and Math
Evaluation of An Urban Natural Science Initiative
Smarter Balanced Assessment Results
Southern Regional Education Board Annual Leadership Forum
Building Academic Language
Building Academic Language
Milwaukee Public Schools University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Building Academic Language
Presentation transcript:

This poster reports on the efforts of the SunBay Digital Mathematics Project (SunBay) to create the links needed to use collaborative digital technology to improve the teaching and learning of conceptually focused middle school mathematics in a large, urban school district (SRI International & University of South Florida St. Petersburg, 2010). SunBay is a partnership among a college of education, a public university, a school district, and a non-profit research organization; each organization providing complimentary expertise to the project. The long- term goal of the project is to implement a dynamic, digital middle school mathematics curriculum that will democratize access to the complex mathematics of change and variation, and create a more coherent and fruitful mathematical experience for all learners, including those who have not traditionally been successful in mathematics. As such, SunBay intends to help pioneer the future of mathematics education by creating a national model where every middle school mathematics teacher in the participating district has the knowledge and support to use technology to become an effective teacher of dynamic mathematics. Method Conclusions Scaling Dynamic Mathematics Reform: Findings from the SunBay Pilot Study Charles F. Vanover & George J. Roy 1, Zafer Unal, Vivian Fueyo, Nicole D. Collier, University of South Florida St. Petersburg Phil Vahey, SRI International, Comparison of SunBay & Texas Pretest Scores The SunBay pilot study asked teachers to implement a curriculum unit that integrates dynamic technology. The unit had been field tested in Texas (Roschelle et al., 2010). All professional development (PD) offered to support implementation was based on an “inquiry stance on teaching” (Cochran-Smith & Lytle, 2001, p. 47). The summer workshops were adapted from a designed PD experience intended to immerse teachers in the unit’s mathematical and technical demands (Roschelle, et al. 2009). Teachers used their laptops to solve problems, and they discussed the mathematics underlying the software’s dynamic simulations. Teachers acted as learners and used digital technology to enact the curriculum’s core strategy (Predict, Check, and Explain) and deepen their knowledge of the unit’s underlying mathematical concepts. They answered questions in the unit’s paper workbooks. During the fall, teachers received technical assistance using the SimCalc MathWorlds® software and participated in monthly PD experiences designed to help them implement the unit and support deeper technological, pedagogical, and mathematical learning. Teachers rated the PD sessions highly, with an average rating of 4.5 on a 5 point scale across summer and fall. Teachers were found to implement the materials with good effect. Prior to implementation, a pre-test was administered to students; immediately after the unit was completed, a post-test was administered. The average pretest score of the SunBay students was statistically identical to the students (treatment and control) in the Texas study (Roschelle et al., 2010; SRI International & University of South Florida St. Petersburg, 2010). Gain scores to measure student learning were calculated by subtracting each student’s pretest score from their posttest score. A final analysis showed the SunBay students’ gain scores were also statistically identical to the SimCalc gain scores in Texas and both were significantly greater than the Texas control gain scores. There was a large and significant main effect in both studies with an effect size of 0.8 (See Figures 1 & 3). Consistent with previous studies (Vahey, Lara-Meloy, & Knudsen, 2009), there was no significant difference in mean student gain score across ethnicities including African-American, Asian, Caucasian, and Hispanic. These results indicate the curricular materials are effective regardless of student ethnicity or prior mathematics knowledge. The purposes of SunBay go beyond implementing software and replacement units. The collaborators intend to create a broad set of materials that allow the district’s students to achieve high rates of growth in their mathematical knowledge by regularly interacting with high quality learning technologies. Whereas the presented results show the promise of this approach, they raise important questions about the nature of professional development that might support such an undertaking both in the district and in other sites. How might computer supported collaborative learning environments be implemented broadly and fruitfully for all students’ benefit? At a time when this question is still unresolved (e.g. National Mathematics Advisory Panel, 2008), it is our commitment that work on SunBay will speak to the international research community and measurably benefit the public school students of the district we serve. Introduction Findings The SunBay pilot investigation was conducted according to the principles of mixed method research (Creswell, 2003; Tashakkdori & Teddlie, 2003). Team members collected different forms of data ranging from observation notes to student assessments in order to track the project’s progress over time. The goal of this effort was to construct a shared, empirically-based perspective—albeit with varying levels of agreement—about teachers’ response to the PD and their use of SimCalc MathWorlds® in the classroom. These data were analyzed as part of the SunBay team’s continuous improvement effort to adapt SimCalc to the local context, to gauge student learning of important mathematics, and to design professional development that met the teacher participants’ needs. Member checks were conducted with university, non-profit, district participants, and the 13 teachers. Table 1 lists the data collected in the SunBay pilot study. (1)Co-first authors. (2)Workbook Samples from SimCalc Mathworlds unit: Managing the Soccer Team:©SRI International. (3)Simulations: ©University of Massachusetts Dartmouth SunBay Digital Mathematics Project is supported by the Helios Education Foundation, the Pinellas County Schools, and the Pinellas Education Foundation. We recognize Dr. Susan Holderness, Jennifer Knudsen, Teresa Lara- Meloy, and Ken Rafanan for their work on the SunBay pilot. Acknowledgements SimCalc Mathworlds 1.5 hours into the trip 3 Workbook Sample: Managing the Soccer Team: On the Road 2 Comparison of SunBay & Texas Posttest Scores 2 hours into the trip