There is a well-recognized disconnect between K-5 classrooms and science and mathematics methods courses: Inservice teachers in K-5 classrooms often do.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Common Core State Standards: Opportunities and Challenges for the Mathematical Education of Teachers.
Advertisements

Inquiry-based Curriculum Reform from Faculty Learning Communities Nancy Shapiro and David May, University System of Maryland Philip Sokolove, University.
Riverpoint Partnership for Math and Science.  Who are we? A group of high school, college and university faculty from 7 school districts, 2 community.
The Cube Activity Kathy Sparrow & George O’Brien Florida International University Science Content & Methods Courses.
21 st Century Classroom ARRA Title IID, Priority 3, Competitive Technology Grant Presentors: Judi Allen, Director of Social Studies Michele Magner, Instructional.
Center of Excellence in Mathematics and Science Education Cooperative Partners College of Arts and Sciences College of Education Dr. Jack Rhoton East Tennessee.
Preliminary Results of the Conference on Teacher Research Experiences April 2005 Hosted by the University of Rhode Island Office of Marine Programs Funded.
Science Inquiry in Pennsylvania Elementary Classrooms Connections to the Standards and Opportunities for Professional Development. Kathleen M. Jones Assistant.
ALTC CONFERENCE 17 September Approach to Research and Teaching My research and scholarly writing have focussed on my teaching, the learning of students.
National Science Standards  Teachers of science plan an inquiry-based science program for their students.
Collaborating for Student Success Teacher Collaboration: Strategies & Outcomes ARCHES Seminar UC Irvine ~ 3/15/10 Ivan Cheng
A Mathematics Specialist Program: Its Structure and Impact on Practicing Elementary Teachers Nadine Bezuk & Susan Nickerson.
This work was supported in part by MSP grant # through the National Science Foundation. Opinions expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily.
Teacher Professional Development Programs in Grades 3-8: Promoting Teachers’ and Students’ Content Knowledge in Science and Engineering Beth McGrath &
Aerospace Education Services Project (AESP) William S. Carlsen, Director Pennsylvania State University.
Developing Professionals: Preparing Technology Teachers Developing Professionals: Preparing Technology Teachers ITEA Standards Specialist and CATTS Meeting.
Asynchronous Discussions and Assessment in Online Learning Vonderwell, S., Liang, X., & Alderman, K. (2007). Asynchronous Discussions and Assessment in.
SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS TEACHER INITIATIVE Improving the Undergraduate Pipeline to Math and Science Teaching Credentials Program Overview.
Outreach to Districts and Schools ?Is there a drop down menu with three items, or does it go to a page on outreach, or both?
Math Science Partnership Excellence In Mathematics Lanakila Elementary School Honolulu, HI.
Implementation of District- Wide Middle School Student Research Projects A Three Year Plan to Build Inquiry Skills and Create Sustained Vertical Articulation.
Research Experience for Teachers (RET) as Professional Development Dr. Fiona Goodchild Education Director, CNSI University of California Santa Barbara.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Illinois MSP Program Goals  To increase the content expertise of mathematics and science teachers; 4 To increase teaching skills through access to the.
Learning to Teach Elementary Science: From Preservice to Induction Change Associated with Readiness, Education, & Efficacy in Reform Science Dr. Betty.
West Kentucky Educational Cooperative Consortium for Innovations in Education.
DEBBIE FRENCH EDCI 5870 OCTOBER 30,  Title of research project:  “An Investigation of the NITARP/ SSTPTS Astronomy Research Experience for Teachers”
Evaluating the Vermont Mathematics Initiative (VMI) in a Value Added Context H. ‘Bud’ Meyers, Ph.D. College of Education and Social Services University.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
A NEW VISION FOR TEACHER PREPARATION IN MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE Beyond Bridging This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation.
THE DRAGON CONNECTION March Who are we?  Jefferson City Schools  Small, rural school district 60 miles north of Atlanta, 18 miles north of the.
Issues for Researchers Allan Feldman, UMass Amherst Jodie Galosy, Michigan State U Carole Mitchener, U of Illinois Chicago STEM Alternative Certification.
Where on the World Are You? Supporting & Developing School Based Math Teacher Leaders NCSM Conference, Washington DC April 21, 2009 Astrid Fossum, Mathematics.
Teacher Algebra Network: Our Model for Professional Development in Three Rural North Carolina Counties Presented by Katie J. Mawhinney and Tracie McLemore.
Debbie French EDCI 5870 November 13,  NITARP has never been evaluated.  Other research experiences for teachers (RETs) in astronomy as well as.
Urban Mathematics Education Leadership Academy Session 1 February 4-6, 2009 Dallas, TX.
Dr. Lesley Farmer California State University Long Beach
Table of Contents Professional Development School Pilot Study.
Bradford R. Findell, Ph.D. bradfindell.com. The Dominant View Many current education reform proposals focus on the recruitment, preparation, and evaluation.
RAJEE AMARASINGHE CSU FRESNO Institutionalization Changes in Policy and Practice Among Partners.
PhysTEC and the TIR: A Work in Progress S. Owen David A. Young.
Experiences and Third Spaces: A Model for Pre-Service Elementary Mathematics Teacher Education Marcy Wood, Erin Turner, Courtney Koestler University of.
Using SEC Data for Program Evaluation Report on SEC Data Analysis for a State MSP.
PRIMES Partnerships and Research Investigations with Mathematicians, Engineers, and Scientists Professional Development Model MSP Regional Meeting February.
National Lab Day and the MSP Program Jan Cuny National Science Foundation National Lab Day 1/13/09 National Lab Day and the MSP Program Jan Cuny National.
National Lab Day and the MSP Program Jan Cuny National Science Foundation National Lab Day 1/13/09.
ML evi ne CP ED Co nv en in g Ju ne  The Purpose  The People  The Process.
The New York State School Improvement Grant Initiative Five Years On Office of Professional Research & Development, Syracuse University, NY.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
 Algebra Preparedness for Higher Achievement Beyond the MSP: Project ALPHA’s Strategies for Institutional Change CAMSP Learning Network Meeting April.
® POSSIBILITIES FOR COLLABORATION: NCSSFL AND THE TITLE VI CENTERS Technical Assistance Workshop September 24, 2013 Washington, DC.
Conducting Professional Development Programme LEADING TO LEARN, LEARNING TO LEAD.
WORKING GROUP 8 DAY 2. Within The Department Start with grad students, new faculty, and the easy to convert Send to workshops, develop workshops, lesson.
Walter Doyle and Bruce Johnson University of Arizona Beyond Bridging NSF Award DRL
Curiosity-Based Knowing in Developing an Inquiry Stance in Teaching Mathematics Olive Chapman University of Calgary Canada.
Evidence… Policy Institutional Support and Facilitation Need to Change Learning and Implementing New Practices Facilitating the Learning and Implementation.
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
Engineering is Elementary Inservice PD Program Christine M. Cunningham Museum of Science, Boston.
Expanding and Generalizing Lesson Study for Improvement of the Quality of Teaching among APEC member economies Collaborative Studies on Innovations for.
Description of a Process for Enhancing Pre-service Programs to Better Prepare General Education Teachers to Teach Students with Disabilities 2016 CEEDAR.
An Introduction to Co-Teaching for Professional Development Schools:
Research Opportunities in AMSP UK Mathematics Education Retreat October 15, 2005.
MSP Summary of First Year Annual Report FY 2004 Projects.
Professional Development: Imagine Difference Shapes and Sizes
“An Impact School Partnership”
The professional Route to Licensure “There IS room for excellence!”
Chapter 9 Transforming Professional Practice
Twenty Questions Competency 10.
Report on SEC Data Analysis
Presentation transcript:

There is a well-recognized disconnect between K-5 classrooms and science and mathematics methods courses: Inservice teachers in K-5 classrooms often do not use the same kinds of problem-solving and inquiry teaching practices that mathematics educators advocate and preservice teachers may fail to engage in problem-solving and inquiry teaching practices when they become new teachers. Beyond Bridging: Co-Education of Preservice & Inservice Elementary Teachers in Science &Mathematics Award # DRL DR K12 PI Meeting Dec. 1-3, 2010 Washington, D.C. The Problem Attempts to bridge the void between K-5 classrooms and methods courses (many of which we have tried) have sought to both situate preservice teacher learning in K-5 classrooms and change K-5 classrooms to better reflect reform science and mathematics teaching practices. However, K-5 classrooms and the university methods courses remain separate communities of practice, with K-5 inservice teachers and preservice teachers constructing different meanings, practices, and identities around science and mathematics teaching. The bridge intended to connect the two communities provides few supports for overcoming the significant barriers to change in the practices of either community. Sequence We are designing a new model that moves beyond bridging, drawing from the construct of a third space (Gutierrez, Baquedano-Lopez, Alvarez, & Chiu, 1999; Moje, Collazo, Carrillo, & Marx, 2001) and the notion of boundary communities (Wenger, 1998). This new, transformational space is being created where IS and PS teachers, mathematics and science teacher educators, scientists and mathematicians come together to build new meanings, practices, and identities. Goals & Research Questions Bridges as Failed Solutions K-5 Teachers and Administrators University Science and Mathematics Preservice Teacher Educators Field Placements and Field Based Methods Courses Beyond Bridging: A Third Space Model Co-Education Community/Third Space Collaborative Design & Implementation Field-based, Co-designed Methods Courses Field Placements with Inservice Teachers in Ongoing Professional Development Program Long-term Apprenticeships with Teachers Mentoring Content Workshops Co-Education Community/Third Space Collaborative Design & Implementation Field-based, Co-designed Methods Courses Field Placements with Inservice Teachers in Ongoing Professional Development Program Long-term Apprenticeships with Teachers Mentoring Content Workshops K-5 Teachers and Administrators Scientists and Mathematicians University Science and Mathematics Preservice Teacher Educators 1. Develop and evaluate co-educational preservice teacher education experiences that emphasize inquiry-based science teaching and problem-solving mathematics. a. What connections do preservice teachers make between methods course experiences, their mentoring from inservice teachers, and classroom experiences? b. What do preservice teachers learn about inquiry-based science teaching and problem-solving mathematics? c. Which contexts and what experiences support preservice teacher learning? 2. Develop and evaluate co-educational professional development experiences for K-5 school teachers that enhance knowledge of mentorship and supports self examination of inquiry and problem-solving techniques. a. What connections do inservice teachers make between professional development, mentoring, and their own teaching? b. What do inservice teachers learn about mentoring and teaching through their participation? 3. Engage scientists and mathematicians to collaborate in the development of preservice and inservice offerings. a. What contributions do scientists and mathematicians make to the education of preservice teachers? b. What do scientists and mathematicians learn through participation in co-educational activities? ParticipantsSemester 1Semester 2SummerSemester 3Semester 4 Preservice Teachers Courses at UA Courses at elementary school, including mathematics methods Classroom fieldwork Courses at school, including science methods Classroom fieldwork Student teach at same school with one of the inservice teachers in the project Inservice Teachers PD on mentoring PD on Powerful Practices – mathematics Input on mathematics methods assignments Mentor preservice teachers PD on “Powerful Practices” – science Input on science methods assignments Mentor preservice teachers Mentor preservice teachers during student teaching Preservice & Inservice together Plan and implement problem-solving mathematics lessons (w/ teacher educators) Powerful Practices in Mathematics and Science Institute (plan unit) Plan and implement inquiry science lessons (w/ teacher educators) Implement “Powerful Practices” unit Mathematics & Science Teacher Educators Plan and implement PD, facilitate input on mathematics methods assignments Teach mathematics methods course, plan and implement PD, facilitate input on science methods assignments Powerful Practices in Mathematics and Science Institute (assist with unit plan) Teach science methods course Assist with implementing Powerful Practices unit Observe student teachers Work on revisions for years 3 & 4 Mathematics & Science Grad Students & Co- PIs Work in inservice teachers classrooms Attend inservice teacher PD Powerful Practices in Mathematics and Science Institute (assist with unit plan) Assist with implementing Powerful Practices unit Mathematics & science Co- PIs work with teacher educators on revisions for years 3 & 4 Partners University of Arizona College of Education PI – Bruce Johnson Project Director – Molly Romano Key faculty – Erin Turner, Kristin Gunckel, Marcy Wood, Walter Doyle, Maura Varley, Courtney Koestler Graduate students – Elsa Schaub, PC Hseih, Philip Stevens Tucson Unified School District Co-PI -- Margaret Shafer Science specialist – Marleen Lyon Mathematics specialist – Melinda Radon Cragin Elementary School Davidson Elementary School University of Arizona College of Science Dept of Mathematics Co-PI -- Marta Civil Dept of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology Co-PI -- Katrina Mangin Contact PI: Bruce Johnson