Björn Zapfel UNFCCC Secretariat JI Sub-Programme Joint Implementation Track 2 UNFCCC Technical Workshop on Joint.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
JI Governance – review of JI Guidelines
Advertisements

UNFCCC secretariat, SDM Olof Bystrom, Programme Officer Module 1.4 JI Project Cycle - Status of Implementation 1st SDM Joint Coordination Workshop Bonn,
Development and Prospects for JI UNFCCC Side Event November 30, 2005 Hiroshi YAMAGATA Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry JAPAN.
The Monitoring Mechanism of greenhouse gas emissions from the European Community Hartmut Behrend European Commission DG ENV.C.2, Brussels.
1 CF Assist Activities in Central and Eastern Europe Helmut Schreiber Annual Meeting of the Host Country Committee on Carbon Finance February 15-16, 2005.
James Grabert Manager, Joint Implementation, UNFCCC secretariat Joint Implementation Overview & Status Kyoto Protocol and Carbon Market.
Background and mandate of the new Task Force on POPs Richard Ballaman Chairman of the Working Group on Strategies and Review.
UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION.
Eastern Europe: Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Russia, Ukraine, Romania, Bulgaria, Macedonia, Albania, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Slovenia,
Ms. Daniela Stoycheva Chair of the JISC COP/MOP 2, Nairobi 14 November 2006 JI Track 2 procedure and its role in JI Track 2 projects UNFCCC Side Event.
Idea’ for JISC Maurits Blanson Henkemans Netherlands Montreal.
Joint Implementation & Gas Flaring Reduction Projects Alexandrina Platonova-Oquab Carbon Finance Unit, World Bank.
1 Georg B ø rsting Chair of the JI Supervisory Committee Joint Implementation 1-3 April 2008 Bangkok, Thailand AWG-KP 5 In-session workshop on means to.
Accreditation of Independent entities under JI - Status of JISC work Georg B ø rsting UNFCCC Technical Workshop on Joint Implementation, 9-10 March 2006.
Climate Change - International Efforts. Direct Observation of Climate Change Source: IPCC 4AR.
Knowledge Management LXV International Council Meeting Qawra, Malta 16 th - 23 rd of March 2014.
1 Andrew Howard Climate Change Secretariat Emissions trading and project-based mechanisms 1-3 April 2008 Bangkok, Thailand AWG-KP 5 In-session workshop.
Climate Change and the Clean Development Mechanism
Joint implementation, eligibility and the Compliance Committee Andrew Howard, Reporting Data and Analysis Cam Carruthers, Legal Affairs Bonn, October 2007.
State, Trends and Barriers to Carbon Finance in RBEC Marina Olshanskaya Regional Energy/Kyoto Protocol Specialist RBEC Energy and Environment Practice.
EXPERT GROUP ON AMMONIA ABATEMENT: Expectations of WGSR Richard Ballaman, Chairman Working Group on Strategies and Review Seventh meeting April 2006,
JOINT IMPLEMENTATION MECHANISM IN BULGARIA J I MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND WATER 26 May 2004 Daniela Stoycheva – National Focal Point on CC, BULGARIA.
Status of Joint Implementation and Green Investment Scheme Vlad Trusca Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development Romania - Annual meeting of.
TÜV SÜD Industrie Service GmbH Determinations with regard to a JI track 2 Nairobi, 14 th November 2006 JI-SC side event at COP/MOP Thomas Kleiser TÜV SÜD.
Cooperative Mechanisms UNFCCC secretariat JI under UNFCCC - An overview -
Motoharu Yamazaki Project-based Mechanisms UNFCCC secretariat JI under UNFCCC - An overview -
Björn Zapfel UNFCCC secretariat JI small-scale projects Fourth meeting of the Joint Implementation Supervisory.
Francisco Arango UNFCCC secretariat Draft JI LULUCF PDD form (incl. guidelines for users) Fourth meeting of the.
CDM Project Cycle & Project Design Document Project Design Document First Extended & Regional Workshops CD4CDM Project Siem Reap, Cambodia March.
ICM Bodrum 24 th October AA Workshop Legal Research Group.
Baseline Setting and Monitoring: Sectoral Approaches Joint Implementation Expert Workshop, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change 9 March.
Björn Zapfel UNFCCC secretariat JI section JI Track 2 Project Cycle Side event at COP/MOP 2: “JI Track 2 Project.
ELSA as the Franchise? LXV International Council Meeting Qawra, Malta 16 th - 23 rd of March 2014.
Fatou Gaye Chair of Joint Implementation Supervisory Committee (JISC) Question and Answer Session – CMP 3 Nusa Dua (Bali), Indonesia, 4 December 2007 Joint.
Barriers to the Successful Implementation of Kyoto Mechanisms (JI/CDM) in CEE and CIS Countries Marina Shvangiradze Ministry of Environment Protection.
Map - Region 3 Europe.
ELSA Summer Law Schools IV KAM Prague, 3rd to 7th September 2014.
TÜV SÜD Group Carbon Management Service Methodology and Project Development – Notions of a DOE Methodology and Project Development – Notions of a DOE PCF.
Canada’s CDM & JI Office First UNFCCC Workshop on the Implementation of Article 6 Projects Under the Kyoto Protocol May , 2004 Moscow, Russia Canadian.
The European Law Students’ Association Albania ˙ Austria ˙ Azerbaijan ˙ Belgium ˙ Bosnia and Herzegovina ˙ Bulgaria ˙ Croatia ˙ Cyprus ˙ Czech Republic.
Introduction to the Project Cycle Jane Ebinger Senior Energy Specialist Sustainable Development Department The World Bank.
Policy, normative base and experience of Kyoto Protocol implementation in Bulgaria and other Central European Countries Daniela Stoycheva Consultant emissions.
JISC work on Small Scale JI Projects UNFCCC Technical Workshop on Joint Implementation Bonn 9 th March 2006 By: Fatou Ndeye Gaye and Evgeny Sokolov.
Update on Methodological Issues Annual Meeting of the Host Country Committee Köln, May 2006.
Francisco Arango UNFCCC secretariat JI section Joint Implementation State of Play UNFCCC Technical Workshop on.
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS Unit 2 Business Development GCSE Business Studies.
Best Sustainable Development Practices for Food Security UV-B radiation: A Specific Regulator of Plant Growth and Food Quality in a Changing Climate The.
JISC – work accomplished and challenges ahead
European Union Duy Trinh.
DISTRIBUTION AUTOMATIC - GENERATION
Dr. Popi KONIDARI Research Fellow of KEPA Prof. Dimitrios MAVRAKIS
The 1680 Family’s Reach.
Eligibility issues and joint implementation
Baseline setting and monitoring under Joint Implementation
GLEB planning 05 March 2018.
Progress in Implementation Process
The European Parliament – voice of the people
The European Parliament – voice of the people
“GHG Data – 2006” Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Data for 1990–2004
EU: First- & Second-Generation Immigrants
European Union Membership
Session 1 Guidelines for projects under Article 6 of the Kyoto Protocol First UNFCCC workshop on implementation of Article 6 projects under the Kyoto Protocol.
New voting rules in Regulatory Committe
JISC from COP/MOP 1 to COP/MOP 2 UNFCCC Technical Workshop on JI
Joint implementation and eligibility requirements
Development of determination and verification manual (DVM)
Joint implementation programmes of activities (JI PoA)
Work Accomplished by JISC
Prodcom Statistics in Focus
UNFCCC Technical Workshop on Joint Implementation
Presentation transcript:

Björn Zapfel UNFCCC Secretariat JI Sub-Programme Joint Implementation Track 2 UNFCCC Technical Workshop on Joint Implementation Bonn, Germany – 16 October 2007

Joint Implementation Track 2 JI Track 1/Track 2 Eligibility requirements (ERU issuance, transfer and acquisition) Party to the Kyoto Protocol Assigned amount calculated National registry in place for tracking assigned amount National system in place for estimating emissions/removals Submission of most recent required emissions inventory Accurate accounting of assigned amount and submission of information Participation requirements (e.g.) : Designated focal point National guidelines and procedures Track 2 procedure Verification procedure under JISC Track 1 procedure Verification procedure according to host Party rules

Joint Implementation Track 2 JI Supervisory Committee Joint Implementation Supervisory Committee Establishment of JISC:CMP 1 Basic role:Operationalization and supervision of JI Track 2 procedure * Resignation as JISC member as of 2 May 2007 ** Resignation as JISC alternate member as of 15 August 2007 MembersAlternate members Annex I (EIT) Mr. Oleg PluzhnikovMr. Evgeny Sokolov Ms. Daniela StoychevaMs. Astrida Celmina Mr. Vlad TruscaMr. Matej Gasperic Annex I (Non-EIT) Mr. Olle BjörkMr. Franzjosef Schafhausen Mr. Maurits Blanson HenkemansMr. Hiroki Kudo Mr. Georg Børsting (Vice-Chair)(Mr. Darren Goetze)** Non-Annex I Mr. Jaime BravoMr. Marcos Castro Rodriguez Ms. Fatou Gaye (Chair)Mr. Vincent Kasulu Seya Makonga (Mr. Shailendra Kumar Joshi)*Mr. Maosheng Duan Non-Annex I (AOSIS) Mr. Derrick OdersonMs. Yumiko Crisostomo

Joint Implementation Track 2 Mandates of the JISC CDM experience Similarities Differences No approval of methodologies No project registration No ERU issuance by the JISC No limitation of LULUCF projects to afforestation and reforestation Mandates of the JISC Legal basis: “Marrakesh Accords” (Decision 9/CMP.1 ) “Montreal decision” (Decision 10/CMP.1 ) “Nairobi decisions” (Decisions 2/CMP.2 & 3/CMP.2 ) Mandates: Rules of procedure Accreditation of independent entities Criteria for baseline setting and monitoring Provisions for small-scale projects JI project design document (PDD) form(s) Reviews Provisions for fees Management plan Reporting to the CMP

Joint Implementation Track 2 Status of work of the JISC 2006: operationalization of JI Track 2 procedure Launch of JI Track 2 procedure on 26 October : operation/supervision of JI Track 2 procedure

Joint Implementation Track 2 JI Track 2 project cycle Project development Preparation and publication of PDD by project participants/AIE

Joint Implementation Track 2 Baseline setting / monitoring Baseline setting and monitoring Basis: Criteria for baseline setting and monitoring in appendix B of JI guidelines Guidance agreed on by JISC:  Baseline: on project-specific basis and/or using multi-project emission factor  Project participants allowed, but not obliged, to use approved CDM baseline and monitoring methodologies  Additionality: various approaches possible Provisions for small-scale projects agreed on by JISC:  JI SSC definitions: like for CDM SSC project activities (non-A/R) – revised by CMP 2  Main difference to CDM approach: No limits on bundling

Joint Implementation Track 2 JI Track 2 project cycle (cont.) Project development Preparation and publication of PDD by project participants/AIE 30 days: stakeholders’ comments

Joint Implementation Track 2 Stakeholders’ comments (status) 84 PDDs published for stakeholders’ comments (8 open for comments) Host Parties: Bulgaria (7 PDDs) Estonia (4) Germany (1) Hungary (1) Latvia (1) Lithuania (6) Poland (4) Romania (2) Russian Federation (41) Slovakia (1) Ukraine (16) Technologies: Renewable energy (biomass, wind, hydro) Methane avoidance (gas distribution, landfills, coal mine) Destruction of nitrous oxide from chemical processes (nitric acid production) Energy efficiency (manufacturing industries, district heating) Fuel switch (manufacturing industries, transportation, power generation) Emission reductions : ~ 145,000,000 t CO 2equ

Joint Implementation Track 2 JI Track 2 project cycle (cont.) Project development Preparation and publication of PDD by project participants/AIE 30 days: stakeholders’ comments Participation requirements Project approval by host Party Fees (advance payment)

Joint Implementation Track 2 Participation requirements (status) Designated Focal Point National guidelines and procedures Austria Belarus* Belgium Bulgaria Canada Czech Republic Denmark European Community Finland France Germany Hungary Ireland Italy Japan Liechtenstein Designated Focal Point National guidelines and procedures Lithuania Luxembourg Netherlands New Zealand Poland Portugal Romania Russian Federation Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Ukraine United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland * The CMP, by its decision 10/CMP.2, adopted an amendment to Annex B to the Kyoto Protocol, adding Belarus to it.

Joint Implementation Track 2 JI Track 2 project cycle (cont.) Preparation and publication of Determination by AIE Possible review by JISC 45 days: decision on review request by Parties involved/ individual JISC members, supp. by 2 JISC members’/alternates’ appraisal (incl. expert inputs) Project development Preparation and publication of PDD by project participants/AIE 30 days: stakeholders’ comments Participation requirements Project approval by host Party Fees (advance payment)

Joint Implementation Track 2 Determinations (status) Determinations regarding PDDs First determination deemed final on 26 March 2007 (“Switch from wet-to-dry process at Podilsky Cement”): Host Party: Ukraine Emission reductions : ~ 3,000,000 t CO 2equ Second determination published on 11 September 2007 (“Rehabilitation of Dolna Arda Hydropower Cascade”): Host Party: Bulgaria Emission reductions : ~ 270,000 t CO 2equ

Joint Implementation Track 2 JI Track 2 project cycle (cont.) Preparation and publication of Determination by AIE Possible review by JISC Preparation and publication of monitoring report by project participants/AIE Preparation and publication of Determination by AIE Possible review by JISC 45 days: decision on review request by Parties involved/ individual JISC members, supp. by 2 JISC members’/alternates’ appraisal (incl. expert inputs) 15 days: decision on review request by Parties involved/ individual JISC members, supp. by 2 JISC members’/alternates’ appraisal Project developmentProject implementation Issuance of ERUs by host Party (conversion of AAUs/RMUs) Transfer of ERUs by host Party and acquisition of ERUs Carbon Market Preparation and publication of PDD by project participants/AIE 30 days: stakeholders’ comments Participation requirements Project approval by host Party Fees (advance payment) Fees Project approval by non-host Party (at the latest) Eligibility requirements

Joint Implementation Track 2 Further information