Emission control potentials in non-EU countries Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) EMEP Centre for Integrated Assessment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
From CESSDA to European Research Infrastructure Developments in cross-European data sharing.
Advertisements

Magician or Math-a-magician?. Math Magic Math Magic – Trick #1 Pick a number… any number! (keep it a secret though) Add 1 to that number Multiply by.
UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION.
Eastern Europe: Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Russia, Ukraine, Romania, Bulgaria, Macedonia, Albania, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Slovenia,
Emission control scenarios for EU and non-EU countries M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, J. Cofala, C. Heyes, Z. Klimont, W. Schöpp, F. Wagner Meeting of.
National work with the GAINS model: experiences from Sweden and other countries Работы в рамках модели GAINS на национальном уровне: опыт Швеции и других.
The potential for further reductions of PM emissions in Europe M. Amann, J. Cofala, Z. Klimont International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
The Clean Air For Europe (CAFE) program: Scientific and economic assessment Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
Application of air quality strategies of Western Europe for modeling of the transboundary air pollution impact on the Russian Federation with the GAINS.
Baseline emission projections for the EU-27 Results from the EC4MACS project and work plan for the TSAP revision Markus Amann International Institute for.
Baseline emission projections for the revision of the Gothenburg protocol All calculations refer to Parties in the EMEP modelling domain Markus Amann Centre.
Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
EXPERT GROUP ON AMMONIA ABATEMENT: Expectations of WGSR Richard Ballaman, Chairman Working Group on Strategies and Review Seventh meeting April 2006,
The impacts of the UN/ECE protocols on PM emissions in Europe Preliminary results of a study conducted for the PMEG Meeting, Dessau, March 10, 2006 with.
Name, event, date Rob de Jong United Nations Environment Programme/
(R14) (R14) European Culture: Language(s). Today’s Standard describecultural characteristicsEurope SS6G11 The student will describe the cultural characteristics.
Mitigation of primary PM emissions Overview of existing technical and non- technical emissions mitigation techniques M. Amann, J. Cofala, Z. Klimont International.
Visa-free Travel for Turkish Nationals: Readmission and beyond Istanbul, 28 May 2014 Brussels, 2 October 2013.
Fuels and Vehicles in CEE Region Regional Meeting on Sustainable Transport Policies in South Eastern Europe Budapest, June 2007 Ruslan Zhechkov,
BC Reporting under the CLRTAP Dr Chris Dore – Aether Emily West – Environment Canada (Robert Wankmueller – CEIP)
RoTAP Chapter 7 European and Global Perspective 4-5 December 2008.
Katarina Mareckova, Robert Wankmueller, Marion Pinterits TFEIP, ETC ACM 14 May 2013, Istanbul Status of emission reporting Gridded Emissions and LPS.
Cost-effective measures to achieve further improvements of air quality in Europe ( focus on key measures in the EECCA and Balkan countries) Based on presentation.
EUROPE.
Doing Business in Europe Bay Area CITD Seminar Series Tuesday, September 21st, 2004 Kemarra Inc. - Key Marketing Resources & Associates San Francisco USA.
Baseline emission projections for the revision of the Gothenburg protocol Markus Amann Centre for Integrated Assessment Modelling (CIAM) International.
Janusz Cofala and Markus Amann Centre for Integrated Assessment Modelling (CIAM) International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Application.
Management Policies in the Region: A Comparative Analysis Professor L D Mee University of Plymouth, UK.
Data sources for GAINS Janusz Cofala and Stefan Astrom.
Europe Research PowerPoint Each group (2-3) must choose two countries from Europe and create a PPT that teaches their classmates about those nations.
Preparations for the review of the Gothenburg Protocol Report to the WGSR September 2006 Markus Amann et al., EMEP Centre for Integrated Assessment Modelling.
Map - Region 3 Europe.
Map Quiz #7 Review World Geography Mr. Wofford. Map Quiz #7 Review Continents, Oceans, Seas, Deserts, Mountains U S A North America South America.
European Union. Refresher  Market: the interaction of buyers and sellers exchanging goods and services  Trade: the process of buying, selling, or exchanging.
Europe. Albania AL Austria Belarus Belgium.
An outlook to future air quality in Europe: Priorities for EMEP and WGE from an Integrated Assessment perspective Markus Amann Centre for Integrated Assessment.
Social Studies: Europe & Russia Lesson 34 Practice & Review
IIASA workshop on GAINS and Key measures - a summary Laxenburg June 2011 Janusz Cofala and Stefan Astrom.
Computer Class – Summer 20092/21/2016 3:45 AM European Countries Albania Andorra Austria Belarus Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina Bulgaria Croatia Czech.
Baseline and MTFR scenarios EECCA and Balkan countries Janusz Cofala and Stefan Astrom.
Inventory issues – Gothenburg Protocol – RAINS TFIEP Workshop on Emission Projections Thessaloniki, Greece, October, 2006 Zbigniew Klimont EMEP Centre.
Geography Review On Map 1, please identify: -Spain -France -England -Russia -Ottoman empire -Persia -China -Mughal India -Songhai Empire.
Emep Co-operative programme for monitoring and evaluation of long-range transmissions of air pollutants in Europe Convention on Long-range Transboundary.
1 Belgrade report – Transport Meeting with the Working GRoup on Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Geneva 28 November 2006 Jan Karlsson.
Eurostat Latest developments at EU level and relation with Eurostat's energy statistics United Nations Oslo Group on Energy Statistics Aguascalientes (Mexico),
France Ireland Norway Sweden Finland Estonia Latvia Spain Portugal Belgium Netherlands Germany Switzerland Italy Czech Rep Slovakia Austria Poland Ukraine.
AllianceSymbol Alliance 1:  Strong military  Weak economy  Unlimited government (dictator) Alliance 2:  Strong military  Strong economy  Limited.
Joint Action on Reducing Alcohol Related Harm RARHA NDPHS ASA EG Murmansk, 3-4 April 2014.
Progress under the Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution and its Protocols Henning Wuester Secretariat of the United Nations Economic Commission.
Convention on Long-range Trans-boundary Air Pollution
Preparations for the revision of the Gothenburg Protocol
Zissis Samaras Professor
The European Parliament – voice of the people
The European Parliament – voice of the people
Намалување на загадувањето на воздухот со електромобилност
European survey respondents by region.
Three policy scenarios for CAFE
Markus Amann, CIAM Status of the RAINS model development for the review of the Gothenburg Protocol.
Adriatic Persian Gulf Map Test #1 Answers.
Adoption, adaptation and applicability of the Global Curriculum in Medical Oncology. Adoption, adaptation and applicability of the Global Curriculum in.
Adriatic Persian Gulf Map Test #1 Answers.
Draft Baseline Scenarios for CAFE
Indirect tax and brexit
Z.Klimont, J.Cofala EMEP Centre for Integrated Assessment Modelling (CIAM) Variability in emission parameters of ozone precursors’ emissions in the GAINS.
The Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution
12 unique solutions allowing for transformations
J. Cofala, Z. Klimont, F. Wagner, M. Amann
The Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution
Prodcom Statistics in Focus
The Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution and its Protocols Henning Wuester Secretariat of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.
Presentation transcript:

Emission control potentials in non-EU countries Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) EMEP Centre for Integrated Assessment Modelling (CIAM)

Status of ratifications of the Gothenburg Protocol as of May 24, 2007, Parties in the GAINS model domain EU PartiesOther Parties 20 ratifications7 not ratified2 ratifications11 not ratified BelgiumAustria*NorwayAlbania BulgariaEstoniaSwitzerlandBelarus CyprusGreece*Bosnia-H. Czech RepublicIreland*Croatia* DenmarkItaly*Montenegro FinlandMaltaRep. Moldova FrancePoland*Russia GermanySerbia HungaryTFYR Macedonia LatviaTurkey LithuaniaUkraine Luxembourg Netherlands Portugal Romania Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden UK*) signed but not ratified

Analysis for non-EU countries that have not ratified the Gothenburg Protocol Baseline projection: –National activity projections supplied by Russia (2002), Ukraine (2004) –1996 energy projection used for Gothenburg Protocol for Albania, Belarus, Bosnia-H., Croatia, TFYROM, Serbia-M. “With measures” scenario: –FGD for new and retrofit of 50% of old plants in 2020 –Low sulphur fuels (1% heavy fuel oil, 0.1% light fuel oil, 0.05% diesel –Industrial processes: -50% SO 2, -40% NO x, and current EU PM emission standards for new Member States –Primary NO x measures for boilers –Euro 4/IV for diesel and gasoline vehicles –Improved electrostatic precipitators for large boilers

Emission projections Baseline projection and “with measures” scenario

Emission control potentials for SO 2

Emission control potentials for NO x

Emission control potentials for PM

Loss in statistical life expectancy due to anthropogenic PM2.5 Baseline projection 2020 With measures scenario 2020

Loss in statistical life expectancy due to anthropogenic PM2.5

Potentials of major control measures compared to 2020 baseline projection FGD for new plants: -40% SO % S diesel: -10% SO 2 Euro-4 for passenger cars: -13% NO x, -2% PM2.5 Euro-IV for heavy duty vehicles: -8% NO x, -4% PM2.5 EU PM emission limit values for new Member States for stationary sources: -16% PM2.5 In 2020, implementation of these measures would reduce health impacts from PM by 40 percent. In addition, major health improvements would result from a phase-out of solid fuels in households