COUNTRY Quality and Completeness of the R-PIN Ownership by both the government and relevant stakeholders Consistency between national strategies & REDD.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
19-20 September 2013, IBGE, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Advertisements

PRESENTATION OUTLINE Introduction Climate change initiatives Capacity Challenges.
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Biodiversity and Sustainable Forest Management GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop March 22 – 24, 2011 Kyiv, Ukraine.
INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE. 2 Implemented in 12 countries of Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, through IUCN regional.
A forest of hope conserving the Maya Forest of Belize, Guatemala and Mexico a capacity-building partnership.
Safeguarding Biodiversity and Communities: Lessons Learned in the Context of the World Bank Safeguard Review World Bank/ IMF Spring Meetings 2015 April.
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – multilateral REDD-plus financing program GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop April 5 – 7, 2011 Da Lat, Vietnam.
Operationalising Carbon Finance in Ghana. Roundtable Meeting November 2008 The Role of Governance and Institutions in REDD Operationalising Carbon.
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility R-PP Preparation DRIVERS OF DEFORESTATION AND DEGRADATION August, 13 – 14, 2009.
Basic Considerations  outlines the process by which the Government of Kenya will develop its national strategy for participating in an evolving international.
Challenges, Opportunities and Recommendations for private sector participation in REDD+ Erastus W. Wahome, Ministry of Finance – Kenya, 2 nd April 2012.
Uma Tenure and Regulatory Reforms: Lessons and Future Steps in Asia September
Katoomba Group Training Initiative Climate Change, Markets and Services Welcome and Introduction Course Introduction and Guidelines Participant Introduction:
Regional highlights of R-PINs Africa Region FCPF Steering Committee Meeting Paris, July 9 and 10, 2008 By FCPF Technical Advisory Panel Forest Carbon Partnership.
GEF and Environmental & Conservation Funds Presentation for the Workshop on “Management of Environmental Funds for the Financial Sustainability of Biodiversity.
The TNA Process in Costa Rica Experiences and lessons learned Francisco Sancho Advisor TNA
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – multilateral REDD-plus financing program GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop 25 – 27 October 2011 Nairobi, Kenya.
Regional highlights of R-PINs Asia Region FCPF Steering Committee Meeting Paris, July 9 and 10, 2008 By FCPF Technical Advisory Panel Forest Carbon Partnership.
Presentation by Alfred N. Gichu Kenya’s REDD+ Readiness.
Berau Forest Carbon Project / BFCP
INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE The conservation context: What are the natural assets of Lao & the region? Integrating business skills into.
Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in Asia Bangkok, Thailand 7-8 April 2009 Tracking national portfolios and assessing results.
The GEF in Mexico Integrating GEF Programmes and Strategies at Country Level Cape Town, August, 2006.
Bhola Bhattarai General Secretary, FECOFUN 25 September, 2009 Bangkok Community Perspective in REDD Mechanism.
Global Action Plan and its implementation in other regions Meeting for Discussion of the draft Plan for the Implementation of the Global Strategy to Improve.
COUNTRY Quality and Completeness of the R-PIN Ownership by both the government and relevant stakeholders Consistency between national strategies & REDD.
Improve Forest Law Enforcement and Governance in the Mekong Region World Bank-FLEG – Todd Sigaty ASEAN ASOF 2009.
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Participants Committee Meeting (FCPF PC3) Montreux, Switzerland, June 16-18, 2009 Panama’s REDD Readiness-Plan Technical.
World Bank - Forest Carbon Partnership Facility: REDD+ Readiness and Country Needs Alexander Lotsch Forest Carbon Partnership Facility The World Bank
The Use of Market Instruments to Pay for Environmental Services in Costa Rica presented by Luis Gamez Advisor, Ministry of Environment of Costa Rica Beijing,
PRESENTED BY: RAHIMA NJAIDI MJUMITA 3 RD APRIL 2012.
Biodiversity and Ecosystem Accounting Initiatives in Uganda Ronald Kaggwa (NEMA) Bright Kimuli (UBOS)
The Forest Carbon Partnership Facility FCPF Consultations with Indigenous Peoples and Forest Dwellers: Main Messages and Follow up Steering Committee Meeting.
Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa Accra, Ghana, 9-11 July 2009 Tracking National Portfolios and Assessing Results.
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Global Dialogue on Developing a Readiness Preparation Proposal August 13-14, 2009 Structure of the R-PP template Review.
“POLICY AND CHALLENGES ON ENVIRONMENT IN MONGOLIA – GEF COOPERATION” By J. Enkhsaikhan GEF Political Focal Point for Mongolia GEF Constituency Meeting.
Session 4 Mainstreaming Climate Change Adaptation and Biodiversity Conservation in National, Sectoral and Donor Strategies.
Sustainable Fertilizers Production and Use Faustin MUNYAZIKWIYE Director/ Climate Change and International Obligations in REMA REPUPLIC OF RWANDA NAMA.
Developing Incentives for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD) The Readiness Mechanism Some ideas for your consideration next steps.
FORESTRY GOVERNANCE AND CLIMATE CHANGE IN THE CONTEXT OF COMMUNITY FORESTRY IN NEPAL Yuba Raj Bhusal Krishna P. Acharya Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation.
U.S. Office: 1877 Garden Avenue Eugene, Oregon USA.
Integrating GEF in Environment and Sustainable Development Plans and Policies - – Jamaica’s Experience GEF CSP Sub-regional Workshop for Caribbean Focal.
Aimin Wang Sustainable Forestry Program Officer Global Environmental Institute April 26 nd 2007 "Regulating Chinese Forest-related Enterprises" Encouraging.
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Participants Committee Meeting (FCPF PC3) Montreux, Switzerland, June 16-18, 2009 Guyana’s REDD Readiness-Plan Technical.
LAC Land Agenda: Secure property rights, access and spatial development Land Policies for Growth and Poverty Reduction (Deininger 2003)—importance of secure.
REDD+ Guiana Plateau project First Steering Committee Meeting Paramaribo, 6 August 2013 Rene Somopawiro SBB, Suriname.
R-PLAN and REDD activities Review Lao PDR Flag of your country.
0 National Inter-Ministerial Dialogue on Climate Change Cape Hotel Monrovia, Liberia June 25, 2009 Assessing and Developing Policy Options for Addressing.
REDD+ FOR THE GUIANA SHIELD Technical Cooperation Project Initiatives around REDD+ in French Guiana Fanny MISS, ONF 6 th August st Steering Committee,
Building REDD+ for People and Nature panda.org/forestclimate Oslo, 28 October 2013 Paul Chatterton Deputy Leader WWF Forest and Climate Programme.
Commission proposal for a new LIFE Regulation ( ) Presentation to Directors Meeting DK 22 May 2012.
Where and how can REDD+ deliver most benefits? Lera Miles, UNEP-WCMC 7 December 2015.
Economic Development livelihoods Conservation Forest values Biodiversity Protected areas Poverty reduction REGIONAL INVESTMENT FORUMS WEST AND CENTRAL.
Duncan Marsh The Nature Conservancy Inter-American Development Bank June 7, 2007 Reducing Deforestation in Developing Countries: Critical Issues and Directions.
Local Governance Anti-Corruption & REDD in Latin America and the Caribbean.
2.4 COMMUNITY FORESTRY: Lessons Learned of Relevance to Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD+) Tom Blomley Lusaka, Tuesday February.
NATIONAL REDD+ SECRETARIAT Zonal Level REDD+ Awareness Creation Workshop MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FOREST Tigray Regional State, Mekele September 3 &
A Brief History of REDD + Regional REDD+ Coordination Unit Tigray Regional State,Mekelle Sep 3 & 4/2015 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FOREST NATIONAL REDD+
REGIONAL DIALOGUE ON THE ENVIRONMENT
GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop
Partnering to Measure Forest Carbon
a capacity-building partnership
Kenya’s REDD+ Readiness Activities
a capacity-building partnership
Bradley Reed USGS Climate and Land Use Change
GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop
Indonesia’s Readiness-Plan Technical Advisory Panel Review
Guidance on Natura 2000 and Forests – Scoping Document
Peru Draft R-PP: Initial comments by the TAP
Presentation transcript:

COUNTRY Quality and Completeness of the R-PIN Ownership by both the government and relevant stakeholders Consistency between national strategies & REDD Strategy Completeness of information & data provided Clear responsibility for execution of REDD Bolivia HighStrong ownership by several ministries and indigenous peoples In line with National Development Plan, sustainable forest management and benefit sharing by indigenous peoples CompleteTwo coordinating committees created to start REDD activities Costa Rica Overall high quality. Slightly confused presentation of deforestation data. Global leader. Extensive consultations. In line with national system of payments for environmental services and national ban on conversion of forests. Complete.Clear. Guyana HighHigh political support, with strong intl NGO involvement. Consultations on R-PIN. Strongly linked to national sustainable forest management strategy CompleteShould be further specified. Mexico High Strong buy-in from forestry and environment agencies, but no consultations beyond that REDD is part of the National Climate Change Strategy. But potential conflict with ag. programs CompleteClear within forest sector, but not across sectors. Latin America – Sheet 1

COUNTRY Feasibility of proposal & likelihood of success Relevance of country in REDD context Variety of approachesGeographic and biome balance Bolivia Potential conflict between internal relocation of population and conservation policies. Good experience from Noel Kempff project. Among the top deforesting countries in the world. Strong international proponent of REDD. High indigenous focus. Mix of command and control and financial incentives. Tradable deforestation permits for soy industry. Amazonian and Andean regions Costa Rica Builds on national system of payments for environmental services and first experience with forest carbon finance REDD provides a complementary or substitute source of revenues for the domestic tax on hydrocarbons. Costa Rica built its tourism industry on forest protection. Good chance to test REDD through payments to individuals and communities Most varied forest types in Meso-America. Guyana Good track record in concession management. Also conservation concessions. High forest cover and low deforestation country. Forest economy and high timber value. REDD could finance maintenance of existing carbn stocks and econ. dvlment Guyana considering creation of carbon and biodiversity reserves Amazonian and Guiana Shield Mexico Strong institutional and financial framework to build on, however governance issues still remain Mexico loses 350,000 ha of forest every year. Second largest emitter from deforestation in Latin America. Track record in community forestry. Payments for environmental services. Use of Mexican Forest Fund to guarantee projects. Temperate and tropical forests. Endemic conifers. High diversity. Latin America – Sheet 2

COUNTRY Quality and Completeness of the R-PIN Ownership by both the government and relevant stakeholders Consistency between national strategies & REDD Strategy Completeness of information & data provided Clear responsibility for execution of REDD Nicaragua Good attempt but disconnection between problem description and proposed REDD strategies Adequate for this stage. REDD strategy is beign designed as part of the new forest policy Limited data available but national forest inventory is starting. Description provided but unclear coordination Panama HighHigh, as illustrated at the April 2008 international workshop REDD directly builds on national environmental strategy CompleteANAM has a clear mandate. Decentralization of protected areas to indigenous peoples. Latin America – Sheet 3

COUNTRY Feasibility of proposal & likelihood of success Relevance of country in REDD context Variety of approachesGeographic and biome balance Nicaragua Currently limited but could improve with international technical assistance for the new forest program. Though Nicaraguan forests are small on a global scale, they are important on a regional scale and provide key livelihoods of some indigenous peoples Very general descriptionMeso-American corridor Panama Strong thanks to integration in current policies Good demonstration country for REDD Based on ongoing national programs, in particular watershed management. Leader in protected area management and devolution of forest management to indigenous communities Meso-American corridor Latin America – Sheet 4