Community-Based Corrections Generally CBC Generally Offender Selection The State of Modern CBC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Punishment and Sentencing
Advertisements

Criminal Justice Process: Sentencing & Corrections
Chapter 15 Sentencing Options
Sentencing Structure Comparisons Barb Tombs July 16, 2007 Presentation to the CT Sentencing Task Force Subcommittees.
Issues Facing the Criminal Justice System
Residential Community Supervision Programs
CRJS 318 Web Site
Criminal Justice Process: Sentencing and Corrections 1. Sentencing Options 2. Purposes of Punishment 3. Parole 4. Capital Punishment 5. Corrections.
Poli 103A California Politics Crime and Punishment II: Race and Crime.
CHAPTER EIGHT SENTENCING.
Mass Incarceration Civic Academy Crime and Punishment in Louisiana Statewide Issues Conference Saturday, February 15, 2014.
1 Components of Criminal Justice PoliceCourtsCorrections The Criminal Justice System Components of Criminal Justice Components of Criminal Justice.
The New Technology of Community Corrections James Byrne Lecture.
Sentencing and Punishment
Chapter 11 Punishment and Sentencing
BY TANYA MARIA GOLASH-BOZA Chapter Eleven: Racism and the Criminal Justice System.
The City of Philadelphia Prison System John F. Street, Esq. Mayor Leon A. King, II, Esq. Commissioner.
Punishment & Sentencing Chapter 10 in Your Textbook John Massey Criminal Justice.
Chapter 15: Criminal Justice Process ~ Sentencing & Corrections Objective: The student should be able to list the various options to sentencing & identify.
Intro to Law Criminal Process: Sentencing. Sentencing Options Suspended Sentence – given, but does not have be served at that time, but may have to serve.
PURPOSES AND PRINCIPLES OF SENTENCING. Goals of Sentencing  In Section 718 of the Criminal Code a statement is found that gives judges some direction.
AJ 50 – Introduction to Administration of Justice
Chapter 40 Rehabilitation. Objectives Identify the major factors that affect criminal behavior Explain the role of correctional treatment programs in.
Chapter 3 Sentencing Trends and Incarceration Introduction (1 of 2)  There are about 2 million incarcerated in prisons and jails  Rate of growth slowing.
Clear & Cole, American Corrections, 8 th Chapter 18 Incarceration Trends.
Probation Supervision and Information Gathering Presentence Reports.
Role of the Courts Court decides what sentence should be imposed on the offender. The Judge or magistrates decide on an appropriate punishment in each.
1 CRJS 4476 Lecture #2. 2 Sentencing key here is in understanding the difference key here is in understanding the difference between the conviction and.
Criminal Justice Today CHAPTER Criminal Justice Today, 13th Edition Frank Schmalleger Copyright © 2015, © 2013 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Crime and Criminal Justice Chapter 1. Crime has evolved with the nation: The Civil War produced widespread business crime. From 1900 to 1935 the nation.
Chapter 4 Sentencing and punishment. In this chapter, you will look at the purposes and process of sentencing and the different factors affecting a sentencing.
 A: Indeterminate Sentencing: punishment where judge gives a minimum or maximum sentence. ◦ Parole: early release from prison after serving a part of.
Welcome to unit What’s New? Announcements Questions - Concerns.
AS Level Law Machinery of Justice Sentencing. AS Level Law What you need to know and discuss: the need for a criminal justice system the main aims of.
1. Explain retribution to deter crime At one time the primary reason for punishing a criminal was RETRIBUTION. This is the idea behind the saying “an.
Purpose of Punishment Corrections. Retribution – An eye for an eye; a tooth for a tooth. – Society, through the criminal justice system, taking on the.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE INTRO TO CORRECTIONS. WHAT IS CORRECTIONS? Corrections is that portion of the criminal justice system charged with carrying out the sentences.
Sentencing and Corrections. Once Found Guilty, a defendant will be sentenced by a jury or judge.
Law & American Society Criminal Justice Process: Sentencing & Corrections.
Vocabulary  Retribution- Theory that includes harsh punishment for criminals, such as long prison sentences and uncomfortable prison conditions.  Rehabilitation-
Sentencing and Corrections. Judges Options Suspended Sentence: Sentence is given but is not imposed until the defendant messes up again (arrested or violates.
Criminal Justice Process:
Introduction to Criminal Justice Sentencing, Appeals, and the Death Penalty Chapter Nine Bohm and Haley.
Chapter 1 The Goals of Correctional Policy Corrections Content: Jails, probation, prisons, parole Context: Democracy, bureaucracy Goals: Fairness (law)
Chapter 14 Prevention and Corrections in the Community 1.
Understanding the Criminal Justice System CJUS 101 Community-Based Corrections.
Corrections: Wassup with that?. What is Corrections? Agencies and programs that carry out the sentence of the court  Institutional Corrections = prisons/jails.
Dealing with Lawbreakers
Chapter 5 Intermediate Sanctions 1.  Intermediate sanctions emerged in the 1980s due to three factors: The belief that prisons were being overused Prison.
Youth Criminal Justice Act. to prevent youth crime to have meaningful consequences and ensure accountability for youth crime to improve rehabilitation.
SENTENCING AND CORRECTIONS CHAPTER 15 PAGES
Sentencing and the Correctional Process
Understanding the Criminal Justice System CJUS 101: Chapter 10 Sentencing, Appellate Review, and the Penalty of Death.
Criminal Law for the Criminal Justice Professional Norman M. Garland Third Edition Copyright © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
State Sentencing Policy Roundup Carl Reynolds Director, Office of Court Administration, Austin Texas.
Community Corrections What happens when a prisoner is released?
Modern Correctional Philosophy. Performance Objectives Refer to POST performance objectives Refer to POST performance objectives.
BCJ 3150: Probation and Parole
Prison Population and Prison Closures in Pennsylvania
Crime and Deviance.
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
C H A P T E R T H R E.
COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS
Chapter 5 Intermediate Sanctions: Between Probation and Incarceration
C10: Punishment and Sentencing
Criminal Justice Process: Sentencing & Corrections
CLU 3MR Lesson 65.
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Warm Up (use 5.1) 1. What is deviance?
CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROCESS: SENTENCING AND CORRECTIONS
Presentation transcript:

Community-Based Corrections Generally CBC Generally Offender Selection The State of Modern CBC

What Is CBC?

Intermediate Sanctions and CBC Recall:

What are Intermediate Sanctions? What are IS?

CBC Objectives

Community Protection Offender Selection Criteria Restrictions (IS) and Level of Control Rules and Rules Enforcement

Rules and rules enforcement tend to deter criminal activity and identify, before crime, persons at risk for criminality.

Fairness and Justice

Fairness and Justice AKA: Proportionality Punishment should fit the crime Aggravating and mitigation circumstances Apply the right amount of just deserts

Should an offender who works and obeys the law, but continues to have problems with drugs, be sent to prison?

Rehabilitation and Reintegration Rebuilding community ties – Family, Job, Friends, Education Why are these things important?

Rehabilitation Rehabilitation is based on the premise that crime and delinquency are:

“Healthy” Community Organization Examples

Why are “healthy” community offerings important?

What happens when offenders are barred from normal social roles?

Labeling Theory

Practical Implications Programs that avoid stigmatizing offenders and enable them to maintain ties to the larger community could be expected to encourage responsible, law-abiding behavior.

Reintegration Reintegration, to be effective, must be:

Restorative and Community Justice

Cost Effectiveness Prison: About $18,000 - $25,000 per year Probation: About $1,400 per year Effective TX: About $12,000 - $14,000 year

Cost Effectiveness cont’d 28,000 VA inmates X $22,000 = $616,000,000 per year 40,000 P&P Cases X $1,400 = $ 56,000,000 per year 7,000 Selected Inmate Cases X $14,000 = $ 98,000,000 per year Savings: $155, $98,000,000 = $57,554,000 per year PLUS Less Crime

Cost Effectiveness cont’d  TX pays for itself.  Fact:

Offender Selection

Offender Selection Tools Presentence Report Risk and Needs Assessments Sentencing Guidelines

Who Uses Sentencing Guidelines?

Sentencing Guideline Purpose

History of SG in Virginia  Historical widespread inequities  Voluntary sentencing guidelines  75% compliance rate by judges

Truth In Sentencing – Number f federal prisoners increased 46% to 75% – Result: 60% increase in corrections spending

Important Concepts Collective Incapacitation: Selective Incapacitation:

Important Concepts Determinate Sentencing: Indeterminate Sentencing -

Important Concepts

The State of Modern Community Corrections

Get Tough On Crime Result of War On Drugs – National crackdown on drug use – Massive increases in law enforcement and prosecutions

Get Tough On Crime Effect – Increase in drug users in prison – Limited prison space for violent and property offenders – Huge increases in correctional spending – DOC became largest agency in many states

Get Tough on Crime

Some Bright Spots  Greater focus on violent offenders  Law authorized federal mandatory minimum for minor drug offenders  Federal money to states for prisons tied to – Evidence of balanced approach Rehabilitation, TX, Education Diversion, Drug Courts, Post Release Assistance

Less Bright Spots  Limited federal court authority to remedy prison overcrowding  Permitted double bunking of maximum security inmates  Most states maximized incarceration – Proliferation of sentencing enhancements for all  Parole abolition

Sentencing Enhancements Three strikes and you’re out For All Truth in sentencing (Serve 85% of time) For All Sentencing Guideline enhancements

Prison Admissions Implication?

Collective Incapacitation Criticisms If collective incapacitation were effective, crime reduction would have been greater. – Serious offenders were already incarcerated – Longer sentences incapacitate offenders after criminal career ended or greatly diminished – Drug offenders leave prison with broader criminal expertise – Middle class assumption prison is equal deterrent to all groups

Reality of Incapacitation Policy

Cost and Consequences of Incarceration Policy Cost – Economic, Social, Educational, Health and Public Safety Consequences If Trend Continues – Raise taxes or reduce Funding in almost all other areas

International Perspective  US places disproportionate emphasis on physical punishment in CCJ policy.  US reliance on collective incapacitation is not based on demonstrated success.

What Are The Alternatives?  Reintroduce Indeterminacy In Sentencing  Focus On Alternatives To Incarceration  Remove Lesser Offenders From Prison Especially Drug Offenders

Solution: Back To CBC CBC can provide protection Rehabilitation and enforcing restrictions costs $ Most offenders respond to the right program match CBC is the best cost effective alternative

Conclusion Public safety concerns dominate correctional planning. Resolution of offender problems and needs may be the best long-term solution to public safety problems and crime prevention.