Broadband Guideline 2002.3.6 Takashi Arano APNIC WG-BB Chair.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

IPv6 allocations to closed networks LACNIC VI Mar 29 – Apr 1, 2004 Montevideo, Uruguay.

Advertisements

Axel Pawlik. LACNIC III, November 2002, Mexico City. 1 6bone Address Registry Proposal Axel Pawlik / Mirjam Kühne RIPE NCC.

Experimental Internet Resource Allocations Philip Smith, Geoff Huston September 2002.

Large Space IPv4 Trial Usage Program for Future IPv6 Deployment ACTIVITIES UPDATE Aug. 29, 2001 Kosuke Ito IPv6 Promotion Council of Japan.

Who cares about abuse? Rodney Tillotson, JANET-CERT APNIC, August 2001 United Kingdom Education & Research Networking Association.

A S I A P A C I F I C N E T W O R K I N F O R M A T I O N C E N T R E APNIC NIR Meeting What is an NIR? Paul Wilson, APNIC.

A S I A P A C I F I C N E T W O R K I N F O R M A T I O N C E N T R E BOF: Network Abuse APNIC 12 th Open Policy Meeting Taipei, TW, 30 August 2001.

JPNIC IPv6 agent service APRICOT2000 Seoul, South Korea Masayoshi Toya JPNIC secretariat 2000/3/1 Copyright(C) Japan Network Information Center.

APNIC Policy SIG1 4 th APNIC Address Policy SIG Report August 31, 2001 Takashi Arano Address Policy SIG Chair.

Copyright (c) 2002 Japan Network Information Center Introduction of JPNICs New Registry System Izumi Okutani IP Address Section Japan Network Information.

Introduction of JPNIC Open Policy Meeting Japan Network Information Center Ruri Hiromi(IP address committee) Yuka Suzuki(JPNIC secretariat) NIR Meeting.

Policy SIG report 29 February 2008 APNIC 25, Taipei Toshiyuki Hosaka Randy Bush Jian Zhang.

From recent discussions in MAEMURA Akinori JPNIC IP Committee / FTLD Address Policy SIG at 13 th APNIC Open.

JPNIC Update Toshiyuki Hosaka Japan Network Information Center (JPNIC) NIR SIG APNIC Indonesia.

11 th Policy SIG Report Takashi Arano Kenny Huang Toshiyuki Hosaka Chair/co-chair of APNIC Address Policy SIG.

APNIC 13March APNIC 13 Bangkok Status Report Ray Plzak.

1 13 th Policy SIG Report Kenny Huang Toshiyuki Hosaka Eugene Li Chair/co-chair of APNIC Address Policy SIG.

Major Activities in JPNIC Since APNIC17 Izumi Okutani Japan Network Information Center NIR 18, Fiji 31 August – 3 September, 2004.

A Proposal for a Revised Policy Development Process (prop-001-v001) APNIC16 – Address Policy SIG Seoul, Korea 20 August 2003.

RFC 2050 Working Group. Background Addressing policy is obviously important Documenting that policy is crucial Todays Addressing policy is complex But.

APNIC Update AfriNIC 11 November Overview Services status Policy developments Priority activities Next meetings.

Doc.: IEEE /516r0-I Submission September 2002 Robert Moskowitz, ICSALabsSlide 1 RADIUS Client Kickstart Robert Moskowitz, ICSALabs John Vollbrecht,

IPv6 Deployment in Japan Takashi Arano Intec NetCore, Inc. ICANN ASO Address Council Board member of the IPv6 Forum Co-chair, International.

R I P E N e t w o r k C o o r d i n a t i o n C e n t r e. h t t p : / / w w w. r i p e. n e t. n c r i p e. n e t 1 The Internet Registry System IPv4.

APNIC Open Policy Meeting: August 2001 IP Addressing Policy for GPRS Mobile Terminals On behalf of GSM Association By: Kim Fullbrook, 3G & GPRS Network.

CATV/xDSL WG panel. Since the Last Address Policy SIG …. Formed a consensus to have a working group for CATV/xDSL assignment guideline. Called for wg.

CMPT 275 Software Engineering

Copyright (c) 2006 Japan Network Information Center Comments from JP on “End site allocation policy for IPv6” (prop-033-v001 ) Izumi Okutani Japan Network.

Update about the “SHOULDs Analysing Project” in RIPE Policy Documents “Should” we use the RFC 2119 Defined Language in RIPE Policy Documents? Jan Žorž,

Senior Project Paper Senior PAPER STYLES Express and Reflect express or reflect on your own life experiences. Often looking backwards to look forwards.

IDNIC-NIR UPDATE STATUS PRESENTATION

Doc.: IEEE /0357r0 Submission March 2011 Marc Emmelmann, Fraunhofer FOKUSSlide 1 A focused path torwards TGai D1.0 Date: Authors:

1 Overview of policy proposals Policy SIG Wednesday 26 August 2009 Beijing, China.

Argumentative Thesis Statements For use with Stepping Stone Argumentative Research Project.

1 WRITING A THESIS STATEMENT ENGLISH 115 Hudson Valley Community College Marvin Library Learning Commons.

60 Recommended Draft Policy ARIN Anti-hijack Policy.

APNIC Policy SIG1 5 th APNIC Address Policy SIG Report March 7, 2002 Takashi Arano Address Policy SIG Chair Asia Global Crossing.

Proposal of “Time-Limited” IPv4 Address Allocation Policy Project leader : Jun Murai Project officiers: –Hiroshi Esaki –Akira Kato –Osamu Nakamura –Masaki.

Copyright © 2008 Japan Network Information Center JPNIC's review of IPv4 address transfer  Izumi Okutani  Japan Network Information.

Policy implementation and document status report Address Policy SIG APNIC 15, Taipei, Taiwan 27 February 2003.

A S I A P A C I F I C N E T W O R K I N F O R M A T I O N C E N T R E APNIC Update RIPE 40 Prague, 1-5 October, 2001.

Address Policy SIG, APNIC Policy meeting, February 27th, 2003 (1) IPv6 Policy in action Feedback from other RIR communities David Kessens Chairperson RIPE.

IP Policy in APNIC and What about TWNIC ? Kuo-Wei Wu.

Developing IPv6 Address Guidelines Izumi Okutani Japan Network Information Center Address Policy SIG Aug 2003, Seoul.

A Review of Policy Development Processes in the Asia Pacific Region Address Policy SIG APNIC 15, Taipei, Taiwan 27 February 2003.

JPNIC Open Policy Meeting Update Yuka Suzuki IP Department Japan Network Information Center (JPNIC) NIR Meeting Aug. 21st, 2003.

Izumi Okutani JPNIC IP Department NIR Meeting Feb 2004 JPNIC Open Policy Meeting Update.

Criteria for the Recognition of NIRs in the APNIC Region NIR Meeting APNIC14, Kitakyushu, Japan 4 Sept 2002.

An Update to the IPv4 Guideline Yi Lee Digital United Inc. (Seednet) Mars Wei NCIC (Sparq*) By IPv4 Guideline Working Group.

Policies for ASN Management in the Asia Pacific Region – Revised Draft Address Policy SIG APNIC14, Kitakyushu, Japan 4 Sept 2002.

Introductions and Conclusions CSCI102 - Systems ITCS905 - Systems MCS Systems.

17 th APNIC Open Policy Meeting APNIC IPv6 Address Guidelines Akira Nakagawa )/ POWEREDCOM Billy MH Cheon / KRNIC Toshiyuki.

Global IPv6 Address Interim Policy Draft Open Issues and Discussion Summary Address Policy SIG / 13 th APNIC Meeting Kosuke Ito Global IPv6 Interim Policy.

Copyright (c) 2002 Japan Network Information Center Proposal for IPv6 Policy for Essential Infrastructure in the AP region Izumi Okutani IP Address Section.

I-NAMES Corporation Database Privacy Policy Database Policy SIG, APNIC Meeting at Taipei, Taiwan Lee, Seung-Min.

8 th Address Policy SIG Report Takashi Arano Yong Wan Ju Kenny Huang Chair/co-Chairs of APNIC Address Policy SIG.

Director of Registration Services

Report of Open NIR Meeting

2002/9/3 Ruri Hiromi (JPNIC IP Committee/Intec NetCore, Inc.)

Recommended Draft Policy ARIN : Post-IPv4-Free-Pool-Depletion Transfer Policy Staff Introduction.

Registration deadline has passed, what now?

6th Address Policy SIG Report

A SPEAKER’S GUIDEBOOK 4TH EDITION CHAPTER 26

The Current Issues in IPv6 Policy

Izumi Okutani (JPNIC) Terence Zhang (CNNIC)

Report from NIR SIG (APNIC16)

Kuniaki Kondo IRR Workshop Chair, JPNIC IIJ

Report on the NIR fee WG discussions

IPv6 Policy Update ~ APNIC community ~

The use of no LBT for DRS is not justified by history

Presentation transcript:

Broadband Guideline Takashi Arano APNIC WG-BB Chair

History : KRNIC raised an issue : Consensus reached for the necessity of a guideline. WG-BB was created : Some basic points were agreed : WG in off-line meeting drafted a proposal – : The WG draft was discussed and accepted generally except some points : Bangkok meeting today… Already TWO years passed!

Remaining Points at the Taipei meeting 1) customer list – Draft: APNIC/NIR may require applicants to submit a customer list – Argument: It may not be always a good thing to force the applicants to submit this kind of list because of information security. 2) assignment justification – Draft: 1:1 static is OK. If you need more, you should justify fully as we usually do. – Argument: It is too restrictive because now many household have more than one PCs. 3) registration threshold – Draft: You should register for assignment shorter than /30. For /30 or longer, it is optional. – Argument: /30 is too small. Why not /28

Discussion summarized in WG (I) 1) customer list – Some people strongly disagree with submission obligation. – On the other hand, registries need more clear evidence to justify the number the applicant submits. WG suggestion – APNIC/NIR may require applicants to submit a customer list or something equivalent to demonstrate the applicant has used the addresses.

Discussion summarized in WG (II) 2) assignment justification – It is difficult to summarize this. Many people have pointed out there are more than one PC in one household these days – but this seems not give enough reasons to skip justification for /29 or something. WG suggestion: – Let's keep the original proposal and make the guideline ASAP. Original: 1:1 static is OK. If you need more, you should justify fully as we usually do. – In parallel, we should continue to discuss this issue.

Discussion summarized in WG (III) 3) registration criteria – Although a proposal to change /29 to /28 was raised at Taipei meeting, no more opinions seem to follow this. WG suggestion: – /29 should be the threshold, i.e. assignment to network should be registered, as the original proposal mentioned.

Two proposals come after the Taipei meeting Both are from Japanese community (i.e. JPNIC Open Policy Meeting) – Maemura-san will present their idea thereafter.

Discussion Points Remaining issues Issues from JP as an additional proposals We need such guideline ASAP, even if it is not perfect. (Chairs suggestion)