RFC 2050 Working Group Ray Plzak ARIN On behalf of Mark McFadden.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Axel Pawlik. 4 th ASO GA Meeting, 24 April 2003, Santiago. Open Policy Process in the RIPE Region Axel Pawlik RIPE NCC.
Advertisements

ICANN ASO Address Council LACNIC III Mexico City, November 2002.
Internet Resource Policy Evaluation Process. facilitates the advancement of the Internet through information and educational outreach allocates Internet.
Address Council Operations Santiago, Chile – April 2003.
Address Council Hartmut Glaser LACNIC VI Montevideo – March 2004.
IPv6 allocations to closed networks LACNIC VI Mar 29 – Apr 1, 2004 Montevideo, Uruguay.
Kuala Lumpur February 2004 APNIC 17 Kuala Lumpur February 2004 APNIC 17 IPv4 /8 Address Space Status.
Axel Pawlik. LACNIC III, November 2002, Mexico City. 1 6bone Address Registry Proposal Axel Pawlik / Mirjam Kühne RIPE NCC.
La Habana - Cuba 18 November 2003 LACNIC V La Habana - Cuba 18 November 2003 LACNIC V IPv4 /8 Address Space Status.
Internet Number Resource Status Report As of 30 September 2004.
Montevideo 31 DE MARZO 2004 LACNIC VI Prepared By NRO (APNIC, ARIN, LACNIC, RIPE NCC)
The Regional Internet Registry System RIR 101 Ciudad de México November 2002 LACNIC III Overview Evolution Structure Activities and Functions IP Address.
March 2010 Internet Number Resource Report. INTERNET NUMBER RESOURCE STATUS REPORT As of 31 March 2010 March 2010.
Internet Number Resource Status Report As of 31 March 2006.
Internet Number Resource Status Report As of 31 December 2004.
Internet Number Resource Status Report As of 31 March 2005.
1 IP Policy update - comparative status in all RIR regions Policy SIG 7 Sep 2006 APNIC 22, Kaohsiung, Taiwan Save Vocea.
Current practices in managing IPv4 address space Survey Update Policy SIG Feb APNIC19, Kyoto, Japan.
IPv6 Resource Management System Project Update Bangkok, 4 March 2002.
1 RIR Policy Development Update Policy SIG 8 Sep 2005 APNIC20, Hanoi, Vietnam Save Vocea.
IPv6 Transition for Enterprises Light Reading Live 14 July 2011 John Curran President and CEO ARIN.
Deploying IPv6: The time is now Are you ready? SFTA 24 May 2012 John Curran President and CEO, ARIN.
Disruption (and Recovery) of the ISP Business Model with IPv4 Depletion PTC12 15 January 2012 John Curran President and CEO, ARIN.
ARIN IP Address Stewardship 3 February About ARIN Regional Internet Registry (RIR) – Established December 1997 by Internet community 100% community.
RFC 2050 Working Group. Background Addressing policy is obviously important Documenting that policy is crucial Todays Addressing policy is complex But.
Introduction to ARIN and the Internet Registry System.
Policy Proposals: AfriNIC-10 Public Meeting Vincent Ngundi AfriNIC PDP-MG Chair AfriNIC-10, Cairo, Egypt.
R I P E N e t w o r k C o o r d i n a t i o n C e n t r e. h t t p : / / w w w. r i p e. n e t. n c r i p e. n e t 1 The Internet Registry System IPv4.
CATV/xDSL WG panel. Since the Last Address Policy SIG …. Formed a consensus to have a working group for CATV/xDSL assignment guideline. Called for wg.
APNIC Update Paul Wilson Director General. Overview Priorities in 2009 IPv4 exhaustion IPv6 deployment Security Internet Governance Priorities in 2010.
IPv4 Depletion IPv6 Adoption 3 February /8s Remaining.
IP Address Management The RIR System & IP policy
1 CS 4396 Computer Networks Lab The Internet. 2 A Definition On October 24, 1995, the FNC unanimously passed a resolution defining the term Internet.
Transition of U.S. Commerce Department’s National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) Stewardship of the IANA Functions to the Global.
1 The Internet Introductory material. An overview lecture that covers Internet related topics, including a definition of the Internet, an overview of its.
APNIC Policy SIG1 5 th APNIC Address Policy SIG Report March 7, 2002 Takashi Arano Address Policy SIG Chair Asia Global Crossing.
1 ARIN: Mission, Role and Services John Curran ARIN President and CEO.
Address Policy SIG, APNIC Policy meeting, February 27th, 2003 (1) IPv6 Policy in action Feedback from other RIR communities David Kessens Chairperson RIPE.
ARIN Registry Update Richard Jimmerson Director of External Relations.
Policy Proposal to amend ARIN IPv6 assignment and utilization requirements ARIN XVI Los Angeles October 2005.
1 The Internet Introductory material. An overview lecture that covers Internet related topics, including a definition of the Internet, an overview of its.
1 IPv4 Depletion and Migration to IPv6 John Curran Chairman American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
A proposal for an APNIC document editorial policy (prop-002-v001) Address Policy SIG APNIC 16, Seoul, Korea 21 August 2003.
RFC 2050 Working Group Presentation by Cathy Wittbrodt Packet Design Original presentation by Mark McFadden University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee.
Filiz Yilmaz IGF 2006, Athens RIPE Policy History Focusing on IPv4 Filiz Yilmaz Policy Development Officer
ICANN Regional Outreach Meeting, Dubai 1–3 April Toward a Global Internet Paul Twomey President and CEO 1 April 2008 ICANN Regional Meeting 1–3.
ARIN VCalgary, Canada Members Meeting Agenda April 5, :30 Doors Open - Continental Breakfast 9:00 Meeting Called to Order 9:05 Adoption of Meeting.
Address Supporting Organization Seoul, Korea – August 2003.
30 April 2003 ITU SG2, Geneva, Switzerland Axel Pawlik, RIPE NCC Information Document 21-E ITU-T Study Group 2 May 2003 Question:1/2 Source:TSB Title:The.
1 The Internet Introductory material. An overview lecture that covers Internet related topics, including a definition of the Internet, an overview of its.
Rob Blokzijl. RIPE 61 Rome, November RIPE Réseaux IP Européens Rob Blokzijl RIPE Chairman
Internet Protocol Addresses What are they like and how are the managed? Paul Wilson APNIC.
1 The Internet Introductory material. An overview lecture that covers Internet related topics, including a definition of the Internet, an overview of its.
A S I A P A C I F I C N E T W O R K I N F O R M A T I O N C E N T R E Emerging Registry Criteria ASO General Assembly Budapest, 19 May 2000.
1 The Internet Registry System Mirjam Kühne RIPE NCC EC-POP Brussels 5 July 1999.
ICANN ASO Address Council Status Report APNIC 14, Open Policy Meeting Kitakyushu, Japan September 5 th, 2002.
Advisory Council Shepherds: David Farmer & Chris Grundemann Global Policy for post exhaustion IPv4 allocation mechanisms by the IANA.
Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-01.txt.
Mirjam Kühne. AfNOG Conference, 11 May Operational Co-ordination in the RIPE Region presented by: Mirjam Kühne RIPE NCC.
IP Address Management The RIR System Nurani Nimpuno APNIC.
IPv6 Adoption Status and Scheduling for Sustainable Development 24 July 2012 Nate Davis Chief Operating Officer, ARIN.
1 WSIS – a Stakeholder’s View from the Internet Address Community Paul Wilson Director General APNIC.
September, 2003 Bill Woodcock Packet Clearing House
René Wilhelm & Henk Uijterwaal RIPE NCC APNIC21, 18 September 2018
2002/9/3 Ruri Hiromi (JPNIC IP Committee/Intec NetCore, Inc.)
IP Statistics Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total /24 Equivalents Issued*
Status of IPv6 Addresses and Address Management
The Internet Introductory material.
IPv6 distribution and policy update
ICANN ASO Address Council
Presentation transcript:

RFC 2050 Working Group Ray Plzak ARIN On behalf of Mark McFadden

Background Addressing policy is obviously important Documenting that policy is crucial Todays Addressing policy is complex But not so complex that it cant be described Many more people are interested than in the mid-1990s Situation isnt nearly the same CIDR, IPv6, mobile

What Was RFC 2050 Internet Registry IP Allocation Guidelines Edited by Kim Hubbard, Mark Kosters, David Conrad, Daniel Karrenberg and Jon Postel An IETF BCP describing the distribution of globally unique IP addresses and registry operations

RFC 2050 Working Group The objective of the RFC 2050 Working Group is to address the issues relating to relevance of RFC 2050 to the needs of today's Internet registry system The group will evaluate RFC 2050 and propose a method of replacing it with a new document or documents Once consensus has emerged on the process that will be used to replace RFC 2050, the working group will cooperatively develop its replacement The working group will work in coordination with the other Regional Internet Registries who will conduct a similar review process in their respective regions

Mailing List As usual Working Group activity is coordinated through a mailing list Available in the usual way Or Send SUBSCRIBE 2050-WG To

Since We Started RFC 2050 inventory has been published on the list Discussion at four RIRs Significant development Rather than have 3 or 4 registries discussing RFC 2050 separately Use a single list Cooperation and coordination

What Else Happened Recently Document series proposed Small editorial teams proposed for the documents But, exactly what documents?

Document Series IP-ADDRdoc 1: INSTRUCTIONS TO EDITORS AND AUTHORS OF IP-ADDRdocs IP-ADDRdoc 2: A GUIDE TO ADDRESSING POLICY, ALLOCATION, AND PRINCIPLES IP-ADDRdoc 3: THE PRINCIPLES OF IP ADDRESS ALLOCATION FOR IPv4 IP-ADDRdoc 4: THE PRINCIPLES OF IP ADDRESS ALLOCATION FOR IPv6

Document Series IP-ADDRdoc 5: THE PRINCIPLES OF AS NUMBER ASSIGNMENT IP-ADDRdoc 6: CRITERIA GUIDELINES FOR IPv4 ADDRESS ALLOCATION IP-ADDRdoc 7: REVERSE MAPPING SERVICES FOR IPv4 IP-ADDRdoc 8: ADDRESSING AND NUMBERING ORGANIZATIONS AND RELATIONSHIPS

Three Teams Small Editing Teams for the first three documents Got participants from diverse areas Europe North America North and Central Asia RIR volunteers

Editorial Teams Put together and then got started Some of the participants disappeared in during the winter Progress has been slowed Need some new blood for the second and third documents

Update on Progress Initial document for ADDRdoc 0 (the so- called meta-document) is being edited and should be published for comment soon Initial document for ADDRdoc 1 (the background document) is being drafted and should be edited and published in March

Outreach Web site for the project to be provided by ARIN Trying to make it as easy as possible to participate Also, linked on the ARIN web site

What Next Anyone who is interested in addressing should be involved This means you! Join the mailing list Participate in the discussions in other settings Get as many other people involved as possible Goal: building a useful consensus

Goals and Timeline Rebuild the editorial teams where needed Initial drafts of the first two of the documents (February 2003) Initial draft of the third document (April 2003) First set of public discussions in Barcelona at RIPE LIR or Memphis ARIN Meeting

Important Especially important given the situation with RIRs and ICANN Nobody seems to disagree that we should do this Just getting peoples time seems hard RIRs participating in the editorial teams You can participate Join the mailing list; volunteer for the editing teams, participate in the public discussions

Thats It!