Dispute Resolution Service (DRS).nz Domain Names.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mark Robinson, Barrister, and Sharlene Naismith, Solicitor
Advertisements

Vincent Ngundi Interim AfriNIC PDP-MG Co-chair
InternetNZ InternetNZ (INZ) is a not for profit, common interest society, established to maintain and extend the availability of the Internet and its.
1 FIFA RULES GOVERNING THE PRACTICE AND PROCEDURES OF THE DISPUTE RESOLUTION CHAMBER by Michele Colucci –
1 Ignacio de Castro WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center Solving Disputes: The Services of the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center WIPO-INSME Training.
Marcia Kelley, Complaint Coordinator
How does the FAT Procedure work? A Guide to Arbitration Procedures before the FIBA Arbitration Tribunal (FAT)
MAKERERE UNIVERSITY DIRECTORATE OF INTERNAL AUDIT ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEMS AND PROCESSES RIDAR HOTEL SEETA 16 TH – 18 TH JUNE 2011 Presented by SAMUEL NATWALUMA.
Dispute Resolution Under the Congressional Accountability Act
Experience of operating.CL Patricio Poblete NIC Chile Kuala Lumpur, July 24, 2004.
Tradition innovation Online Branding Kate Legg Solicitor.
CYBERSQUATTING: PREVENTION AND REMEDIATION STRATEGIES NET2002 – Washington, DC April 18, 2002 Scott Bearby NCAA Associate General Counsel Copyright Scott.
InternetNZ -.nz update for ICANN ccTLD Rome meeting.
An overview of.nz Debbie Monahan Domain Name Commissioner APTLD Noumea, New Caledonia 8 April 2011.
.nz update APTLD August nz domain name space ¢Almost 300,000.nz domain names.
Some Comments on ccTLD Manager Local & Global Responsibilities Frank March Chair,.nz Oversight Committee (NZOC) (also IT & Telecoms Policy Group)
Dispute Settlement Services offered by the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center Heike Wollgast, WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center.
Background Check Procedures
ELECTRONIC PRELODGEMENT NOTICES IN THE CIVIL JURISDICTION OF THE MAGISTRATES COURT before.
APARTMENT OWNERS NETWORK NOVEMBER o Outline the new District Court Procedure o o Service of Proceedings – Problems o Statute of Limitations – 6.
OVERVIEW OF THE FLORIDA BAR DISCIPLINE SYSTEM November 30, 2006.
Medicaid1 SANDHILLS CENTER PARTICIPATING PROVIDER VIOLATIONS AND DISPUTE RESOLUTIONS (Medicaid & State Funded)
Addressing spam and enforcing a Do Not Registry using a Certified Electronic Mail System Information Technology Advisory Group, Inc.
The Revised Federal EEO Complaint Process Prepared by the IHS Equal Employment Opportunity and Civil Rights Office May 16, 2000.
CEARM CHAMBER OF ENFORCEMENT AGENTS OF THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA The Macedonian System of Transfer of Old Unfinished Enforcement Cases, Applied in the.
™ May 8, 2015 Copyright
ICC Amicable Dispute Resolution Services Mediating Corporate Governance Disputes By Mélanie Meilhac.
East Anglia Branch Annual Seminar Downing College, Cambridge 14 June 2013 The Man* in the Middle *The masculine gender shall include the feminine.
Johannes Christian Wichard Deputy Director WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center WIPO and ccTLDs ccTLD Best Practices: Latest and Future developments Luxembourg,
Domain Disputes Overview of UDRP Procedures 6/5/2015.
Lesson 9-3 Consumer Protection Laws LEARNING GOALS -LIST AND EXPLAIN CONSUMER PROTECTION LAWS THAT ARE RELATED TO CREDIT -DISCUSS THE PROCESSES OF USING.
Domain Names Ferenc Suba LLM, MA Chairman of the Board, CERT-Hungary, Theodore Puskás Foundation Vice-Chair of the Management Board, European Network and.
Example - Human Rights Case. Case Citation Formats Criminal Law:R v. Jones prosecution v. defense Civil Law:Smith v. Jones plaintiff v. defendant Human.
IDEA 2004 Procedural Safeguards: Legal Rights and Options Mississippi Association of School Superintendent Spring, Mississippi Department of Education.
NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP MODULE: 4 INVESTIGATION.
Measuring and Monitoring Registry Performance.nz.
Real and Virtual Identities Francis Gurry Assistant Director General World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)
EService Process Descriptions. COSCA/NACM Standards for Electronic Filing Processes Technical and Business Approaches Section 1.2A Court rules may provide.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.
GhNIC.gh ccTLD organization by Eric Akumiah
Management of the.nz domain name space. The.nz Domain Name Space ¢No legislation covering the.nz domain name space ¢.nz domain name space operates as.
.nz ccTLD APTLD August Who looks after.nz ¢InternetNZ – delegated responsibility for.nz ¢.nz Oversight Committee (NZOC) – sub- committee of InternetNZ.
OECD - HCOPIL - ICC Conference on Building Trust in the Online Environment The Hague, December 11-12, 2000 THE ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION EXPERIENCE OF.
PROCESSES/PROCEDURAL ISSUES FOR DECISION MAKING AT RCAKL 1 MARCH 2010 Syed Naqiz Shahabuddin NAQIZ & PARTNERS
1 Chapter 32 e-business Copyright © Nelson Australia Pty Ltd 2003.
Dispute Resolution in.uk Edward Phillips, Company Solicitor Nominet UK.
IRTP Part D PDP WG Items for Review. Items for Review Policy Development Process WG Charter GNSO WG Guidelines.
VALIDATION OF PLANNING & OTHER APPLICATIONS A brief guide for Planning Agents.
Presentation to InternetNZ Council 31 August 2007.
Implementation of the.eu Top Level Domain Marko Bonač Arnes.
Authorization Part III. Content of a license Structure of a license General elements General and specific conditions Annexes Documents attached (e.g.
United States Department of Transportation Notification And Federal Employee Anti- Discrimination And Retaliation Act of 2002.
Civil Law Civil Law – is also considered private law as it is between individuals. It may also be called “Tort” Law, as a tort is a wrong committed against.
INDIAN TAKEOVERS Meaning Of Acqusition: When an “acquirer” takes over the control of the “target company”, it is termed as takeover. When an acquirer.
Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Division of Immigration Health Services FY 2010.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
Procedure and application.  Before the enactment of the consumer Protection Act,1986 a person aggrieved by the defective goods or deficiency in service.
Presented by: Antony N. Gichia Regional Audit Center Mombasa
Resolving IP Disputes outside the Courts through WIPO ADR
ENROLLEE DUE PROCESS for Medicaid Managed CARE 42 CFR § 438 et seq.
Administering Human Rights Legislation
EEO MODULE 3: DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCESSING
Complainant files complaint in person or through online reporting system to one of the entities defined by an arrow Bemidji State University & Northwest.
Administering Human Rights Legislation
The Office of Open Records webinar will begin soon
Overview & Guideline for Dispute Resolution Mechanism
Overview & Guideline for Dispute Resolution Mechanism
The to Grand Central Mitigation
NZ Registry Services Update
Presentation transcript:

Dispute Resolution Service (DRS).nz Domain Names

Outline of presentation ¢Brief background information ¢An Overview of the DRS process ¢Published decisions ¢The first eight months

The.nz Domain Name Space ¢InternetNZ (The Internet Society of New Zealand Incorporated) holds the delegation for.nz ¢.nz Oversight Committee (NZOC) delegated responsibility for.nz ¢.nz Registry Services (NZRS) runs the registry ¢No legislation covering the.nz domain name space. Policies at

DNC InternetNZ NZOC NZRS How they fit together.....

Registration rules ¢There are no registration restrictions for any of the open second level domains (2LDs).co.nz,.net.nz,.org.nz,.geek.nz,.maori.nz,.gen.nz,.school.nz and.ac.nz

Disputes in.nz ¢Up until 31 May 2006, advice given: Negotiate directly with the registrant Take the matter before the courts ¢From 1 June 2006, an alternative has been offered: Dispute resolution service, based on the Nominet (.uk) approach.

Features ¢Complaints are filed online at ¢If response received, matter goes to mediation ¢If mediation unsuccessful, or there is no response, complainant can pay $NZ1,800 plus GST ($2,025) and submit complaint to Expert ¢Expert appointed ¢Appeal available - $NZ6,600 plus GST ($7,425), for panel of three Experts

Timeframes ¢Quick and relatively inexpensive process 15 working days for a response 5 working days for a reply 10 working days for mediation 10 working days to pay for Expert 10 working days for Expert decision 15 working days to appeal

Complainants obligations ¢Required to prove to the Expert that: They have Rights in respect of a name or mark which is identical or similar; and The domain name in the hands of the Respondent is an Unfair Registration ¢Both elements have to be proven on the balance of probabilities

Rights ¢Defined as: includes, but is not limited to, rights enforceable under New Zealand law. However, a Complainant will be unable to rely on rights in a name or term which is wholly descriptive of the Complainants business

Unfair Registration ¢Means a domain name which either: Was registered or otherwise acquired in a manner which, at the time when the registration or acquisition took place, took unfair advantage of or was unfairly detrimental to the Complainants Right; or Has been, or is likely to be, used in a manner which took unfair advantage of or was unfairly detrimental to the Complainants Rights.

How to make a complaint – online at

Making a complaint (cont.) ¢Complaints must be submitted electronically ¢4 signed copies of the complaint and any annexes must be sent to our office ¢We cannot act on the complaint until the hard copies are received ¢Complaints can only address disputes over.nz names. gTLD disputes (eg..com names) must be addressed using the WIPO process.

Mediation ¢Occurs only if a response is received ¢Panel of mediators appointed and they are allocated disputes on a first cab off the rank system ¢DNC pays mediators a flat fee per mediation ¢Mediation by phone and/or - up to mediator ¢Signed document if mediation successful

Expert determinations ¢A panel of eight Experts has been appointed. ¢An Expert is assigned to a dispute on a first cab off the rank basis, on receipt of payment of the appropriate fee by the Complainant. ¢The Expert has 10 working days to make a determination on the dispute. ¢Appeals are available, but none have been lodged to date.

Decisions to date ¢ 6 cases determined at this time 5 ordered transferred 1 dismissed ¢Refer

First eight months ¢71 complaints lodged 18 (25%) ruled invalid ¢Of the 53 valid complaints 8 settled on initial notification, prior to mediation 18 disputes went to mediation, with 10 of those successfully settling 6 went through to Expert decision