U.S. Department of Homeland Security Office for Domestic Preparedness Frank LePage July 23, 2004

Office for Domestic Preparedness

Coast Guard U.S. Secret Service Transportation Security Administration Office for Domestic Preparedness FEMA NET Guard R&D Centers DoE National Labs S&T Advisory Committee Technology Clearinghouse Visa Issuance Bureau of Border Security Nuclear Incident Response Team Chief Financial Officer Chief Information Officer Chief Human Capital Officer Officer for Civil Rights National Homeland Security Council Homeland Security Institute Technology Advisory Committee Bureau of Citizenship & Immigration Office for State & Local Government Coordination & Preparedness Office of International Affairs Office for National Capital Region Coordination Under Secretary - Information Analysis & Infrastructure Protection Directorate Under Secretary - Information Analysis & Infrastructure Protection Directorate Under Secretary - Science & Technology Directorate Under Secretary – Border & Transportation Security Directorate Under Secretary – Border & Transportation Security Directorate Under Secretary – Emergency Preparedness & Response Directorate Under Secretary – Emergency Preparedness & Response Directorate Secretary Under Secretary - Management Deputy Secretary U.S. Customs Service HSARPA

 ODP Background  ODP Programs  Assessments and Homeland Security Strategies  Current Grant Resources  ODP Program Guidance/Requirements  Questions/Discussion ODP Overview

Office for Domestic Preparedness  Created by Congress in the FY’ 1999 Appropriations Act  Program office renamed the Office for Domestic Preparedness (ODP) was established by the U.S. Attorney General (April 1998) in the Office of Justice Programs.  ODP was transferred to the Department of Homeland Security in 2002  ODP services include:  Equipment Acquisition  Training and Exercises  Technical Assistance

ODP Responsibilities  Incorporate the national strategy into planning guidance.  Support risk analysis and risk management activities.  Direct and supervise federal terrorism preparedness grant programs.  Coordinate preparedness efforts.  Provide training for federal, state and local agencies and international entities.  Coordinate and consolidate communications relating to homeland security.  Cooperate closely with FEMA.  Consolidate terrorism related elements of FEMA’s Office of National Preparedness.

(millions) ODP Funding History (millions) FY 97 - $5.0 FY 98 - $21.0 FY 99 - $127.0 FY 00 - $112.0 FY 01 - $ FY 02 - $ FY 03 - $3,223.5 FY 04 - $4,013.2

FY’ 04 ODP Funding Overview Formula-Based Grants$1,700,000,000 Law Enforcement Terrorism Prevention Grants 500,000,000 High-Threat, High-Density Urban Areas Grants 725,000,000 Citizen Corps40,000,000 National Domestic Preparedness Consortium 135,000,000 Technical Assistance30,000,000 National Exercise Program50,000,000 Competitive Training Grants60,000,000 Equipment and Testing17,000,000 Management and Administration30,000,000 Total3,287,000,000

ODP provides planning and equipment grants, training, exercises, technical assistance, and other resources to state and local emergency responders. Since 1998, ODP has:  Trained more than 400,000 emergency first responders  Conducted over 369 combating terrorism exercises, including the Top Officials (TOPOFF) exercise series  Made available over $6.6 billion in homeland security funding for equipment acquisitions, training, exercises and planning ODP Accomplishments

ODP Program Approach  Work with State Administrative Agency designated by Governor  State Homeland Security Strategy Program  Identify state and local capabilities and needs through threat/vulnerability/needs assessments  Develop multi-year preparedness plans  State Assistance Plans  Created from strategies as blueprint for the utilization of federal, state, and local resources to meet preparedness needs  Distribution of ODP services  Tailored services based on identified needs

Strategic Planning Process Overview END RESULT END RESULT = Appropriately allocated emergency preparedness resources State uses strategy to identify & allocate all HS resources Statewide Homeland Security Strategy Conducted at the state and local level Created at the state level Created by ODP in concert with the state Assessments State Assistance Plan

ODP Equipment Program States may purchase first responder equipment in the following categories:  Personal Protective Equipment  Detection Equipment  Decontamination Equipment  Interoperable Communications Equipment  Terrorism Incident Prevention Equipment  Explosive Device Mitigation and Remediation Equipment  Physical Security Enhancement Equipment  Medical Supplies/Pharmaceuticals  CBRNE Logistical Support Equipment  CBRNE Incident Response Vehicles  CBRNE Search and Rescue Equipment  CBRNE Reference Materials

Albany, NYHouston, TXOrlando, FL Anaheim, CAIndianapolis, INPhiladelphia, PA Atlanta, GAJersey City, NJPhoenix, AZ Baltimore, MDKansas City, MOPittsburgh, PA Baton Rouge, LALas Vegas, NVPortland, OR Boston, MALong Beach, CARichmond, VA Buffalo, NYLos Angeles, CASacramento, CA Charlotte, NCLouisville, KYSan Antonio, TX Chicago, ILMemphis, TNSan Diego, CA Cincinnati, OHMiami, FLSan Francisco, CA Cleveland, OHMilwaukee, WISan Jose, CA Columbus, OHMinneapolis, MNSanta Ana, CA Dallas, TXNew Haven, CTSeattle, WA Denver, CONew Orleans, LASt. Louis, MO Detroit, MINew York, NYSt. Paul, MN Fresno, CANewark, NJTampa, FL Honolulu, HIOakland, CAWashington/NCR FY’ 04 UASI Sites

UASI Sites FY’ 04 Funding New York City$47 million Chicago, IL$34.1 million Washington DC$29.3 million Los Angeles, CA$28.3 million San Francisco, CA$26.5 million Philadelphia, PA$23.1 million Houston, TX$19.9 million Miami, FL$19.2 million Boston, MA$19.2 million Jersey City, NJ$17.1 million Seattle, WA$16.5 million Baltimore, MD $15.9 million Santa Ana, CA$15.1 million Newark, NJ$15. million Detroit, MI$13.8 million Kansas City, MO$13.3 million Cincinnati, OH$12.7 million Minneapolis, MN$12.3 million Phoenix, AZ$12.2 million Dallas, TX$12.2 million Long Beach, CA$12.1 million Pittsburgh, PA$11.9 million St. Louis, MO$10.7 million Atlanta, GA$10.7million Las Vegas, NV$10.5 million San Diego, CA$10.5 million Cleveland, OH$10.4 million Anaheim, CA$10.3 million Milwaukee, WI $10.2 million Indianapolis, IN$10.2 million Buffalo, NY$10.1 million Memphis, TN$10.0 million San Jose, CA$9.9 million New Haven, CT$9.7 million Tampa, FL$9.3 million Louisville, KY$8.9 million Orlando, FL$8.7 million Columbus, OH$8.7 million Denver, CO$8.6 million Portland, OR$8.1 million Sacramento, CA$8 million Oakland, CA$7.8 million St. Paul, MN$7.8 million Charlotte, NC$7.4 million Baton Rouge, LA$7.1 million New Orleans, LA $7.1 million Fresno, CA$7 million Albany, NY$6.8 million Richmond, VA$6.5million San Antonio, TX$6.3 million

Technical Assistance Programs  Support for State Homeland Security Strategy development and conduct of assessments.  Centralized Scheduling and Information Desk (CSID) / Helpline, and homeland security information resources.  Support to key public sector associations.  Support to meet specific requests outside of training, exercise, and equipment support.  Support Domestic Preparedness Equipment Technical Assistance Program.  Support Interoperable Communications Technical Assistance Program.

The Department of Homeland Security encourages mutual aid compacts and interoperability so that first responders from different agencies, municipalities and even States from one State to another, can communicate during a terrorist attack. And, as we’ve seen, terrorist attacks have no boundaries. Tom Ridge - Secretary, Department of Homeland Security ODP and Interoperability

Interoperable Communications Plans Guidance  Plans should address building, upgrading, replacing, and maintaining public safety communications systems, training staff, and managing projects  Examples of considerations when developing a communications plan:  Operational  Topography/terrain of agency  Structures where agency operates  Patches  Dispatch process  Interoperability  Regional, multi-jurisdictional, statewide systems  Project 25 suite of standards  XML standards (DATA)  Scalability  Security Requirements

Contact Information ICTAP Program Manager Frank Lepage (202) Call the ODP Help Line at 1 (800) Contact Information