Field Test Comparisons of Drift Reducing Products for Fixed Wing Aerial Applications Robert E. Wolf, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas Scott Bretthauer,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Spray droplet management tool – Increases the opportunity for canopy penetration and coverage – Manipulates the full droplet spectrum – Provides more.
Advertisements

Cecil Tharp MSU Pesticide Education Program Pesticide Education Specialist Department of Animal and Range Montana State University.
Calibrating Sprayers for Droplet Size…. ….according to the label Robert E. Wolf Extension Specialist Application Technology Biological and Agricultural.
“Spray Application Accuracy” Nozzle Selection. Why are you here???? Are you concerned with accuracy? n $$ go bye, bye n Changing rates (< an ounce/acre)
A Summary of Studies Comparing Nozzle Types, Application Volumes, and Spray Pressures on Postemergence Weed Control Robert E. Wolf and Dallas E. Peterson,
when calibrating the sprayer
Drift-Reducing Nozzles Rich Affeldt Extension Crop Scientist Jefferson County Acknowledgment: Dr. Tom Wolf, Agri-Food Canada Dr. Bob Wolf, Kansas State.
SPRAYER CALIBRATION Nov
Calibration using the Test Strip Method (Long Hand) Cecil Tharp Pesticide Education Program Montana State University Extension.
1 Herbicide Drift Management John Boyd University of Arkansas.
Calibration 2014 Wisconsin Pesticide Applicator Training Program University of Wisconsin Extension 1 of 40.
 Spotty Pest Control  Wasted chemicals  Off-target damage  Higher costs - $$$  Environmental impact  Water and Air Quality  Public more aware of.
Adjuvants and How They Influence Application Practices Robert E. Wolf Extension Specialist Application Technology Biological and Agricultural Engineering.
Calibration of Pesticide Spray Equipment
Application Equipment and Calibration G. S. Manual - Chap. 7 Workbook - pp Application Calibration & Calculations
Using Pulse Width Modulation to Control Spray Droplet Size Robert E. Wolf Extension Specialist Application Technology Biological and Agricultural Engineering.
1/128 Method Of Calibration Calibrating Hand Sprayers And High Pressure Hand Guns Because a gallon = 128 ounces and the area to be sprayed is 1/128 of.
Replacing Your Spray Nozzle Biological and Agricultural Engineering Robert E. Wolf Extension Specialist Application Technology.
MSU Extension Pesticide Education Turfgrass Pest Management (Category 3A) Application Calculations and Calibration Chapter 5.
Turf & Ornamental Turf and Ornamental Pest Control Robert E. Wolf BAE Dept. K-State University.
Equipment Methods The Basic Function of a Sprayer: Distribution & Metering Apply a dilute amount of herbicide (Rate) in a determined volume of water.
Crop Protection Equipment and Calibration
Insect Control Field Days Sponsored by the Kansas Fruit Growers Association.
Spray Droplet Size Standard S-572 Robert E. Wolf Extension Specialist Application Technology Biological and Agricultural Engineering.
Selecting Nozzles while Calibrating Your Field Sprayer Cecil Tharp Pesticide Education Program Montana State University Extension.
Equipment II Nozzles Nozzles Selection Low Drift Nozzles.
Calibrating Homeowner Equipment
Calibration. Calibration Challenge #1 A label may call for 1 pint of pesticide to be applied over an entire acre (1 pint per acre). An acre is 43,560.
BASF Project – Meade, KS July 28, MEADE, KS.
Pesticide Drift Management
Comparison of Drift for Four Drift-Reducing Flat-fan Nozzle Types Measured in a Wind Tunnel and Evaluated using DropletScan  Software Robert E. Wolf &
Agricultural Aviation Technology
Calibration of Sugarcane Sprayers Curtis Rainbolt, Ron Rice, and Les Baucum University of Florida/IFAS.
Spray Spectrum of Spray Droplets Concerning Fungicide Control in Dense Canopy.
U NDERSTANDING S PRAY D EPOSITION AND M INIMIZING D RIFT Dan Heider University of Wisconsin - IPM.
Application Concerns for Control of Invasive Species ‘A focus on Equipment & Calibration’
Volume Median Diameters from a Medium Spray Quality Nozzle.
Practical Field Demonstrations for Drift Mitigation Presented at ASAE/NAAA Technical Session 36 th Annual NAAA Convention Silver Legacy Hotel and Casino.
Spray Droplet Sizing – Understanding the Basics Brad Fritz USDA ARS Aerial Application Technology Research Unit College Station, Texas.
Kansas State University Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department Influence of Spray Droplet Size on Paraquat and Glyphosate Efficacy Robert Wolf.
Kansas State University Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department Spray Droplet Analysis of Air Induction/Venturi Nozzles Using WRK’s DropletScan.
Pesticide Drift Management Dr. Eric P. Prostko Extension Weed Specialist University of Georgia.
Pesticide Spray Drift Conference September 5 and 6, 2001 AgDRIFT® Dave Esterly Environmental Focus, Inc
Comparison of Spray Droplet Characteristics for Nozzles Used for Agronomic Weed Control Robert Wolf Cory Friedli and Brian Lauer Biological and Agricultural.
Waste Pesticide Program Program costs offset by portion of license fees Usually in June in various Montana locations. Must pre-register!!! Local Extension.
Kansas State University Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department Comparison of Off-Target Deposits for Conventional Spray Nozzles and Venturi.
Robert E. Wolf Associate Professor - Extension Specialist Application Technology, Bio & Ag Engineering, Kansas State University Biological and Agricultural.
Calibrating Your Field Sprayer
Application Equipment for ASR Bobby Grisso Biological Systems Engineering.
Field Comparisons for Drift Reducing/Deposition Aid Tank Mixes Presented at ASAE/NAAA Technical Session 37 th Annual NAAA Convention Silver Legacy Hotel.
Successful Farming Sprayer Calibration Project Robert E. Wolf Associate Professor - Extension Specialist Application Technology Bio & Ag Engineering Kansas.
The Affect of Application Volume and Deposition Aids on Droplet Spectrum and Deposition for Aerial Applications Presented at ASAE/NAAA Technical Session.
Calibrating Spray Equipment
Calibration of your Field Sprayers using Shortcut Methods
The Affect of Flat-fan Nozzle Angle on Aerial Spray Droplet Spectra Presented at ASAE/NAAA Technical Session 39 th Annual NAAA Convention Silver Legacy.
NAAA/ASABE Technical Session Robert E. Wolf Associate Professor - Extension Specialist Application Technology Biological and Agricultural Engineering.
Kansas State University Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department Influence of Nozzle Type and Spray Pressure on Droplet Size Robert Wolf Biological.
Cecil Tharp MSU Pesticide Education Program Pesticide Education Specialist Department of Animal and Range Montana State University.
Tank Mix and Adjuvants Summary l The entire tank mix determines droplet size l Adjuvants added to improve spray performance l Droplet size spectra l Drift.
Kansas State University Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department Comparison of Drift Potential for Venturi, Extended Range, and Turbo Flat-fan.
Understanding Spray Drift Robert E. Wolf Extension Specialist Application Technology Biological and Agricultural Engineering.
Herbicide Application Update Herbicide Application Update New Nozzle Design for Reduced Drift but….What About Control? Robert E. Wolf Biological and Agricultural.
Field Test Comparisons of Drift Reducing Products for Fixed Wing Aerial Applications Robert E. Wolf, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas Dennis.
Work Sheet Calibration is included at the end of this presentation.
Spray Drift Reduction Practices John Nowatzki Extension Ag Machine Systems Specialist.
Influence of Tractor Speed and Boom Height on Spray Coverage Eric P. Prostko 1, Glen C. Rains 2, and O. Wen Carter 1 1 Dept. Crop & Soil Sciences 2 Dept.
DEPOSITION AND CANOPY PENETRATING AID. Features and Benefits Unique modified seed oil formulation – Slows drying time allowing the pesticide more time.
Tractor Speed and Boom Height Effects on Spray Coverage
Application Strategies Calibration….Calibration….
Application Strategies to Improve Crop Health
Presentation transcript:

Field Test Comparisons of Drift Reducing Products for Fixed Wing Aerial Applications Robert E. Wolf, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas Scott Bretthauer, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois Dennis R. Gardisser, University of Arkansas, Little Rock, Arkansas ABSTRACT Ten drift control products were compared for reducing horizontal and vertical drift for a high-speed fixed wing aerial application scenario. Water- sensitive paper and DropletScan™ software was used to collect and compare the differences in drift. Differences in amounts of drift were found among all treatments. A few of the products exhibited less drift potential than water alone. Several of the products exhibited the same or more drift potential than water alone. Slight differences were measured in how the products affected the droplet size (VMD). INTRODUCTION Off-target drift is a major source of application inefficiency. Application of crop protection products with aerial application equipment is a complex process. In addition to meteorological factors, many other conditions and components of the application process may influence off-target deposition of the applied products. Spray formulations have been found to affect drift from aerial applications. Materials added to aerial spray tank mixes that alter the physical properties of the spray mixture affect the droplet size spectrum. With new nozzle configurations and higher pressure recommendations, and with the continued development of drift reducing tank mix materials, applicators seek to better facilitate making sound decisions regarding the addition of drift control products into their tank mixes. OBJECTIVE This study evaluated the influence of selected drift control products/deposition aids on horizontal, vertical, and total spray drift during a high-speed fixed wing aerial application scenario. AT 501A  Drop booms  CP-11TT #15 nozzles w/8° deflection  44 psi  156 mph ground speed by radar Droplet Spectrum: Medium (CP/USDA Model) Percent Volume < 200 microns = 7.65% Aircraft calibrated for 28 L/ha (3 GPA) Product NameCompanyMixing Rate a Tap water 1Local supplyX-77 only Superb HC + Interlock Winfield Solutions 133 oz + 33 oz / 50 gal Formula 1United Suppliers1.5 qt / 50 gal #PX056-ZPrecision Labs, Inc5 qt / 50 gal Tap water 2Local supplyX-77 only Ag 06037Winfield Solutions64 oz / 50 gal Ag 08050Winfield Solutions80 oz / 50 gal Interlock 1.25Winfield Solutions80 oz / 50 gal Control GarrCo Products, Inc 2 oz /50 gal Tap water 3Local supplyX-77 only INT 908Rosen’s5 gal / 45 gal Tap water + Prime Oil b Local supply + Winfield Solutions 266 oz / 50 gal Interlock 0.8Winfield Solutions50 oz / 50 gal a All tank mixes included X-77 at.25% v/v (16 ounces per 50 gallon load). b Oil to simulate a suggested tank mix with fungicide (Prime 1 pint/acre). CONCLUSIONS Differences in coverage representing downwind drift were measured at all horizontal and vertical collector positions for all the treatments. INT 908, Control, and Interlock 0.8 all were measured with significantly less drift than the average of the three all water treatments. A water and oil treatment also had less drift than the average of the water treatments. The remainder of the products were measured with more drift than the water only average. Based on mixing, loading, and system cleanout evaluations, some products may hinder good application techniques. RESULTS Figure 3. Treatment volume median diameter’s. Figure 4. Horizontal drift summary. Figure 6. Total drift summary. Figure 5. Vertical drift summary. Figure 7. Total drift rank. water average Volume Median Diameter Horizontal Drift Vertical Drift Total Drift Ranked Total Drift Figure 1. Air Tractor 502A. Figure 2. Horizontal and vertical drift collection towers. Three vertical towers extended 40 feet and located 300 feet downwind from the flight line. WSP positioned at 5-foot increments up the tower. WSP on horizontal collectors located on 50-foot increments away from flight line and toward the towers. Vertical Towers Horizontal Collectors Flight Line % Area Coverage EQUIPMENT AND PRODUCTS