Page 1 © EADS Presentation title – file name – date Defence Electronics department Closing two mayor safety gaps in helicopter VFR flights S. Scherbarth,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Emergency COA Process Presented to: UAS All Users TELCON
Advertisements

Garmin 330 Mode S Transponder
Garmin SVT for Diamond DA40 April Crumlin Sideroad London ON N5V 1S2 KNOW NO BOUNDS Synthetic Vision – Real Safety Introducing.
National Certification Program Exclusively for those in Public Safety Certified Rider Class.
September 2005 The Implications of Handling Qualities in Civil Helicopter Accidents Involving Hover and Low Speed Flight Daniel C. Dugan, NASA CDR Kevin.
Radio frequency use in uncontrolled airspace Flight Instructor Seminars August 2013.
Breaking the Accident Chain IHST Safety Workshop March 4, 2013.
T HE L AST 200 F EET William J. McDevitt III Advisor – Karen Schuckman, C.P., P.L.S., MGIS The Pennsylvania State University World Campus State College,
Night Helicopter EMS (HEMS) Operations Safety
Technology Solutions. There are a variety of technologies—old and new—that have been developed to warn drivers and operators when workers on foot are.
Avionics. jobs
Lecture 9: Ground Proximity Warning System (GPWS)
O/Cdt. Darcel “I picked the wrong day to stop teaching Air Law”
Chapter 4 Motion in Two and Three Dimensions
AT 209 Introduction to Civil Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS)
Sense & Avoid for UAV Systems
Collision Avoidance and 20 GA mid-air events per year world-wide In every 3 rd event gliders are involved 50% fatality rate Every 3rd fatality in gliding.
Data Processing Equipment
Authors: Amy R. Pritchett, Scottie-Beth Fleming Presented by: Rachel A. Haga Cognitive Engineering Center, Georgia Tech 32 nd DASC, Oct. 9, 2013 Pilot.
Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System TCAS
1 Introduction of new electronic systems for aviation Thor Breien, Dr. Ing Park Air Systems AS Presented by Linda Lavik.
The Effects of Weather on Aircraft Part 2 of 2. Video Delta Flight 191 Aug 2, 1985 Causes and Effects
ELEC4504/4906G AVIONICS SYSTEMS ENGINEERING
PERFORM MULTIAIRCRAFT OPERATIONS TASK 2010 CONDITIONS: In an H-60 helicopter. STANDARDS: Appropriate common standards plus the following additions/modifications:
Sep 2012 Lesson 3.4 Air Law Air Traffic Rules. Reference From the Ground Up Chapter 5.1: Air Traffic Rules and Procedures Pages
Chapter 5:intrument flight rules
Cirrus Transition Course
OPERATIONAL SUPPORT AIRLIFT AGENCY DEPARTURE & CONTINGENCY PROCEDURES CW3 MICHAEL R. JEWETT OSAA FLIGHT STANDARDS CW3 MICHAEL R. JEWETT OSAA FLIGHT STANDARDS.
Federal Aviation Administration Unmanned Aircraft Systems in the National Airspace System Coming soon to airspace near you…..UAS-101 Presented At: Pecora.
VFR FLIGHT IVAO Tunisia Division.
Honeywell Helicopter RMUs
READY OR NOT THE FLIGHT REVIEW. FLIGHT REVIEW A FLIGHT REVIEW IS REQUIRED WITHIN THE PREVIOUS 24 CALENDAR MONTHS TO ACT AS PIC.
Recite a prayer…(15 seconds)
6-1 Design of UAV Systems UAV operating environmentsc 2002 LM Corporation Lesson objective - to discuss UAV Operating Environments including … National.
DTM establishment around Nausori Airport. Siu Pouvalu, s GS 350 Projects in Geospatial Science University of the South Pacific, SOPAC & Airports.
UAV LANDING SYSTEM Submitted by: SHAKTI SINGH SHEKHAWAT SHRISH KUMAR SHUKLA RISHI KUMAR YADAV VINEET AGRAWAL.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Certification Standards for New Technologies June 9, 2005 Certification Standards for New Technologies Presentation to:
WILDFIRE UAS Concept of Operations US Forest Service Fire & Aviation Management DRAFT.
1/11/2011AAS SOFIA splinter (Seattle, WA) 1. 1/11/2011AAS SOFIA splinter (Seattle, WA) 2 SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy 2.7-meter.
Lecture 10: Traffic alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS)
AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL.
Network UAV C3 Stage 1 Final Briefing Timothy X Brown University of Colorado at Boulder Interdisciplinary Telecommunications Program Electrical and Computer.
CANADIAN COAST GUARD AUXILIARY - PACIFIC COORDINATION OF MULTIPLE SURFACE UNITS CANADIAN COAST GUARD AUXILIARY - PACIFIC February 2012.
Lecture 7: INSTRUMENT LANDING SYSTEM (ILS)
Measures and Models of Aviation Display Clutter
Radar.
National Airspace System
Low Level Flying And Special Use Airspace Capt John Withelder.
Flygteknik 2010 Oct 19 MIDCAS – Sense and Avoid for UAS Bengt-Göran Sundqvist, Saab AB.
1 Use or disclosure of this information is subject to the restriction on the title page of this document. Flight Symbology to Aid in Approach and Landing.
Lecture 9: Ground Proximity Warning System (GPWS).
Navigation Technology
Flight Manual - Sections 5 & 6 Performance Charts and Weight & Balance
WIRE STRIKE ACCIDENTS. Where is the Wire Environment? Except for mountainous areas, the wire environment is any airspace below 500 feet AGL. In mountainous.
Zuliana-July Lecture 1: INTRODUCTION AIRCRAFT MASS (WEIGHT) & PERFORMANCE By: Zuliana Ismail, 2010.
High Fidelity Simulation as a Route to Certification Autonomous Systems: Legal / Regulatory Aspects and V&V Workshop 22 nd February 2016 Dr. M. Jump.
(Enhanced) Traffic Collision Avoidance System
Navigational Aids. Discussion What would you do if you lost sight of land and your compass didn’t work? What clues might help you go in the right direction?
~ RPAS use and regulation of civil Air Traffic Control point of view Acceptable and reasonable rules are needed Mr. Kornél Szepessy CEO 3-4th of November.
Collision Avoidance Procedures Soaring Safety Foundation Flight Instructor Refresher Clinic Rich Carlson.
Lecture 10: Traffic alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS)
Lecture 10: Traffic alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS)
AIR TRAFFIC ONTROL.
C.F.I.T. © Global Air Training Limited 2010.
What the US can learn from international UAS law
Rotorcraft Unique Considerations
How(UAVs) are used in Disaster Management
Civil Air Patrol – California Wing Weather Mission Scanner Course
Runway Excursions.
Questions/Comments on ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2019/10
Presentation transcript:

Page 1 © EADS Presentation title – file name – date Defence Electronics department Closing two mayor safety gaps in helicopter VFR flights S. Scherbarth, K. Schulz, EADS Deutschland GmbH, Friedrichshafen, Germany

Page 2 © EADS Defence Electronics department Presentation title – file name – date The wire and pole problem in VFR flights  The Visual Flight Regulations is based on the “see and avoid” concept for safe helicopter flight.  Close to ground there are hard to see obstacles like poles or masts and obstacles like wires not perceivable at all by itself.  Obviously, for these obstacles see and avoid does not work due to the deficits in the unaided human “see”.  This is clearly visible in the accident statistics:

Page 3 © EADS Defence Electronics department Presentation title – file name – date The size of the safety gap  The in-flight collision with obstacles caused 15,7% of all U.S. civil rotorcraft accidents This is the second largest cause of accidents just after loss of engine power (28.5%) (1)  In-flight collisions with wires and poles are the main cause of all in flight collisions with obstacles contributing to 53% of all these accidents (1)  Therefore, next after loss of engine power we talk about the largest single safety problem causing 8.3% of all accidents (1) (1) NASA/TM , “ U.S.Civil Rotorcraft Accidents 1963 through 1997 “

Page 4 © EADS Defence Electronics department Presentation title – file name – date It is time to update the VFR definition Since the historic VFR definition, the situation has changed:  The density of poles (mobile antenna masts), windmills and wires has increased significantly and helicopter missions changed more to close to ground missions with landing in unknown terrain (EMS, SAR, Police,..)  With active obstacle warning systems there are certified, technical means readily available to close the mayor safety gap caused by wire and pole collision.

Page 5 © EADS Defence Electronics department Presentation title – file name – date HELLAS – Active Obstacle Warning Product Family FLIR Control Panel HELLAS-W HELLAS-A Sensor- and Electronic unit Warning Indicator Warning Management Caution display Video Display Acoustic alarm generator Communication Management EW System - Blanking Navigation System AHRS Navigation System IRS Collective NVG/Night mode Avionic bus Control Panel HMS/D PLT&CPLT DKU System architecture

Page 6 © EADS Defence Electronics department Presentation title – file name – date HELLAS – Product Family Performances Field of View Vertical:42° Horizontal:36° Line of Sight range AZ:  12° Field of Regard Vertical:42° Horizontal:60° Max. Range of Sensor:1200 m Scan frequency:3 Hz Weight:21-24 kg Power consumption:< 280 VA Window Heating 50 VA Classification of Obstaclesmultiple Obstacles History function:multiple Obstacles Detection 5 mm wires up to 700 visib. Field of View Vertical:32° Horizontal:31.5° Line of Sight range EL:+10°/ -20° Field of Regard Vertical:62° Horizontal:31.5° Max. Range of Sensor:1050 m Scan frequency:2 Hz Weight:27,4 kg Power consumption:< 160 VA Window HeatingN/A Classification of ObstaclesHigh Risk History function:8 s Detection 10 mm wires up to 500 visib. HELLAS-WHELLAS-A

Page 7 © EADS Defence Electronics department Presentation title – file name – date HELLAS – Product Family NORMAL Normal Operating during Cruising Flight APPROACH Operation Take-off and Landing ON HELLAS Power ON OFF HELLAS Power OFF MODE: OFFPower Off STBY/SNStandby/Snapshot SLSafety Line-Mode WR/PLWire/Pole-Mode TREETree-Mode HMS/D-SYM: Control for symbology on the HMS/D’s DR/WR: Setting Display Range and Warning Range HELLAS-W HELLAS-A NORMAL APPROACH OFF OWS ON Command and Control

Page 8 © EADS Defence Electronics department Presentation title – file name – date HELLAS – Product Family Display Warning Indicator Indication whether there is an obstacle warning on the left, center or right field in front of the helicopter Safety Line Display on HMS/D Safety Line and Obstacles on HMS/D and MFD Obstacle Display on MFD APCH Flight Vector Horizon Safety Line HELLAS-W HELLAS-A At present optional:

Page 9 © EADS Defence Electronics department Presentation title – file name – date HELLAS – Product Family HELLAS W is available off the shelf. More than 50 units sold in Europe, North America and Asia. Operational since 2003 EASA and CAA certified according LBA-NTS02 (August 21, 2003) HELLAS A is in development for NH90, first flight 2006

Page 10 © EADS Defence Electronics department Presentation title – file name – date Conclusion On of the conclusions of the NASA Study on U.S. Civil Rotorcraft Accidents 1963 through 1997 was: “The authors (2) recommend that:  Flying below 750 feet (above ground level) be discouraged by the industry and regulatory agencies.  A low-price proximity spherical sensor be developed and certified; a sensor sphere of some large radius should, in effect, cocoon the helicopter and provide the pilot with sufficient warning to avoid obstacles “ (2) Franklin D. Harris, Eugene F. Kasper, and Laura E. Iseler

Page 11 © EADS Defence Electronics department Presentation title – file name – date Conclusion With our HELLAS products we have developed the proposed proximity sensor to effectively cocoon the helicopter. Therefore its now time to update the requirements for helicopters flying routinely missions below 750 feet. For these helicopters the installation of an appropriate active obstacle warning system should be mandatory. We believe its now overdue to close this mayor safety gap caused by in flight collisions with wires and poles.

Page 12 © EADS Defence Electronics department Presentation title – file name – date The second safety issue to adress Loss of visual reference by Brownout (Sand) Whiteout (Snow)

Page 13 © EADS Defence Electronics department Presentation title – file name – date The size of the brown out / white out safety problem  Brown out has been a mayor problem in recent military helicopter operations.  It has been reported that “Brown-outs have claimed 28 US Army helicopters in Iraq” (3)  15% of all Class A accidents of the US-Army in 2002 – 2003 has been caused by brown outs. (4) (3) Defense Helicopter, February / March 2004 (4) US Army Combat Readiness Center

Page 14 © EADS Defence Electronics department Presentation title – file name – date The Risk – Degraded Visual Environment Typical Flight Scenario into Brownout Condition

Page 15 © EADS Defence Electronics department Presentation title – file name – date Principle of the Solution with Hellas (3) Step 1 Close to and during low speed landing approach the HELLAS gets a brown-out/white-out free sight to the landing area and accumulates a high resolution tree dimensional image of that area. Step 2 In case of upcoming brown/whiteout condition, the HELLAS system has gathered enough three dimensional area scan data in the internal buffer to create a HELLAS natural synthetic vision video of the landing area. Step 3 This synthetic vision video presents to the pilots an artificial three dimensional representation of the outside view correlated to his current position and inertial reference. (3) U.S. Patent pending

Page 16 © EADS Defence Electronics department Presentation title – file name – date Clear view to landing zone in brown-out Hellas brown-out support with HMSD

Page 17 © EADS Defence Electronics department Presentation title – file name – date Conclusion HELLAS is capable to provide continuous visual reference for landing in brown-out or white-out conditions through a virtual view. This virtual view is generated from an high resolution 3-D image of the landing zone in same way as in a state of the art flight simulator. With this support no critical switching from visual reference to an abstract instrument reference is required when a brown-out condition occurs.