Moving Toward Small Group/ Targeted and Individual Supports: Building Efficient and Effective Systems Janice Morris and Barbara Mitchell Columbia Public.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Connecting Classrooms to Systems of School-wide PBS
Advertisements

PBS Overview Goal for Today To introduce you to key principles and basic concepts for a continuum of support for students known as Positive Behavior.
Targeted & Individual Systems of Support Lori Newcomer, Ph.D. Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri – Columbia OSEP Center for Positive Behavior Interventions.
Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri
School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Keeping the Momentum Going Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions.
Working Your Way Up the Triangle: Systems, Data and Practices Mary Richter, Ph.D. Missouri SW-PBS State Coordinator.
Schoolwide Positive Behavior Interventions and Support -SWPBIS- Mitchell L. Yell, Ph.D. University of South Carolina
PURPOSE Enhance capacity of school teams to provide the best behavioral supports for all students…... What is PBIS? (Positive Behavioral Interventions.
Loitering Noncompliance PDA Sexual Harassment Tardies Technology Violation Theft Threat to Student/Teacher Unprepared Vandalism Weapons Other Absences.
Optional PBIS Coaches Meeting November 15, 2010 Tier 2 and Tier 3 Interventions and Supports.
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports: New Team Training Acknowledgement Program Established Day 2.
Improving School Climate and Student Behavior Through Positive Behavior Supports Doug Maraffa.
The Role and Expectations for School-wide PBS Coaches Rob Horner and George Sugai OSEP TA-Center on PBS Pbis.org.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports CCSD
School-wide Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports: What paraprofessionals have asked.
MES Secondary Interventions
CT PBS Coaches’ Meeting Coaching SWPBS Basics December 9, 2008 Brandi Simonsen, Kari Sassu, & George Sugai.
PBiS Overview Positive Behavior Interventions and Support.
Tier II Supports: Teaming Structures Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center for Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports.
Skill Building for Small Group / Targeted Interventions Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center for Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports.
Building a Tier II/III School Wide PBS System Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports pbis.org.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Outcomes, Data, Practices, & Systems George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports University.
Effective Tier II Systems: From Classroom to Small Group Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Intervention & Supports.
Rob Horner University of Oregon Implementation of Evidence-based practices School-wide behavior support Scaling evidence-based practices.
Social Skill Instruction as Tier II Intervention Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports.
PBIS POSITIVE BEHAVIOR INTERVENTION SUPPORT OCTOBER 2, 2014.
“Tiering” It Up Tier 2 & 3 Supports Lauren Feigel & LaThomas Willis The Lincoln Center Wyandotte, MI 1/17/2013.
Lansdowne High School PBIS The Viking Code The Viking Code.
Classroom Instruction and Management: The Connect Point Across Universal and Tier II Supports within the School-wide Positive Behavior Support Continuum.
Advanced Teams Action Planning: Setting the Stage for a Productive Summer Institute Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral.
Positive Behavior Support in the Classroom
Building School-based Systems to Support Small Group / Targeted Interventions for At-risk Students Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center.
Growing the Green: Focusing on Universal Interventions Joan Ledvina Parr PBIS Team Leaders and Coaches Meeting November 13, 2008.
Positive Behavior Support System Lovell Elementary School.
Intensive Positive Behavior Support -- Secondary and Tertiary Behavioral Interventions Bruce Stiller, Ph.D.; Celeste Rossetto Dickey, M.Ed.
Building A Tier Two System In An Elementary School: Lessons Learned Tina Windett & Julie Arment Columbia Public Schools, Missouri Tim Lewis & Linda Bradley.
Positive Behavior Support Lost Lake Elementary. PBS Team PBS Team: –Mrs. Loyko, Mrs. Zamora, Mrs. Marcil, Mrs. Horton, Mrs. Gault, Coach Henry, Mrs. Maldonado.
Consequence System. GMS - STUDENT CONSEQUENCE GRID We developed the student consequence grid as a tool to develop consistency in student discipline in.
PBIS in Urban Settings Presented by Christine McGrath, Ph.D., PBIS Trainer The May Institute Association for Positive Behavior Supports March 27, 2009.
The Essential Feature of Individual Supports: Systems, Systems, Systems Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri Barbara Mitchell Columbia Public Schools.
Creating a Positive Environment: P ositive B ehavioral I nterventions & S upports Carol Frodge Former Principal, Edmonds School District PBIS Trainer Fierce.
Scaling Up: Lessons Learned in the Implementation of School- wide Positive Behavior Supports Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive.
PBIS Team Training Baltimore County Public Schools Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports SYSTEMS PRACTICES DA T A OUTCOMES July 16, 2008 Secondary.
Tier Two and an Evidence-Based Practice: Check-In/Check-Out Janice Morris, Barbara Mitchell and Nicole Reifesel Columbia Public Schools.
FPS – What is RTI? FPS RTI wiki:
The Role of the Teacher. Basically, the state believes that teachers, along with the school district, are responsible for students that fail. If a student.
MO SW Positive Behavior Support MU Center for SW-PBS College of Education University of Missouri.
Defining Behaviors and Establishing a Data System for Behavior SWPBIS Day 3: Universal Curriculum.
PBS TEAM TRAINING BRIDGEPORT PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Preparing for Advanced Tiers using CICO Calvert County Returning Team Summer Institute Cathy Shwaery, PBIS Maryland Overview.
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 SRIP – Cohort 9 August 2014.
Behavior Management in Specific Settings Applying School-wide Expectations and Interventions.
Local Case Management Teams. LCMT (11) Quality Indicators 1.Members 2. Frequency 3. Structure 4. Interventions 5. Data 6. School Policies 7. Discipline.
SWPBS Fidelity & Sustainability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Oregon Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
Annie McLaughlin, M.T. Carol Davis, Ed.D. University of Washington
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 Continuum of Support *
Positive Behavior Support for Families and Community Members School Name / Date (Red font denotes information to be completed/inserted by the district.
Using the Pyramid of Intervention for Special Education Referrals.
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Rationale, Readiness, Features George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
ORGANIZATION & DELIVERY OF TERTIARY SYSTEMS AT THE DISTRICT LEVEL Cynthia M. Anderson & Kimberli Breen University of Oregon & Illinois PBIS.
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
Consistent and Predictable Consequences Idaho SWPBIS Training Institute.
Diversity, Prevention & Intervention Department Broward County Public Schools Data-based Problem Solving in a RtI:B Team Meeting 3.0.
RTI: Linking Academic and Behavior Support Wesley Temple Dawn Davis.
SWPBS - School Wide Positive Behaviours Support
What We’ve Learned About PBIS
PBIS and Discipline.
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership
Lansdowne High School PBIS
Presentation transcript:

Moving Toward Small Group/ Targeted and Individual Supports: Building Efficient and Effective Systems Janice Morris and Barbara Mitchell Columbia Public Schools

Primary Prevention: School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior ~80% of Students ~15% ~5% CONTINUUM OF SCHOOL-WIDE INSTRUCTIONAL & POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT

What Do We Know? 1. Understand interaction between behavior and the teaching environment Behavior is functionally related to the teaching environment 2.Provide supports to Teach pro-social “ replacement ” behaviors Small group or targeted to function 3. Create environments to support the use of appropriate behaviors Practice and acknowledge success

SYSTEMS PRACTICES DATA Supporting Staff Behavior Supporting Decision Making Supporting Student Behavior Positive Behavior Support OUTCOMES Social Competence & Academic Achievement

Research Findings on “Scaling Up” (Fixsen, Naoom, Blase, Friedman, & Wallace, 2005, p. 70) Best evidence documents what doesn’t work: –Information dissemination alone –Training by itself

Research Findings on “Scaling Up” (Fixsen, Naoom, Blase, Friedman, & Wallace, 2005, p. 70) What works –Long term, multi-level approaches –Skills-based training –Practice-based coaching –Practioner performance-feedback –Program evaluation –Facilitative administrative practices –Methods for systems intervention

Applied Work in Progress Gentry Middle School

Background and Context PBS in Columbia Public Schools –18 elementary buildings –3 middle schools –3 junior highs –3 high school programs –17,000 students

Gentry Middle School Three core teams per grade level –Five general education teachers –One special education /One paraprofessional Elective team Literacy support center Self-contained/Special education Administrative team

PBS at Gentry Year 1-2 Universal Features –Administrative and faculty buy in –Building wide expectations (RRKS) –PBS team –Matrix

PBS at Gentry Year 3-4 Universal Features –Lesson plans –Redesign office referral –Track discipline data –System for acknowledging (RRKS Ribbon) –Team process revisited

PBS at Gentry Year 5-6 Universal Features –Revisit matrix –Lesson plans and teaching schedule –Behavioral expectations posted –RRKS Ribbon data collection –Assign sub-committee work

The Saga Begins Student Assistance Team (SAT) –Administrator –School psychologist –Counselors –Team teacher –Behavior specialist Goal = Individual supports

Painful Lessons… Year 1: Floundering, Flailing and Failing –Inadequate universal supports –Targeted interventions not systematic or data- based –Individual plans overwhelming and ineffective

Initial Outcomes Multiple changes in individual plans Ineffective supports for teachers and students Loss of time Increased number of referrals Diminished credibility

The Saga Continues Year 2: Reinforcements Arrive –Outside expertise –Administrative supports Money Meetings Melee

Building Systems How to get there 1. Develop method for communication 2. Provide tools for decision making 3. Design process for accessing support 4. Plan for maintaining and sustaining

Communicating Practice SAT-STAT-RRKS

RRKS Team STAT Team School-Wide Systems Matrix Lesson Plans School-Wide Data Acknowledgement Communication Core Team Representative District PBS Support Building Administrator and Counselors *Meets Monthly Core Team Representative SAT Partner Core Team Teachers *Meets Weekly Core Team/Classrooms Implement AIS Monitor Progress Refer to SAT SAT Process Teacher Assistance and Support Targeted Interventions Individual Student Plans SAT Team Administrator Counselor Behavior Specialist Method for Communicating Practice

Skills-Based Assistance Assistance Model –SAT members with behavior specialist Behavior basics and management SAT process Function-linked strategies –SAT members with STAT team representative –SAT and STAT with core team teachers

Ongoing Intensive Support Weekly, skills-based, with feedback Periodic, intensive, with follow-up Example: Sessions Classroom/team universals AIS process Follow-up AIS Peer observations Feedback and systems maintenance

Decision Making Tools Pyramid to Success RRKS TOC AIS guide ( Alternative Intervention Strategies )

Classroom Teacher Issues Out of seat, Talking to classmates, Talking out, Off-task, Violation of class rules, Inappropriate language, Lack of materials, Gum, Disrespect, Cheating, Tardies, Minor destruction of property Method for handling student behaviors Proactive: Positive call to parents, Use praise, Use Rewards, Daily/Weekly Goal sheets, Proximity to instructor, Provide choices, One-to-One assistance, Pre-correct for transitions/trouble situations, Regular breaks for exercise, Give a job, RRKS Review, Reward lunch with teacher, etc. Corrective: One and only one REDIRECT, RRKS Review, Safe-seat, Buddy Room, Think Sheet, Parent Phone call, Lunch Detention, Recovery Study Hall, Removal of privilege in classroom, etc. Team Issues Repeated minor & major disruptions in multiple classrooms, Throwing things, Hallway/Lockers problems, Attendance, Repeated disrespect to peers or adults, Cheating, Inappropriate to substitute, Insubordination, Chronic Disruptions Method for handling student behaviors Proactive: Parent contact (mandatory), RRKS review, Team conference, Team conference with student, Team conference with Parents, Team conference with Administrator/Counselor, Triage in the AM with the student, Triage at lunch with the student, Team Focus, etc. Corrective: Removal of privilege on team, Recovery Study Hall, Buddy Room, etc. Office Issues Bus referrals, Truancy, Chronic offender, Threatening student or adult, Fighting, Refusal to go to or Disruptive in Buddy Room, Sexual harassment, Weapons, Drug/cigarettes/ tobacco/alcohol, Assault – physical or verbal Teacher Method for handling student behaviors  Referral Form – send student to office with completed form  Process with student before re-entry Office Method for handling student behaviors Proactive: RRKS Review, Parent Contact Corrective: Loss of Privilege, Saturday detention, Opportunity Center, Suspension, etc. Pyramid to Success for All

RRKS TOC (front side) RRKS – Time Out of Class Code: _____ Student: _________________________ Date:______________________ Incident Time: ____________________# of min. out of rm.: __________ Teacher: _______________________Subject: ____________________ What did you do/not do that got you sent out of class? ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ Circle the RRKS expectation that was not followed: Respect ResponsibleKindSafe What will you do differently next time?______________________________________

RRKS TOC (back side) Processing Checklist: Processing data & time: Review with the student reason he/she was sent out. Teach & practice replacement behavior. Provide positive reinforcement for replacement behavior. Check the setting in which the behavior occurred. Whole group instruction Small group instruction Individual work Working with peers Alone 1-on-1 instruction Interacting with peers Other: Please identify below Minor List: Circle the appropriate code (MDD) Defiance/Disrespect/Non- compliance (MDS) Disruption (MI) Inappropriate Verbal Language ( MO) Other(MPC) Phys. Contact (MP) Property Misuse

Gentry FBA Matrix Lewis, 2008

Process for Accessing Support AIS - SAT Flowchart

Plan for Maintaining and Sustaining Administrative Perspective

Work Smarter Not Harder Restructure resources Realign responsibilities Revise routines Review results

Build Buy-In Same things we do for students –Teach expected behavior –Reinforce reasonable approximation –Acknowledge success

A Happy Ending… Outcomes to Date –Increased implementation of universals –Paradigm shift –Building infra-structure to sustain small group/ targeted and individual supports

Pulling It All Together Success in building sustained systems –Long-term, multi-level approach –Skills-based training –Practice-based coaching –Practitioner performance-feedback –Program evaluation –Facilitative administrative practices –Methods for systems intervention