Fiscal Year 2003 Budget Overview Debbie Curtis Budget Team Leader April 30, 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Position Budgeting Seminar Presented by: The Office of Planning, Budget & Analysis.
Advertisements

California Department of Food and Agriculture
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education
Understanding the Federal Budget Process Tribal Self-Governance Financial Training Session Elizabeth Fowler March 27, 2012.
Cost Share Fundamentals. Learning Objectives Todays presentation will focus on: Cost share – The What and Why The different types of cost sharing Sponsor.
Federal Budget Process Steve Kidd and Allison Boehm Budget and Program Analysis Staff April 2009.
David Norquist Tampa Bay PDI April 3rd, 2014 A Brief History of Federal Financial Management.
1.  Office of Management and Budget (OMB) – Circular A-87  US Department of Education ◦ Delegates authority for indirect cost rate determination to.
Financial Management for the CACFP Sponsoring Organizations.
Cost Sharing Date Presenter Name Presenter Phone Number Presenter .
Revenue Budget Training 2/11/15. What is Revenue? Resources provided to the university as a result of a service and/or product provided. For higher education.
Indirect Cost Rate Proposal Region 11 Education Service Center January 28, 2015.
Contract Support Costs Contract Support Costs April 17, 2009.
2014 AmeriCorps State and National Symposium Updates and Fixed Awards.
Time System What is this all about? The purpose of this project is to automate how Evergreen collects, records and manages employees’ dates and times worked.
Staff Timesheets 2014 Project Director Training & Annual Meeting1.
Facilities & Administrative (F&A) Cost Recovery March 5, 2009.
A SOUND INVESTMENT IN SUCCESSFUL VR OUTCOMES. Presenters: Tanielle Chandler, Financial Management Specialist, U.S. Department of Education, Rehabilitation.
05/31/2012 Page 1 Financial Management: Timekeeping.
If the funder provides specific guidelines related to format or contents of your budget… FOLLOW THEM! Otherwise, your proposal may not make it out of.
1 South Dakota Department of Education – Grants Management Rob Huffman – Administrator Mark Gageby – Special Education Fiscal Kim Fischer – Fiscal Monitoring.
Accountability Matters! Illinois All Employee Training Conference March 1, 2005 Decatur, Illinois Dan D. Lawson, Director Dan D. Lawson, Director Strategic.
Budgets & Financial Management. Financial Management 2 Two components: – Demonstrating overall Viability, Capability, and Accountability (VCA) – Showing.
A SOUND INVESTMENT IN SUCCESSFUL VR OUTCOMES. Presenters: Mary Gougisha, Director of the Indirect Cost Group, Office of the Chief Financial Officer, U.S.
April 8, Budget Committee Meeting Budget Overview and Discussion.
Programmatic and Fiscal Compliance as a Team Effort 2014 Project Director Training & Annual Meeting1.
1 INTERNAL CONTROLS Matthew Pakos School Improvement Grant Programs May 23, 2011.
NRCS Equitable Relief Authority for NRCS Covered Conservation Programs.
2015 VOCA National Training Conference Grant Financial Management.
DGA Community Meeting June 12, DGA Community Meeting: Agenda June 12, 2012 Agenda ItemDiscussion Leader Welcome and IntroductionsMoira Kiltie.
Training Module 4 Special thanks to the Michigan Association of Conservation Districts for assisting in the development of this training module.
Training Module 4. What You’ll Learn In This Module What the characteristics are of a successful Director? What the duties are of District Directors?
2015 Fiscal Year-End Activities for Recharge Centers Internal / External Sales Office.
Cost Principles – 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E U.S. Department of Education.
USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service Kenneth Morgan, Program Specialist USDA - NRCS Phone: (352) Phone: (352) FAX: (352)
Time with Office of Sponsored Programs April 4, 2011 Topic: Cost Share.
Coding Compliance Plan July 12, Benefits of a compliance program  To demonstrate our commitment to honest and responsible conduct, decrease the.
Cost Sharing on Contracts and Grants October 16, 2001.
Financial Management for the CACFP Sponsors of Centers.
The board of each community college district shall within or before the first quarter of each fiscal year, adopt an annual budget which it deems necessary.
Restricted Account Status Reports November 29, 2001.
A Presentation by Craig Jagger Chief Economist House Committee on Agriculture For the Session: Assessing the Equitability of Farm Program Benefits at the.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
Kansas State University – Sponsored Programs Accounting Last updated March 2015.
1 BUYING LIGHTNING DATA LESSONS LEARNED AND FUTURE CHALLENGES TO AVOID ANTI-DEFICIENCY DAN CLEVER DIRECTOR NWS ACQUISITION DIVISION 6/15/05.
Adult Education and Literacy Budget Development and Cost Allocation.
Unboxing Research Finance at the UofA Research Administration Day 2015.
Webinar for FY 2011 i3 Grantees February 9, 2012 Fiscal Oversight of i3 Grants Erin McHughJames Evans, CPA, CGFM, CGMA Office of Innovation and Improvement.
Internal/External Sales Rate Development – Intermediate “Answers to Common Questions”
Budgets & Financial Management. Financial Management 2 Two components: – Demonstrating overall Viability, Capability, and Accountability (VCA) – Showing.
Federal Grant Training. I. Title I-A Fiscal Requirements  To ensure Title I-A funds are in addition to regular services normally provided, three fiscal.
Monitoring Region 3 Discretionary Roundtable May 20 – 23, 2008 Mary Evans And Conyers Garrett EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT.
UNC Charlotte Purchasing Card Training. Agenda Program Overview Roles and Responsibilities Internal Policies and Procedures Documents and Reference Materials.
1 Food, Conservation and Energy Act of Information on NRCS Conservation Programs EQIP-Environmental Quality Incentives Program WHIP-Wildlife Habitat.
Management & Development of Complex Projects Course Code - 706
1 Time and Effort Reporting Lessons Learned: Problems and Potential Solutions Helga Greenfield Associate Vice President for College Relations and Director.
Cost Allocation/Indirect Costs Cost Allocation/Indirect Costs November 2 nd 2009.
Maximizing Multiple Funding Sources Belinda Rinker, Senior Policy Analyst Office of Head Start Developing a recipe for high.
Cost Sharing on Sponsored Awards Division of Financial Affairs OSP Roundtable October, 2015.
BASIC BUDGET CONCEPTS By Kenneth Kelly June 2008.
NRCS Grants and Agreements Overview of Grants, Cooperative and Contribution Agreements Arizona State Office October 30, 2013.
How to budget & buy at Cal Maritime… Vineeta Dhillon
Illinois Head Start Association Wage & Benefit Database Webinar March 30, 2016 Lauri Morrison-Frichtl Executive Director Illinois Head Start Association.
Natural Resources Conservation Service “Helping People Help the Land” June 8, 2016.
THE VSC MECHANICS OF DETERMINING COSTS AND RATES
The Council Budget Understanding the Budget Process
Federal Grant Programs Conference October 23, 2017
Internal/External Sales Rate Development Level II
Participant Support Costs
Regional healthcare coalition match documentation
Presentation transcript:

Fiscal Year 2003 Budget Overview Debbie Curtis Budget Team Leader April 30, 2003

UNIFIED BUDGET FA Social Security Trust Fund Treasury General Fund Mandatory TA FA Direct Discretionary Reimbursable Direct Reimbursable TA Direct Reimbursable Direct Reimbursable ON-BUDGET OFF-BUDGET

What are Mandatory Funds? Funds available to persons who meet certain requirements. Includes all CCC funded programs. Accounts for about 2/3 of all government spending. Amount is included in the authorization; Congress does not have to act in order for funds to be available. Controlled by “Pay-As-You-Go” (PAYGO) Includes: Farm Price Supports.

What are Discretionary Funds? 13 annual appropriation acts. Congress must act in order for discretionary funds to be available. If not, no obligations may be incurred. Accounts for about 1/3 of all government spending. Includes All NRCS Appropriations. Controlled through Spending Caps.

Direct Funds – how does NRCS get them? Direct funds come from NRCS appropriations: –Conservation Operations –Watershed Surveys and Planning –Watershed & Flood Prevention Operations –Resource Conservation & Development –Watershed Rehabilitation Program Some of the direct funds come from transfers from CCC and other Federal Agencies: –Farm Security and Rural Investment Program –Rural Abandoned Mine Program

Reimbursable Funds – where does NRCS get them? Reimbursable funds are received from sources other than appropriations or transfers from other federal agencies. Sources include: –Other USDA Appropriations –Other Federal Appropriations –State & Local Government –Private Entities

FY 2003 Discretionary Funds Conservation Operations Watershed and Flood Prevention Watershed Surveys & Planning Watershed Rehabilitation Resource Conservation & Development TOTAL $825,004,000 $110,000,000 $11,197,000 $30,000,000 $51,000,000 $1,027,201,000

FY 2003 Mandatory Funds EQIP FPP WHIP GRP GSWC Klamath Basin WRP CSP TOTAL $695,000,000 $100,000,000 30,000,000 $85,000,000 $45,000,000 10,136, ,000,000 3,700,700 $1,208,836,000

What does direct charge mean? Title 31 of the United States Code (1301(a)) requires that all costs associated with implementing a program to be charged to the benefiting program. Examples include: Salary Benefits Travel Training Other Indirect Costs

What is so hard about direct charge? Much more “management” involvement required. Many employees work on several programs. Many costs benefit multiple programs. –General managers and administrative costs –Utilities and communications –Supplies –State Office and Service Center rent –Printing –Postage, NFC and FFIS costs, etc.

How does NRCS manage the difficulties associated with direct charge? NRCS implemented “offset” policy many years ago. “Offset” allows costs to be “charged as budgeted” based on the following assumptions: Allocations are converted to fundable staff years, by program. Fundable staff years, in each program, are converted to performance goals. Performance goals are incorporated into business plans. Performance plans are monitored to ensure that the proper work is being performed and corrective action is taken (if necessary) to ensure that goals are being met. Adjustments are made to the performance plan whenever an allowance holder receives a large change in their allocation that affects fundable staff years, such as EWP funds made available in March.

Does everyone agree that “offset” satisfies these requirements? A GAO audit of NRCS titled “Additional Actions Needed to Strengthen Program and Financial Accountability reported: …”the policy of charging as budgeted and not as worked often misstates a project’s costs by underestimating the costs to one account and overstating the costs to another….” (GAO/RCED dated April 2000)

FY 2003 Fiscal Guidance Initial allowance letters to STC’s 1.Limit obligations to amount available 2.Use funds as intended by Congress 3.Assure that planning is charged to CTA 4.Encourage the use of TSP’s 5.Assure equity in program delivery

6.Assure that obligations align with actual costs of program 7.Track Congressional earmarks 8.Assure accurate and timely reporting of obligations 9.Assure accurate and timely reporting of performance 10.Monitor obligations in Farm Bill programs—these funds expire 9/30/03 More Guidance

WebTCAS Actual Hours Paid Actual Hours Worked ACRESFFIS (NFC) Program Activity Modifier County Assigned Fund Code Internal Decision Making Official External Reporting (Audited Annually)

What is “cost” in CIS reports? Salary and benefit cost data -- WebTCAS/ACRES –Includes dollars for actual hours worked (hourly rate times hours worked), by program/activity/modifier as entered in TCAS by an employee for: Basic pay hours worked Credit hours worked Comp time worked Overtime worked Support data -- obligations recorded in the accounting system (FFIS) in “support” object classes plus lump sum leave, awards, and agreements.

What is an “obligation” in CIS reports? Salary and benefit obligation data -- FFIS –Includes dollars obligated for actual hours paid, by fund code, as entered in the WebTCAS master file for: Basic pay hours paid (includes paid leave) Credit hours paid Comp time paid Overtime paid Support data -- obligations recorded in FFIS in “support” object classes plus lump sum leave, awards, and agreements.

Meet Mr. NRCS In pay period 15, Mr. NRCS worked 40 hours on CRP and 40 hours on EQIP He entered this information into WebTCAS by program, activity, and modifier His assigned “fund code” is CTA-General His “fund code” was determined in the cost allocation process and entered into the WebTCAS master record by the timekeeper

What do we see in CIS for Costs? Costs associated with 40 hours of Mr. NRCS CRP included here. 23,125 Costs associated with 40 hours of Mr. NRCS EQIP included here.

What are Mr. NRCS “costs” in CIS for pay period 15? 40 hours * Mr. NRCS’ Basic Pay hourly rate will be recorded in the salary “cost” column for CRP 40 hours * Mr. NRCS’ Basic Pay hourly rate will be recorded in the salary “cost” column for EQIP Associated benefits will be recorded in both CRP and EQIP benefit “cost” columns based on rate identified at beginning of fiscal year for each retirement type

What do we see in CIS for obligations? Mr. NRCS dollars and associated hours are included here.

What are Mr. NRCS “obligations” in CIS for pay period 15? 80 hours * Mr. NRCS’ Basic Pay hourly rate will be recorded in the salary “obligation” column for CTA- General Actual benefits will be recorded in the CTA-General benefit “obligation” column based on actual charges to the agency for Mr. NRCS: –Retirement –Life Insurance –Health Insurance –FICA/Medicare –COLA (for overseas employees)

Why are there differences? It could be the difference between: –Credit hours worked in WebTCAS vs. credit hours paid in FFIS –Comp time hours worked in WebTCAS vs. comp time hours paid in FFIS –Benefit costs (estimated) in WebTCAS vs. benefit costs (actual) in FFIS –Overtime capped at 1.5 times GS-10 step 01 hourly rate for Washington DC locality in WebTCAS vs. cap applied not to exceed 1.5 times the basic hourly rate for a GS-10/1 in FFIS –Obligation adjustments not processed through WebTCAS

What causes the most significant differences? “Direct” charge of hours by program/activity/modifier in WebTCAS interfaced into ACRES VS “Offset” charge of hours by fund code assigned to each employee in the cost allocation process interfaced into FFIS

Why are there differences between direct charge of time & cost allocation charge of time? Bottom line – By the end of the fiscal year, direct charge hours should be very close to cost allocation hours except for those funds in which NRCS was not fully reimbursed for actual work performed

Why aren’t they closer? You have to plan your work then You have to work your plan This demonstrates adherence to one of the fundamental laws of Title 31 of the United States Code: “Appropriations must be used for the purpose intended by Congress only.”

CTA BASE

Thank you!