Unified Support Services Workgroup recommendations August 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

PERSONAL LITERACY PLANS AT THE SECONDARY LEVEL December 12, 2003.
Laying the Ground Work – How to Begin Successful Implementation Carolinas Innovations in Education Conference 2007 Giancarlo Anselmo Cleveland County Schools.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION
No Wasted Time: PBIS Meetings That Work. Our School Durham Elementary School Durham Elementary School Tigard, Oregon Tigard, Oregon 550 students in grades.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Dr. Denise P. Gibbs, Director Alabama Scottish Rite Foundation Learning Centers PST RtI STUDENT SUCCESS Christine R. Spear, Education Administrator Alabama.
Multi-tiered System of Supports District Application.
Ingham RtI District Leadership Team November 4, 2009.
Statewide Expectations Presenter: Christine Spear Alabama Department of Education.
Literacy Leveled Library Lakshmi Valdes. What is the LLI KIT  The Fountas & Pinnell Leveled Literacy Intervention System (LLI) is a small-group, supplementary.
Using Technical Assistance Teams for Tertiary PBS Carol Davis, Ed. D., Ilene S. Schwartz, Ph. D. University of Washington
STUDENT SUPPORT TEAM A PARTNERSHIP FOR SUCCESS!. SST: Based on the Multi-Tiered Intervention Model and Pyramid of Intervention Framework Utilizes a collaborative.
Training in Instructional Consultation, Assessment & Teaming Todd A. Gravois, Ph.D. Edward Gickling, Ph.D. & Sylvia Rosenfield, Ph.D.
Eugene Field Elementary School “Inspiring and empowering each other to positively impact our community and our world.” Our Journey to Responsive Intervention.
Gifted Program Review Spring Process  In February 2013 a team of 41 individuals met to develop questions: parent, teachers, psychologists and administrators.
IIT: Supporting Staff and Students at PVMS.
Teachers directing the work of paraprofessionals
Getting It Right at the Building Level  Introductions  Burton Street Elementary  NYS TAC Grant Pilot School.
Response to Intervention Henrico Implementation Update: Winter 2011.
October 2009 Pamela Kaufman, Deerfield, Il DPS 109.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Guidance from the CSDE on SRBI Implementation May 14, 2010 CAPSS Assistant Superintendents’ Meeting Mary Anne Butler, Education Consultant Iris White,
Developing Professional Learning Communities To Promote Response to Intervention Linda Campbell Melissa Nantais.
Maine’s Response to Intervention Implementation: Moving Forward Presented by: Barbara Moody Title II Coordinator Maine Department of Education.
Response to Intervention
Case Facilitators: A Best Practice Model for Evaluation, Due Process and Coordination.
Professional Learning Communities “The most promising strategy for sustained, substantial school improvement is developing the ability of school personnel.
Response to Instruction Training Wednesday, October 30, 2013.
HELP!!! Support Team-Triage Section 504Special EdELLG & T Most Common Structure Reading Program A Other effective/ affective intervention systems Classroom.
Initial Group Data Meeting Preparation & Facilitation August 23, 2012.
WORKING TOGETHER TO HELP CHILDREN SUCCEED. RtI is the Practice of… *providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to individual student needs.
IN NORTH THURSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS KATY LEHMAN PBIS SPECIALIST MAY 22, 2013 PBIS Implementation.
John Fuller Elementary School Pine Tree Elementary School &
TRHS Action Plan Goal 1 O Goal #1: In the School Year TRHS will further develop our Response to Instruction (RTI) model to ensure.
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
School Based Teams. Basic Assumptions  All teachers have responsibility for students with special learning needs  All students can be helped by regular.
RTI & THE CONNECTION TO PLC’S Essentials for Administrators Sept. 27, 2012.
PLCS & THE CONNECTION TO RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Essentials for Administrators Sept. 27, 2012.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Response to Intervention RTI Teams: Following a Structured Problem- Solving Model Jim Wright
Northwest ISD Target Improvement Plan Seven Hills Elementary
Response to Intervention RTI Teams: Following a Structured Problem- Solving Model Jim Wright
Anchor Presentation: Inclusive Education for ALL Students Hour 3 Project #H325A Inclusive Service Delivery.
Annie McLaughlin, M.T. Carol Davis, Ed.D. University of Washington
Florida Charter School Conference Orlando, Florida November, 2009 Clark Dorman Project Leader Florida Statewide Problem-Solving/RtI Project University.
Broward County Public Schools BP #3 Optimal Relationships
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
ASSIST: Achieving Student Success through Interventions, Strategies, & Teamwork A Response to Intervention Model Kristi Snow, Ed.S.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
MASSACHUSETTS TIERED SYSTEM OF SUPPORT Melrose Public Schools July 9, 2013.
ADVANCED (SACS) SYSTEM SUMMARY FY15. STANDARD ONE INDICATORS 1.1-The system engages in a systematic, inclusive and comprehensive process to review, revise.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
RTI/MTSS Self-Assessment. RTI Session Objectives -An increase in the understanding of the necessary components of RTI/MTSS -An awareness that each school.
SAM (Self-Assessment of MTSS Implementation) ADMINISTRATION TRAINING
Morgan County Schools Response to Instruction
North Ridge Elementary
Florida’s MTSS Project: Self-Assessment of MTSS (SAM)
Ed Skowneski, Principal Jane Sturgell, School Psychologist
Response to Intervention R. E. A. C. H
RTI: Response To Instruction
Effective Implementation of Professional Learning Communities
Response to Intervention = RTI
NOTES FOR PRESENTERS VIEW
RTI: Response to Intervention
ABC Unified School District
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Presentation transcript:

Unified Support Services Workgroup recommendations August 2012

The Charge The work group will examine the "current state" for accessing and utilizing student support services. In addition, the team will identify a "desired state" that will support staff to address the needs of struggling learners. The team will also develop a consistent district wide collaborative problem solving model to align support services, which will help increase staff capacity and learning.

Problem-Solving Teams within RTI 1.Meeting #1 – Data Review Meetings (PLC) 3x/per following universal assessments 2.Meeting #2 – Instructional Planning Meetings (PLT) Grade level/Dept meetings with ancillary supports 3.Meeting #3 – Problem-Solving Meetings (Instructional Consultation, Building Team, etc.) The meeting we are all used to…building team

District Student Services  ESL/Bilingual para  SAPC/Behavior Intervention  Speech  ICT  LLI  Title 1  OT/PT  Resource/ASD Teachers  Teacher Consultant  Social Work  Psychologist  Para  Literacy Coaches  Counselors  Principal  Assistant Principals  SE Supervisor  Parent Coordinators  Administrative Intern  Student Dean

Instructional Consultation Implementation  Year 1- Facilitator trained. Team developed.  Year 2- Facilitator trained and practice. Team training.  Year 3- Team training and practice  Year 4- full implementation

Instructional Consultation  Team 8-12 members Facilitator Case managers  General Education Teachers  Specialist Teachers  Administrator  Speech and Language  Social Work  Psychologist  SAPC/ Behavior Interventionist  Bilingual teacher  Literacy interventionist

PST Coordinator  Trained in facilitation, communication and problem solving skills  Elementary PST Coordinator will be the ICT Facilitator.  Counselors will be identified as the PST coordinator. It is believed naming the counselor is a natural progression of the counselor’s duties with an added element of structure and systematic progress with consistency across the district. 1 representative for each grade level.  Secondary recommendations to begin a work group for a problem solving process and unification support services.

PST procedure  Single form to request any student support. This form will be clear, concise, systematic and provide tracking.  The PST facilitator will bring the forms to the weekly or bi- weekly PST meeting  A case manager is matched to each case  Within one week the partner will contact the teacher  At the PST meeting: tracking, case updates will happen and case managers/partners will get needed support and collaboration on cases. PST members will designate established roles to keep the process smooth (facilitator, time keeper, record keeper, etc.)  Case manager will follow the PST system

Problem Solving Stages  Problem Identification Specific and measurable  Baseline Collection/Goal setting  Strategy design  Strategy implementation  Strategy Evaluation

Data Collection  Varies based on case manager  Recorded and monitored  Goal setting based on skill building  Pearson

Common Understandings will be established by PST team, such as:  Emphasis in the PST process is on in-the-classroom interventions, which the teachers implement with integrity  Proactive response to learning challenges are emphasized over reactive response  Alignment with RTI, the tiers, theory  Contracting between teacher and case manager/case partner involves: (no pull-out, shoulder to shoulder collaboration)  Support personnel that have cases will communicate with classroom teacher to ensure that instruction is consistent with instruction in the classroom

Next Steps  Building level  Each building needs awareness about the PST system by ICT facilitator or PST leader in upper elementary, including rationale and Basic Assumptions  PST will replace other student support committees, such as building team Use technology whenever possible to support and share PST work, ie., meeting room with projector, putting forms and tracking system on-line of on shared folder etc Align a weekly meeting date to include all student support personnel

Next Steps  Professional Development Pearson Training for PST members in Problem solving stages to align with Instructional Consultation Build awareness about team at each building and within each department Tighten PLC’s to look at data and address problem solving District meetings with PST Coordinators

Next Steps  District  Develop schedule for district-based personnel to meet at particular building on PST – school at the beginning of the year PST meetings are put on a consistent day/time so that support staff can plan meetings into their schedules. This is scheduled on district calendar.  Support departments professional development to build awareness about the PST system  Unification work group for the secondary level buildings (7-12)