Anticipating Cloud-to-Ground (CG) Lightning Utilizing Reflectivity Data from the WSR-88D. Pete Wolf, SOO National Weather Service Jacksonville, Florida.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
5 th International Conference of Mesoscale Meteor. And Typhoons, Boulder, CO 31 October 2006 National Scale Probabilistic Storm Forecasting for Aviation.
Advertisements

WSR-88D Signatures Associated with One Inch Hail in the Southern Plains Dennis E. Cavanaugh Jessica A. Schultz National Weather Service Weather Forecast.
Cloud Flash Evaluation Issues and Progress Report Don MacGorman, NOAA/NSSL Al Nierow, FAA Dennis Boccippio, NASA/MSFC.
Total Lightning Collaborations with NASA SPoRT and the National Weather Service Southern Thunder Workshop July, 2011 Norman, OK Christopher Darden,
WFO OKX – Topics in WDM Michael L. Ekster Severe Weather Warning Technology Workshop 12 July 2005.
Jess Charba Fred Samplatsky Phil Shafer Meteorological Development Laboratory National Weather Service, NOAA Updated September 06, 2013 LAMP Convection.
Chapter 5: Storm Chasing (MetEd, Into the Storm) Chapter 6: Lightning, Thunder, Tornados Chapter 7: Tropical Storms & Hurricanes Mr. Hartwell UNIT B –
Prof. Paul Sirvatka ESAS 1115 Severe and Unusual Weather Severe and Unusual Weather ESAS 1115 Severe and Unusual Weather ESAS 1115 Spotter Training and.
A tale of two severe weather surprises – The isolated event of 16 July 2010 and the severe weather outbreak of 17 July 2010 Neil A. Stuart NOAA/NWS Albany,
Inter-comparison of Lightning Trends from Ground-based Networks during Severe Weather: Applications toward GLM Lawrence D. Carey 1*, Chris J. Schultz 1,
Preparing for a “Change” in Severe Hail Warning Criteria in 2010 Brian J. Frugis NWS WFO Albany, NY NROW XI November 4-5, 2009.
S. Hunter Coleman*, Michael Cammarata, Anthony Petrolito NOAA/National Weather Service WFO Columbia, SC * A Significant Hail.
STEPS Severe Thunderstorm and Precipitation Studies May-July 2000.
Using WSR-88D Reflectivity for the Prediction of Cloud-to- Ground Lightning Nowcasting a storm’s first strike Brandon Vincent NWS-Newport Larry Carey Texas.
Severe Squall Line over Quebec August 18th 2008 Robert Michaud QSPC – Montreal October 29th 2008.
Lightning The LDAR II Network Nicholas W. S. Demetriades, Ronald L. Holle and Martin J. Murphy Vaisala, Inc., Tucson, Arizona HEAT Project - First Planning.
A Storm-Scale Analysis of the 16 June 2008 Significant Severe Weather Event across New York and Western New England Thomas A. Wasula NOAA/NWS at Albany.
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting. The National Weather Service The National Weather Service (NWS) is responsible for forecasts several times.
Determining Favorable Days for Summertime Severe Convection in the Deep South Chad Entremont NWS Jackson, MS.
Kristopher White & Brian Guyer The GOES-R Convective Initiation Product... Operational Examples and Thoughts on Proper Viewing Strategies.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Operational thunderstorm nowcasting in the Alpine region.
Auroras Now! Kirsti Kauristie 1), Anssi Mälkki 1), Anneli Ketola 1), Heikki Nevanlinna 1), Tero Raita 2), and Alberto Blanco 1) 1)Finnish Meteorological.
On the relationship of in-cloud convective turbulence and total lightning Wiebke Deierling, John Williams, Sarah Al-Momar, Bob Sharman, Matthias Steiner.
An Update on TBSSs and Relatively Moist Environments Matthew J. Bunkers 2006 Spring Training.
The Lightning Warning Product Fifth Meeting of the Science Advisory Committee November, 2009 Dennis Buechler Geoffrey Stano Richard Blakeslee transitioning.
GOES-R Proving Ground Storm Prediction Center and Hazardous Weather Testbed Chris Siewert 1,2, Kristin Calhoun 1,3 and Geoffrey Stano OU-CIMMS, 2.
Verification of the 88D Hail Detection Algorithm at WFO Cheyenne Mike Weiland WFO Cheyenne.
Forecasting Lightning Initiation and Cessation at Kennedy Space Center
USE AND EVALUATION OF TOTAL LIGHTNING DATA IN THE GOES-R PROVING GROUND AND EXPERIMENTAL WARNING PROGRAM Kristin Kuhlman (CIMMS/NSSL) Geoffrey Stano (NASA/SPORT)
Christopher J. Schultz 1, Walter A. Petersen 2, Lawrence D. Carey 3* 1 - Department of Atmospheric Science, UAHuntsville, Huntsville, AL 2 – NASA Marshall.
Enhanced Lightning Products and Services for Incident Support Operations through Improved Short Term Forecast Techniques Ben Herzog 1, Matthew Volkmer.
NCAR Auto-Nowcaster Convective Weather Group NCAR/RAL.
Julie Haggerty National Center for Atmospheric Research Friends and Partners of Aviation Weather October July 2014.
Evolving to Polygon Warnings: An Effective False Alarm Solution for the National Weather Service Pete Wolf, SOO NWS Jacksonville FL.
Bryan Jackson General Forecaster WFO LWX. Introduction Utilizing Total Lightning data from the DC- Lightning Mapping Array (DC-LMA) to create a preview.
An Experiment to Evaluate the Use of Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts from Numerical Guidance by Operational Forecasters Joshua M. Boustead and Daniel.
MDL Lightning-Based Products Kathryn Hughes NOAA/NWS/OST December 3, 2003
The Benefit of Improved GOES Products in the NWS Forecast Offices Greg Mandt National Weather Service Director of the Office of Climate, Water, and Weather.
Vaisala TLS200 VHF total lightning mapping for safety and nowcasting applications Nick Demetriades 1, Ron Holle 2, and Nikki Hembury 2 Vaisala Inc. 1 Helsinki,
Flash Flood Monitoring and Prediction (FFMP) John Ferree Warning Decision Training Branch Norman, OK John Ferree Warning Decision Training Branch Norman,
Relationships between Lightning and Radar Parameters in the Mid-Atlantic Region Scott D. Rudlosky Cooperative Institute of Climate and Satellites University.
T he Man-In-The-Loop (MITL) Nowcast Demonstration: Forecaster Input into a Thunderstorm Nowcasting System R. Roberts, T. Saxen, C. Mueller, E. Nelson,
Geoffrey Stano – ENSCO / SPoRT David Hotz and Anthony Cavalluci– WFO Morristown, TN Tony Reavley – Director of Emergency Services & Homeland Security of.
National Weather Service Water Science and Services John J. Kelly, Jr. Director, National Weather Service NOAA Science Advisory Board November 6, 2001.
NOAA Hazardous Weather Test Bed (SPC, OUN, NSSL) Objectives – Advance the science of weather forecasting and prediction of severe convective weather –
Discriminating Between Severe and Non-Severe Storms Scott D. Rudlosky Henry E. Fuelberg Department of Meteorology Florida State University.
1 April 27-28, 2011 Southeast Tornado Outbreak April 27-28, 2011 ~190 tornadoes, ~311 fatalities Deadliest outbreak since March 21, 1932 Outlook issued.
Lightning Jump Evaluation RITT Presentation Tom Filiaggi (NWS – MDL) 11/28/12 Evaluation of “2σ” as Predictor for Severe Weather.
Analysis of Cloud-to-Ground Lightning Within 16 Landfalling Hurricanes Danielle Nagele.
THE BARON TORNADO INDEX (BTI)
Early Evaluation and Operational Applications of Total Lightning in AWIPS-2 Al Cope NOAA/National Weather Service Forecast Office Mount Holly, NJ
Statistical Severe Convective Risk Assessment Model (SSCRAM) SPC Mesoanalysis Data every hour from (Bothwell et al. 2002) + CG NLDN Lightning.
HRV (70-100%)IR10.8 (Tb 35dBz HRV cloud (HRV,HRV,IR10.8) radar Zmax > 35dBz (CC+CG) 10-minute lightning data (CC+CG) Simultaneous.
Recent and Planned Updates to the NCAR Auto-Nowcast (ANC) System Thomas Saxen, Rita Roberts, Huaqing Cai, Eric Nelson, Dan Breed National Center for Atmospheric.
Applied Meteorology Unit 1 High Resolution Analysis Products to Support Severe Weather and Cloud-to-Ground Lightning Threat Assessments over Florida 31.
Paper WSN05 Toulouse 5-9 September, 2005 VERIFICATION OF OPERATIONAL THUNDERSTORM NOWCASTS E. Ebert, T. Keenan, J. Bally and S. Dance Bureau of.
National Weather Association 40th Conference, October 2015 Early History of Using “Total Lightning Information” in National Weather Service Operations.
Lecture 8 (10/28) METR 1111 Radars. Radar & its History RADAR is an acronym Stands for RAdio Detecting And Ranging In 1930’s, radar used to monitor shipping.
A Study of In-Cloud and Cloud-to-Ground Lightning in Tornado-Bearing Supercells in the Midwest Ben Herzog and Patrick S. Market Dept. of Soil, Environmental.
Total Lightning Characteristics in Mesoscale Convective Systems Don MacGorman NOAA/NSSL & Jeff Makowski OU School of Meteorology.
© 2000 Roger Edwards Investigating the Potential of Using Radar to Nowcast Cloud-to-Ground Lightning Initiation over Southern Ontario 18 th Annual GLOMW.
The 1 November 2004 tornadic QLCS event over southwest Illinois Ron W. Przybylinski Science and Operations Officer National Weather Service – St. Louis.
Total Lightning Applications Sixth Meeting of the Science Advisory Committee 28 February – 1 March 2012 National Space Science and Technology Center, Huntsville,
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Combining GOES Observations with Other Data to Improve Severe Weather Forecasts.
Operational Use of Lightning Mapping Array Data Fifth Meeting of the Science Advisory Committee November, 2009 Geoffrey Stano, Dennis Buechler, and.
Kristin M. Kuhlman (CIMMS/NSSL) Christopher Siewert (CIMMS/SPC) Geoffrey Stano (NASA/SPORT) Eric Bruning (TTU) GLM in the GOES-R Proving Ground and HWT.
Paper Review Jennie Bukowski ATS APR-2017
ATM 401/501 Status of Forecasting: Spring 2013
ASAP Convective Weather Analysis & Nowcasting
Using WSR-88D Reflectivity for the Prediction of Cloud-to-ground Lightning: A Central North Carolina Study A collaborative research project between NCSU.
Presentation transcript:

Anticipating Cloud-to-Ground (CG) Lightning Utilizing Reflectivity Data from the WSR-88D. Pete Wolf, SOO National Weather Service Jacksonville, Florida Image from NOAA

Should We Do More? CG lightning as weather-related killer…2 nd to floods. CG lightning among leading weather-related causes of property damage, and most frequent damage claim. –$2 billion+ annually in U.S. alone. Lightning is the most frequent threat to life/property. Our current effort is primarily focused on public awareness. –30/30 rule, “Take Cover if you Hear Thunder”, Lightning Awareness Week, etc. –In real-time, we do more to alert people of penny-sized hail than CG lightning. –More is not done due to belief that all t-storms produce deadly lightning.

Is CG Lightning Predictable (or at least “Nowcast”-able) A study on CG lightning initiation radar clues at the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) determined that skill in anticipating CG lightning was achievable. –The study involved about 40 thunderstorms around the KSC area. –Results showed the best correlation when the 40dBZ core reached at least the -10C height…yielding a POD around 0.85, an average lead time of 7.5 minutes, and a low FAR.

WFO Jacksonville FL Study A more ambitious study was completed in 2005, involving 420+ convective cells across northern FL, southern GA and other areas of the southern U.S. The study included a mix of single cell, multi-cell, and supercell events occurring during various times of the year (a few cases were in prior years). –Nearly 320 cells for CG initiation study, 109 not producing CG lightning. –Additional 109 cells producing numerous CG strikes after initially producing isolated/scattered strikes The study compared storms producing… –No CG strikes (that had 40dBZ core up to at least 10 Kft, with an echo top up to at least 22 Kft) –Isolated/Scattered strikes (defined as 1-10 CG strikes per 5-minute period) –Numerous/Excessive strikes (defined as > 10 CG strikes per 5- minute period)

WFO Jacksonville FL Study KSC Study: –Used Environ. -10C level –Used 40 dBZ echo height JAX Study –Used “Updraft” -10C level –Used 40 dBZ echo height Updr -10C Envir -10C

WFO Jacksonville Findings Due to a number of issues, a probabilistic approach to the results was taken. –Radar issues (e.g. interpolation, calibration, etc). –NLDN output accuracy issues. –Specific values issue (is there a difference between 40 dBZ and 38 dBZ or 42 dBZ?)

WFO Jacksonville Findings The results suggested skill in producing probabilistic guidance based on the 40 dBZ echo height… PROBABILITY OF: No CGCGNmrs CG Lgtng Lgtng Strikes 40dBZ height < -10C level – 8 kft100%0%0% 40dBZ height = -10C level – 5 to 7 kft87%13%0% 40dBZ height = -10C level – 2 to 4 kft (~ -6/-7C level)67%33%0% 40dBZ height = -10C level +/- 1 kft (apprch/exceed -10C)23%77%0% 40dBZ height = -10C level + 2 to 4 kft22%78%0% 40dBZ height = -10C level + 5 to 7 kft0%100%18% 40dBZ height = -10C level + 8 to 10 kft5%95%41% 40dBZ height > -10C level + 11 to 14 kft 1%99%75% 40dBZ height > -10C level + > 14 kft 0%100%92% (51%) Note skill in predicting CG strikes when 40dBZ height reaches -10C height in updraft. Note skill in predicting numerous CG strikes when 40 dBZ height > -10C height + 10kft. Note CG lightning is unlikely when the 40dBZ height is no higher than -10C level - 5kft The probability patterns above suggest probabilistic guidance can be generated for CG lightning.

WFO Jacksonville Findings…Update Updated results through mid 2006, incorporating a total of 835+ convective cells: PROBABILITY OF: No CGCGNmrs CG Lgtng Lgtng Strikes 40dBZ height < -10C level – 8 kft100%0%0% 40dBZ height = -10C level – 5 to 7 kft92%8%0% 40dBZ height = -10C level – 2 to 4 kft (~ -6/-7C level)79%21%0% 40dBZ height = -10C level +/- 1 kft (apprch/exceed -10C)39%61%0% 40dBZ height = -10C level + 2 to 4 kft16%84%0% 40dBZ height = -10C level + 5 to 7 kft1%99%11% 40dBZ height = -10C level + 8 to 10 kft2%98%35% 40dBZ height > -10C level + 11 to 14 kft 2%98%45% 40dBZ height > -10C level + > 14 kft0%100%92% (57%) Note skill in predicting CG strikes when 40dBZ height reaches -10C height in updraft. Note skill in predicting numerous CG strikes when 40 dBZ height > -10C height + 10kft. Note CG lightning is unlikely when the 40dBZ height is no higher than -10C level - 5kft The probability patterns change little, again suggesting probabilistic guidance can be generated for CG lightning.

Failure Areas This concept does not work well for: –Lengthy anvils, that may not have 40dBZ echo, yet can yield “bolts from the blue”. –Widespread MCS stratiform regions. It is possible to relate these failures to a sufficiently high 40dBZ core within the upstream (storm-relative) updraft region. Manual intervention needed to account for these failure areas.

CASE EXAMPLES Let’s take a look at a few cases, to demonstrate what the results suggest…an ability to anticipate occurrence and amount of CG lightning, based on WSR-88D reflectivity data. –April 22, 2005: Supercell/bow echo case –June 27, 2005: Pulse storm case The following are 5-min CG lightning displays (from NLDN), with CG lightning probabilities overlaid (numerous strike…>10 per 5 min…probabilities in parentheses). Very High Probability…90%+ (80%+) High Probability…60-85% (50-75%) Moderate Probability…30-50% (25-45%) Low Probability…5-25% (5-20%)

PROBABILITIES USED IN EXAMPLES 40dBZ height relative Prob of CG lightningProb of numerous strikes to updraft -10C level(1+ per 5 min period)(> 10 per 5 min period) -8+ kft -7 kft5% -6 kft10% -5 kft15% -4 kft20% -3 kft30% -2 kft40% -1 kft50% 0 kft60% +1 kft70% +2 kft75% +3 kft80% +4 kft85%5% +5 kft90%10% +6 kft95%15% +7 kft95%20% +8 kft95%25% +9 kft95%30% +10 kft99%40% +11 kft99%50% +12 kft99%60% +13 kft99%70% +14 kft99%80% > +14 kft99%90%

1640z March 22, 2005 Part I

1645z

1655z 1655

1700z

1705z

1710z

1715z

1725z

1730z

1735z

1745z

1750z

1755z

1800z

1805z

1810z

1815z P A U S E

2045z March 22, 2005 Part II (2 ½ hrs later)

2050z

2055z

2100z

2105z

2110z

2115z

2120z

2125z

2130z

2135z 99(90)

2140z

2145z P A U S E

1725z June 27, 2005

1730z

1735z

1740z

1745z

1750z

1755z

1800z

1805z

1810z

1815z

1820z

1825z P A U S E

How Can We Utilize This? Develop a WSR-88D algorithm that shows CG lightning/ numerous strike probabilities for detected cells. –Currently, SCAN only has detected CG rate. –Have algorithm update after every slice. Develop a web page display of CG lightning/ numerous strike probabilities, based on WSR-88D data. –Private sector could develop program to alert customers based on desired probability level. Issue CG lightning alerts for communities. –Some offices include lightning potential (especially excessive strikes) in significant weather alert SPS products. CG Lgtng Any Nmrs 95% 70% 75% 20% 40% 5% L4 C8 J CG Lightning Probability

THE NEXT STEP… Pete Wolf, SOO NWS Jacksonville FL ext 224 Develop algorithm, that produces radar-based CG lightning (and numerous strike) probabilities, for field evaluation. QUESTIONS / COMMENTS ???