Hy-V 0.1 Environmental Testing Phillip Jasper Ryan Johnson Mitchell Foral December 2008 Virginia Tech and University of Virginia.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Data Acquisition Concepts Data Translation, Inc. Basics of Data Acquisition.
Advertisements

Analog Sensing 101 WITH P Agenda  Analog Signal Characteristics  Common Problems with A/D Conversion  Clipping  Small Signals  Aliasing  Analog.
RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Minnesota Sound Wreckers Conceptual Design Review University of Minnesota Alexander Richman Jacob Schultz Justine Topel Will Thorson.
FLIGHT READINESS REVIEW TEAM HAWAII. LEO HANO FULL SCALE LOW POWER March 13, 2011 Motor = K780R.
Protocol & Test Review Spaceport America Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Proposal Analysis Review NMSGC Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Data Test Review Spaceport America Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Critical Analysis Review NMSGC Student Launch Program University/Institution Team Members Date.
Flight Readiness Review New Mexico Space Grant Consortium University/Institution Team Members Date.
May 14th, 2010 FMSTR. The Problem and Proposed Solution No current, acceptable solution exists to determine liquid volume in a tank exposed to microgravity,
Colorado Space Grant Consortium DemoSat-B Colorado State University Matthew Jui, Ian Patterson, Mark Spowart, Todd Wallis June Colorado Space Grant.
Rock it rocke Temple University
Preliminary Design Review Northwest Nazarene University Advisor: Dr. Lawrence Chad Larson Ben Gordon Seth Leija David Vinson Zach Thomas Drew Johnson.
Critical Design Review Northwest Nazarene University Advisor: Dr. Lawrence Chad Larson Ben Gordon Seth Leija David Vinson Zach Thomas Drew Johnson.
Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date.
University of Wyoming Charles Galey, Nicholas Roder, Peter J. Jay, William Ryan 10/14/
Good Vibrations Conceptual Design Review University of Wyoming James Richey, Justin Thornton, Luke Voss, Jake Thatcher, Tony Allais Oct 27, 2008.
Space Cowboys. Mission Overview Objective – Accurately measure flight parameters including ambient and skin temperatures, pressure, acceleration, spin.
University of Wyoming Dorin Blodgett, Kevin Brown, Heather Choi, Ben Lampe Eric Robinson, Michael Stephens, Patrick Weber October 7,
NORTHWEST NAZARENE UNIVERSITY CHAD LARSON, BEN GORDON, DAVID VINSON, SETH LEIJA, ZACH THOMAS, DREW JOHNSON NNU Team Conceptual Design Review.
RockSat-C 2011 CoDR Harding Flying Bison ROCKSAT-C Team Conceptual Design Review Harding University Ed Wilson, Mentor, Will Waldron, Student 2, Student.
Payload Subsystem Integration and Testing Report Team Name 1 Team Name 2 Team Name N Universities/Institutions Team Members Date.
Electrical and Computer Engineering Personal Heads-Up Display Ivan Bercovich Radu-Andrei Ivan Jeff Little Felipe Vilas-Boas Faculty: Dr. Tilman Wolf Preliminary.
Conceptual Design Review Metro State College of Denver Daniel Bass, Matt Hanley
P13625 – Indoor AIR Quality Monitor
Full Mission Simulation Report New Jersey Space Grant Consortium at Stevens Institute of Technology and Rutgers University Ethan Hayon, Mark Siembab, Mike.
(PDR ) University of Northern Colorado Nathan and Casey 11/14/08.
FSAE Instrumentation Presentation Bret Isbell Al Mukmin Paul Otto Miguel Roncal Jud Ryckman Walter Thorn.
Team of engineers who build a system need:  An abstraction of the system  An unambiguous communication medium  A way to describe the subsystems ◦ Inputs.
Critical Design Review Team Name University/Institution Team Members Date.
RamRack Preliminary Design Review Colorado State University Zach Glueckert Christopher Reed Timothy Schneider Brendan Sheridan Christina Watanuki Advisor:
MINNROCK CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW University of Minnesota William Ung Scott Balaban Tom Thoe Bryce Doug Carlson 11/14/2008.
Kaitlin Peranski Spencer Wasilewski Kyle Jensen Kyle Lasher Jeremy Berke Chris Caporale.
Common PDR Problems ACES Presentation T. Gregory Guzik March 6, 2003.
Critical Design Review Team Name University/Institution Team Members Date.
Team Parro Project HUSP. Team Members Jason Rollins – Project Manager / Electrical Design Jason Rollins – Project Manager / Electrical Design Shawn Mullins.
Hy-V.1 Skin Friction Sensor Experiment Presenters: Ryan F. Johnson Mitchell Foral-Systems November 24, 2008 University of Virginia.
MinnRock Design and Canister Layout Team members Bryce Schaefer (team coordinator)- AEM Cameron Japuntich- AEM Liz Sefkow- ME Mitch Andrus-
By: Christiano Daniel Abadi. Deliverables/Achievements in Spring 2000: 8 Systems Engineering Documents Overall and power budgets Gantt Chart for Preliminary.
Autonomous Helicopter James LydenEE 496Harris Okazaki.
Wireless Test Instrumentation System for Rotating Parts ECE Team 167 Lawrence Bogan Jeremy Neaton Adam Bienkowski Michael Golob ME Team 29 Sean Handahl.
The BRASS Project University of North Dakota Matthew Voigt Nathan Ambler Ron Fevig John Nordlie Tim Young Nirmal Patel (University of North Florida) Baike.
Individual Subsystem Testing Report New Jersey Space Grant Consortium with Rutgers University Stevens Institute of Technology 2/13/2012.
P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015.
RockSat-C 2012 SITR Full Mission Simulation Report University of Minnesota Alexander Richman Jacob Schultz Justine Topel Will Thorson 4/23/2012.
Aerospace Digital Communication Instrument Senior Design 1 Presentation.
ISA CIRCUIT BREAKERS TEST SETS
Path The purpose of this project is to design a universal data recording device to monitor the health of a Dresser-Rand compressor during operation. In.
Aerospace Digital Communication Instrument Senior Design Presentation.
MNROCK CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW University of Minnesota William Ung Scott Balaban Bryce Schaefer Tom Thoe 11/3/2008.
Launch Readiness Review
BlackBox Sat Critical Design Review Colorado State University-Pueblo April 2, 2004 Greg Barela Jose Segovia Enrique Cornejo.
RequirementMethodStatus The payload must not exceed a weight of 1.45 Kgm.Design, Test The payload must conform to the WFF “no volt requirement”
Section 1: Mission Overview Mission Statement Mission Objectives Expected Results System Modifications Functional Block Diagrams 2.
Colorado State University Paul Scholz, Tyler Faucett, Abby Wilbourn, Michael Somers June
2014 CoDR Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
Preliminary Design Review Metro State College of Denver Matthew Hanley, Daniel Bass 14 November 2008.
Full Mission Simulation Test Report RocketSat CU Boulder
Tethered Aerostat Program Concept Design Review Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/College Team Members Date.
1 Summary Lecture: Part 1 Sensor Readout Electronics and Data Conversion Discovering Sensor Networks: Applications in Structural Health Monitoring.
RamRack Conceptual Design Review Colorado State University Zach Glueckert Christopher Reed Timothy Schneider Brendan Sheridan Christina Watanuki Advisor:
Inertial Measurement Unit. Project Advisor: Dr. Basart Client: Matt Nelson Team Members (491): Matt Ulrich Luis Garcia Amardeep Jawandha Julian Currie.
In and Out Line Monitoring System for Volleyball
SOAREX VII Mission Design, construct, test, and fly an ultralight (
Functional Decomposition
JASMM Conceptual Design Review
Image Acquisition and Processing of Remotely Sensed Data
Team Name Conceptual Design Review
Launch Readiness Report West Virginia University
Command and Data Handling
Presentation transcript:

Hy-V 0.1 Environmental Testing Phillip Jasper Ryan Johnson Mitchell Foral December 2008 Virginia Tech and University of Virginia

Overview Objective: –Test the vibration, external and internal temperature, and pressures experienced in flight –Flight qualify the five sensors and Persistor DataLogger –Students to gain experience in several areas of engineering by engaging in a student run sounding rocket experiment Expected to prove: –Prove the equipment are viable for the Hy-V Project to be launched in 2010/2011 –Measured values match predicted values of vibration, pressure, and temperature

Importance of Hy-V 0.1 Act as a Preliminary Flight test: –Students already involved in Hy-V scramjet flight experiment –Hy-V is an experiment executed between UVA and VT Flight will give UVA and VT a chance to work together to achieve a successful flight prior to the flight experiment –These students will be able to advise faculty and peers on the sounding rocket process –Important for students to broaden their knowledge of instrumentation Given experience with instrumentation, students will be able to advise on sensor function for the future

Science and Theory Vibration, Temperature, and Pressure profiles must be known for Hy-V Project to be successful Certain pieces of equipment unique to this project are sensitive to these parameters _X)_Mach_7_computational_fluid_dynamic_(CFD).jpg

Temperature Sensor Omega P-L Series 100 Ohm Platinum RTD Operating Temperature: -100 C to +400C (dependent on cable covering) 1/8” Mounted Thread Accuracy Available up to 10 DIN (δT = +/- 0.1 X ( |T|)) Probe is 6” Long with wiring, main body is 2”

Pressure Transducer Honeywell ASDX100 Supply Voltage: 4.75V to 5.25V dc Max Supply Voltage: 6.50V dc Consumption Current: 6 mA Lead Temperature: 250 C Pressure Range: 0 – 100 PSI Sensitivity: V/PSI Accuracy: +/- 2% Operating Temperature Range: -20 C to +105 C Vibration max: 10G at Hz Shock max: 50G for 11 ms Approximate Price: $25 asheet-09/tnDSA jpg

Accelerometer Freescale Semiconductor MMA3201 Supply Voltage: 4.75V to 5.25V dc Consumption Current: mA Sensitivity: 50 mV/g Operating Temperature Range: -40 C to +125 C Vibration max: 45g

Inertial Sensor Analog Devices High Precision Tri-Axis Inertial Sensor ADIS16355 Operating Temperature Range: -40 C to +85 C Tri-axis gyroscope with digital range scaling 14-bit resolution +/- 10 g measurement range Supply Voltage 4.75 – 5.25 V 2000 g Shock Qualified Size: 23 mm X 23 mm X 23 mm

UVA Skin Friction Sensor Skin friction sensor specifications: Operates in excess of 1000 degrees C. Between 4 and 10 mm^2 in surface area. Frequency response in the kHz range. Power in: 3-20V From the manufacturer: o Analog signal output o Small footprint o Low weight o Low power consumption

Current Board Options Persistor DataLogger CF2 –Motorola based single board computer –ADC: 8 Channels at 12-bit, 4 channels at 16 bit –Accepts 3.6 to 20 Volt power input –Draws 5 to 50 mA current at 3.3 VCurrently RockON! Board (fall back): –Voltage Range: 0-5V –8 Channels –10 Bit Resolution –16 MB Data capacity –50 Hz sampling rate –30 minutes of data PC/104+ –Currently owned by VT –Minimum boot time 5-15 secs –Experienced boot time at VT – a few minutes

Concept of Operations: Shortly after T-zero, G-Switch Closes Data logger boots, Sensors turn on CF2 computer begins executing code Logging software is interrupt-driven Data is sampled over SPI bus Data is written directly to Compact Flash Compact Flash card recovered with payload

UVA Concept of Operations Skin friction sensor o Activated by G-switch o Takes readings from inside payload bay, sends them to processor to store into memory until memory is exhausted o Instead of storing data directly, take running averages over periods of time so less memory is needed

Shared Can Logistics UVA: 25% VT: 75% Two Skin Friction sensors Largest sensors Location: irrelevant 5 Sensors Smaller sensors Positioning somewhat relevant Circuit board

Shared Can Logistics-Systems (cont) UVA will make several trips to VT systems integration substructure integration DILT collaboration UVA subsystem team will assist VT’s System team Supply with adequate experimental component  Sensors  Code  Special needs (IE voltage requirements)

Shared Can Logistics(cont)-Mech and Aero VT and UVA will collaborate on structure design Solid modeling Material Selection Fabrication Element analysis (determine structural integrity) VT and UVA will divide aero analysis  Expected instrumentation reading  Expected rocket loads

Shared Can Logistics(cont)-Management UVA and VT teams will collaborate on weekly basis next semester Management- Weekly meetings Systems and Mech- meet every other week UVA and VT will work over the next month to: Delegate specific duties Arrange travel More in-depth system analysis

Flow Chart Diagram for Flight Test Ignition of Rocket Tripping of G-Switch Board Turns on Sensors Power on Code Execution Begins Is memory Full? Yes No Keep Executing Code Stop Code Splash Down Recovery of Rocketv Recovery of DATA Assessment of Test Deintegrate

Block Diagram

Structural Diagrams

Subsystem Overview Electrical and Power Supply (EPS) –EPS subsystem will provide power to all sensors. –EPS subsystem will remain between 20 and 40 Degrees Celsius at all times –Design wiring scheme Communication and Data Handling –Handle the transfer and storing of data from sensors to the CF2 Thermal and Environment –Track temperature profiles and requirements –Track pressure expectations and component requirements –Track vibration levels and component limitations Systems –Track mass and power budgets –Integration of payload into the can (support from structures) Structures –Design interior structure of the canister and provide necessary support and vibration resistance for payload

Parts List PartQuantityCompanyModel CF2 Data Logger1PersistorPERCF21M A/D Board (8ch 12bit) 1PersistorR212 A/D Board (4ch 16bit) 1PersistorAD16S2 RTD2OmegaP-L-1/10-1/8-6-1/8-G-3 Skin Friction Sensor2ATKN/A Inertial Sensor1Analog DevicesADIS16350 Pressure Transducer 1HoneywellASDX Series Accelerometer1FreeScaleMMA3201D Lithium Ion Batt. (9V) 5PowerizerLI-9V400+CH

Rocksat User’s Guide Compliance RequirementMethodStatus Payloads must weigh less than lbs (5.75 kg).Design, Test Payloads must fit in cylindrical can with a diameter of 9.2 inches and height of 9.4 inches. Design The payload’s center of gravity (CG) shall be within a 1x1x1 inch envelope of the geometric centroid of the can. Design, Test No volt requirement: Payload may not have current passing through it before activated at launch. Design, Test Communication systems are prohibited. All data must be stored on on-board memory. Design Payload must withstand G-forces around 25 Gs on the positive z-axis and endure large vibrations in all directions. Design, Test The payload must be capable of meeting all mission objectives. Design, Test

Special Mission Requirements VT would like to measure temperature and pressure near the surface of the rocket. –This requires access to a static port near the wall of the rocket –If impossible to integrate pressure sensor near the rocket skin, the sensors will simply be placed in the RockSat canister.

Sean FlemmingMark Paretic Max RuschePreston Cupp Jason HennDmitry Volodin Matt Banks Phil Jasper Ben Leonard Archie Raval Jess Quinlan Naeem AhmedShaun Masavage Management Chris Koehler and Shawn Carroll PM: Ryan Johnson Chris Goyne Advisor SystemsMech and Aero Kevin Shinpaugh PM: Kyle Knight Mitchell Foral Chris Sweeney UVAVT

Schedule

Test Plans Required tests include: –Structural testing To ensure the payload will survive takeoff (i.e. vibration testing) –Environment Testing Running full simulations for Temperature, Pressure, and Vibration levels –Day In The Life (DITL) Testing At least two full simulations to exhibit the functionality of the payload. This will entail the payload being operated on a bench as an integrated payload for the entire mission life (less than 30 minutes) Tests will also be done on each piece of equipment to ensure they are operative.

Conclusion We have a plan to place multiple sensors on board These sensors will be flight qualified for Hy-V The information gathered will help the Hy-V team plan their components and mission profile Information of sensors’ performance will be used on later flight experiments: UVA shear sensor experiment Hy-V

Appendix Temperature Sensor (RTD) - Ultra_RTD Invensys ASDX100 Pressure Sensor - line.cn/iol_asdx005d44r/pdfview/ htm AS Autosport Pressure Transducer - Transducer.html MMA3201 Accelerometer - pdf/pdf/188041/FREESCALE/MMA3201.html ADIS16355 Inertial Sensor - chip/adis16355/products/product.html