Alberto Loarte 10 th ITPA Divertor and SOL Physics Group Avila – Spain 7/10 – 1 – 2007 1 Current Plans for ITER Hydrogen Phase Presented by A. Loarte with.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Plasma-Surface Interactions Lecture 6 Divertors.
Advertisements

ASIPP Characteristics of edge localized modes in the superconducting tokamak EAST M. Jiang Institute of Plasma Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences The.
Thermal Load Specifications from ITER C. Kessel ARIES Project Meeting, May 19, 2010 UCSD.
First Wall Heat Loads Mike Ulrickson November 15, 2014.
PhD studies report: "FUSION energy: basic principles, equipment and materials" Birutė Bobrovaitė; Supervisor dr. Liudas Pranevičius.
George Sips ITPA, active control, 14 July Real-time Control ( and development of control systems ) at ASDEX Upgrade George Sips Max-Planck-Institut.
Alberto Loarte 10 th ITPA Divertor and SOL Physics Group Avila – Spain 7/10 – 1 – Update on Thermal Loads during disruptions and VDEs A. Loarte.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 14: Anomalous transport / ITER.
1 st ITPA T&C Meeting, Milan, October WAHPage 1 ITER R&D Needs for Transport & Confinement W.A. Houlberg ITER Organization 1st ITPA Transport.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 8 : The tokamak continued.
Energy loss for grassy ELMs and effects of plasma rotation on the ELM characteristics in JT-60U N. Oyama 1), Y. Sakamoto 1), M. Takechi 1), A. Isayama.
Role of ITER in Fusion Development Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA FPA Annual Meeting September 27-28, 2006 Washington,
A. HerrmannITPA - Toronto /19 Filaments in the SOL and their impact to the first wall EURATOM - IPP Association, Garching, Germany A. Herrmann,
Y. Sakamoto JAEA Japan-US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants and Related Technologies with participations from China and Korea February 26-28, 2013 at Kyoto.
Recent JET Experiments and Science Issues Jim Strachan PPPL Students seminar Feb. 14, 2005 JET is presently world’s largest tokamak, being ½ linear dimension.
Prof. F.Troyon“JET: A major scientific contribution...”25th JET Anniversary 20 May 2004 JET: A major scientific contribution to the conception and design.
M.E. Fenstermacher - Summary of Progress and Outlook for Work Plan in PEP ITPA WG on RMP ELM Control 4/23/09 11:15 PM 1 PEP ITPA Working Group on RMP ELM.
10th ITPA meeting on SOL & divertor physics, Avila, Spain, Jan 7-10, 2008 Arne Kallenbach 1/15 Prediction of wall fluxes and implications for ITER limiters.
Kaschuck Yu.A., Krasilnikov A.V., Prosvirin D.V., Tsutskikh A.Yu. SRC RF TRINITI, Troitsk, Russia Status of the divertor neutron flux monitor design and.
H. Urano, H. Takenaga, T. Fujita, Y. Kamada, K. Kamiya, Y. Koide, N. Oyama, M. Yoshida and the JT-60 Team Japan Atomic Energy Agency JT-60U Tokamak: p.
pkm- NCSX CDR, 5/21-23/ Power and Particle Handling in NCSX Peter Mioduszewski 1 for the NCSX Boundary Group: for the NCSX Boundary Group: M. Fenstermacher.
ITPA - IOS st Oct Kyoto E. Joffrin JET programme with the ILW in and relations with the IOS Joint experiments.
ASIPP EAST Overview Of The EAST In Vessel Components Upgraded Presented by Damao Yao.
Progress in ARIES-ACT Study Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego Japan/US Workshop on Power Plant Studies and Related Advanced Technologies 8-9 March 2012 US.
Alberto Loarte 9 th ITPA Divertor and SOL Physics Meeting IPP-Garching 7-10/5/ Report on ITER Design Review Sub-group on : Heat and Particle Loads.
H-mode characteristics close to L-H threshold power ITPA T&C and Pedestal meeting, October 09, Princeton Yves Martin 1, M.Greenwald, A.Hubbard, J.Hughes,
1 Modeling of EAST Divertor S. Zhu Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Selection of Plasma Facing Components for ITER and ITER Operational plan V. Chuyanov (Thanks to Y. Shimomura ) ITPA Garching May
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Stan Milora, ORNL Director Virtual Laboratory for Technology 20 th ANS Topical Meeting on the Technology.
Status of the ASDEX Upgrade Tokamak Programme Hartmut Zohm MPI für Plasmaphysik, EURATOM Association Joint Executive Committee session of IEA-IAs on Pol.
US ITER UFA Meeting APS-DPP Savannah, GA Ned Sauthoff (presented by Dale Meade) November 15, 2004 US In-kind Contributions and Starting Burning Plasma.
V. A. Soukhanovskii NSTX Team XP Review 31 January 2006 Princeton, NJ Supported by Office of Science Divertor heat flux reduction and detachment in lower.
Discussions and Summary for Session 1 ‘Transport and Confinement in Burning Plasmas’ Yukitoshi MIURA JAERI Naka IEA Large Tokamak Workshop (W60) Burning.
NSTX-U NSTX-U PAC-31 Response to Questions – Day 1 Summary of Answers Q: Maximum pulse length at 1MA, 0.75T, 1 st year parameters? –A1: Full 5 seconds.
High  p experiments in JET and access to Type II/grassy ELMs G Saibene and JET TF S1 and TF S2 contributors Special thanks to to Drs Y Kamada and N Oyama.
OPERATIONAL SCENARIO of KTM Dokuka V.N., Khayrutdinov R.R. TRINITI, Russia O u t l i n e Goal of the work The DINA code capabilities Formulation of the.
1 Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik 10th ITPA meeting on SOL/Divertor Physics, 8/1/08, Avila ELM resolved measurements of W sputtering MPI für Plasmaphysik.
Recent Results of KSTAR
Programmatic issues to be studied in advance for the DEMO planning Date: February 2013 Place:Uji-campus, Kyoto Univ. Shinzaburo MATSUDA Kyoto Univ.
Introduction of 9th ITPA Meeting, Divertor & SOL and PEDESTAL Jiansheng Hu
OPERATIONAL SCENARIO of KTM Dokuka V.N., Khayrutdinov R.R. TRINITI, Russia O u t l i n e Goal of the work The DINA code capabilities Formulation of the.
FOM - Institute for Plasma Physics Rijnhuizen Association Euratom-FOM Diagnostics and Control for Burning Plasmas Discussion All of you.
1) Disruption heat loading 2) Progress on time-dependent modeling C. Kessel, PPPL ARIES Project Meeting, Bethesda, MD, 4/4/2011.
Background Long term tritium retention is one of the most critical issues for ITER during the tritium phase. It is mandatory to evaluate the long term.
EFDA EUROPEAN FUSION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Task Force S1 J.Ongena 19th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Lyon Towards the realization on JET of an.
Heat Loading in ARIES Power Plants: Steady State, Transient and Off-Normal C. E. Kessel 1, M. A. Tillack 2, and J. P. Blanchard 3 1 Princeton Plasma Physics.
ITER STEADY-STATE OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS A.R. Polevoi for ITER IT and HT contributors ITER-SS 1.
B WEYSSOW 2009 Coordinated research activities under European Fusion Development Agreement (addressing fuelling) Boris Weyssow EFDA-CSU Garching ITPA 2009.
JT-60U -1- Access to High  p (advanced inductive) and Reversed Shear (steady state) plasmas in JT-60U S. Ide for the JT-60 Team Japan Atomic Energy Agency.
PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION International Plan for ELM Control Studies Presented by M.R. Wade (for A. Leonard)
L. Zanotto – 10 February 2011 – RFX-mod programme workshop TF2: Active control of RFP and tokamak plasmas Report on experimental proposals L. Zanotto,
RFX-mod programme workshop, January 2009 Scenario and operational issues for high current L. Zanotto, R. Cavazzana, S. Dal Bello, F. Milani.
045-05/rs PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Technical Readiness Level For Control of Plasma Power Flux Distribution.
ELM propagation in Low- and High-field-side SOLs on JT-60U Nobuyuki Asakura 1) N.Ohno 2), H.Kawashima 1), H.Miyoshi 3), G.Matsunaga 1), N.Oyama 1), S.Takamura.
1 EAST Recent Progress on Long Pulse Divertor Operation in EAST H.Y. Guo, J. Li, G.-N. Luo Z.W. Wu, X. Gao, S. Zhu and the EAST Team 19 th PSI Conference.
Integrated Simulation of ELM Energy Loss Determined by Pedestal MHD and SOL Transport N. Hayashi, T. Takizuka, T. Ozeki, N. Aiba, N. Oyama JAEA Naka TH/4-2.
1 Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik 9th ITPA Meeting on Divertor and SOL Physics, 10/5/07 Initial operation of ASDEX Upgrade with 100 % tungsten PFCs.
Seminar in ASIPP, 11 Dec Page 1 Status of ITER Project and Issues of Plasma-Wall Interaction Michiya Shimada With contribution from Richard Pitts.
045-05/rs PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Taming The Physics For Commercial Fusion Power Plants ARIES Team Meeting.
NSTX-U Run Planning Guidance for 2015 NSTX-U Research Forum 1 FY2015 (and 2016) research milestones will guide prioritization of eXperimental Proposal.
ELM propagation and fluctuations characteristics in H- and L-mode SOL plasmas on JT-60U Nobuyuki Asakura 1) N.Ohno 2), H.Kawashima 1), H.Miyoshi 3), G.Matsunaga.
Fast response of the divertor plasma and PWI at ELMs in JT-60U 1. Temporal evolutions of electron temperature, density and carbon flux at ELMs (outer divertor)
Page 1 Alberto Loarte- NSTX Research Forum st - 3 rd December 2009  ELM control by RMP is foreseen in ITER to suppress or reduce size of ELM energy.
Development and Assessment of “X-point limiter” Plasmas M. Bell, R. Maingi, K-C. Lee Coping with both steady-state and transient (ELM) heat loads is a.
Alberto Loarte 7 th ITPA Divertor Meeting – Toronto 6/9 – 11 – ITER Issue Card FW-3. Modification of Upper Be-blanket modules, material and/or PFC.
NIMROD Simulations of a DIII-D Plasma Disruption S. Kruger, D. Schnack (SAIC) April 27, 2004 Sherwood Fusion Theory Meeting, Missoula, MT.
TFE 3/2/2004 – Fuel retention in JET - J. Bucalossi / T. Loarer Assessment of fuel retention in JET : Contingency – 2 shifts on 6 th of february E. Tsitrone.
Pellet injection in ITER Model description Model validation
L-H power threshold and ELM control techniques: experiments on MAST and JET Carlos Hidalgo EURATOM-CIEMAT Acknowledgments to: A. Kirk (MAST) European.
Presentation transcript:

Alberto Loarte 10 th ITPA Divertor and SOL Physics Group Avila – Spain 7/10 – 1 – Current Plans for ITER Hydrogen Phase Presented by A. Loarte with input from P. J. Lomas, M. Bell, D. Campbell, R. Sartori, I. Nunes, M. Shimada, E. Synakowski, Y. Kamada, L. Horton, M. Wade, G. Sips, A. Costley, et al.,

Alberto Loarte 10 th ITPA Divertor and SOL Physics Group Avila – Spain 7/10 – 1 – ITER Research and Exploitation Plans  ITER Research Plan being prepared with the following aims Definition of research & exploitation plan to meet ITER mission goals Analysis of ITER facility’s capacity to meet mission Highlighting of R&D required to prepare efficient ITER operation Identification main thematic research areas to be integrated in the exploitation plan  ITER Exploitation Plan (~ 20 years) Hydrogen Phase (~ 2.5 years) Deuterium Phase DT1 Operational Phase (inductive/non-inductive) DT2 Operational Phase (towards power plant physics & technology) Foreseen operation (2 operational shifts/day for 2 weeks + 1 week maintenance & a few months shutdown per 1-2 year)

Alberto Loarte 10 th ITPA Divertor and SOL Physics Group Avila – Spain 7/10 – 1 – Assumptions for start of H Phase  Installation is essentially complete and ready for hydrogen phase (Magnets, Vacuum systems, Be-wall, CFC divertor)  Torus conditioning (without plasma) is complete  Individual subsystem commissioning is either complete or can be phased with plasma operation (T plant commissioned in parallel)  Operation days ~ 150 per year with 50% availability  Available H&CD systems NBI : 8 MW at 0.5 MeV (possibilty of higher power being explored) ICRH : 20 MW (40-55 MHz) ECRH : 20 MW (170 GHz) + 3 MW (127.5 GHz for 10s BD) Error field correction coils Minimum set of diagnostics (first plasma or ready for commissioning with plasma) : Magnetics, n e (r)-T e (r)-T i (r), Runaway diagnostics, visible-near UV & VUV spectroscopy, neutral pressure and gas composition, Halo current monitors, Bolometry and gas balance measurements

Alberto Loarte 10 th ITPA Divertor and SOL Physics Group Avila – Spain 7/10 – 1 – Objectives of H Phase  Demonstrate facility operation sufficient for commissioning with plasma  Commissioning of H&CD systems and diagnostics with plasma  Validation and consistency of measurements  Commissioning and integration of all installed control systems  Commissioning and integration of all safety related systems  Demonstration of plasma operation to full technical performance (15 MA, 5.3 T)  Demonstrate critical systems performance (i.e. divertor power loads)  Validation of licensing assumptions concerning loads (disruptions)  Characterise operational boundaries and off-normal events  Demonstrate (to possible extent) plasma performance and scenarios envisaged for DD and DT operation (ramp-up/down & flat top)  Characterise hydrogenic retention and demonstrate techniques to be used later for control of T inventory

Alberto Loarte 10 th ITPA Divertor and SOL Physics Group Avila – Spain 7/10 – 1 – Operation for commissioning with plasma Objective : Develop plasma operation/scenarios that allow commissioning of H&CD and diagnostic systems with plasmas  Breakdown : Null formation, Inductive breakdown and ECRH assisted breakdown  Initial plasma current rise  Controlled current rise in limiter configuration  Density control by gas fuelling  Demonstration of X-point operation  Demonstration of diverted phase with plasma current flat top  Controlled ramp-down and discharge termination (incl. emergency plasma shutdown) Proposed target plasmas : 3-7 MA, T with q 95 = 4-5 with 10 s flat top (50-100s with PFC protection & emergency shutdown) Exploration of divertor plasmas DL (operation at 80% n GW ) (If Breakdown at low field problematic  Full field option considered)

Alberto Loarte 10 th ITPA Divertor and SOL Physics Group Avila – Spain 7/10 – 1 – Commissioning of Installed systems with Plasma (I) Objective : Commissioning of heating systems and dedicated diagnostic commissioning  Possible reduced field operation for H&CD commissioning (2 nd  ) ECRH: MA(mp)/4-8MA(ul) & T(mp)/ T(ul) q 95 =3-5 ICRH : 3-8MA T q 95 =3-5 NBI : 5.5 MA T q 95 = ICRH ECRH ICRH ECRH

Alberto Loarte 10 th ITPA Divertor and SOL Physics Group Avila – Spain 7/10 – 1 – Commissioning of Installed systems with Plasma (II)  Proposed plan Common plasma for all systems (5-6 MA T with q 95 = 4) (if L-mode density limit higher than 0.8 n GW ) Commission in parallel of H&CD systems to 20 s (100 s flat top assumed)  IR systems (WAV + DIV) + Impurity monitors fully functional Dedicated time for CXRS, MSE calibration (if possible) and other diagnostics cross calibration + absolute calibration foreseen

Alberto Loarte 10 th ITPA Divertor and SOL Physics Group Avila – Spain 7/10 – 1 –  Major topic of H campaign to proceed in parallel with system commissioning & expansion of plasma operation  Some dedicated time to specific to solve problems and discrepancies foreseen  Key measurements to be considered depend on achievable plasma regime : L-mode, poor quality H-mode (maybe possible), high quality Type I H-mode (unlikely)  Measurement validation programme to be linked to scientific objective of R&D programme : fast particle studies (incl. ripple), CD efficiency measurements, L-mode studies, NTM threshold determination in L-mode, fuelling studies (incl. pellets, etc.) Validation of diagnostic data & measurement consistency (I)

Alberto Loarte 10 th ITPA Divertor and SOL Physics Group Avila – Spain 7/10 – 1 – Validation of diagnostic data & measurement consistency (II)

Alberto Loarte 10 th ITPA Divertor and SOL Physics Group Avila – Spain 7/10 – 1 – Validation of diagnostic data & measurement consistency (III)

Alberto Loarte 10 th ITPA Divertor and SOL Physics Group Avila – Spain 7/10 – 1 –  SICs protect plant against failure and some of their actions need to be commissioned with plasma Plasma termination (active protection) Fusion Power Shutdown (failure of tokamak cooling water system) Faults in coils and PF system switch-off Radiological and fire interfaces, etc.  Dedicated time to commissioning of non SIC machine protection systems/diagnostics (e.g. divertor thermography for over-heating avoidance, etc.) Commissioning/Integration of all Safety related systems

Alberto Loarte 10 th ITPA Divertor and SOL Physics Group Avila – Spain 7/10 – 1 –  Push plasma parameters from commissioning level to 15 MA/5.3T and full heating power (~ 48 MW)  Proposed development routes : Constant q 95 ~ 3 : 7 MA  9.6 MA  11.3 MA  12.7 MA  15 MA ~ Constant B  = 5.3 T : 5-6 MA to 7 MA from 2.5 T  5.3T + 9 MA  MA  15 MA at 5.3 T (q 95 = 5  4  3) Initial pulse length secs (> 10  E ) to be extended together with divertor performance assessment Plasma Operation to full technical performance (I) 1.0 ICRH ECRH ICRH ECRH

Alberto Loarte 10 th ITPA Divertor and SOL Physics Group Avila – Spain 7/10 – 1 – R&D topics (with PWI emphasis) that must/could be addressed in this phase in addition to those in main objectives of H campaign  Development of ramp-up scenarios ( l i control) for VS and flux consumption assessment (aiming at l i ~ 0.85 – 1.0) by H&CD application in ramp-up (+ dI p /dt tuning) Plasma Operation to full technical performance (II)

Alberto Loarte 10 th ITPA Divertor and SOL Physics Group Avila – Spain 7/10 – 1 –  SOL transport and divertor power scaling in L-mode (IR + edge plasma measurements) P input, n e, I p, q 95 scans ideal for transport analysis Investigation of divertor asymmetries and plasma flows Initial assessment of SOL effects by plasmas dominated by e- heating + equipartition in reactor scale plasmas Initial assessment of impurity generation and plasma contamination in large range of conditions in ITER (ICRH + W, fast particle effects, etc.)  Density limit characterisation (linked to disruption studies) First assessment of ITER “specific” divertor physics (Ly  re- absroption, n-n collisions, detachment physics, etc.) if high /n GW accessible in L-mode and medium/high currents L-mode : 15 MA, 48 MW, /n GW ~ 0.6  n sep ~ m -3, T sep ~ eV (P sep ~ 30 MW)  n div ~ m -3 for T div = 3 eV Plasma Operation to full technical performance (III)

Alberto Loarte 10 th ITPA Divertor and SOL Physics Group Avila – Spain 7/10 – 1 –  Initial studies of plasma fuelling : fuelling efficiency for gas puffing (divertor & main chamber) and pellet injection for range of L- mode plasma conditions (if H pellets available)  First assessment of divertor erosion/ dust production and fuel retention (linked to retention and inventory control studies) and dependence on plasma characteristics  First assessment of divertor and first wall power and particle fluxes and dependence on plasma conditions Detailed R&D in support of these studies comparing L and H modes (in H & D) in existing devices would allow an initial guess to H-mode SOL plasma characteristics and power fluxes in ITER to be checked in H (if L-H threshold allows) Plasma Operation to full technical performance (IV)

Alberto Loarte 10 th ITPA Divertor and SOL Physics Group Avila – Spain 7/10 – 1 –  Performance of critical systems need to be tested before DD and DT operations  steady-state power handling of divertor and first wall (limiters & upper X-point region) Plasmas to be employed for main wall PFC and divertor tests maybe different because p ~ 1/I p Expected maximum power flux at divertor in L-mode : I p = 15 MA, q 95 = 3, P input = 48 MW, n e /n GW ~ 0.3 and P rad /P input ~ 0.3 if p ~ 1 cm & P div out /P div in ~ 2  q div out ~ 6 MWm -2 (q mp out ~ 120 MWm -2 ) & q II (  R = 4 cm) ~ 2 MWm -2 + wall flux I p = 7.5 MA, q 95 = 3-6, P input = 48 MW, n e /n GW ~ 0.6 and P rad /P input ~ 0.6 if p ~ 2 cm & P div out /P div in ~ 2  q div out ~ 2 MWm -2 (q mp out ~ MWm -2 ) & q II (  R = 4 cm) ~ 5-10 MWm -2 + wall flux Length of P heat most likely set by flux consumption : Higher V loop in L-mode + higher l i  cause higher resistive and inductive flux than in reference H-mode Demonstration of critical system performance

Alberto Loarte 10 th ITPA Divertor and SOL Physics Group Avila – Spain 7/10 – 1 –  Forces on Vacuum Vessel during disruptions and VDEs is a key parameter for licensing  Disruption forces on in-vessel components, disruption thermal loads on PFCs, runaway impact key issues for protection of the tokamak and development of operational strategies  Determination of operational boundaries required for minimisation of disruptive events (, q 95, P input ) during L-mode phases of ITER discharges  Issues to be studied : EM forces on vessel, Blanket modules, Divertor, TBMs, Port Plugs Halo current magnitude, poloidal and toroidal distribution Thermal loads on PFCs during thermal quench and current quench Validation of disruption models Validation of licensing assumptions (I) (disruptions and operational boundaries)

Alberto Loarte 10 th ITPA Divertor and SOL Physics Group Avila – Spain 7/10 – 1 – Runaway generation and suppression schemes/strategies Disruption/VDE mitigation by active methods (MGI)  Conditions to be explored : Upwards/downwards VDEs Density limit and radiative disruptions ideal MHD driven disruption (pressure peaking, low q 95, etc.) L-mode vs. H-mode target plasma before disruption/VDE  Total number of expected disruption several 100s including some at 15MA and highest W plasma achievable  possible in-vessel repairs needed (much easier in H than in DD or DT  Disruption programme to be interleaved with development of plasma performance to 15 MA to allow safe approach to full current plasma Validation of licensing assumptions (II) (disruptions and operational boundaries)

Alberto Loarte 10 th ITPA Divertor and SOL Physics Group Avila – Spain 7/10 – 1 – Plasma performance and scenarios suitable for DD and DT (I) Three areas of R&D during H phase could have major impact on subsequent DD and DT programme  Large hydrogenic retention  Poor H-mode confinement or marginal power for good H-mode  Large unacceptable ELMs for divertor/wall PFC lifetime Assessment of these issues may require additional experimental time and/or plasma conditions besides that already foreseen for the other topics

Alberto Loarte 10 th ITPA Divertor and SOL Physics Group Avila – Spain 7/10 – 1 – Plasma performance and scenarios suitable for DD and DT (II)  Determining as soon as possible hydrogenic retention and related issues in initial PFM choice (Be+W+CFC) important for PFC redesign and/or planning of PFC changes (CFC  W) Monitoring of gas balance in H  Dedicated system under consideration but problem of background H level in materials Analysis of long term or retrievable samples Collection and analysis of dust and flakes Test of techniques (night/weekend shifts) and strategies (operational sequence) to minimise in-vessel fuel inventory Dependence of fuel retention, dust production on plasma characteristics (P inp, I p, n e, L-mode vs. H-mode)

Alberto Loarte 10 th ITPA Divertor and SOL Physics Group Avila – Spain 7/10 – 1 – Plasma performance and scenarios suitable for DD and DT (III)  Understanding H-mode access and H-mode confinement in ITER plasmas as early as possible beneficial for further studies in H plasmas and R&D planning in DD and DT Determination of SOL power width in similar L-mode and H- mode conditions  need for high recycling/detached divertor operation at Q DT = 10 Influence of plasma regime on disruption and VDE dynamics and processes (thermal/mechanical loads, runaways) and mitigation systems Influence of H-mode operation and ELMs on fuel retention

Alberto Loarte 10 th ITPA Divertor and SOL Physics Group Avila – Spain 7/10 – 1 – Plasma performance and scenarios suitable for DD and DT (IV) Available power (48 MW) marginal for Type I H-mode operation  P LH = MW even at 7.5 MA/2.7T and /n GW ~ 0.6 Margin above threshold low ( depending on H-mode natural density) even for optimistic threshold scalings  H-mode studies in H will be very limited or impossible in ITER

Alberto Loarte 10 th ITPA Divertor and SOL Physics Group Avila – Spain 7/10 – 1 – Plasma performance and scenarios suitable for DD and DT (V) If H-mode access in ITER requires powers on the lower range of predictions  Type I ELM studies in H would be possible Determination of ELM size and power load characteristics at q 95 = 3 and 4 (~ 7.5 MA)  relevant ELMs for controlled ELM studies (material erosion) and marginally-uncontrolled ELM studies (material damage) and post-ELM plasma behaviour n ped = m -3 T ped = keV & W ped ~ 25 MJ (from 15MA no isotopic effect) * ped =   W ELM /W ped ~   W ELM < MJ & “natural” f ELM = 1(5MJ) – 4 (3.8MJ) Hz p,ELM ~ p,s.s. ~ 1 cm &  W ELM in /  W ELM out = 2  0.9 – 1.2 MJm -2 at inner divertor for uncontrolled ELMs Tolerable ELM of 0.5 MJm (  rise ~ 250  s)~0.7 MJm MA

Alberto Loarte 10 th ITPA Divertor and SOL Physics Group Avila – Spain 7/10 – 1 – Plasma performance and scenarios suitable for DD and DT (VI) If H-mode access in ITER requires powers on the lower range of predictions  Type I ELM studies in H would be possible Initial studies of ELM control by RMP (requires system to be able to operate in a range of q 95 if lowest field operation difficult) ELM control by pellet pacing (if H pellets available) possible with moderate frequency > 10Hz (i.e. 2 x largest “natural” largest f ELM ) Tests of other ELM control schemes developed in the future (e.g. second separatrix distance, etc.) If H-mode (ELM control) studies are considered essential before D operation and are impossible in H then He operation could be explored (lower P L-H but worse H-mode confinement and no retention studies)

Alberto Loarte 10 th ITPA Divertor and SOL Physics Group Avila – Spain 7/10 – 1 – Overall schedule for H-campaign 1 month  20 planned operational days 50% availability in H-phase  Multiplication by factor of 2 Real time for H-phase = 30.5 months  2.5 years duration for H- phase is not unreasonable

Alberto Loarte 10 th ITPA Divertor and SOL Physics Group Avila – Spain 7/10 – 1 – Conclusions  H phase in ITER key objectives concern system commissioning, critical system tests, acquisition of key measurements for licensing of DD and DT operations and pushing towards full current/field plasmas  Besides this “technical” objectives key Physics R&D will be addressed, such as SOL transport and power deposition in L-mode and, possibly, in a limited range for H-mode conditions Density limit and detachment physics in “typical” ITER conditions (optically thick and collisional neutrals) Runaway generation and suppression methods Disruption physics and mitigation schemes Evaluation of fuel retention and dust production in L-mode and, possibly, in a limited range for H-mode conditions Depending on H-mode access  ELM physics and control in “typical” ITER conditions (low * ped and high n ped /n GW ) Input from ITPA groups to refine further the foreseen R&D plan is very welcome