New partnership dynamics in a changing Cohesion policy context Laura Polverari and Rona Michie Meeting with Economic and Social Partners European Commission,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EMPL Committee 15 July 2010 The ESF Committee Opinion on the future of the ESF and the 23/24 June conference Thomas Bender Employment, Social Affairs and.
Advertisements

Improving Learning – Five Recommendations Herta Tödtling-Schönhofer, Metis Shaping the Future of the ESF Workshop 1: Learning Brussels, 23rd and 24th June.
1 The new ESF Investing in your Future -
1 Open Days 2008 Communicating Cohesion Policy Together Bruxelles, 10/07/2008 The experience of the Italian ED network in Cohesion Policy Communication.
Evaluating administrative and institutional capacity building
NBFSE Financial instruments and mechanisms of fund allocation to social economy Common meeting 5-6 th December, Milano.
Ex-ante conditionality – General guidance Workshop on strategic programming, monitoring and evaluation Ilse De Mecheleer, DG EMPL Madrid, 22 February 2013.
Improving the added value of EU Cohesion policy Professor John Bachtler European Policies Research Centre University of Strathclyde, Glasgow
The Platform of European Social NGOs Making sense of Social Investment Presentation by Michel Mercadié member of Social Platform’s Management Committee.
Role of RAS in the Agricultural Innovation System Rasheed Sulaiman V
European Union | European Regional Development Fund Zooming in Interreg Europe National Info Day 12 May 2015, Paris Nicolas Singer | Senior Project Officer.
Managing authorities working with cities Regions for Economic Change 17 th February 2009 Peter Ramsden Pole Manager.
Regional Policy Managing Authorities of the ETC programmes Annual Meeting W Piskorz, Head of Unit Competence Centre Inclusive Growth, Urban and.
David Halldearn, ERGEG Conference on Implementing the 3 rd Package 11 th December 2008 Implementating the 3rd Package: An ERGEG Consultation paper.
EU-Regional Policy and Cohesion Structural Funds and Accession 1 SPP BUILDING IMPLEMENTATION CAPACITY Training seminar on evaluation Prague February.
Riga – Latvia, 4 & 5 December 2006
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland Experience and new arrangements Ministry of Infrastructure and Development, Poland Athens,
Structural Funds We have to act now! Javier Güemes Acting Director European Disability Forum.
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – Regional Policy Why change? Cohesion Policy has been changing already for a long time! ✦ EU has been changing:
Date: in 12 pts The cultural dimension of the Eastern Partnership Culture Gyöngyi Mikita Policy Officer, "Culture Policy, Diversity and Intercultural Dialogue"
The European Code of Conduct on Partnership Teresa EPALZA European Commission DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion.
REGIONAL ANALYSIS ON DISASTER RISK REDUCTION EDUCATION IN THE ASIA PACIFIC REGION IN THE CONTEXT OF HFA PRIORITY 3 IMPLEMENTATION Bangkok, March 2009 Prepared.
ESPON Seminar 15 November 2006 in Espoo, Finland Review of the ESPON 2006 and lessons learned for the ESPON 2013 Programme Thiemo W. Eser, ESPON Managing.
Reformed Partnership and Multi-Level Governance Ana Maria Dobre Political Administrator General Council Secretariat
Green Paper on National Strategic Planning The Presidency November 2009.
Regional Policy Common Strategic Framework The Commission's revised proposal for the CPR - COM (2012) 496 of 11 Sept.
European Territorial Cooperation SAWP meeting, 9 July
Expert group meeting on draft delegated act on the European code of conduct on partnership (ECCP) under cohesion policy
Evaluation of EU Structural Funds information and publicity activities in Lithuania in Implementing recommendations for Dr. Klaudijus.
Regional Development OP in Hungary , June 2008, Zagrab.
Main elements of the templates for the Partnership Contract and the operational programme.
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Proposals from the European Commission.
European Commission Joint Evaluation Unit common to EuropeAid, Relex and Development Methodology for Evaluation of Budget support operations at Country.
DETERMINE Working document # 4 'Economic arguments for addressing social determinants of health inequalities' December 2009 Owen Metcalfe & Teresa Lavin.
Regional Policy Veronica Gaffey Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy International Monitoring Conference Budapest 11 th November 2011 Budapest 26 th September2013.
1 Cohesion Policy Evaluation Network Meeting: Brussels, September 2009 Ex post evaluation of Cohesion policy programmes co-financed.
Monitoring and Evaluation of Roma projects and policies, Brussels, 30/11/2010 Evaluating the European Social Fund support to Roma inclusion: processes,
The partnership principle and the European Code of Conduct on Partnership.
DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION FRAMEWORK Presentation by Ministry of Finance 10 December 2013.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity SFIT meeting, 12 December 2005 Barbara Piotrowska, DG REGIO
1 UNEP/IETC EST Initiative Proposed Cooperation Framework 4 December 2003 Otsu, Japan.
ESPON Seminar Luxembourg, 8-9 December Cohesion-and-Urban-Policy-_26-27-November-2015_-Luxembourg-City_/index.php.
1 EUROPEAN FUNDS IN HALF-TIME NEW CHALLENGES Jack Engwegen Head of the Czech Unit European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy Prague,
The role of impact assessment in promoting Policy Coherence for Development Meeting of the national focal points for Policy Coherence for Development 1.
REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION The contribution of EU Regional/Cohesion programmes Corinne Hermant-de Callataÿ European Commission,
"The challenge for Territorial Cohesion 2014 – 2020: delivering results for EU citizens" Veronica Gaffey Acting Director EUROPEAN COMMISSION, DG for Regional.
Future outlook and next steps for ESPON The ESPON 2013 Programme OPEN DAYS Bruxelles, 10 October 2007.
Evaluation grid. 1.1 Territorial representativeness Goal:to assess the territorial (and institutional) relevance of the applicants within their national.
Implementation of the European code of conduct on partnership Findings of a survey by ETUC, BUSINESSEUROPE, UEAPME Structured dialogue 12 November 2014.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity Structural Funds Information Team Brussels, 30 June 2005 Barbara Piotrowska, DG REGIO.
European Commission 1 An EU Framework for National Roma Integration Strategies by 2020 An EU Framework for National Roma Integration Strategies by 2020.
MULTI-LEVEL GOVERNANCE FOR THE ACHIEVEMENT OF EQUALITY AND NON-DISCRIMINATION How to ensure thatdifferent governance levels combine to achieve goals of.
Principles 7 Main obstacles articulated in implementing the leading ESF Principles  Uncertainty on advantages  Assumed higher administrative costs 
TAIEX-REGIO Workshop on Applying the Partnership Principle in the European Structural and Investment Funds Bratislava, 20/05/2016 Involvement of Partners.
Partnership in the fight against poverty:
Ex-ante conditionality – General guidance
European social dialogue A new start for social dialogue
Gender Equality Ex post evaluation of the ESF ( )
Presentation ESF performance report AIR 2016 ESF Technical Working Group 9 February 2018 Brussels Costanza Pagnini.
Overview performance report AIR2016
ESF and Social Partners
Summary of key findings Inga Pavlovaite
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland
Anne-Charlott Callerstig & Renate Wielpütz
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
The partnership principle in the implementation of the CSF funds ___ Elements for a European Code of Conduct.
Post-2020 discussions 1. State of play of discussions 2. On-going work 3. Questions for debate.
Ex ante conditionalities in cohesion policy:
Social services for the active inclusion of disadvantaged people
Where do we stand with the Structural Funds?
Presentation transcript:

New partnership dynamics in a changing Cohesion policy context Laura Polverari and Rona Michie Meeting with Economic and Social Partners European Commission, 9 December 2009

Laura Polverari and Rona Michie, Bruxelles, 9 December Background and outline  Paper prepared for the IQ-Net consortium –circa 100 interviews in 15 Member States and with EU level stakeholders –discussed at the Åre IQ-Net conference, 2-4 December 2009  Focus on Socio-Economic and other Non- Governmental Organisations (‘SENGOs’) –how is Art.11 being implemented? –what factors explain the degree to which SENGOs are involved? What constraints and facilitators? –what is the evidence on SENGOs’ influence on programme management? –what issues/lessons for Cohesion policy 2014+? IQ-Net consortium

Laura Polverari and Rona Michie, Bruxelles, 9 December Constraints to effective partnership Constraints internal to partners organisations Programme level arrangements General constraints Institutional factors (culture, resources, leadership, capacities, perception …“annoying insects”) Perception of partnership as strategic by MA Complexity, technicality and timetable of involvement mechanisms Lack of agreement on purpose and role of SENGO involvement Lack of binding rules on partnership  but no consensus on this

Laura Polverari and Rona Michie, Bruxelles, 9 December Actions supporting effective partnership Addressing PMCs’ shortcomings More environments for discussion Regional PMC-type bodies Strategic Advisory Committees More/better targeted information Efforts to keep partners involved Dedicated information platforms Better targeting/channelling of information Capacity Building Targeted initiatives for SENGOs, e.g. Sachsen-Anhalt Kompetenzzentrum, Welsh 3-SET, Slovenian CNVOS, Italian TA project Training Use of TA rare, even discouraged Initiatives by the SENGOs Continuous contact amongst SENGOs Capacity Building Organisation of internal information flows Informal communication

Laura Polverari and Rona Michie, Bruxelles, 9 December Changing partnership dynamics?  New territorial and strategic scope of OPs refocusing of partnership (different composition)  BUT no radical reshaping in the way partnership is operationalised  SENGOs more involved in programme design than in stages of implementation (as in )

Laura Polverari and Rona Michie, Bruxelles, 9 December Influence  SENGOs interviewed found it difficult to assess their influence –“influence is a strong word” –“no immediate influence”  Only a minority were positive about the degree to which they had been able to affect decision-making  Yet a cultural change was noted and there is evidence of concrete impact of SENGOs’ action (on programme design or project selection)

Laura Polverari and Rona Michie, Bruxelles, 9 December Conclusions 1.Programme managers largely satisfied with how SENGOs are involved BUT some fundamental constraints remain 2.SENGOs are more involved in programme design than other stages of programme management 3.SENGOs largely do not perceive their influence to be significant 4.The accountability role of horizontal partnership is undeveloped  SENGOs do not hold MAs to account 5.The Commission’s role in this area is limited  at least in EU15, COM is marginal as a partner and as an enforcer of SENGO inclusion

Laura Polverari and Rona Michie, Bruxelles, 9 December Looking forward: emerging issues Rationale and scope for SENGO involvement  need for a more explicit reflection amongst MS authorities, MAs and SENGOs on the rationale and purpose of SENGO involvement  potential for strategic frameworks with agreed responsibilities and mutual commitments Adequacy of regulatory provisions  no support for more stringent rules, soft tools instead  separation of ERDF and ESF hinders effective SENGOs involvement The reform of Cohesion policy  potential for SENGOs to be involved in debates over future policy  need to ensure that positive experiences matured over decades of Cohesion policy are not lost (in EU15)  a new role for the European Commission? (e.g. as with evaluation)

Laura Polverari and Rona Michie, Bruxelles, 9 December Thank you for your attention.