Marginalised Roma Communities

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation of ESF Support for Roma integration Dominique Bé EURoma, 10 November 2011, Budapest.
Advertisements

What new period of 2007–2013 Convergence program brings to Lithuanias regions Rolandas Kriščiūnas Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Lithuania.
Planning and use of funding instruments
MINISTERSTVO VÝSTAVBY A REGIONÁLNEHO ROZVOJA SLOVENSKEJ REPUBLIKY Sekcia stratégie rozvoja regiónov Prievozská 2/B Bratislava 26 Evaluation within.
PhDr. Michal Vašečka, Ph.D. Center for the Research of Ethnicity and Culture ( Education of Roma as the greatest Challenge of Inclusion Policies.
Regional Policy Revised version Marielle Riché Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy International Monitoring Conference Budapest 11 th November 2011 Brussels.
Cyprus Project Management Society
European Social Fund Evaluation in Italy Stefano Volpi Roma, 03 maggio 2011 Isfol Esf Evaluation Unit Human Resources Policies Evaluation Area Rome, Corso.
Labor market and social protection in Slovakia Project „EU Enlargement and its Impact on the Social Policy and Labor Markets of Accession and Non-Accession.
Delegation of the European Commission Romania preparing for EU membership European Structural and Cohesion Funds.
Integrated Territorial Investment (ITI)
The Youth Employment Initiative
José Manuel Fresno EURoma meeting Budapest, 8 November 2011.
Evidence Based Cohesion Policy Focus on performance incentives Thomas Tandskov Dissing Senior Adviser Ministry of Economics and Business Affairs Danish.
Human Resources Development OP MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND SOCIAL POLICY REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA Opportunities for investment in children's future Gergana.
Sandra Turner ESF Effectiveness Officer Setting the scene.
EUROPEAN COHESION POLICY AT A GLANCE Introduction to the EU Structural Funds Ctibor Kostal Sergej Muravjov.
NEW APPROACH TO MARGINALIZED COMMUNITIES IN SLOVAKIA - ACT ON SOCIALLY EXCLUDED COMMUNITIES EUROMA MEETING, BRATISLAVA, MAY 4, 2012 MARTIN VAVRINČÍK, DEPARTMENT.
Fighting Roma Poverty, Helping Roma Inclusion Seminar on different approaches to social and economic integration of Roma 6 October Brussels Presentation.
Strategic Environmental Assessment and environmental issues in programme evaluation Ivana Capozza Italian Evaluation Units Open Days Roma, July 5, 2006.
1 Swiss-Slovak Cooperation Programme April SWISS-SLOVAK COOPERATION PROGRAMME  New possibilities of financial support for the 10 new member states.
Introducing the 3 rd SEE Call: a strategic approach SEE Programme: the new Calls Ljubljana, 20 April 2011 Ivan Curzolo – SEE Joint Technical Secretariat.
Information by the Managing Authority on thematic evaluation of EU structural funds in Iruma Kravale Head of Strategic Planning Unit, European.
Joost de Laat (Phd) Senior Economist Human Development Europe and Central Asia The World Bank.
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion The new architecture for cohesion policy post-2013 High-Level Meeting on the.
Operational programme “Regions in growth” 2014 – 2020 (OPRG) Operational programme“Regions in growth” Measures aimed at Roma Integration EURoma.
The EU perspective on poverty maps and their use.
Guidance notes on the Intevention Logic and on Building a priority axis 27 September 2013.
Regional Policy Common Strategic Framework The Commission's revised proposal for the CPR - COM (2012) 496 of 11 Sept.
The new EU cohesion policy ( ) EASPD Project Development Workshop May 10th – Sofia (BG) Jelle Reynaert – Policy Officer.
Partnership Agreement of the SR for years
Branislav Ondruš State Secretary. + Improvement of Public Health – contageous diseases, immunization of children and adults + Improvement of hygienics.
Unilob – Artur Nowicki Istitutional Support System for Business Support Organisations in Poland Example of National Services Network for SMEs Artur Nowicki.
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Proposals from the European Commission.
Drawing and applying poverty maps The Hungarian case Open Society Foundations Making the Most of EU Funds for Roma initiative 23 Jan 2012.
Regional Policy as a Tool of Regional Development Support Chapter IV. Pavol Schwarcz Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra.
EU COMMON STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FUNDS IN ENGLAND INITIAL PROPOSALS FROM HMG 21 NOVEMBER 2012.
Regional Policy Result Orientation of future ETC Programes Veronica Gaffey Head of Evaluation & European Semester 23 April 2013.
European policy perspectives on social experimentation Antoine SAINT-DENIS and Szilvia KALMAN, European Commission - DG Employment, social affairs and.
Operational Programme Human Resources Operational Programme Human Resources MOLSAF – 24 September 2013.
Chapter X. Policy of Support of Rural Development and Rural Tourism in Slovakia Ing. Barbora Milotová, PhD. Department of Regional Development
REGIONAL OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME (ROP) SLOVAK REPUBLIC DG REGIO Evaluation Network Meeting, Brussels, 14 March 2012.
Evaluation of equal opportunity measures in the Hungarian Operational Programmes Monitoring and evaluation of Roma projects and policies 30 November 2010,
National strategic reference framework Jela Tvrdonova.
04/2007 THE EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENT POLICY & ITS INSTRUMENTS OF IMPLEMENTATION Preparation & Draft of environmental projects THE EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENT POLICY.
MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT, CONSTRUCTION AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC Section of Coordination of EU Funds Námestie slobody č. 6, P.O.BOX.
REPORT OF GRANADA CONFERENCE ON POLICIES TOWARDS ROMA, GYPSIES AND TRAVELLERS IN EUROPE, Spain, May 2003 REPORT OF GRANADA CONFERENCE ON POLICIES.
Roma in Serbia Introduction Roma Population in Serbia: Official statistics (census 2002), Roma population - 108,193 Estimates of Roma population (different.
Forecasting the labor market needs of workforce skills Budapest 26 February 2014.
Integration of MRC in a new programming period June 2014 Bratislava, Ministry of Interior of the SR, Pribinova 2 1 Ministry of Interior of.
European Commission 1 An EU Framework for National Roma Integration Strategies by 2020 An EU Framework for National Roma Integration Strategies by 2020.
Innovative Labour Market Measures to Fight the Crisis Prague, Czech Republic October 20 – 21, 2011.
The Role of Active Labour Market Policy Measures for Youth Employment Youth Guarantee in Slovakia TAIEX Seminar on Building Opportunities for Youth Employment.
Promoting Travellers and Roma Inclusion in SICAP Presented by : Pavee Point Traveller and Roma Centre 4 th May 2016.
1 The urban dimension of cohesion policy 2014 – 2020.
Regional Policy Future of Cohesion Policy and Investments in Health Christopher Todd, Head of Unit, Slovakia European Commission, Directorate General for.
Youth employment of the most vulnerable Michal Páleník
Inese Vilcane Social inclusion department Senior expert
Ministry of Interior of the Slovak Republic Office of the Plenipotentiary of the SR for Roma communities M E E T I N G European Commision – Office of the.
Paul Casey Head of Research Monitoring and Evaluation
Youth employment of the most vulnerable Michal Páleník
LABOUR, SOCIAL AFFAIRS AND FAMILY OF SLOVAK REPUBLIC
Drawing and applying poverty maps The Hungarian case
Mechanisms under the Human Capital OP counteracting economic slowdown
Kamil Valica Unit A.3 Impact Assessment and Evaluation
Ex ante conditionalities in cohesion policy:
ESF EVALUATION PARTNERSHIP
Where do we stand with the Structural Funds?
OP Integrated infrastructure 2014 – 2020
European Social Fund February 2012
Presentation transcript:

Marginalised Roma Communities GOVERNMENT OFFICE OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC Office of the Plenipotentiary of the SR Government for Roma Communities Coordinator of horizontal priority Marginalized Roma Communities Horizontal Priority Marginalised Roma Communities EURoma 3-4 May, 2012, Bratislava

Helping disparities among regions diminish is markedly supported by: GOVERNMENT OFFICE OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC Office of the Plenipotentiary of the SR Government for Roma Communities Coordinator of horizontal priority Marginalized Roma Communities Programme period 2007- 2013 Helping disparities among regions diminish is markedly supported by: NSFR 2007 – 2013 policy and following NSFR 2007 – 2013 policy also implementation of Horizontal priority Marginalized Roma Communities with the main goal that is increasing employment and educational level of marginalized Roma communities population and improving their standard of living mainly via integrated approach implementation – LSCxA on behalf of 6 operational programmes integration (ROP, OP Env, OP H, OP CaEG, OP Edu and OP EaSI) 2 2

GOVERNMENT OFFICE OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC Office of the Plenipotentiary of the SR Government for Roma Communities Coordinator of horizontal priority Marginalized Roma Communities MRC support is during the programme period 2007 – 2013 focused on four major areas : ►Education- better educational attainment of MRC (direct support via OP Edu, OP EaSI and indirect support via ROP) ►Employment- higher employment and lower unemployment of MRC (direct support via OP EaSI, OP C&EG and indirect support via OP Env, OP Edu) ►Health – better access to the health care attendance for MRC (direct support via OP H) ►Living- better standard of living and environmental conditions (not proceeded on behalf of HP MRC) 3 3

Structure of the coordination of the horizontal priority GOVERNMENT OFFICE OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC Office of the Plenipotentiary of the SR Government for Roma Communities Coordinator of horizontal priority Marginalized Roma Communities Structure of the coordination of the horizontal priority Department for Coordination of horizontal priority MRC Local strategies for integrated approach MA ROP MA Enviro MA Educ MA EmSoc MA Health MA CaEG 4 4

GOVERNMENT OFFICE OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC Office of the Plenipotentiary of the SR Government for Roma Communities Coordinator of horizontal priority Marginalized Roma Communities Implementation of HP MRC as of April 30th, 2012-projects with a direct support Operational programme Number of Contracts - projects Amount of Contracts in € (EU resources) Regional operational programme 42 48 751 142,13 OP Environment OP Competitivenes and economic growth OP Education 77 32 690 884,33 OP Employment and social inclusion 596 93 866 285,22 OP Healthcare 14 7 751 142,13 Total 729 183 115 291,70 5 5

Implementation of LSIxA-projects integration in 6 OP GOVERNMENT OFFICE OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC Office of the Plenipotentiary of the SR Government for Roma Communities Coordinator of horizontal priority Marginalized Roma Communities Implementation of LSIxA-projects integration in 6 OP Operational programme Allocation LSCxA via OP integration (EU resources + state budget) Contracts-project intents LSCxA (EU resources+state budget) Contracts from allocation € number % Regional operational programme 85 000 000,00 OP Environment 22 937 163,00 OP Competitivenes and economic growth 16 470 588,00 OP Education 17 000 000,00 5 518 172,65 3,04 OP Employment and social inclusion 26 500 000,00 13 1 622 091,33 6,12 OP Healthcare 10 000 000,00 14 9 334 256,31 93,34 Total 177 907 751,00 32 11 474 520,29 6,45 6 6

Projects with indirect support of HP MRC GOVERNMENT OFFICE OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC Office of the Plenipotentiary of the SR Government for Roma Communities Coordinator of horizontal priority Marginalized Roma Communities Projects with indirect support of HP MRC Operational programme Number of Contracts-projects Amount of Contracts in € (EU resources) Regional operational programme 761 589 690 884,33 OP Bratislava region 6 1 951 189,35 OP Environment 141 399 678 157,81 OP Competitivenes and economic growth 75 85 440 216,19 OP Education 25 70 419 393,63 OP Research and development 19 30 775 834,07 OP Employment and social inclusion 115 28 836 775,28 OP Healthcare 46 224 706 904,99 Total 1 128 1 430 826 800,10 7 7

► cross-sectional horizontal priority of MRC: GOVERNMENT OFFICE OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC Office of the Plenipotentiary of the SR Government for Roma Communities Coordinator of horizontal priority Marginalized Roma Communities Advice based on the current programme period and applicable during the next programme period: ► cross-sectional horizontal priority of MRC: positives: an independent HP generation means a mile stone in finding a possiblity of solution to the Roma communities issue on behalf of Structural Funds; possibility of its fullfillment in various OP negatives:misunderstanding replacement of MRC and Romma communities, non-existing proper allocation based on real needs of MRC and not based on possibilities of each OP, non-existing flexibility of variable conditions tailored to the MRC needs (a high need of audit in OP which is an area that is not reachable by the coordinator) ► cross-connection of HP and OP postpones an implementation for more than one year: a call by Office of the Plenipotentiary (3 months) =>applications evaluation in the Office of the Plenipotentiary (3-6 months) =>calls by OP (due to the schedule of MA but from 1-12 months, call 3 months) =>applications evaluation in the office of OP (3-6 months) =>contract signing and project implementation initiation (1-2 months) – total since the project has been delivered to the Office of the Plenipotentiary – 14 up to 32 months -can we still talk about projects up-to-date? Or about the projects effectiveness?

GOVERNMENT OFFICE OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC Office of the Plenipotentiary of the SR Government for Roma Communities Coordinator of horizontal priority Marginalized Roma Communities ►specification of the targeted group of HP MRC based on the Map of Roma Communities – insufficient (a high need of update and new data complete) and incorrect (Map of Roma Communities does not provide us with the information about MRC but all settlements with Roma population) ►a need of various OP cross-connection and guarantee of cofinancing with no consideration that the recipients present settlements with low budget and low income from the population (project budget is 100% higher than the municipality budget) ► position of HP MRC coordinator with his competencies is not in accordance with his responsibilities ►fractionalism of the whole allocation in 6 OP has not been a good choice as an effective possibility (variability of cross-connected OP makes an integration and timing of calls schedule complicated; MRC needs then must adopt to the possibilities of OP and strategies of each MA of OP on how to solve the MRC social inclusion in Slovakia)

A possible solution for the next programme period: GOVERNMENT OFFICE OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC Office of the Plenipotentiary of the SR Government for Roma Communities Coordinator of horizontal priority Marginalized Roma Communities A possible solution for the next programme period: ► remain with the HP with real impact – „Horizontal priority Roma inclusion (HP RI)“ ► generation of independent OP „Marginalized Roma Communities“ with a direct contribution to the HP RI goals approach Combination of ESF a ERDF resources Areas of intervention Only for communities with MRC population Determine measure of cofinancing reflecting measure of marginalization and applicants type Cross-connection with projects already implemented from the programme period 2007-2013

(Ad hoc evaluation HP MRC in 2011 – CA Consulting Associates s.r.o.) GOVERNMENT OFFICE OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC Office of the Plenipotentiary of the SR Government for Roma Communities Coordinator of horizontal priority Marginalized Roma Communities Evaluation needed for the next programme period preparation: „Specially solution to the problems of marginalized Roma communities is an ideal area to consider effects of the benefits from Structural Funds objectively. In order to qualify a real impact of intervention it is undoubtedly necessary to possess appropriate instruments for monitoring and measuring effects. Practically it means to have an accurate and reliable information about the targeted group, or about its conditions which are aimed to be affected.“ (Ad hoc evaluation HP MRC in 2011 – CA Consulting Associates s.r.o.) During the programme period 2007-2013 there has been the ex ante evaluation of OP proceeded though ex ante evaluation of HP MRC has not been proceeded (information based only on Map of Roma Communities). Due to this situation it appears to be a problem to evaluate effects of interventions on MRC in that we are not familiar with the initial criteria of targeted group. There is a high need to have an ex ante evaluation of good quality of targeted group to be proceeded during the next programme period.

GOVERNMENT OFFICE OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC Office of the Plenipotentiary of the SR Government for Roma Communities Coordinator of horizontal priority Marginalized Roma Communities 12 12