Supervisor training and monitoring for ethics at the University of Winchester Bridget Egan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Key Stage 3 National Strategy
Advertisements

Sheffield Hallam University CPD Scheme: "Realising our Potential"
The Compliance & Risk Functions In Credit Unions What Supervisors need to know? Michael Mullen ILCU Learning Advisor.
Preparing for Confirmation of Candidature
Queensland University of Technology CRICOS No J Research Students Centre CRICOS No 00213J Surviving Confirmation Semester 2 Gardens Point.
How do we teach research ethics? Professor Ann Macaskill 1.
Graduate Research Degree Orientation 2013 Decision Making and Governance.
Research Supervisor Training Programme Obligations of the Supervisor.
Trainer Recognition and Accreditation. New Arrangements for Trainer Recognition and Accreditation  In August 2012, the GMC released a document ‘Recognising.
What makes a good project?.  A testing ground for concepts presented in the taught programme  An opportunity to demonstrate the ability to apply knowledge.
The Changing Regulatory Environment for Industry Support The accreditation bodies’ point of view. Ian Starke (UK)
Introduction to PhD Code of Practice Jo FerrieInterim Director Graduate Training September 2013.
Student to generate their ethical approval form alongside their research proposal which will be reviewed and considered by a member of academic staff (Project.
Recent Changes to HDR Policy and Procedures Felicity Roddick Associate Dean Research and Innovation.
SET approach to HDR Irena Cosic Dean R&I SET. Slide 2 SET PORTFOLIO Higher Degree by Research Environment *Graduates will have: Commitment and the capacity.
Fast Track Validation Background and Issues Prof Mark Stiles.
School of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science
How do I manage my work as well as possible? Know who is responsible for what Three key parties: 1.The student (you) 2.Your supervisor 3.Your unit/UCC.
Implementing the GMC’s Standards for Training
A MEMBER OF THE RUSSELL GROUP PGR PERIODIC REVIEW Sara Crowley
MASTER OF ARTS in GUIDANCE COUNSELLING AND LIFESPAN DEVELOPMENT 2014Dr. Lucy Hearne, Course Director
Supporting you to understand research governance and ethics Emily Lamont Senior Research Manager NFER Claire Easton Senior Research Manager NFER
SYDNEY MEDICAL SCHOOL NEPEAN HONOURS STUDENT APPLICATION PROCESS Step 1 - Once qualified, look for a supervisor at Nepean Hospital in your area of interest.
The Learning Agreement, Intellectual Property Rights and Project Approval Professor Dianne Ford Director of PhD Studies, Faculty of Medical Sciences.
Assessment Improvement Maureen McEnaney Safeguarding & Review Manager Every Child Matters.
Student Recruitment and Admissions Servicewww.stir.ac.uk PhD Admissions Process Beth Shotton Student Recruitment & Admissions
NSW Department of Education & Training NSW Public Schools – Leading the Way SELECTION PANEL PROCEDURES FOR SCHOOL TEACHERS 2009 Procedural.
CIMP & DUE PROCESS POINTERS It’ that time again… Anoka-Hennepin participates in the Continuous Improvement Monitoring Process supported by.
Short Course in Undergraduate Clinical Supervision: The effect on personal and professional growth in both supervisors and students San Schmutz, Elize.
 The IRB: Why, what and how  Core Concerns: Subject selection, subject consent to participate, confidentiality  IRB Protocol Forms  Contact Information.
Research Governance Dr. Sheila Francis
MSc projects 2014 Brief update session Mike Spann.
Aline Giordano & Sean Wellington Southampton Solent University.
Academic Approval and Periodic Review Staff Development for Chairs and Secretaries of Approval and Periodic Review Events.
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
Policy and Procedures Ian S Burnett Student Research Culture Session – 29 April 2009.
Ethics scrutiny of student research Bridget Egan.
Practice learning of social work students is composed of practical education and field education and has visible place in a curricula of higher education.
The research ethics review process Hazel Abbott, Chair University Research Ethics Committee.
Chapter 16 Staff training and certification. Outline The objectives of training and certification The training and certification process Determine professional.
Course title: RESEARCH PLANNING AND REPORT WRITING Lecture 1 Introduction to postgraduate research.
Research Student Supervision – Update 2012 Dr Ann Hartley.
1 Visiting the IVT PhD candidates Oct-Nov 2012 From faculty adm: Vice Dean Research, Section head Research, Senior officer PhD. From the departments: totaly.
Dissertation Guidelines for Students MSc in Econ; MSc EIFE 2016/2017
Purpose of this Presentation
Credentialing Requirements
Research with human participants at Carnegie Mellon University
Post-Doctoral Trainee Senior Professional Research Staff Staff
MSc in Social Research Methods
Scenario 25: Peer mentoring
IAAO Conference 2017 Update from Slovenia
Autumn Term Education Learning Events ( )
Postgraduate Research Student Supervision
Chair of Chemistry Graduate School
Education Practice and Recognition
The Learning Agreement, Intellectual Property Rights and Project Approval Professor Dianne Ford Director of PhD Studies, Faculty of Medical Sciences.
Welcome to Keele University
LEVEL 1 DEMENTIA AWARENESS
EPQ Learner Outcomes identify, design, plan and complete an individual project, applying a range of organisational skills and strategies to meet.
2012 (COMPETENCY-BASED) FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM
Supporting SEACs across the Province:
Compliance, Policy and Regulations
LEVEL 1 MENTAL HEALTH AWARENESS
Evaluation of Teaching Process and Students Experience
Progression and Advancement
Curricular Practical Training Workshop
LEVEL 1 DEMENTIA AWARENESS
F-1 Visa International Students
Program Modification “Academic Year 2019” Assumption University
Research Compliance: Protections for Research Subjects
Presentation transcript:

Supervisor training and monitoring for ethics at the University of Winchester Bridget Egan

Supervisor training Two forms: An accredited programme for new supervisors (and anyone who wishes to complete it Occasional sessions (within the programme) for experienced supervisors Ethics training is one of the sessions, and is kept up to date

Supervisor training New supervisors are expected to Enrol on the first module of the certificate in doctoral supervision Participate regularly in supervisor training sessions Develop their knowledge of procedures and processes Monitor their knowledge using on-line self- tests

Supervisor training All supervisors are expected to Participate regularly in supervisor training sessions Update their knowledge of procedures and processes Monitor their updated knowledge using the on-line self-tests

Research supervisor training for ethics Principles: Research ethics is about understanding the risks and knowing how to minimise them. It is not simply a matter of compliance with codes of practice and University procedures. Ethical behaviour in research extends beyond care for living human participants, and includes care for non-human species, for fragile artefacts, and for the environment.

Research supervisor training for ethics Discussion of 1.case studies and issues that have arisen in supervision. 2.specific ethical considerations that arise in particular fields of research 3.how students should be advised to frame ethics discussion in their proposal and methodology sections of their work 4.how to fill in the forms – levels of risk, levels of approval, who scrutinises

Research supervisor training Supervisors required to submit a form with their research report at the end of each academic year which tracks their participation in events that ensure that they are clear and up-to-date with the regulations.

Sanctions for not participating in Research supervisor training 1.In the worst case, supervisors barred from taking on new doctoral students until they can demonstrate participation. 2.Student proposals may take longer to reach approval if supervisor knowledge is out of date

Research students All PhD students participate in a short programme of on-line research training First module includes a discussion of research ethics.

Research students A student evaluation: This module has helped me to......focus and develop my ideas in relation to the MPhil/PhD through its series of exercises. […]I found the information relating to the Data Protection Act particularly helpful as this was something I had not come across before in so much detail. The course helps to expose students to such issues This module has extended my thinking by......making me consider the rights of interviewees, whilst highlighting the importance of the Data Protection Act and the security it affords those involved in any such project.

Student Research Proposals Proposals for Mphil/PhD EdD research go through a three-stage system of scrutiny. 1.Flags those proposals that are likely to require approval rather than release. Scrutiny by a faculty ethics representative prior to interview. 2. At interview, discussion of level of risk for those candidates who may be eligible for release (very low risk although human participants are involved) or who need full scrutiny and approval. 3.Full scrutiny of the proposal by the ethics panel for students whose proposals are higher risk.

Undergraduate and MA dissertation proposals Where human research involved: Staff trained in research ethics scrutiny Supervisors scrutinise for ethics, and countersign the ethics form. (we are currently considering the question of dual scrutiny for u/g and MA proposals)