++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++ Cap-and-Trade Program Scope and Point of Regulation Judi Greenwald Director of Innovative Solutions Pew Center on Global.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cap-and-Trade 101 Judi Greenwald Director of Innovative Solutions WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE Franz Litz Senior Fellow.
Advertisements

Getting More for Four Principles for Comprehensive Emissions Trading Jan Mazurek, Director Center for Innovation and the Environment 2002 Environmental.
STATE CLIMATE POLICY OPTIONS Meeting of the Illinois Climate Change Advisory Group Michael A. Bilandic Building, 160 N. LaSalle St., Room C500 Chicago,
1 The questions l Is economic growth leading to excessive exploitation of natural resources and to degradation of the ecosystem? l Are increases in welfare,
A Lower-Cost Option for Substantial CO 2 Emission Reductions Ron Edelstein Gas Technology Institute NARUC Meeting Washington DC February 2008.
March 2009 Emissions Trading in South Africa National Climate Change Summit Emily Tyler.
March 2009 Emissions Trading in South Africa National Climate Change Summit Emily Tyler.
California GHG policy and implications for the power sector APEX Sydney Conference October 13, 2008 Anjali Sheffrin, PhD.
4 good reasons why Energy Efficiency is Important.
Carbon Tax Andrew Jope PA 395 – Green Tax September 14, 2004.
Federal Cap-and-Trade Policy: Overview of Design Options Ray Hammarlund, KCC Energy Programs Division Director Presentation to Kansas Energy Council Greenhouse.
1.  What is a Renewable Energy Credit (REC)?  What are they used for?  Who uses them?  How is REC ownership tracked?  What is the Renewable Portfolio.
Session 3: The Federal Question: Setting a Good Precedent & Positioning California for Competitive Advantage California Public Utilities Commission Greenhouse.
Federal Initiatives Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act of 2008 vs. Bingaman-Specter Low Carbon Economy Act Presented By: Jennifer Knorr April 8, 2008.
Sustainable Energy Roundtable Series January, 2005 Pfizer Greenhouse Gas Management Program Experience.
THE NATIONAL CLIMATE CHANGE RESPONSE POLICY Mitigation System National Climate Change Response Policy 26 May 2015.
MITIGATION POTENTIAL AND EMISSION REDUCTION CONFIDENTIAL 1.
1 What can you do to lower yours? Mohammed Alshammari Ben Bahlenhorst Zheng Fu Joe Hill Ian Laird Long Nguyen Binh Phan Application 13.1.
Lessons learned from EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS)
6-8 September 2004 US Approach for Projected Greenhouse Gas Emissions Casey Delhotal Issues in the preparation of GHG projections for the energy, transport,
Ad Hoc Working Group on Article 3.9 of the Kyoto Protocol Battling global climate change - the EU’s perspective (Part II) Artur Runge-Metzger European.
Climate and Energy Policies that Threaten Manufacturing Competitiveness Paul Cicio President Industrial Energy Consumers of America October, 2008.
Rising Food and Energy Prices October 2 nd, 2008 Corvallis, Oregon A. Michael Schaal Director, Oil and Gas Division Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting.
Baker & McKenzie International is a Swiss Verein with member law firms around the world. In accordance with the common terminology used in professional.
Carbon markets An international tool for cost-effective GHG mitigation.
Questions on Green Taxes
Common Carbon Metric for Measuring Energy Use & Reporting Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Building Operations A tool developed by GHG Protocol and UNEP-SBCI.
Market Mechanisms to Curb Greenhouse Gases: Challenges and Future Directions Joe Kruger February 20, 2007 Joe Kruger February 20, 2007.
Regulatory Approaches to Address U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Rebecca Stanfield Shriver Center Climate Change Symposium September 30, 2009.
1 DEDICATED TO MAKING A DIFFERENCE Vincent Mages Climate Change Initiatives VP Lafarge Greenhouse gas mitigation in the cement.
1 Cap and Trade for Regulating Greenhouse Gases Presented by Scott Murtishaw Advisor to President Peevey, CPUC NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting San Francisco June.
Cap & Trade. Cap & Trade (Cap) A cap commits a region or country to limits on greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) and then reduces those limits over time.
FEDERAL CLIMATE CHANGE LEGISLATION Overview of Key Provisions of House and Senate Bills for Industrial Energy Users John Clancy Godfrey & Kahn, S.C. 780.
AGEC/FNR 406 LECTURE 21 Atmospheric Concentrations of Carbon Dioxide,
Offsets and Climate Policy: EPA Perspectives Dina Kruger Director, Climate Change Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency May 30, 2008.
Bill Harnett March 30, 2010 WESTAR Spring Meeting.
Context, Principles, and Key Questions for Allowance Allocation in the Electricity Sector Joint Workshop of the Public Utilities Commission and Energy.
Investing in America’s Electric Future Morry Markowitz Group Director, External Affairs New Mexico Utility Shareholders Alliance October 7, 2009.
Federal Climate Change Legislation – Charlotte Chamber September 22, 2009 Mike Stroben Director, EHS Policy.
California Cap on Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Market-Based Compliance Mechanisms Edie Chang California Air Resources Board September 2015 California.
Federal Climate Change Legislation Update on Senate and House Legislation Discussion of Strategy Next Steps… COG Climate Change Steering Committee November.
Developing a Framework for Offset Use in RGGI Opportunities and Risks Dale Bryk, NRDC and Brian Jones, MJB&A – Northeast Regional GHG Coalition RGGI Stakeholder.
Non-CO 2 Greenhouse Gas Offset Projects: Basic Considerations Karl H. Schultz Climate Mitigation Works International LLC Panel Three: Design Issues RGGI.
Implementing AB 32: California’s Approach to Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions National Association of Clean Air Agencies Spring Membership Meeting May.
State and Business Action on Climate Change Judi Greenwald Director of Innovative Solutions Pew Center on Global Climate.
American Public Power Association Pre-Rally Workshop February 28, 2006 Washington, D.C. Climate Change: Making Community-Based Decisions in a Carbon Constrained.
© 2008 Goldman Environmental Consultants Greenhouse Gas Reductions: Challenges in Determining What is Real Henry Balikov Vice President Goldman Environmental.
Overview of Recent Developments Gregory B. Greenwood Science Advisor Resources Agency.
EU Emissions Trading. Context European Climate Change Programme (ECCP) European Climate Change Programme (ECCP) Directive on Greenhouse Gas Emissions.
California Public Utilities Commission CPUC Climate Change Activities Paul Clanon Executive Director August 28, 2007 Presentation to the Senate Energy,
State Climate Policy Solutions For a new, stronger, clean energy economy State Climate Policy Solutions For a new, stronger, clean energy economy NCEL
California Public Utilities Commission Why a Load-Based Emissions Cap for California? Julie Fitch CPUC Director of Strategic Planning April 19, 2007 Presentation.
Session 2 Buildings and Measurements. Buildings Sector Accounts for About 40% of U.S. Energy, 72% of Electricity, 34% of Natural Gas, 38% of Carbon, 18%
Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Regional Low Carbon Fuel Standard Nancy L. Seidman Deputy Assistant Commissioner for Climate Strategies Massachusetts Department.
Driving Forces Behind the Adoption of Pollution Control Technologies in the Electricity Sector : A U.S. Perspective Meredith Fowlie University of Michigan.
2/27/ % below 2005 by 2020 cap and trade 11/15/2007 set emissions targets by 11/15/08 ~60-80% cuts by ???? (2040?) cap and trade; C inventory, reporting.
California Environmental Protection Agency Market Advisory Committee: Process Update April 17, 2007.
Change picture on Slide Master It’s Not Easy Being Green: What’s Up on Warming in Washington? Virginia Bar Association July 25, 2009 PRESENTED BY Peter.
Climate Policy and Green Tax Reform in Denmark Some conclusions from the 2009 report to the Danish Council of Environmental Economics Presentation to the.
Greenhouse Gas Initiatives: progress and perspective Sandra Meier Environmental Energy Alliance of New York.
Linkages Workshop November 14/ Outline Alberta context Regulatory framework Compliance options Carbon connections.
John Davis Mojave Desert and Mountain Recycling Authority.
State and Regional GHG Initiatives What are the individual states doing to mitigate GHG emissions? What are the common elements? and regional differences?
Recent Cap and Trade Programs: EU ETS and RGGI
Understanding Updates to the EPA Inventory of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Natural Gas Systems Richard Meyer Managing Director, Energy Analysis August.
The Low Carbon Fuel Standard
Regional Climate Alliances Spring 2008
Anna Garcia Air Innovations Conference August 2004
Ontario’s New System to Price Industrial Pollution Emissions Performances Standards (EPS) March 15, 2019.
Understanding Updates to the EPA Inventory of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Natural Gas Systems Gina DeFrancesco Clean Energy Analyst | May 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Cap-and-Trade Program Scope and Point of Regulation Judi Greenwald Director of Innovative Solutions Pew Center on Global Climate Change December 12, 2007

What is Scope and Point of Regulation? Scope of Coverage: What GHG emissions are included in the cap and trade program? –What greenhouse gases? –What sectors? –What facilities? What types and thresholds? –What fuels? –Combustion emissions included? Process-related emissions? –Embodied emissions? Point of Regulation: Who has the obligation to surrender allowances to match emissions? –Upstream (where GHGs enter the economy, or close) –Downstream (where GHGs are emitted into the atmosphere) –Other (vehicle manufacturers, local distribution companies) –Hybrid (cover large sources downstream, address the rest of the economy at a different point of regulation or through other policy tools)

Key Considerations Maximize breadth of coverage taking into account administrative feasibility Integrity of emissions data –Availability of data before setting baseline key consideration –Ability to measure, monitor & report emissions data at the point of regulation Number of covered sources –Too large a number administratively complex –Too small a number threatens viability of emissions commodities market

What are Upstream and Downstream? Refers to position of greenhouse gases as they move through the economy from production or introduction into commerce, to emission into the atmosphere Downstream means at the point of emission Upstream: –at choke points toward the upstream end of the spectrum (refiners, importers, natural gas processors, coal prep plants) –Most fuels move through these facilities –(generally not all the way upstream - coal mines doable, but not oil or gas wells -- too many)

Upstream/Downstream downstream electricity generation Petroleum refiners and importers transportation large industrial and commercial sources Extracted coal upstream Transmission small industrial and commercial sources, residential sources Natural gas processors and importers Coal prep FIRST SELLERS/ LSEs LDC/ Distribution Extracted natural gas Extracted crude petroleum Vehicle Manufacturers

Natural Gas downstream electricity generation large industrial and commercial sources upstream Transmission small industrial and commercial sources, residential sources Natural gas processors and importers LDC/ Distribution Extracted natural gas

Why Upstream? Most comprehensive coverage at the smallest number of facilities –Greater coverage leads to lower costs Possibility of lower administrative costs View that response to price signal independent of point of regulation

Why Downstream? View that point of regulation does affect behavior; that emitters generally have more compliance options than fuel providers; and that its appropriate for regulated entities to be the ones with options Most real-world experience is with downstream (acid rain, eastern NO x program, EU ETS); or upstream where substitutes are available (CFCs, lead in gasoline) Facility-level data availability (already reported for electric power plants; protocols and data collection easily expandable to other large stationary combustors) –NJ GHG mandatory reporting example Automatically rewards CO 2 emissions-reducing technologies (CCS, etc.); not just technologies that reduce fuel C content Can phase in coverage over time

A Matter of Perspective Some tendency among energy folks to think in terms of carbon and fuels moving through the economy; some tendency among environmental folks to think in terms of CO 2 e and emitters Some tendency among economists to think point of regulation doesnt affect behavior; some tendency among regulators and some businesses to think it does

Good News Hard to be a purist on this Although each side starts at one end of the spectrum, pragmatic considerations move you along the GHG chain On non - CO 2 gases, consensus emerging: –HFCs and SF 6 should be covered upstream –N 2 O at nitric acid and adipic acid plants and PFCs at aluminum plants should be covered downstream On process CO 2 emissions, cover large sources downstream Seems to be convergence (at least in the Senate) on coal; EPW Committee bill covering coal downstream (1000 coal power plants vs coal mines vs. 300 prep plants)

So the issues are… Depending how you think about this: Oil and gas Buildings and transportation Maybe some outstanding issues on non- CO 2 gases

Special Considerations for States Upstream a bit more problematic: upstream source may be out of state To do upstream at regional level requires covering imports into the region; this could be tricky as it may be difficult to distinguish fuels destined to be used in-region from out-of-region, and regional boundaries may keep changing as program expands Difficult to cover vehicle manufacturers at state/regional level For electricity at state level a key issue is how to deal with imports (e.g., first deliverer or load-based approach)

Hybrid #1: downstream electricity generation Petroleum refiners and importers transportation large industrial and commercial sources Extracted coal upstream Transmission small industrial and commercial sources, residential sources Natural gas processors and importers Coal prep FIRST SELLERS/ LSEs LDC/ Distribution Extracted natural gas Extracted crude petroleum Vehicle Manufacturers Oil and gas upstream; coal downstream

Hybrid #1: Oil refiners and importers Natural gas processors and importers Considerations –sends price signal to consumers –for oil and coal, most comprehensive coverage at fewest sources –no compliance options for covered entities other than reduced sales (like a quota) or buying allowances and passing on the costs –incomplete coverage of natural gas; no facility- specific data on natural gas processors –concentration of ownership Cover Oil and Gas Upstream; Coal Downstream

Upstream Oil and Gas Data 150 refineries cover almost the whole sector Natural Gas: –530 natural gas processing plants cover 78% of gas; importers bring it up to 86% –California Example: 120 natural gas processors, interstate pipelines and pipelines from Mexico cover most natural gas

Hybrid #2: Large sources downstream; Gas LDCs; oil refiners downstream electricity generation Petroleum refiners and importers transportation large industrial and commercial sources Extracted coal upstream Transmission small industrial and commercial sources, residential sources Natural gas processors and importers Coal prep FIRST SELLERS/ LSEs LDC/ Distribution Extracted natural gas Extracted crude petroleum Vehicle Manufacturers

Hybrid #2: Cover natural gas, coal and oil combustion, process emissions (including non-CO 2 gases) at large sources Cover natural gas local distribution companies for residential and commercial gas use (buildings) Cover oil upstream (at refiners and importers; covers transportation and buildings) Considerations: –already collect data on electric power plants; easy to expand to large combustors –if coal combustors are covered, makes sense to cover natural gas combustors –combustors have efficiency and fuel switching options; also CCS –Need more exploration of LDCs: they can implement efficiency programs, but decoupling important accounting issues Large sources downstream; Gas LDCs; oil refiners

Hybrid #3: Large sources downstream; Gas LDCs; and vehicle manufacturers downstream electricity generation Petroleum refiners and importers transportation large industrial and commercial sources Extracted coal upstream Transmission small industrial and commercial sources, residential sources Natural gas processors and importers Coal prep FIRST SELLERS/ LSEs LDC/ Distribution Extracted natural gas Extracted crude petroleum Vehicle Manufacturers

Hybrid #3: Cover large sources downstream (natural gas, coal and oil combustion, process emissions (including non-CO 2 gases) Buildings: Cover natural gas local distribution companies for residential and commercial gas use (home heating oil excluded) Transportation: –Cover vehicle manufacturers – make them responsible for the emissions of the vehicles they manufacture –Airlines? Large sources downstream; Gas LDCs; vehicle manufacturers

Hybrid #4: Large sources downstream; regulatory standards for transportation and buildings downstream electricity generation Petroleum refiners and importers transportation large industrial and commercial sources Extracted coal upstream Transmission small industrial and commercial sources, residential sources Natural gas processors and importers Coal prep LDC/ Distribution Extracted natural gas Extracted crude petroleum FIRST SELLERS/ LSEs Vehicle Manufacturers

Hybrid #4: Cover large sources downstream (natural gas, coal and oil combustion, process emissions (including non-CO 2 gases) Cover transportation and buildings (vehicles and commercial and residential heating) through regulatory standards Considerations: –Standards generally considered less economically efficient –Successful experience with standards –Both standards and price signal may be necessary Large sources downstream; regulatory standards for transportation and buildings

Key Options for Transportation Cover Oil Upstream –Comprehensive –Sends price signal with every gallon used –Covered entities have limited compliance options –Consumers relatively unresponsive to gasoline price changes Low-Carbon Fuel Standard –Comprehensive –Takes into account life- cycle GHG emissions –Life cycle analysis is challenging –Doesnt put a hard cap on emissions –All things equal, not as economically efficient as cap and trade

Key Options for Transportation, contd Cover vehicle manufacturers – hold allowances to match the emissions from the vehicles they sell: Lots of compliance options Manufacturers are price-responsive Similar to CAFE compliance Manufacturers have no control over VMT Emissions must be estimated; uncertainty No fuel price incentive to discourage driving or motivate interest in efficiency Initially coverage low but can cover growing percentage over time CAFE Vehicle GHG standards

Special Issue with Transportation Should it have a separate market or be part of broader market? All things equal, broader market more economically efficient If part of broader market, could bid up allowance price for total economy without achieving much additional reduction Rest of economy may not be able to reduce rapidly enough without resorting to very high CO 2 prices to drive demand reduction. May want GHG reductions in transportation sector for co- benefits (e.g., energy security, congestion) May need more than one tool to address transportation

Before There Were GHG Programs US Acid Rain Cap-and-Trade Program –Electric sector only –SO 2 Only –Obligation at the source of the emissions sources Northeast NOx Budget Program (Later EPA NOx SIP Call) –Electric and Industrial combustion sources –NO x Only –Obligation at the source of the emissions sources

EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) Multi-Sector Cap-and-Trade on Emissions Sources Covers CO 2 only Sectors: –Electricity generators –Other combustion installations (heat & steam production) –Mineral oil refineries –Iron and steel production and processing –Cement & lime –Glass & ceramics –Pulp & paper sector Role for offsets (CDM)

RGGI Electric Sector Cap-and-Trade on Emissions Sources Covers CO 2 only Role for offsets Intend to add sectors over time, but no move as yet to expand beyond electric sector Northeast Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI)

Electricity Sector Cap-and-Trade Designs Load-based Design (OR, CA PUC) –Load-serving entities (LSEs) are required to hold allowances to cover emissions attributable to the power they deliver First Seller/Deliverer Approach (CA MAC)-- applies to the first seller of electricity in the state, meaning: –Generators in the state (emissions sources) and –First sellers/deliverers in the state of electricity generated out of state (seller to LSEs).

Path Forward Consider decisions in existing programs Explore sector by sector, or fuel by fuel, or both –Identify and resolve data issues –Look at key transport options –Consider phase in of sectors over time –Additional work may be needed in natural gas Develop straw proposal(s) covering scope, point of regulation, and data gathering

Included?Point of Regulation? Feasible?Data Available? At emissions source? At fuel source? Other? Sector/Fuel?

Questions?