Read On, Indiana! Anna Shults, Reading Specialist John Wolf, Reading Specialist Indiana Reading Initiatives.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

WASC Visiting Committee Report 3/28/2007. Areas of Strength Organization The Co Principals and the School Leadership Team provide direction and support.
Shore Acres Elementary Restructuring Plan Transformation Model May 11, 2010.
Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
When Students Can’t Read…
How Can Using Data Lead to School Improvement?
Theory of Action If teachers…. Curriculum: Teach targeted guided Math lessons based on reading data. Ensure student with disabilities are in the general.
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
RtI: The Key to “All” is Every RtI Basics in BASD.
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
Response to Intervention
What We’re Learning Building & Improving an RTI System Seven Key Foundations RISS 2009.
1 Program Improvement Update Foundations for writing the LEA Addendum.
Ingham RtI District Leadership Team November 4, 2009.
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
January 2010IDEA Partnership1 Response to Intervention: Basics for families and community members.
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
1 Reading First Internal Evaluation Leadership Tuesday 2/3/03 Scott K. Baker Barbara Gunn Pacific Institutes for Research University of Oregon Portland,
1 Oregon K-12 Literacy Framework and K-3 Statewide Outreach.
Secondary Intensive Reading Block Evan Lefsky, Ph.D. Reading Specialist, 6-12.
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
1 Supporting Striving Readers & Writers: A Systemic Approach United States Department of Education Public Input Meeting - November 19, 2010 Dorothy S.
New York State Professional Development Standards S/CDN 2010.
Striving Readers Comprehensive Literacy Program (SRCL) SRCL is a comprehensive literacy development education program to advance literacy skills for students.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Arshall Public Schools Walking the Talk: The Role of Leadership in Implementing an RtI Framework Presented By: Barb Sramek, District Administrator Barb.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Developing Professional Learning Communities To Promote Response to Intervention Linda Campbell Melissa Nantais.
Data Summit July 27, 2012 Stephanie Smyka RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION.
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
Anna Shults, Literacy Specialist John Wolf, Literacy Specialist Elementary Reading Plan.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Timberlane Regional School District
+ Is your School's Instructional Program Ready for Common Core? Reach Institute for School Leadership.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. April 4, 2006.
Title I Parent Meeting at Back-to-School Night Tri-Community Elementary School September 2, 2015.
Effective Coaching for Success Presenter: Dr. Wendy Perry 2015.
Professional Learning Communities “The most promising strategy for sustained, substantial school improvement is developing the ability of school personnel.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Winston/Salem Forsyth County Schools RESPONSIVENESS TO INSTRUCTION (RTI)
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
Literacy Framework: What Does It Look Like at Shawnee Heights? Tamara Konrade ESSDACK Educational Services and Staff Development Association of Central.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
TRHS Action Plan Goal 1 O Goal #1: In the School Year TRHS will further develop our Response to Instruction (RTI) model to ensure.
Suggested Components of a Schoolwide Reading Plan Part 1: Introduction Provides an overview of key components of reading plan. Part 2: Component details.
Blueprints for RtI Implementation Coaches/Principals 10/8/09.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
CHAPTER 3 Strategy Cards for: Communication with Colleagues, Students, & Families.
Maine Department of Education Maine Reading First Course Session #1 Introduction to Reading First.
The Comprehensive Literacy Plan Pennsylvania KeystonestoOpportunity Tom Corbett Governor Ron Tomalis Secretary.
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
By: Jill Mullins. RtI is… the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time and.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
Response to Intervention: The Georgia Student Achievement Pyramid of Interventions October 22, 2008.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
Building a Framework to Support the Culture Required for Student Centered Learning DeeDee Washington, Associate Superintendent of Academics Elementary.
Interboro School District Keystones to Opportunity Grant Four Year Overview School Years.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Presentation transcript:

Read On, Indiana! Anna Shults, Reading Specialist John Wolf, Reading Specialist Indiana Reading Initiatives

The Vision of the Indiana Department of Education 90% of students will pass the Language Arts section of Indiana Statewide Testing for Educational Progress (ISTEP+) and End-of- Course Assessments (ECA) by 2012.

Why a Sense of Urgency in Indiana? Confusion surrounding a Core Reading Program Lack of explicit lessons being taught Misunderstanding of progress monitoring importance

What purposes are served by state literacy frameworks? Address a high priority goal or problem Summarize the knowledge and beliefs that should inform reading practices Set forth a framework to organize efforts at all levels

Indiana K-6 Reading Framework Six organizing components of the framework: 1.Goals 2.Instruction 3.Assessment 4.Professional Development 5.Leadership 6.Commitment

Indiana’s K-6 Reading Framework: Goals Development of individualized, measurable reading goals Understanding of formative versus summative goals

Indiana’s K-6 Reading Framework: Instruction Effective use of a secured 90 minutes for daily reading instruction Use of research-based strategies, programs, interventions, and materials Differentiated instruction based on student data to reach reading goals

Indiana’s K-6 Reading Framework: Assessment Significance and purpose of assessment measures Relationship to Response to Instruction (RtI) Use of data to make instructional decisions and guide professional development

Indiana’s K-6 Reading Framework: Assessment Assessment Systems screen and place students monitor progress monitor effectiveness of instruction determine overall proficiency and extent to which students meet their goals diagnose specific skill needs

Indiana’s K-6 Reading Framework: Professional Development Targets research-based practices Commitment to time for educators to learn reading programs and improve instruction through individual and collaborative planning and reflection Assessment data drives PD efforts

Indiana’s K-6 Reading Framework: Professional Development Training and embedded support that is coordinated, ongoing, and multidimensional High quality PD fosters a deep understanding of reading priorities and leads to effective implementation of proven practices.

Indiana’s K-6 Reading Framework: Leadership Leadership structures at multiple levels to build and sustain schoolwide reading practices that infuse effective reading instruction with content areas Development of Reading Leadership Teams with defined roles and responsibilities

Indiana’s K-6 Reading Framework: Leadership School administrators and leadership teams work collaboratively to establish a coherent plan for reading instruction, understand key elements of reading instruction make grade level (or above grade level) reading a priority

Development of a school Reading Plan Providing regular reports of reading progress to stakeholders Actively involving parents and community members in fostering and promoting reading achievement Indiana’s K-6 Reading Framework: Commitment

Implementing the necessary changes to improve reading achievement for all students Using staff and resources purposefully and effectively to support reading goals Promoting a culture of shared responsibility and accountability for results Indiana’s K-6 Reading Framework: Commitment

Elementary Reading Plan 1.Leadership Team 2.Core Program (Tier 1) 3.Tier 1 Instructional Minutes 4.Tier 2 and Tier 3 Instruction 5.Tier 2 and Tier 3 Instructional Minutes 6.K-2 and 3-6 Assessment & Goals 7.Professional Development Efforts 8.Parent Communication Plan

- focusing on high quality, comprehensive K-3 reading for all students - putting an emphasis on scientifically-based reading research - basing all instructional decisions on data - providing supports for struggling readers PL 109 will help schools and teachers produce successful readers by…

Statewide Reading Campaign