Sensitivity of High-resolution Tropical Cyclone Intensity Forecast to Surface Flux Parameterization Chi-Sann Liou, NRL Monterey, CA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Meteorologisches Institut der Universität München
Advertisements

Sensitivity of the HWRF model prediction for Hurricane Ophelia (2005) to the choice of the cloud and precipitation scheme Yuqing Wang and Qingqing Li International.
Hurricanes and climate ATOC 4720 class22. Hurricanes Hurricanes intense rotational storm that develop in regions of very warm SST (typhoons in western.
Advanced Research WRF High Resolution Simulations of Hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma (2005) Kristen L. Corbosiero, Wei Wang, Yongsheng Chen, Jimy Dudhia.
A drag parameterization for extreme wind speeds that leads to improved hurricane simulations Gerrit Burgers Niels Zweers Vladimir Makin Hans de Vries EMS.
Cold Fronts and their relationship to density currents: A case study and idealised modelling experiments Victoria Sinclair University of HelsinkI David.
Sensitivity of High-Resolution Simulations of Hurricane Bob (1991) to Planetary Boundary Layer Parameterizations SCOTT A. BRAUN AND WEI-KUO TAO PRESENTATION.
Tropical Cyclone Prediction for HFIP with COAMPS-TC Richard M. Hodur 1, S. Chen 2, J. Cummings 3, J. Doyle 2, T. Holt 2, H. Jin 2, Y. Jin 2, C.-S. Liou.
Evaluation of the Simulated Ocean Response to Hurricane Ivan in Comparison to High-Quality Ocean Observations George Halliwell, Nick Shay Rosenstiel School.
1 Progress Towards Developing a Coupled Atmosphere-Wave-Ocean Framework for Research and Operational Hurricane Models Isaac Ginis B. Thomas, R. Yablonsky,
Overview of ROMS features (numerics and boundary layer parameterizations) ROMS developments: boundary layers, data assimilation, nesting, Prototype model.
GFS Deep and Shallow Cumulus Convection Schemes
HWRF Model Sensitivity to Non-hydrostatic Effects Hurricane Diagnostics and Verification Workshop May 4, 2009 Katherine S. Maclay Colorado State University.
High-resolution simulations of air-sea interaction in the Mediterranean Sea R. Justin Small, Travis Smith, Tim Campbell, Rick Allard, Jim Dykes Naval Research.
Air-Sea Interaction in Hurricanes Kerry Emanuel Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Impact of the 4D-Var Assimilation of Airborne Doppler Radar Data on Numerical Simulations of the Genesis of Typhoon Nuri (2008) Zhan Li and Zhaoxia Pu.
The Hurricane Weather Research & Forecasting (HWRF) Prediction System Next generation non-hydrostatic weather research and hurricane prediction system.
Henry R. Winterbottom, Eric P. Chassignet, and Carol Anne Clayson A Coupled Atmosphere-Ocean Model System for Tropical Cyclone Studies Motivation Methodology.
Prediction of Atlantic Tropical Cyclones with the Advanced Hurricane WRF (AHW) Model Jimy Dudhia Wei Wang James Done Chris Davis MMM Division, NCAR Jimy.
IMPROVING VERY-SHORT-TERM STORM PREDICTIONS BY ASSIMILATING RADAR AND SATELLITE DATA INTO A MESOSCALE NWP MODEL Allen Zhao 1, John Cook 1, Qin Xu 2, and.
Initialization Schemes in the Naval Research Laboratory’s Tropical Cyclone Prediction Model (COAMPS-TC) Eric A. Hendricks 1 Melinda S. Peng 1 Tim Li 2.
IMPACTS OF TURBULENCE ON HURRICANES (ONR-BAA ) PI: Yongsheng Chen, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Co-PIs: George H. Bryan and Richard.
13 June, 2013 Dymecs Meeting, Reading Tropical convective organisation in the UM Chris Holloway NCAS-Climate, Dept. of Meteorology, University of Reading.
Hurricane structure and intensity change : Effects of wind shear and Air-Sea Interaction M é licie Desflots Rosenstiel School of Marine & Atmospheric Science.
Higher Resolution Operational Models. Operational Mesoscale Model History Early: LFM, NGM (history) Eta (mainly history) MM5: Still used by some, but.
Earth-Sun System Division National Aeronautics and Space Administration SPoRT SAC Nov 21-22, 2005 Regional Modeling using MODIS SST composites Prepared.
Energy Production, Frictional Dissipation, and Maximum Intensity of a Numerically Simulated Tropical Cyclone 4/ 蘇炯瑞 Wang, Y., and J. Xu, 2010: Energy.
Richard Rotunno NCAR *Based on:
Air-Sea Exchange in Hurricanes by Peter G. Black & Hurricane Intensity and Eyewall Replacement by Robert A. Houze Jr. Lynsie M. Schwerer Atmospheric Science.
Impact of global warming on tropical cyclone structure change with a 20-km-mesh high-resolution global model Hiroyuki Murakami (AESTO/MRI, Japan) Akio.
Three Lectures on Tropical Cyclones Kerry Emanuel Massachusetts Institute of Technology Spring School on Fluid Mechanics of Environmental Hazards.
Shuyi S. Chen Joseph Tenerelli, Wei Zhao, Mark Donelan Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science University of Miami Coupled Atmosphere-Wave-Ocean.
Higher Resolution Operational Models. Major U.S. High-Resolution Mesoscale Models (all non-hydrostatic ) WRF-ARW (developed at NCAR) NMM-B (developed.
The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology The Tropical Cyclone Boundary Layer 4:
How Do Outer Spiral Rainband Affect Tropical Cyclone Structure and Intensity? The working hypothesis is based on the fact that the outer rainbands are.
On the Definition of Precipitation Efficiency Sui, C.-H., X. Li, and M.-J. Yang, 2007: On the definition of precipitation efficiency. J. Atmos. Sci., 64,
Bulk Parameterizations for Wind Stress and Heat Fluxes (Chou 1993; Chou et al. 2003) Outlines: Eddy correlation (covariance) method Eddy correlation (covariance)
Attempts to improve distribution of boundary layer clouds in AFES Akira Kuwano-Yoshida, Takeshi Enomoto and Wataru Ohfuchi Earth Simulator Center, JAMSTEC,
An Atmosphere-Ocean coupled model Morris, A., Bender and Isaac Ginis, 2000 : Real-case simulations of hurricane-ocean interaction using a high-resolution.
 one-way nested Western Atlantic-Gulf of Mexico-Caribbean Sea regional domain (with data assimilation of SSH and SST prior to hurricane simulations) 
Physics of Sea Spray Scott W. Powell 1,2, Jian-Wen Bao 1, Christopher W. Fairall 1, Laura Bianco 1 1 NOAA/ESRL/PSD, Boulder, Colorado 2 Rosenstiel School.
CHANGSHENG CHEN, HEDONG LIU, And ROBERT C. BEARDSLEY
Mesoscale Modeling with a 3D Turbulence Scheme Jocelyn Mailhot and Yufei Zhu (Claude Pelletier) Environment Canada MSC / MRB 3 rd Annual Meeting on CRTI.
Vincent N. Sakwa RSMC, Nairobi
Hurricane Model Transitions to Operations at NCEP/EMC 2006 IHC Conference, Mobile, AL Robert Tuleya, S. Gopalkrishnan, Weixing Shen, N. Surgi, and H.Pan.
Shuyi S. Chen Rosenstial School of Marine and Atmospheric Science University of Miami (DRAFT only!!! Improving Hurricane Structure and Intensity Forecast:
Météo-France / CNRM – T. Bergot 1) Methodology 2) The assimilation procedures at local scale 3) Results for the winter season Improved Site-Specific.
Evaluation of Upper Ocean Mixing Parameterizations S. Daniel Jacob 1, Lynn K. Shay 2 and George R. Halliwell 2 1 GEST, UMBC/ NASA GSFC, Greenbelt, MD
Improving air-sea flux parameterization in the GFDL/URI Coupled Hurricane-Wave-Ocean Model for Transition to Operations Isaac Ginis Il Ju Moon, Tetsu Hara,
Mesoscale Assimilation of Rain-Affected Observations Clark Amerault National Research Council Postdoctoral Associate - Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey,
1 James D. Doyle and Clark Amerault Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, CA James D. Doyle and Clark Amerault Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, CA Sensitivity.
ESSL Holland, CCSM Workshop 0606 Predicting the Earth System Across Scales: Both Ways Summary:Rationale Approach and Current Focus Improved Simulation.
TC Structure Theta_e Structure Grid 3: Vertical motion surfaces 15:30 UTC 26 August, m/s – red -1 m/s -blue +0.5 m/s – red -0.5 m/s -blue.
Jun Zhang NOAA/AOML/HRD William Drennan Univ. of Miami/ RSMAS
Enhancement of Wind Stress and Hurricane Waves Simulation
Development of nonhydrostatic models at the JMA
Ben Green Group meeting, 9/13/2013
Coupled atmosphere-ocean simulation on hurricane forecast
IMPROVING HURRICANE INTENSITY FORECASTS IN A MESOSCALE MODEL VIA MICROPHYSICAL PARAMETERIZATION METHODS By Cerese Albers & Dr. TN Krishnamurti- FSU Dept.
Shuyi S. Chen, Ben Barr, Milan Curcic and Brandon Kerns
Mark A. Bourassa and Qi Shi
ATMOS. MODEL (MM5/COAMPS/WRF) OCEAN MODEL (HYCOM or 3DUOM) WAVE MODEL
Coupled Atmosphere-Wave-Ocean Modeling
Tropical Cyclone Structure-2008 (TCS-08) ONR/NRL Funded Projects
Coupled Atmosphere-Wave-Ocean Modeling Experiments in Hurricanes
Ping Huang, I-I Lin*, Chia Chou, Rong-Hui Huang
Impacts of Air-Sea Interaction on Tropical Cyclone Track and Intensity
Orographic Influences on Rainfall Associated with Tropical Cyclone
The Flux Model of Orographic Rain
A Coastal Forecasting System
Presentation transcript:

Sensitivity of High-resolution Tropical Cyclone Intensity Forecast to Surface Flux Parameterization Chi-Sann Liou, NRL Monterey, CA

Uncertainties of Surface Flux Parameterization at High Winds Current surface parameterization schemes are based upon the similarly theory fitted for wind speed less than 25 ms -1

Black and Chen (2006) CBLAST ** Powell Donelan Large & Pond NWP Model Drag Coefficient C D o+□  CBLAST HEXOS COARE

Surface Drag Coefficient C D Estimated from Ocean Observations (Jarosz et. al, 2007) 6 Moorings, TC Ivan 9/15/2004 C D Estimated from 3 Different r’sC D Estimated from r=0.02 Powell Moon et. al

C E /C D : (for TC growth) Black and Chen (2006) *** CBLAST HEXOS COARE NWP model Critical value (Emanuel, 1985)

Uncertainties of Surface Flux Parameterization at High Winds ==> Conduct numerical experiments to examine the sensitivities of TC intensity forecast to these uncertainties Surface Entropy flux (C E /C D at high winds?) Surface layer depth at high winds Impacts of SST cooling Surface Stress (level off at high winds) Current surface parameterization schemes are based upon the similarly theory fitted for wind speed less than 25 ms -1

Numerical Experiment Resolution: 45/15/5km, 30 levels Dynamics, Numerics: Nonhydrostatic, Fully Compressible (Klemp and Wilhelmson, JAS 1978) Sigma-Z Vertical Coordinate (Gal-Chen and Somerville, JCP 1975) Scheme C grid (Arakawa and Lamb, 1974) Multiple Nested Grids with Movable Inner Meshes (Liou and Holt, 2003) Precipitation Physics: Grid Scale – Explicit Moist Physics (Rutledge and Hobbs, JAS 1984) Convective – Kain and Fritsch (JAS 1990, JAM 2004) Boundary Layer: (Level 2.5 TKE Closure) Mixing length – Mellor and Yamada (RGSP 1982) Counter gradient flux – Therry and Lacarrère (BLM 1983 ) Surface Layer: Modified Louis (BLM 1979) Radiation: Harshvardhan (JGR 1987) Time-dependent Boundary Conditions: Davies (QJRMS 1976) Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Mesoscale Prediction System (COAMPS ® )

COAMPS ® Surface Flux Parameterization Uncertainties at high winds: Z 0 (or C d, or U * ) ?? Z 0h and Z 0q ?? Formula still good ??

Numerical Experiments Model Resolution: 45/15/5 km with moving third mesh Forecast length: 48h Initial conditions: 3D-Var analysis with 41 bogus data Six tropical cyclones (Cat 4 or higher): Lili (2002), Isabel (2003), Ivan (2004), Maemi (2003), Mindulle (2003), Indian Storm 5 (1999)

(Changes are for water points only) Set limit to U * when U 10  33 ms -1 : U *  1.45 for U 10 = 33 ms -1 U *  1.90 for U 10  51 ms -1 (  U 1/2 between 33 to 51 ms -1 ) Sensitivity Test 1 Sensitivity Test 2 Increase Z 0h and Z 0q by 10 times Sensitivity Test 3 Set Z 0h = Z 0q = Z 0 /10 as over land C E /C D

Sensitivity Test 5 When U 10  25 ms -1, SST is cooled at a rate:  SST = -0.5 o C/day, U 10 = 25 ms -1 = -3.0 o C/day, U 10  50 ms -1  U 2 between 25 to 50 ms -1 (Changes are for water points only) Sensitivity Test 4 When U 10  33 ms -1, assume surface layer is deeper than bottom layer and compute stress at the layer top as:  TB = (  sfc +  turb )/2

Averaged Impacts on COAMPS Track and Intensity Forecasts Impacts of Sensitivity Test 1: (Limiting Stress) (Control Run Scores)

Averaged Impacts on COAMPS Track and Intensity Forecasts Impacts of Sensitivity Test 2: (Z 0h *10.) C H /C D = 0.55, u = 40 m/s = m/s = m/s Impacts of Sensitivity Test 3: (Z 0h =0.1*Z 0 ) C H /C D = 0.77, u = 40 m/s = m/s = m/s

Averaged Impacts on COAMPS Track and Intensity Forecasts Impacts of Sensitivity Test 4: (  TB = (  sfc +  turb )/2) Impacts of Sensitivity Test 5: (  SST= -0.5 ~ -3.0 o C/day)

Impacts on Indian Storm-5 Forecasts TrackIntensity

Summary Tested uncertainties of surface flux parameterization at high winds have little impacts on the TC track forecast by COAMPS ® The limit on surface stress and increase of C E /C D have large impacts on the TC intensity forecast by COAMPS ® Their positive impacts on the intensity forecast almost as large as the negative impact by SST cooling The simple average of the stress at the top of the bottom layer has little help in the intensity forecast The accurate and balanced initial condition is another area that needs improvement for TC intensity forecast