Measuring and Ensuring Success

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Impact of Auditing on Records Management Risk and Compliance Susan B. Whitmire, CRM, FAI Manager, Enterprise Records and Information Management BlueCross.
Advertisements

© 2007 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice HP TRIM HP Information Management.
What is GARP®? GARP® is an Acronym for Generally Accepted Recordkeeping Principles ARMA understands that records must be.
HR Manager – HR Business Partners Role Description
Course: e-Governance Project Lifecycle Day 1
Enabling traceability and transparency with standards-based regulatory reporting Dr. Said Tabet Senior Technologist and Industry Standards Strategist Office.
Records Management for UW-Madison Employees – An Introduction UW-Madison Records Management UW-Archives & Records Management 2012 Photo courtesy of University.
BENEFITS OF SUCCESSFUL IT MODERNIZATION
© 2008 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco Confidential 14854_10_2008_c1 1 Holistic Approach to Information Security Greg Carter, Cisco Security.
Executive Insight through Enhanced Enterprise Risk Management Leverage Value From Your Risk Management Investment.
Leaders in Asset Management Establishing a Property Training Program How do we get Property Officials trained AND….motivated?
Building a Better Business Model Start with a discussion of Risk Higher Education Policy Commission Board of Governors Summit August 2, 2014.
AUDIT COMMITTEE FORUM TM ACF Roundtable IT Governance – what does it mean to you as an audit committee member July 2010 The AUDIT COMMITTEE FORUM TM is.
EDiscovery and Records Management. Records Management- Historical Perspective- Paper Historically- Paper was the “Corporate Memory” – a physical entity.
IT Governance Portfolio and Project Management in State Government Chris Cruz, Chief Information Officer, California Department of Food and Agriculture.
Developing a Records & Information Retention & Disposition Program:
1 © Copyright 2008 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. Litigation Response Planning: eDiscovery Best Practices Stephen O’Leary Sr. eDiscovery and Compliance.
By Saurabh Sardesai October 2014.
Moving from money well accounted for to money well spent UK Information Technology Summit May 2005 Helen McDonald A/Chief Information Officer Treasury.
Optimizing IT Department Project Portfolio Management (Concurrency Corporation)
GTM for Product Leaders Project Overview A project that guides product leaders and their teams in developing a successful go-to-market strategy.
“The Impact of Sarbanes Oxley, An Evolving Best Practice” Ellen C. Wolf Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer American Water National Association.
Click to add text © 2010 IBM Corporation OpenPages Solution Overview Mark Dinning Principal Solutions Consultant.
Information Systems Controls for System Reliability -Information Security-
Charting a course PROCESS.
Privileged and Confidential Strategic Approach to Asset Management Presented to October Urban Water Council Regional Seminar.
Information Technology Audit
Class 14: Information Governance Jason R. Baron UMD Seminar on Ediscovery LBSC 708X/INFM 708X May 3, 2012.
Why Information Governance….instead of Records & Information Management? Angela Fares, RHIA, CRM, CISA, CGEIT, CRISC, CISM or
© 2010 Plexent – All rights reserved. 1 Change –The addition, modification or removal of approved, supported or baselined CIs Request for Change –Record.
Chapter © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Delivering Business Value WebDirector. Personal Productivity Disconnected Business Processes Disconnected Information Disconnected People Forms LOB.
DMV’s Service Transformation Program AASHTO Auditor’s Conference Tom McClellan, DMV Administrator and Dawn Farr, Interim STP Lead Oregon Department of.
Network Security Policy Anna Nash MBA 737. Agenda Overview Goals Components Success Factors Common Barriers Importance Questions.
Supporting tools in an IT Project & Portfolio Management environment Ann Van Belle -
0 Comerica’s Transformation The Next Chapter George Surdu.
Roles and Responsibilities
Implementing and Auditing Ethics Programs
Service Transition & Planning Service Validation & Testing
An Integrated Control Framework & Control Objectives for Information Technology – An IT Governance Framework COSO and COBIT 4.0.
1 Improving Information Economics with Information Lifecycle Governance and Defensible Disposal 1.
Modernizing the Records and Retention Program to Express Business Value and Enable Defensible Disposal FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY.
Business Productivity Infrastructure Optimization Campaign 1 Agenda: BPIO Partner Sales Readiness Workshop Day 3: Topic: Enterprise Content management.
Microsoft.com/publicsector Records Management Microsoft Records Management for Government Agencies.
Chapter 9: Introduction to Internal Control Systems
1 Records Management Organization The Committee provides guidance on operating the company’s records management program.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Company: Cincinnati Insurance Company Position: IT Governance Risk & Compliance Service Manager Location: Fairfield, OH About the Company : The Cincinnati.
Chapter © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
GRC: Aligning Policy, Risk and Compliance
Leadership Guide for Strategic Information Management Leadership Guide for Strategic Information Management for State DOTs NCHRP Project Information.
Driving Value from IT Services using ITIL and COBIT 5 July 24, 2013 Gary Hardy ITWinners.
Establishing (or Enhancing) PMO Effectiveness Nicolle Goldman, PMP March 28, 2007.
Info-Tech Research Group1 Info-Tech Research Group, Inc. Is a global leader in providing IT research and advice. Info-Tech’s products and services combine.
Establish and Identify Processes  Identify and establish current state:  Roles and responsibilities  Processes and procedures  Operational performance.
Stony Brook University Data Strategy
Data Minimization Framework
PMI Chapter, IT Governance, Portfolio and Project Management in State Government Chris Cruz, Chief Information Officer, California Department of Food and.
Transforming IT Management
Making Information Security Manageable with GRC
By Jeff Burklo, Director
MAZARS’ CONSULTING PRACTICE Helping your Business Venture Further
Information Governance Part 2
Managing IT Risk in a digital Transformation AGE
Enterprise Content Management (ECM) Project
Presentation transcript:

Measuring and Ensuring Success Information Lifecycle Governance Launching a High Impact Defensible Disposal Program in Your Organization Measuring and Ensuring Success

Barriers To Launching a Program: Lack of Funding, Lack of Operational Model Similar information governance starting point 78% cannot reliably dispose of data Common goal and approach 98% agree rigorous discovery and defensible disposal of information is a desired benefit and requisite outcome of information governance efforts B A P In search of a better Information Governance Program On leadership: 57% of respondents’ companies had information governance - leadership committees yet only 17% said right stakeholders were at the table On ownership: only 25% of companies said the IG ownership model works well today On process management: #1 barrier to achieving IG is managing the enormity of the effort to make the change 2 2

Overcoming Funding Barrier: Quantify Economic Benefits of Defensible Disposal We could spend $35m less next year and lower our run rate We could lower run rate $3m now and spend $24m less over 3 years We could free up $150m to drive revenue and profit

Strategy: ILG Policy and Process Integration Overcoming Operational Program Model Barrier: Establish a Strong Strategy and a Clear Execution Path P + Strategy: ILG Policy and Process Integration ILG Leadership and Execution Organization Focuses enterprise on ILG savings and risk reduction opportunity Drives charter, directive, resources and cross-functional accountability for ILG program. Metrics Align and engage enterprise stakeholders, focus progress toward process maturity targets, capacity requirements, goal achievement Process Capacity Improve and Integrate Processes, Consistently and Defensibly Dispose, Decommission. Automate processes, ensure transparency, provide capacity. Accelerated deployment to drive faster save. Asset Recovery Remove Excess Storage, Infrastructure Savings-prioritized recovery of infrastructure to drive P&L benefit LEADERSHIP EXECUTION LOWER LEGAL AND IT COSTS, REDUCED RISK

Defensible Disposal-Driven Cost and Risk Reduction Opportunity Operationalizing ILG Program is Only Possible with a Precise Path to Success Defensible Disposal-Driven Cost and Risk Reduction Opportunity Costs and Risks of ‘Keep Everything’ 5

1. People and Organization Defensible Disposal-Driven Cost and Risk Reduction Opportunity Costs and Risks of ‘Keep Everything’ 6

Governance Organizational Model: 4 Levels of Leadership, Program Structure Executive Committee: Validate Metrics, Objectives and roles and responsibilities as defined by Program Director and Senior Advisory Group Process and policy resolution Resources and capacity alignment Audit onset and cadence approval Senior Advisory Group: Identity delegates and working group participants in their respective organizations Process and policy definition Monitor process maturation and workstream results in the area Ensure capacity is aligned with program objectives Program Director and PMO: Drive execution on 15 core business processes based on business recommendations from function leaders and practice delegates Communication and training plan oversight Maturity assessment cadence and dependencies Establishes audit cadence and ratifies audit onset Reviews and ratifies implementation/maturation methodology Working Group Delegates & Leads: Audit onset timing Process implementation/maturation methodology Capacity and capability recommendations to line of business leadership and executive committee Communication and training in their domain

Metrics, Measurements and Communication Communication and Reporting Roles and Cadence

Defensible Disposal-Driven Cost and Risk Reduction Opportunity 2. Process Defensible Disposal-Driven Cost and Risk Reduction Opportunity Costs and Risks of ‘Keep Everything’ 9

16 Business Processes to be Enhanced and Instrumented

Enhancing and Instrumenting These 16 Processes Reduces Inherent Risk RISK ELEMENT Legal does not identify the right custodians. Actual, rogue or IT managed data sources are missed. IT or employees migrate, retire or modify data due to no hold visibility. Legal fails to follow through on information identified in custodian interview process. Collection failure from overlooked source, departing employee, incomplete prior collection inventory, communication and tracking errors. Unable to assemble, understand or defend the audit trail of discovery activities. Failures in record keeping and regulatory change management. IT ‘saves everything’ increases discoverable mass, complexity. IT disposes of data of value to the business or with legal obligation. Private customer data is exposed, theft, brand damage, or regulatory penalty occurs. Legal obligations for data are poorly understand and executed from miscommunication or lack of information. Systems are incapable of complying with information obligations IT lacks full facts on disposal of information so excess accumulates or data is lost Legacy data is poorly understood, overlooked in litigation, expensive or difficult to find and not reliably disposed Unable to reclaim or recover unused assets or allocate based on business need Unable to pass an audit on compliance with retention, preservation, protection and disposal policies Highest Risk M B C D N E J H I L G A Potential Impact P F K K J N O P M A B E H G C D F I O L Likelihood to Occur High risk Requires constant monitoring and review, immediate escalation on failure or impending failure. 50% likelihood Moderate risk Requires frequent monitoring to prevent and detect; costly to correct or mitigate. Between 10% -50% likelihood Low risk Does not require constant monitoring and is easy to prevent, detect, correct, defend. Less than 10% likelihood 11

Process Maturity Levels Target maturity level needed for defensible disposal, lower risk and cost 4 INTEGRATED, INSTRUMENTED ENTERPRISE PROCESSES People in the group use the same method Process is automated and facts are routinely incorporated in process Process is repeatable, consistent and reliable in dynamic enterprise Facts from adjacent stakeholders are routinely incorporated in process Process provides enterprise transparency Process dependencies and risks are systematically detected, communicated across processes 3 SILO’ED, CONSISTENT & INSTRUMENTED People in the group use the same method Process is automated Process facts are routinely incorporated in departmental process Process is repeatable, consistent Process and facts are isolated in department Typical maturity level today, cause of excess data, cost and risk 2 SILO’ED, MANUAL Facts are difficult to retrieve but available; isolated to dept People in the group use the same method Spreadsheets are stored in common place or in shared email 1 AD HOC, INCONSISTENT Inconsistent activity Informal or incomplete Facts isolated to an individual Can’t easily be compared, reconciled or monitored HIGH RISK, COST HIGH TRANSPARENCY & CONTROL

Measure the Current State to Develop a Path Forward The Current State May be Manual and Silo’ed Process 1: Ad Hoc, Manual 2: Manual Structure, Silo’ed 3: Instrumented, Silo’ed 4: Instrumented, Integrated A Employees on Legal Holds B Data on Legal Hold C Hold publication D Legal Interviews E Evidence Collection F Evidence Analysis & Cost Controls G Legal Record H Master Retention Schedule & Taxonomy I Departmental Information Practices J Privacy & Data Protection K Data Source Catalog & Stewardship L System Provisioning M Disposal & Decommissioning N Legacy Data Management O Storage Alignment P Audit

Defensible Disposal-Driven Cost and Risk Reduction Opportunity 3. Technology Defensible Disposal-Driven Cost and Risk Reduction Opportunity Costs and Risks of ‘Keep Everything’ 14

Process Capabilities & Requirements PROCESS TRANSPARENCY Unified Governance Transparency across stakeholder processes Common governance data model and enterprise map Linkage of duties, value to information assets and business processes Governance analytics CREATE, USE Optimal accessibility Communicate value and duration Tap governance liaisons Access valuable information more easily Analytics on volume/cost of information HOLD, DISCOVER Rigorous Discovery Robust, affirmative legal holds for people, records, and data Preserve in place automation where disposition occurs Efficient data analysis and collection Legal cost and risk analytics STORE, SECURE Efficient Storage Store and optimize by value Meet SLAs for structured and unstructed information access ILG execution capability and enablement (holds, retention, disposal, collection) for data Data hygiene and governance RETAIN, ARCHIVE Value-Based Taxonomy and regulatory requirements Business value inventory Reliable, executable retention schedules for records and information of value Archive during period of value only Information cost and risk analytics DISPOSE Defensible Disposal Catalog of information value and duty by asset Legacy data clean up, application retirement Procedures and capabilities for disposal by source Risk and cost dashboard for information portfolio 15

IBM Solution Systematically Links Obligations and Value to Assets to Address Root Cause, Lower Cost and Risk Information Department Systems Matter Hold Laws & Regs Retention Schedule DUTY VALUE ASSET LEGAL BUSINESS IT RECORDS Modernize eDiscovery Process Precise, reliable legal holds Assess evidence in place, collect less Lower legal risk, cost State Information Value Guidance on information utility Participate in volume reduction Align around value Optimize Information Volume Dispose and retire unnecessary data Optimize storage based on value Lower information cost Modernize Retention Process Address electronic information Executable schedules can be automated 16

IBM’s ILG Solution Links Records, Legal, the Business and IT to Enable Defensible Disposal Instrumentation and Execution Capabilities by Stakeholder RIM/Business - Records and Retention Management Legal - Rigorous eDiscovery Business/IT Value-Based Archiving IT - Governance and Disposal

Summary – Information Economics Drive ILG Programs Defensible Disposal-Driven Cost and Risk Reduction Opportunity Costs and Risks of ‘Keep Everything’ 18

IBM Has Strong Strategy and Clear Execution Path to Achieve the Risk and Cost Reduction Opportunities Policy and Process Integration Across Information Stakeholders Enables Disposal, Lowers Cost and Risk Strategy and Execution Drive Business Outcomes with Structure, Defined Processes, Metrics, Capacity & Accountability Governance Program Driving Savings and Risk Metrics Charter, directive and accountability for enterprise program. Savings achievement cadence and reporting. Program Office to Coordinate Stakeholders, Drive Benefit Achievement Ensures cross-silo engagement and progress toward maturity targets and financial objectives, change management Technology Provides Capacity to Improve and Integrate Processes, Consistently and Defensibly Dispose, Decommission Automates processes, ensures transparency, provides capacity. Accelerated deployment to drive faster save. Reclamation Removes Excess Storage, Infrastructure Savings-prioritized reclamation and recovery of infrastructure to drive P&L benefit STRATEGY EXECUTION >$300M enterprise value created over 3 years with lower legal and IT costs, reduced risk

Only IBM Provides Rigorous Compliance, Value-Based Archiving & Defensible Disposal Strategy, Software & Services 20

Learn More & Join the Conversation Compliance, Governance and Oversight Council Join the CGOC! Forum of over 1600 corporate legal, IT, records and information management professionals. CGOC conducts primary research, has dedicated working groups on challenging topics, and hosts meetings throughout the U.S. and Europe where practice leaders convene to discuss discovery, retention, privacy and governance. Mission: To provide executives the opportunity to benchmark and exchange case studies; its practice groups focus on discreet areas in preservation, retention, and information governance to deliver work products that help our members best approach the challenges in maintaining best-in-class programs. Online and in person events Regional and International summits Published materials

Additional Sessions Improving Information Economics with Information Lifecycle Governance Information Governance Programs - launching a high-impact defensible disposal program in your enterprise Modernizing eDiscovery and Hold Process - Reduce risks, increase transparency Modernizing Retention Program - Express Information Value Value-Based Archiving and Defensible Disposal - Dispose rather than store unnecessary data