Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessing Students in Cooperative Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Technological Leadership Institute/ STEM Education Center/
Advertisements

Design and Implementation of Active and Cooperative Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of.
Engaging Students in Large Classes Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of Minnesota Design and Implementation.
New Mexico State University Teaching Academy
Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University
Design and Implementation of Cooperative Learning in Large Classes Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University.
Washington State University
Teamwork and Leadership
Engaging Students Through Active and Cooperative Learning
Cooperative Learning Session 1 Karl A. Smith Civil Engineering University of Minnesota Eastern Michigan University.
Design and Implementation of Active and Cooperative Learning in Large Classes - Overview - Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil.
Engaging Students in Large Classes Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of Minnesota
Assessing Students in Team-Based Learning
1 Teaching for Learning: Using Active Learning Strategies & Cooperative Student Groups to Promote Learning in Lecture Classes – Session 4 Karl Smith Civil.
High-Performance Teamwork Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of Minnesota Preparing and Supporting.
1 Problem-Based Cooperative Learning Karl Smith Civil Engineering Estimation Exercise.
Designing and Implementing High Performance Learning Teams Karl A. Smith Civil Engineering University of Minnesota
Engaging Learners Cooperatively in Large and Small Classes Karl A. Smith Civil Engineering University of Minnesota
Formal Cooperative Learning: Text Comprehension/Interpretation Karl A. Smith Laura Apol.
Team Charter Examples & Research
Active, Interactive, Cooperative & Collaborative Learning Karl A. Smith Civil Engineering University of Minnesota
Design and Implementation of Active and Cooperative Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University STEM Education Center/Civil Eng –
Pegadogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -
1 Problem-Based Cooperative Learning Karl Smith Civil Engineering Tower Design Exercise.
High-Performance Teamwork Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of Minnesota -
Click to edit Master title style 2009 Workshop for The Committee for the Formation of Engineers Puebla-Tlaxcala Content, Assessment and Pedagogy (CAP):
Engaging Faculty and Students in Talking about Teaching and Learning (Informed by Assessment Data) Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University.
Enhancing STEM Classes with Active and Cooperative Learning Karl A. Smith Civil Engineering University of Minnesota
Cooperative Learning and Problem- Based Learning: Working with Teams Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University.
Building and Managing Successful Teams for Cooperative Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University.
1 Creating More Engaged Learning for Today’s College Students Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of.
Formal Cooperative Learning: Text Comprehension/Interpretation Karl A. Smith Laura Apol.
Engaging Students Through Active and Cooperative Learning Karl A. Smith Civil Engineering - University of Minnesota
Pedagogies of Engagement: Cooperative Learning and Challenge-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Technological Leadership.
Engaging Students Through Active and Cooperative Learning Karl A. Smith Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota
Cooperative Learning: Engaging Students in Large Classes Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of Minnesota.
Engaging Students Through Active and Cooperative Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of Minnesota.
Design and Implementation of Active and Cooperative Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of.
Developing a Team Environment Karl A. Smith University of Minnesota January 2005 Engineers Leadership Institute Minnesota.
Pegadogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -
Informal Cooperative Learning – Design, Implementation and Assessment Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University STEM Education Center/Civil.
Design and Implementation of Active and Cooperative Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of.
Problem-Based Cooperative Learning
High Performance Teamwork
Active/Cooperative Learning (ACL) & Teamwork
High-Performance Teamwork
Engaging Students Through Active and Cooperative Learning
Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University
Using Active and Cooperative Learning in Large Classes
Karl A. Smith Civil Engineering - University of Minnesota
Formal Cooperative Learning – Design, Implementation and Assessment
Cooperative Learning Basics
Designing, Implementing, and Assessing Student-Student Collaboration
Engaging Students Through Active and Cooperative Learning
High Performance Teamwork
Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University
High Performance Teamwork
Engaging Students in Large Classes
California State University – Dominguez Hills
Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University
Innovation in a Team Environment High-Performance Teamwork
Engaging Students Through Active and Cooperative Learning
Developing a Team Environment Karl A. Smith University of Minnesota
Engaging Students Through Active and Cooperative Learning
Getting Started with Cooperative Learning
Engaging Students Through Active and Cooperative Learning
High-Performance Teamwork
Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University
Enhancing Engineering Classes with Active and Cooperative Learning
Presentation transcript:

Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of Minnesota STEP Project Workshop Louisiana State University College of Engineering May 2010

2 Session Agenda Review/Introduce Cooperative Learning (CL) Key concepts of CL Approaches for implementing CL

3 Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom Informal Cooperative Learning Groups Formal Cooperative Learning Groups Cooperative Base Groups See Cooperative Learning Handout (CL College-804.doc)

Cooperative Learning is instruction that involves people working in teams to accomplish a common goal, under conditions that involve both positive interdependence (all members must cooperate to complete the task) and individual and group accountability (each member is accountable for the complete final outcome). Key Concepts Positive Interdependence Individual and Group Accountability Face-to-Face Promotive Interaction Teamwork Skills Group Processing

5 Individual & Group Accountability ?

6

7 Book Ends on a Class Session

1.Advance Organizer 2.Formulate-Share-Listen-Create (Turn- to-your-neighbor) -- repeated every minutes 3.Session Summary (Minute Paper) 1.What was the most useful or meaningful thing you learned during this session? 2.What question(s) remain uppermost in your mind as we end this session? 3.What was the “muddiest” point in this session?

9 Advance Organizer “The most important single factor influencing learning is what the learner already knows. Ascertain this and teach him accordingly.” David Ausubel - Educational psychology: A cognitive approach, 1968.

10 Quick Thinks Reorder the steps Paraphrase the idea Correct the error Support a statement Select the response Johnston, S. & Cooper,J Quick thinks: Active- thinking in lecture classes and televised instruction. Cooperative learning and college teaching, 8(1), 2-7.

11 Formulate-Share-Listen-Create Informal Cooperative Learning Group Introductory Pair Discussion of a FOCUS QUESTION 1.Formulate your response to the question individually 2.Share your answer with a partner 3.Listen carefully to your partner's answer 4.Work together to Create a new answer through discussion

12 Formulate-Share-Listen-Create (Think-Pair-Share) Individually read the quote “To teach is to engage students in learning...” Underline/Highlight words and/or phrases that stand out for you Turn to the person next to you and talk about words and/or phrases that stood out

To teach is to engage students in learning; thus teaching consists of getting students involved in the active construction of knowledge...The aim of teaching is not only to transmit information, but also to transform students from passive recipients of other people's knowledge into active constructors of their own and others' knowledge...Teaching is fundamentally about creating the pedagogical, social, and ethical conditions under which students agree to take charge of their own learning, individually and collectively Education for judgment: The artistry of discussion leadership. Edited by C. Roland Christensen, David A. Garvin, and Ann Sweet. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School, 1991.

14 Minute Paper What was the most useful or meaningful thing you learned during this session? What question(s) remain uppermost in your mind as we end this session? What was the “muddiest” point in this session? Give an example or application Explain in your own words... Angelo, T.A. & Cross, K.P Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

15 Session Summary (Minute Paper) Reflect on the session: 1. Most interesting, valuable, useful thing you learned. 2. Things that helped you learn. 3. Question, comments, suggestions. 4.Pace: Too slow Too fast 5.Relevance: Little Lots 6.Instructional Format: Ugh Ah

16 Q4 – Pace: Too slow Too fast (3.0) Q5 – Relevance: Little Lots (3.9) Q6 – Format: Ugh Ah (4.1) MOT 8221 – Spring 2010 – Session 1 (1/29/10)

17 Q4 – Pace: Too slow Too fast (3.3) Q5 – Relevance: Little Lots (4.2) Q6 – Format: Ugh Ah (4.4) MOT 8221 – Spring 2009 – Session 1

18 Informal CL (Book Ends on a Class Session) with Concept Tests Physics Peer Instruction Eric Mazur - Harvard – Peer Instruction – Richard Hake – Chemistry Chemistry ConcepTests - UW Madison Video: Making Lectures Interactive with ConcepTests ModularChem Consortium – STEMTEC Video: How Change Happens: Breaking the “Teach as You Were Taught” Cycle – Films for the Humanities & Sciences – Harvard Thinking Together & From Questions to Concepts Interactive Teaching in Physics : Derek Bok Center –

19 The “Hake” Plot of FCI Pretest (Percent) ALS SDI WP PI(HU) ASU(nc) ASU(c) HU WP* UMn Traditional X UMn Cooperative Groups X UMn-CL+PS

Richard Hake (Interactive engagement vs traditional methods) Traditional (lecture) Interactive (active/cooperative) = Concept Inventory Gain/Total

21

22 Physics (Mechanics) Concepts: The Force Concept Inventory (FCI) A 30 item multiple choice test to probe student's understanding of basic concepts in mechanics. The choice of topics is based on careful thought about what the fundamental issues and concepts are in Newtonian dynamics. Uses common speech rather than cueing specific physics principles. The distractors (wrong answers) are based on students' common inferences.

Strategies for Energizing Large Classes: From Small Groups to Learning Communities: Jean MacGregor, James Cooper, Karl Smith, Pamela Robinson New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 81, Jossey- Bass

Informal Cooperative Learning Groups Can be used at any time Can be short term and ad hoc May be used to break up a long lecture Provides an opportunity for students to process material they have been listening to (Cognitive Rehearsal) Are especially effective in large lectures Include "book ends" procedure Are not as effective as Formal Cooperative Learning or Cooperative Base Groups

Formal Cooperative Learning Task Groups

26

27 Top Three Main Engineering Work Activities Engineering Total Design – 36% Computer applications – 31% Management – 29% Civil/Architectural Management – 45% Design – 39% Computer applications – 20% Burton, L., Parker, L, & LeBold, W U.S. engineering career trends. ASEE Prism, 7(9),

28 Teamwork Skills Communication Listening and Persuading Decision Making Conflict Management Leadership Trust and Loyalty

29 Ideo's five-point model for strategizing by design: Hit the Streets Recruit T-Shaped People Build to Think The Prototype Tells a Story Design Is Never Done Design Thinking Discipline Thinking Tom Friedman Horizontalize Ourselves CQ+PQ>IQ AAC&U College Learning For the New Global Century

30

Design team failure is usually due to failed team dynamics (Leifer, Koseff & Lenshow, 1995). It’s the soft stuff that’s hard, the hard stuff is easy (Doug Wilde, quoted in Leifer, 1997) Professional Skills ( Shuman, L., Besterfield-Sacre, M., and McGourty, J., “The ABET Professional Skills-Can They Be Taught? Can They Be Assessed?” Journal of Engineering Education, Vo. 94, No. 1, 2005, pp. 41–55.)

32 Teamwork

33 Characteristics of Effective Teams ?

A team is a small number of people with complementary skills who are committed to a common purpose, performance goals, and approach for which they hold themselves mutually accountable SMALL NUMBER COMPLEMENTARY SKILLS COMMON PURPOSE & PERFORMANCE GOALS COMMON APPROACH MUTUAL ACCOUNTABILITY --Katzenbach & Smith (1993) The Wisdom of Teams

35 Hackman – Leading Teams Real Team Compelling Direction Enabling Structure Supportive Organizational Context Available Expert Coaching Team Diagnostic Survey (TDS)

Team Charter Team name, membership, and roles Team Mission Statement Anticipated results (goals) Specific tactical objectives Ground rules/Guiding principles for team participation Shared expectations/aspirations

Code of Cooperation EVERY member is responsible for the team ’ s progress and success. Attend all team meetings and be on time. Come prepared. Carry out assignments on schedule. Listen to and show respect for the contributions of other members; be an active listener. CONSTRUCTIVELY criticize ideas, not persons. Resolve conflicts constructively, Pay attention, avoid disruptive behavior. Avoid disruptive side conversations. Only one person speaks at a time. Everyone participates, no one dominates. Be succinct, avoid long anecdotes and examples. No rank in the room. Respect those not present. Ask questions when you do not understand. Attend to your personal comfort needs at any time but minimize team disruption. HAVE FUN!! ? Adapted from Boeing Aircraft Group Team Member Training Manual

38 Ten Commandments: An Affective Code of Cooperation Help each other be right, not wrong. Look for ways to make new ideas work, not for reasons they won't. If in doubt, check it out! Don't make negative assumptions about each other. Help each other win, and take pride in each other's victories. Speak positively about each other and about your organization at every opportunity. Maintain a positive mental attitude no matter what the circumstances. Act with initiative and courage, as if it all depends on you. Do everything with enthusiasm; it's contagious. Whatever you want; give it away. Don't lose faith. Have fun Ford Motor Company

39

Group Processing Plus/Delta Format Plus (+) Things That Group Did Well Delta (Δ) Things Group Could Improve

41 Professor's Role in Formal Cooperative Learning 1.Specifying Objectives 2.Making Decisions 3.Explaining Task, Positive Interdependence, and Individual Accountability 4.Monitoring and Intervening to Teach Skills 5.Evaluating Students' Achievement and Group Effectiveness

Formal Cooperative Learning – Types of Tasks 1.Jigsaw – Learning new conceptual/procedural material 2.Peer Composition or Editing 3.Reading Comprehension/Interpretation 4.Problem Solving, Project, or Presentation 5.Review/Correct Homework 6.Constructive Academic Controversy 7.Group Tests

43 Challenged-Based Learning Problem-based learning Case-based learning Project-based learning Learning by design Inquiry learning Anchored instruction John Bransford, Nancy Vye and Helen Bateman. Creating High-Quality Learning Environments: Guidelines from Research on How People Learn

44 Challenge-Based Instruction with the Legacy Cycle Legacy Cycle The Challenges Generate Ideas Multiple Perspectives Research & Revise Test Your Mettle Go Public 44

45 Problem-Based Learning Problem posed Identify what we need to know Learn it Apply it START

46 Problem Based Cooperative Learning Format TASK: Solve the problem(s) or Complete the project. INDIVIDUAL: Estimate answer. Note strategy. COOPERATIVE: One set of answers from the group, strive for agreement, make sure everyone is able to explain the strategies used to solve each problem. EXPECTED CRITERIA FOR SUCCESS: Everyone must be able to explain the strategies used to solve each problem. EVALUATION: Best answer within available resources or constraints. INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNTABILITY: One member from your group may be randomly chosen to explain (a) the answer and (b) how to solve each problem. EXPECTED BEHAVIORS: Active participating, checking, encouraging, and elaborating by all members. INTERGROUP COOPERATION: Whenever it is helpful, check procedures, answers, and strategies with another group.

47

48 Cooperative Base Groups Are Heterogeneous Are Long Term (at least one quarter or semester) Are Small (3-5 members) Are for support May meet at the beginning of each session or may meet between sessions Review for quizzes, tests, etc. together Share resources, references, etc. for individual projects Provide a means for covering for absentees