Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer 2013 Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Advertisements

Pythagorean Theorem Group 7 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Committed Listening Learning Focused Conversations October,
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reviewing the Cognitive Rigor Matrix and DOK Tuesday September.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Building Capacity as a Presenter Presenter Skills November.
Comparison Situations and Tape Diagrams
Division of Fractions: Balancing Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge Part 2 January 15, 2013 Common Core Leadership in Mathematics2 (CCLM) This material.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Linking Assessment Targets to Instructional Tasks and DOK This.
Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2013–2014 This material was developed for.
Volume Group 5 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013 This material.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Shape Group 1 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013 This material.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer Institute 2012 Laying the Foundation for Single-Digit Addition.
Coaching Case 3 Group 4 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Paraphrases and Wait Time Learning Focused Conversations April.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Listening and Paraphrasing Learning Focused Conversations November.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Understanding Shape in Kindergarten and Grade 1 Common Core.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer Institute 2012 Division Common Core Leadership in Mathematics.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer Institute 2012 What are Fractions? Part 1 Common Core Leadership.
Coaching Case 10 Group 6 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Word problems…. No problem! Class 5 November 13, 2012 This.
Understanding Angle Group 3 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer Institute 2012 Fractions: Teaching with Understanding Part 2 This.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2013–2014 This material was developed for.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Ratio and Proportional Relationships April 23, 2013 Common.
CCSS-M and Classroom Practice: Reflecting Conversation DECEMBER 13, 2011 Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee,
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer 2012 Getting to know the CCSSM CCLM June 20, 2011 Melissa Hedges.
Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical Knowledge and
Equality and Relational Thinking: Abstracting from Computation Part 1
Classroom Discussions to Support Problem Solving
Connecting Two- and Three-Dimensional Figures
Surfacing MP6, MP7 and MP 5 Core Mathematics Partnership
Project & Syllabus.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics (CCLM) Friday June 29, 2012
Developing Linear Thinking & Extending to a Ruler
Standards for Mathematical Practice
Multiplication Concept Development & Word Problem Structures
Single-Digit Addition Fluency Grades K-2
Ratio Reasoning in 6th Grade The Road to Proportional Reasoning
Smarter Balanced Assessment Items
Use the next 10 minutes to share.... Goal…
Number Talks: Focusing in Computational Fluency
Using Talk Moves to Help Students Engage in the Reasoning of Others
Number Talks: Developing Computational Fluency
Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical Knowledge and
The Power of A Number String Purposeful Number Talks
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
Number Talks: An Instructional Strategy used to Create a Classroom Culture of Listening, Sharing and Flexible Thinking Core Mathematics Partnership.
The Power of A Number String Purposeful Number Talks (part 2)
Understanding Ratios as Percents
Moving From Multiplicative Comparisons to Proportional Reasoning
K-6 Geometry and Geometric Measurement : Tying it All Up
A Language-Rich Math Class
Access & Equity Core Mathematics Partnership
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
Single-Digit Addition Fluency: Part 2 Grades K-2
Student Work Presentation and Reflection Project Due: July 31
Student Work Analysis: Looking for Growth in Thinking
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
Presentation transcript:

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer 2013 Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2013–2014 This material was developed for the Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics project through the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Center for Mathematics and Science Education Research (CMSER). This material may be used by schools to support learning of teachers and staff provided appropriate attribution and acknowledgement of its source. You may not use this work for commercial purposes. This project was supported through a grant from the Wisconsin ESEA Title II Improving Teacher Quality Program.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer 2013 Assessment: Present and Past Common Core Leadership in Mathematics (CCLM) This material was developed for use by participants in the Common Core Leadership in Mathematics (CCLM^2) project through the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Use by school district personnel to support learning of its teachers and staff is permitted provided appropriate acknowledgement of its source. Use by others is prohibited except by prior written permission.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer 2013 Questions to Ponder … Can we really prepare students to achieve on the Smarter Balanced Assessment? (belief system) What will it take? What will need to change?

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer 2013 Before moving ahead, let’s take a step back. What are components of your classroom assessment system?

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer 2013 Classroom Assessment System What is your current assessment system? Use bullet points and list components of your assessment system.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer 2013 Assessment System Goals What do you want your assessment system to accomplish in your classroom? How will your system accomplish these things?

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer 2013 Learning Targets and Success Criteria We are learning to: Explain the ways in which our current assessment model is tied to our assessment history. Connect assessment practice to current needs. We will be successful when we can: Describe historical trends in assessment practice. Articulate structural changes to our own assessment practice.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer 2013 Our Assessment Legacy Think back … What summative assessments have been given to students in the past? Make a list of the types of assessments. What has been the purpose of these summative assessments? How have these assessments and student results from these assessments supported teaching and learning? How have they supported education practices?

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer 2013 Video

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer 2013 Video Video of Stiggins on Assessment. Two Parts: Part 1: Our Assessment Legacy (30 min) Part 2: Our Assessment Future (20 min)

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer 2013 Listening to Part 1 of the Video Consider two questions about your own assessment system. 1.What assessment beliefs must change? 2.If those beliefs are changed, what changes in practice will follow? Take about 3 minutes to write silently. You’ll be sharing these ideas with a partner.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer 2013 Reflecting on Video – Part 1 Listening and Paraphrasing In pairs, you will have a chance to share and practice some coaching skills. Partner 1 - two minutes to share thoughts on the questions. Partner 2 – listens and paraphrases Partner 1 during the two minutes. Switch roles.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer 2013 Debrief Listening and Paraphrasing What went well? What was a challenge?

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer 2013 Debrief Mistaken Beliefs 1.High stakes tests are good for all students because they motivate learning. 2.If I threaten to fail you, it will cause you to try harder. 3.If a little motivation doesn’t work, use a lot of intimidation. 4.The way to maximize learning is to maximize anxiety. 5.It is the adults who use assessment results to make the most important instruction decisions. 6.The most important decisions are made annually based on once-a-year tests.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer 2013 Messages What did you learn this morning? What are three big messages to take away? Turn and talk with a partner. Then have a table discussion. Select the top three big messages from your table.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer 2013 Success Criteria We will be successful when we can: Describe historical trends in assessment practice. Articulate structural changes to our own assessment practice.