Relationships Scatterplots and correlation BPS chapter 4 © 2006 W.H. Freeman and Company.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 3 Examining Relationships Lindsey Van Cleave AP Statistics September 24, 2006.
Advertisements

Section 6.1: Scatterplots and Correlation (Day 1).
Looking at data: relationships - Correlation Lecture Unit 7.
Chapter 3 Examining Relationships
Chapter 6: Exploring Data: Relationships Lesson Plan
CHAPTER 4: Scatterplots and Correlation. Chapter 4 Concepts 2  Explanatory and Response Variables  Displaying Relationships: Scatterplots  Interpreting.
Chapter 41 Describing Relationships: Scatterplots and Correlation.
Looking at data: relationships - Correlation IPS chapter 2.2 Copyright Brigitte Baldi 2005 ©
Looking at Data - Relationships Scatterplots
Looking at data: relationships Scatterplots IPS chapter 2.1 © 2006 W. H. Freeman and Company.
CHAPTER 3 Describing Relationships
Chapter 7 Scatterplots, Association, Correlation Scatterplots and correlation Fitting a straight line to bivariate data © 2006 W. H. Freeman.
MATH 2400 Chapter 4 Notes. Response & Explanatory Variables A response variable (a.k.a. dependent variables) measures an outcome of a study. An explanatory.
LECTURE 2 Understanding Relationships Between 2 Numerical Variables
Objectives (BPS chapter 5)
Examining Relationships Prob. And Stat. CH.2.1 Scatterplots.
Association between 2 variables We've described the distribution of 1 variable in Chapter 1 - but what if 2 variables are measured on the same individual?
Looking at data: relationships - Caution about correlation and regression - The question of causation IPS chapters 2.4 and 2.5 © 2006 W. H. Freeman and.
Chapter 3: Examining relationships between Data
Chapter 6: Exploring Data: Relationships Lesson Plan Displaying Relationships: Scatterplots Making Predictions: Regression Line Correlation Least-Squares.
Scatterplots. Learning Objectives By the end of this lecture, you should be able to: – Describe what a scatterplot is – Be comfortable with the terms.
LECTURE UNIT 7 Understanding Relationships Among Variables Scatterplots and correlation Fitting a straight line to bivariate data.
Looking at data: relationships Scatterplots IPS chapter 2.1 © 2006 W. H. Freeman and Company.
Chapter 6 Scatterplots and Correlation Chapter 7 Objectives Scatterplots  Scatterplots  Explanatory and response variables  Interpreting scatterplots.
IPS Chapter 2 DAL-AC FALL 2015  2.1: Scatterplots  2.2: Correlation  2.3: Least-Squares Regression  2.4: Cautions About Correlation and Regression.
1 Examining Relationships in Data William P. Wattles, Ph.D. Francis Marion University.
Chapter 3 Section 3.1 Examining Relationships. Continue to ask the preliminary questions familiar from Chapter 1 and 2 What individuals do the data describe?
Examining Relationships Scatterplots
Objectives (IPS Chapter 2.1)
The Practice of Statistics, 5th Edition Starnes, Tabor, Yates, Moore Bedford Freeman Worth Publishers CHAPTER 3 Describing Relationships 3.1 Scatterplots.
Correlation tells us about strength (scatter) and direction of the linear relationship between two quantitative variables. In addition, we would like to.
The Practice of Statistics, 5th Edition Starnes, Tabor, Yates, Moore Bedford Freeman Worth Publishers CHAPTER 3 Describing Relationships 3.1 Scatterplots.
Objectives 2.1Scatterplots  Scatterplots  Explanatory and response variables  Interpreting scatterplots  Outliers Adapted from authors’ slides © 2012.
Chapter 4 Scatterplots and Correlation. Explanatory and Response Variables u Interested in studying the relationship between two variables by measuring.
Chapter 7 Scatterplots, Association, and Correlation.
Association between 2 variables We've described the distribution of 1 variable - but what if 2 variables are measured on the same individual? Examples?
Relationships Scatterplots and correlation BPS chapter 4 © 2006 W.H. Freeman and Company.
3.2: Linear Correlation Measure the strength of a linear relationship between two variables. As x increases, no definite shift in y: no correlation. As.
Correlation tells us about strength (scatter) and direction of the linear relationship between two quantitative variables. In addition, we would like to.
4.2 Correlation The Correlation Coefficient r Properties of r 1.
Chapter 4 Scatterplots and Correlation. Chapter outline Explanatory and response variables Displaying relationships: Scatterplots Interpreting scatterplots.
Relationships Scatterplots and correlation BPS chapter 4 © 2006 W.H. Freeman and Company.
Chapter 2 Examining Relationships.  Response variable measures outcome of a study (dependent variable)  Explanatory variable explains or influences.
Relationships Scatterplots and Correlation.  Explanatory and response variables  Displaying relationships: scatterplots  Interpreting scatterplots.
Notes Chapter 7 Bivariate Data. Relationships between two (or more) variables. The response variable measures an outcome of a study. The explanatory variable.
The Practice of Statistics for Business and Economics Third Edition David S. Moore George P. McCabe Layth C. Alwan Bruce A. Craig William M. Duckworth.
Lecture 8 Sections Objectives: Bivariate and Multivariate Data and Distributions − Scatter Plots − Form, Direction, Strength − Correlation − Properties.
Correlation  We can often see the strength of the relationship between two quantitative variables in a scatterplot, but be careful. The two figures here.
Lecture 4 Chapter 3. Bivariate Associations. Objectives (PSLS Chapter 3) Relationships: Scatterplots and correlation  Bivariate data  Scatterplots (2.
Lecture 3 – Sep 3. Normal quantile plots are complex to do by hand, but they are standard features in most statistical software. Good fit to a straight.
Statistics for Business and Economics Module 2: Regression and time series analysis Spring 2010 Lecture 2: Examining the relationship between two quantitative.
Scatter plots Adapted from 350/
3. Relationships Scatterplots and correlation
Looking at Data–Relationships 2.1 Scatterplots
Looking at data: relationships - Correlation
The Practice of Statistics in the Life Sciences Fourth Edition
Chapter 2 Looking at Data— Relationships
Objectives (IPS Chapter 2.3)
CHAPTER 3 Describing Relationships
CHAPTER 3 Describing Relationships
CHAPTER 3 Describing Relationships
CHAPTER 3 Describing Relationships
CHAPTER 3 Describing Relationships
Association between 2 variables
CHAPTER 3 Describing Relationships
CHAPTER 3 Describing Relationships
Association between 2 variables
Scatterplots.
CHAPTER 3 Describing Relationships
Image from Minitab Website
Presentation transcript:

Relationships Scatterplots and correlation BPS chapter 4 © 2006 W.H. Freeman and Company

Objectives (BPS chapter 4) Relationships: Scatterplots and correlation  Explanatory and response variables  Displaying relationships: scatterplots  Interpreting scatterplots  Adding categorical variables to scatterplots  Measuring linear association: correlation  Facts about correlation

StudentNumber of Beers Blood Alcohol Level Here we have two quantitative variables for each of 16 students. 1. How many beers they drank, and 2. Their blood alcohol level (BAC) We are interested in the relationship between the two variables: How is one affected by changes in the other one?

StudentBeersBAC Scatterplots In a scatterplot one axis is used to represent each of the variables, and the data are plotted as points on the graph.

Explanatory (independent) variable: number of beers Response (dependent) variable: blood alcohol content x y Explanatory and response variables A response variable measures or records an outcome of a study. An explanatory variable explains changes in the response variable. Typically, the explanatory or independent variable is plotted on the x axis and the response or dependent variable is plotted on the y axis.

Some plots don’t have clear explanatory and response variables. Do calories explain sodium amounts? Does percent return on Treasury bills explain percent return on common stocks?

Interpreting scatterplots  After plotting two variables on a scatterplot, we describe the relationship by examining the form, direction, and strength of the association. We look for an overall pattern …  Form: linear, curved, clusters, no pattern  Direction: positive, negative, no direction  Strength: how closely the points fit the “form”  … and deviations from that pattern.  Outliers

Form and direction of an association Linear Nonlinear No relationship

Positive association: High values of one variable tend to occur together with high values of the other variable. Negative association: High values of one variable tend to occur together with low values of the other variable.

One way to remember this: The equation for this line is y = 5. x is not involved. No relationship: x and y vary independently. Knowing x tells you nothing about y.

Caution:  Relationships require that both variables be quantitative (thus the order of the data points is defined entirely by their value).  Correspondingly, relationships between categorical data are meaningless. Example: Beetles trapped on boards of different colors What association? What relationship? Blue White Green Yellow Board color Blue Green White Yellow Board color Describe one category at a time. ?

Strength of the association The strength of the relationship between the two variables can be seen by how much variation, or scatter, there is around the main form. With a strong relationship, you can get a pretty good estimate of y if you know x. With a weak relationship, for any x you might get a wide range of y values.

This is a very strong relationship. The daily amount of gas consumed can be predicted quite accurately for a given temperature value. This is a weak relationship. For a particular state median household income, you can’t predict the state per capita income very well.

How to scale a scatterplot Using an inappropriate scale for a scatterplot can give an incorrect impression. Both variables should be given a similar amount of space: Plot roughly square Points should occupy all the plot space (no blank space) Same data in all four plots

Adding categorical variables to scatterplots Often, things are not simple and one-dimensional. We need to group the data into categories to reveal trends. What may look like a positive linear relationship is in fact a series of negative linear associations. Plotting different habitats in different colors allowed us to make that important distinction.

Comparison of men’s and women’s racing records over time. Each group shows a very strong negative linear relationship that would not be apparent without the gender categorization. Relationship between lean body mass and metabolic rate in men and women. While both men and women follow the same positive linear trend, women show a stronger association. As a group, males typically have larger values for both variables.

Outliers An outlier is a data value that has a very low probability of occurrence (i.e., it is unusual or unexpected). In a scatterplot, outliers are points that fall outside of the overall pattern of the relationship.

Not an outlier: The upper right-hand point here is not an outlier of the relationship—it is what you would expect for this many beers given the linear relationship between beers/weight and blood alcohol. This point is not in line with the others, so it is an outlier of the relationship. Outliers

Example: IQ score and grade point average a)Describe what this plot shows in words. b)Describe the direction, shape, and strength. Are there outliers? c)What is the deal with these people?

The correlation coefficient is a measure of the direction and strength of a relationship. It is calculated using the mean and the standard deviation of both the x and y variables. The correlation coefficient “r” Correlation can only be used to describe QUANTITATIVE variables. Categorical variables don’t have means and standard deviations. Time to swim: x = 35, s x = 0.7 Pulse rate: y = 140 s y = 9.5

Part of the calculation involves finding z, the standardized score we used when working with the normal distribution. You DON'T want to do this by hand. Make sure you learn how to use your calculator!

Standardization: Allows us to compare correlations between data sets where variables are measured in different units or when variables are different. For instance, we might want to compare the correlation shown here, between swim time and pulse, with the correlation between swim time and breathing rate.

“r” doesn’t distinguish explanatory and response variables The correlation coefficient, r, treats x and y symmetrically. “Time to swim” is the explanatory variable here and belongs on the x axis. However, in either plot r is the same (r = −0.75). r = -0.75

Changing the units of variables does not change the correlation coefficient “r,” because we get rid of all our units when we standardize (get z-scores). “r” has no unit r = z-score plot is the same for both plots

“r” ranges from − 1 to +1 “r” quantifies the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two quantitative variables. Strength: How closely the points follow a straight line. Direction is positive when individuals with higher x values tend to have higher values of y.

When variability in one or both variables decreases, the correlation coefficient gets stronger (closer to +1 or −1).

Use correlation only for linear relationships. Note: You can sometimes transform non-linear data to a linear form, for instance, by taking the logarithm. You can then calculate a correlation using the transformed data. Caution using correlation

Correlations are calculated using means and standard deviations and thus are NOT resistant to outliers. Just moving one point away from the general trend here decreases the correlation from −0.91 to −0.75. Influential points

Adding two outliers decreases r from 0.95 to Try it out for yourself—companion book website

1) What is the explanatory variable? Describe the form, direction, and strength of the relationship. (in 1000s) 2) If women always marry men 2 years older than themselves, what is the correlation of the ages between husband and wife? Review examples age man = age woman + 2 equation for a straight line r = 1

Thought quiz on correlation 1.Why is there no distinction between explanatory and response variable in correlation? 2.Why do both variables have to be quantitative? 3.How does changing the units of one variable affect a correlation? 4.What is the effect of outliers on correlations? 5.Why doesn’t a tight fit to a horizontal line imply a strong correlation?