State of the Faculty Survey Philip C. Wander President of the Faculty Senate LMU March 18 2010.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Promotion and Tenure at the University of Washington Eve Riskin, Joyce Yen, and Denice Denton.

Advertisements

Promotion and Tenure Faculty Senate May 8, To be voted on.

Assessment of the Impact of Ubiquitous Computing on Learning Ross A. Griffith Wake Forest University Ubiquitous Computing Conference Seton Hall University.

Proposal for the Process of Faculty Selection to Committees in the School of Undergraduate Studies History As the School of Undergraduate Studies (UGS)

PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,

A PROJECT OF THE UNDERGRADUATE CLINICAL COMMITTEE SPRING 2011 CONHS TAMUCC An Undergraduate Clinical Faculty Orientation Program.

Why Bother? Helping Women Achieve Full Professor Rank Christine A. Hult Utah State University.

Say what?! Getting and Responding to Feedback in the Pre-award Office Joseph McNicholas, Ph.D. Director Office for Research and Sponsored Projects Loyola.

NSF ADVANCE: Institutional Transformation for Faculty Diversity ADVANCE Faculty Work Life Survey: Comparison of Statistically Significant Gender Differences.

Tenure Track Faculty Survey Spring  Population:241 ◦ Female: 79 ◦ Males: 162 ◦ Faculty of Color: 54  Sample:159 (66%) ◦ Females: 52 (66%) ◦ Males:

Diversity Assessment and Planning with members of the October 14, 2005.

1 Faculty Climate Survey Highlights Institutional Research & Faculty Development and Diversity March 2008.

Faculty Rights and Other Scholarly Communication Practices Denise Troll Covey Principal Librarian for Special Projects Carnegie Mellon DLF Forum – Boston,

The Graduate School at The University of Missouri– St. Louis Kathleen M. Haywood, Ph.D. Professor and Associate Dean for Graduate Education in the College.

College Strategic Plan by Strategic Planning and Quality Assurance Committee.

Benchmarks from the Harvard Collaborative on Academic Careers in Higher Education (COACHE) Faculty Job Satisfaction Survey University Faculty Meeting October.

COACHE Survey Results Faculty of Arts & Science March 28, 2014.

Developing Diverse Departments at NC State NSF ADVANCE Project

University Senate August 26, 2014 KEY FINDINGS FROM THE COACHE FACULTY JOB SATISFACTION SURVEY.

GRU Faculty Governance GRU Faculty Governance. Terminology General Faculty: all individuals holding full- time, ranked faculty appointments at GRU University.

Assessing College Wide SLOs using a Student Perception Survey: A Tale of Two SLOs Jeanne Edman and Brad Brazil Cosumnes River College.

Central Virginia Community College Where your future begins.

PH.D. PROGRAM SURVEY RESULTS, 2002 Executive Summary The Joint Ad Hoc Committee on the Shortage of Ph.D. Students and Faculty in Communication Sciences.

Mentoring: More than just a welcome Michael DeBisschop, Pharmacy Alan Pogroszewski, Sports Management Kelly McCormick-Sullivan, Communication/Journalism.

Promotion and Ten ure October 15, 2013 S. Laurel Weldon Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs (Interim) PURDUE FACULTY.

Retention Survey Report Submitted March 22, 2004; corrections March 29, 2004 Presented to the Provost on May 28, 2004 Recruitment and Retention Subcommittee,

WSU SAMPLE  All full-time tenured and tenure-track faculty  All campuses  Response rate: 57.6 % (N=603)  At least 50 % response rate in all colleges.

2 From the BOV Bylaws Faculty Representatives The Faculty shall elect a non-voting representative to the following committees of the Board: Academic.

January 18, 2012 Administrative Council Presentation.

Disability Studies Program – Marketing, Recruitment, and Outcomes Texas Center for Disability Studies University of Texas at Austin Penny Seay, Ph.D.

Presented by the Faculty Affairs Office September 2013.

Diversity Data Resources from the Office of Academic Planning and Institutional Research apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm.

REPORT OF IMPROVED GRADUATION RATE COMMITTEE December 2008.

General Faculty Meeting August 23,  For PHHP, maximum = 7 years  For COM, maximum = 10 years (under certain circumstances)  Faculty in the Departments.

+ Meeting of Assistant Professors June 29, Faculty and Academic Affairs Leadership Steven Abramson, M.D., Vice Dean for Education, Faculty and.

“Taking the Pulse of Your Graduate Students’ Experiences” UW ADVANCE Winter Quarter Pre-Tenure Faculty Workshop March 17, 2015.

Work of the Faculty Leadership Team An Overview. Our Charge Serving to recommend process Serving to set up a strategic plan.

KerryAnn O’Meara Associate Professor, Higher Education Co-PI UM ADVANCE Corbin M. Campbell Research Assistant ADVANCE Research and Evaluation: ARHU Report.

Practicing Meaningful Learning Outcomes Assessment at UGA Department of Crop and Soil Sciences August 10, 2015 Dr. Leslie Gordon Associate Director for.

1 Faculty Motivation and Policies Steven R. Hall Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Chair of the MIT Faculty.

Faculty Well-Being Survey: A Quick Look at A Few Things that Matter to Faculty Presentation for NC State University Board of Trustees Academic Affairs.

Biology Scholars Program Amy Chang American Society for Microbiology Goal: Develop faculty expertise in evidenced-based science education reform Seven.

Visioning 2 Committee 15,800 by 2018 JoyceArmstrongFamily Sciences 13 JessicaGullionSociology GovernorJacksonFinancial AidMarkHamnerInstitutional Research.

Faculty Affairs presents:. PPCs  Consist of 3 or 5 members  Are selected based on Program Personnel Standards (i.e. one per program or one per faculty.

Supporting Women Scientists and Engineers Abigail J. Stewart University of Michigan.

Retention and Advancement for Mid Career Faculty K.D. JoshiKelly Ward Associate Professor of Interim Chair and Information Systems Professor, Education.

ADVANCE AT UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY THE GOAL OF THE NSF ADVANCE PROGRAM IS TO PROMOTE INSTITUTIONAL TRANSFORMATION IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING FIELDS BY INCREASING.

Faculty Well-Being Survey: Some Select Findings for Vice Provosts to Pique Curiosity in What the Data Can Tell Us Presentation for Vice Provosts.

Outline Survey overview Instrument Construction Survey Logistics Response Rates Uses of Survey Data Communication with campus groups Program evaluation.

Recruiting, Retaining, & Mentoring Women Faculty 11/1/02.

Senate 101 California State University, Los Angeles Nancy Warter-Perez, Academic Senate Chair

Measuring Outcomes of Doctoral Programs: Alumni and Exit Surveys at Western University CAGS October 2015.

Faculty Well-Being North Carolina State University March 10, 2009 Committee on Faculty Well-Being.

1Tuesday, April 21, 2009Presentation on the Latest Research kfairf aifiar 1 Speaker and Deputy are elected from within the Senate. What the Faculty Senate.

2008 COACHE Survey of Pre-Tenure Faculty Faculty Senate January 25, 2011 Betsy Brown and Nancy Whelchel.

KerryAnn O’Meara Associate Professor, Higher Education Co-PI UM ADVANCE Corbin M. Campbell Research Assistant ADVANCE Research and Evaluation: BMGT Report.

Klod Kokini Associate Dean for Academic Affairs College of Engineering Professor of Mechanical Engineering 1 ADVANCE-FAST October 21, 2014.

The Rising Profile of Women Academics Statistics Canada Perspectives on Labour and Income February 2005 Vol. 6, No. 2.

Kapil Bawa, Ph.D., Professor of Marketing, Zicklin School of Business Micheline Blum, Director, Baruch College Survey Research, Distinguished Lecturer,

P&T Update: College of Medicine, Carol S. Weisman, PhD Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs Distinguished Professor of Public Health Sciences.

AAMC Faculty Forward Engagement Survey Results

Positioning Yourself for Promotion and Tenure at KSU

Alfredo G. Torres, MS, PhD Director of Faculty Diversity Professor

COACHE Survey Results Monday, February 5, 2018

Administrative Review

Provost Guidelines for Submission of Tenure on Hire Requests to the University Promotion and Tenure Committee.

Apportionment for 2016/2017 CRAO committee gathered data on faculty numbers in their college as of fall Faculty were counted if they: Held a full.

Administrative Committee Review

Extension Title Series

Faculty Governance at NU

Presentation transcript:

State of the Faculty Survey Philip C. Wander President of the Faculty Senate LMU March

When was the survey conducted? March 5 – 11, 2010 In one week

What’s the response rate? 368 faculty members received the survey 121 responded The response rate was 33%

Who responded to the survey?

Women 44% Men 56%

Age 49

# of dependents 2

Race African American 2% Asian 6% Multiracial 6% Hispanic/Latino 13% White 73%

Rank Associate professor 23% Assistant professor 32% Full Professor 45%

College Education 7% Film & Television 8% Communication & Fine Arts 13% Business 14% Science & Engineering 15% Bellarmine 45%

What did faculty tell us?

Who responded to the survey?

Senate Communication with Faculty

Senate Communication effectiveness mean score = X

Let us guess … In senate communication with faculty which of the following works the worst? Which the best?

Form of Communication Listening Session Faculty Senate Website s Newsletter Personal comm with senator(s)

Form of Senate Communication Mean Score Ranking in Communication Effectiveness Listening Session2.474 Faculty Senate Website  s Newsletter2.733 Personal comm with senator(s)

Faculty knowledge of what the senate accomplished

Let us guess again … Which of the following senate accomplishment faculty has the least knowledge of? And the most knowledge of?

#Faculty Senate Accomplished Item Faculty Representation in the Core Revision 2 Rank and Tenure Independent Review Committee Process 3Faculty Handbook revision regarding Clinical Faculty 4 Approval of the Undergraduate Learning Goals and Outcomes 5 Accepting the report and recommendations from the GreenTrans Subcommittee 6 Adopting the Governance Committee’s recommendations on the Regular and Periodic Evaluation of Academic Administrators. 7 Formation of the Committee on the Comprehensive Evaluation of Teaching

#Answer Faculty Knowledge Ranking % of Faculty who knew 1Faculty Representation in the Core Revision263% 2Rank and Tenure Independent Review 1 80% 3 Faculty Handbook revision re. Clinical Faculty 427% 4 Approving Undergraduate Learning Goals & Outcomes 618% 5 Accepting the GreenTrans Subcommittee Report 7  8% 6 Regular & Periodic Evaluation of Academic Administrators. 522% 7 Forming Committee on Comprehensive Teaching Evaluation 328%

What is faculty satisfaction with Senate representing them?

Senate representativeness mean score = X

One last guess… Which of the following 3 items harbor the highest faculty anxiety?

#Faculty Anxiety Area 1Climate Issues 2Faculty Mentoring 3Faculty Governance 4Recruitment of tenure track faculty 5Recruitment of part-time/clinical faculty 6Rank and Tenure 7Core Curriculum 8Pre-Tenure retention review practice

#Faculty Anxiety Area Anxiety Ranking % 1Climate Issues441% 2Faculty Mentoring727% 3Faculty Governance 1  63% 4Recruitment of tenure track faculty633% 5Recruitment of part-time/clinical faculty815% 6Rank and Tenure 3  57% 7Core Curriculum 2  60% 8Pre-Tenure retention review practice534%

Top issues faculty wanted to see on the Senate Agenda …

RankingWhat Faculty Thought the Senate Should Address Impor- tance 1 Administration’s responsiveness to issues that impact faculty Administration’s consistency and accountability Improving tenured/tenure track faculty working conditions Rank and Tenure process Governance issues at LMU Improvement in LMU information technology Climate issues at LMU Faculty Service report process LMU faculty committee structure and accountability Housing issues among faculty at LMU Improving part-time/adjunct/clinical faculty working conditions Dining/food issues at LMU Child Care issues among faculty at LMU written responses from faculty – to be coded

Conclusion 1. Craft the senate agenda to represent faculty better: a. Administration’s responsiveness, consistency and accountability b. Improving faculty working condition 2. Feel the pulse of the faculty and address top areas of faculty anxiety: a. governance b. R&T c. Core d. Climate 3. Communicate better with faculty about what we plan to do and what we have accomplished.