Observation of Electron Anti-neutrino Disappearance in Daya Bay and RENO experiments.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Search for  13 at Daya Bay On behalf of the Daya Bay Collaboration Deb Mohapatra Virginia Tech.
Advertisements

Results from Daya Bay Xin Qian On behalf of Daya Bay Collaboration Xin Qian, BNL1.
Systematic errors of reactor neutrino experiments and ideas about new detectors Yifang Wang Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing Nov.28, 2003.
Prototype of the Daya Bay Neutrino Detector Wang Zhimin IHEP, Daya Bay.
Manfred Jeitler Daya Bay Neutrino Experiment Hephy, 19 October ν.
Past Experience of reactor neutrino experiments Yifang Wang Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing Nov. 28, 2003.
Daya Bay Neutrino Experiment
Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment
Measuring  13 with Reactors Stuart Freedman University of California at Berkeley SLAC Seminar September 29, 2003.
1 The Daya Bay Reactor Electron Anti-neutrino Oscillation Experiment Jianglai Liu (for the Daya Bay Collaboration) California Institute of Technology APS.
Jun Cao Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing Daya Bay Neutrino Experiment 3rd International Conference on Flavor Physics, Oct. 3-8, 2005 National.
Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment Jun Cao On behalf of the Daya Bay Collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics XIII International.
Physics Symposium: Steve Kettell10/2/20071 The Daya Bay Reactor Antineutrino Experiment Steve Kettell BNL 1)Why Daya Bay? 2)Status/BNL involvement.
1 Measurement of reactor antineutrino disappearance driven by  13 Steve Kettell Brookhaven National Lab NuFact 2013, IHEP, Beijing New results from all.
S. Kettell WIN09 9/13/09 Daya Bay Experiment Steve Kettell BNL On Behalf of the Daya Bay Collaboration.
Pieter Mumm and Karsten Heeger January 10, 2012 Search for Sterile Neutrinos with Reactor Antineutrinos An Opportunity for NIST?
Caren Hagner CSTS Saclay Present And Near Future of θ 13 & CPV in Neutrino Experiments Caren Hagner Universität Hamburg Neutrino Mixing and.
Eun-Ju Jeon Sejong Univ. Sept. 09, 2010 Status of RENO Experiment Neutrino Oscillation Workshop (NOW 2010) September 4-11, 2010, Otranto, Lecce, Italy.
Observation of Electron Anti-neutrino Disappearance at Daya Bay Yifang Wang Institute of High Energy Physics June 19, 2012.
1 2nd Sino-French Workshop on the Dark Universe Changgen Yang Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing for the Daya Bay Collaboration Daya Bay Reactor.
Cheng-Ju S. Lin Lawrence Berkeley National Lab (On Behalf of the Daya Bay Collaboration) 17 July 2010 Status of the Daya Bay Neutrino Oscillation Experiment.
Christopher White Illinois Institute of Technology and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Neutrino Christchurch, New Zealand 26 May 2008 Asian.
A detector design for the Daya Bay reactor neutrino experiment Yifang Wang Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing Jan. 18, 2004.
1 Antineutrino Detector of Dayabay Reactor Neutrino Experiment Yuekun Heng, IHEP, Beijing On Behalf of the DayaBay Collaboration.
RENO and the Last Result
νeνe νeνe νeνe νeνe νeνe νeνe Distance (L/E) Probability ν e 1.0 ~1800 meters 3 MeV) Reactor Oscillation Experiment Basics Unoscillated flux observed.
Karsten Heeger, Univ. of WisconsinDNP2006, Nashville, October 28, 2006 A High-Precision Measurement of sin 2 2  13 with the Daya Bay Reactor Antineutrino.
Measuring sin 2 2  13 with the Daya Bay nuclear power reactors Yifang Wang Institute of High Energy Physics.
The Daya Bay Experiment to Measure  13 Herbert Steiner UC Berkeley & LBNL On behalf of the Daya Bay Collaboration Presented at the Erice School/Workshop.
L. Oberauer, Paris, June 2004   Measurements at Reactors Neutrino 2004 CdF, Paris, June chasing the missing mixing angle.
The Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment Jonathan Link Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University on behalf of the Daya Bay Collaboration Neutrino.
Results for the Neutrino Mixing Angle  13 from RENO International School of Nuclear Physics, 35 th Course Neutrino Physics: Present and Future, Erice/Sicily,
,,,,, The Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment Liangjian Wen On behalf of the Daya Bay Collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics Daya Bay Detectors.
RENO & RENO-50 Soo-Bong Kim (KNRC, Seoul National University) “NOW 2014, Conca Specchiulla, Otranto, Lecce, Italy, September 7-14, 2014”
1 Precise measurement of reactor antineutrino oscillations at Daya Bay Vít Vorobel (on behalf of the Daya Bay Collaboration) Charles University in Prague.
Results from RENO Soo-Bong Kim (KNRC, Seoul National University) “17 th Lomosonov Conference on Elementary Particle Physics” Moscow. Russia, Aug ,
The Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment R. D. McKeown Caltech On Behalf of the Daya Bay Collaboration CIPANP 2009.
Search for  13 at Daya Bay On behalf of the Daya Bay Collaboration Deb Mohapatra Virginia Tech.
Measuring sin 2 2  13 with the Daya Bay nuclear power reactors Yifang Wang for Daya Bay collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics.
Karsten Heeger Beijing, January 18, 2003 Design Considerations for a  13 Reactor Neutrino Experiment with Multiple Detectors Karsten M. Heeger Lawrence.
Double Chooz Near Detector Guillaume MENTION CEA Saclay, DAPNIA/SPP Workshop AAP 2007 Friday, December 14 th, 2007
Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment On behalf of the DayaBay collaboration Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Joseph ykHor YuenKeung,
Daya Bay Neutrino Experiment Huang Xingtao Shandong University, Jinan, China On Behalf of the Daya Bay Collaboration.
1 Muon Veto System and Expected Backgrounds at Dayabay Hongshan (Kevin) Zhang, BNL DayaBay Collaboration DNP08, Oakland.
  Measurement with Double Chooz IDM chasing the missing mixing angle e  x.
Karsten Heeger, Univ. of Wisconsin Yale University, March 1, 2010  13 from Global Fits current best limit sin 2 2θ 13 < CL Fogli, et al., arXiv:0905:3549.
Recent Results from RENO NUFACT2014 August. 25 to 30, 2014, Glasgow, Scotland, U.K. Hyunkwan Seo on behalf of the RENO Collaboration Seoul National University.
1 Work report ( ) Haoqi Lu IHEP Neutrino group
1 Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Oscillation Experiment Jen-Chieh Peng International Workshop on “Double Beta Decay and Neutrinos” Osaka, Japan, June 11-13,
Results on  13 Neutrino Oscillations from Reactor Experiments Soo-Bong Kim (KNRC, Seoul National University) “INPC 2013, Firenze, June 2-7, 2013”
Status and Prospects of Reactor Neutrino Experiments Soo-Bong Kim (KNRC, Seoul National University) “NuPhys 2014: Prospects in Neutrino Physics, London,
Double Chooz Experiment Status Jelena Maricic, Drexel University (for the Double Chooz Collaboration) September, 27 th, SNAC11.
Daya Bay Neutrino Experiment and the Future Yifang Wang Institute of High Energy Physics.
核科学与技术学院 School of Nuclear Science and Technology Results from Daya Bay Neutrino Experiment Qingmin Zhang for Daya Bay Collaboration IPA 2014 Aug ,
Daya Bay: Results and Future
The Double Chooz reactor neutrino experiment
NEUTRINO OSCILLATION MEASUREMENTS WITH REACTORS
Search for Sterile Neutrinos
The Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment
Xin Qian Caltech For Daya Bay Collaboration
Recent results from Daya Bay reactor neutrino Experiment
Simulation for DayaBay Detectors
Recent results from Daya Bay
Observation of Electron Anti-neutrino Disappearance at Daya Bay
Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment
Current Results from Reactor Neutrino Experiments
The Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment
Daya Bay Neutrino Experiment
Daya Bay Neutrino Experiment
Neutrinos Oscillation Experiments at Reactors
Presentation transcript:

Observation of Electron Anti-neutrino Disappearance in Daya Bay and RENO experiments

The Daya Bay Collaboration Europe (2) JINR, Dubna, Russia Charles University, Czech Republic North America (16) BNL, Caltech, LBNL, Iowa State Univ., Illinois Inst. Tech., Princeton, RPI, UC-Berkeley, UCLA, Univ. of Cincinnati, Univ. of Houston, Univ. of Wisconsin, William & Mary, Virginia Tech., Univ. of Illinois-Urbana-Champaign, Siena Asia (20) IHEP, Beijing Normal Univ., Chengdu Univ. of Sci. and Tech., CGNPG, CIAE, Dongguan Polytech. Univ., Nanjing Univ., Nankai Univ., NCEPU, Shandong Univ., Shanghai Jiao tong Univ., Shenzhen Univ., Tsinghua Univ., USTC, Zhongshan Univ., Univ. of Hong Kong, Chinese Univ. of Hong Kong, National Taiwan Univ., National Chiao Tung Univ., National United Univ. ~250 Collaborators 2

Daya Bay: for a New Type of Oscillation  Goal : search for a new oscillation  13  Neutrino mixing matrix:  12 solar neutrino oscillation  23 atmospheric neutrino oscillation  13 ? Unknown mixing parameters:  13,  + 2 Majorana phases Need sizable  13 for the  measurement 3

P ee  1  sin 2 2   sin 2 (1.27  m 2  L/E)  cos 4   sin 2 2   sin 2 (1.27  m 2  L/E) 4 Δm 2 13 = Δm 2 23 = (2.32±0.12/0.08)10 -3 eV 2 E=4 MeV L = 2.1 km L=50 km Δm 2 sterile =1eV 2 E=4 MeV L= 4m Reactor experiments

Reactor experiments: P ee  1  sin 2 2   sin 2 (1.27  m 2  L/E)  cos 4   sin 2 2   sin 2 (1.27  m 2  L/E) Small-amplitude oscillation due to  13 Large-amplitude oscillation due to  12 5

10-40 keV Neutrino energy: Neutrino Event: coincidence in time, space and energy Neutrino Detection: Gd-loaded Liquid Scintillator 1.8 MeV: Threshold  s(0.1% Gd) n + p  d +  (2.2 MeV) n + Gd  Gd* +  (8 MeV) 6

Short baseline experiments near reactors One detector Comparison with calculated neutrino flux

A deficit observed at long baseline can either be caused by θ 13 or by new physics closer to the core (oscillation towards a 4th neutrino, qnew)  One detector Comparison with calculated neutrino flux

Direct Searches in the Past sin 2 2θ 13 = ± 0.041(stat) ± 0.030(sys)  Double Chooz L=1050 m Arxiv: v1 29 Dec 2011

Reactor Neutrinos  Reactor neutrino spectrum  Thermal power, W th, measured by KIT system, calibrated by KME method  Fission fraction, f i, determined by reactor core simulation  Neutrino spectrum of fission isotopes S i (E ) from measurements  Energy released per fission e i Relative measurement  independent from the neutrino spectrum prediction Kopeikin et al, Physics of Atomic Nuclei, Vol. 67, No. 10, 1892 (2004) 10

Daya Bay Experiment: Layout  Relative measurement to cancel Corr. Syst. Err.  2 near sites, 1 far site  Multiple AD modules at each site to reduce Uncorr. Syst. Err.  Far: 4 modules , near: 2 modules  Multiple muon detectors to reduce veto eff. uncertainties  Water Cherenkov : 2 layers  RPC : 4 layers at the top + telescopes 11 Redundancy !!! Cross check; Reduce errors by 1/  N

Underground Labs Overburden ( MWE ) R  ( Hz/m 2 ) E  ( GeV ) D1,2 (m) L1,2 (m) L3,4 (m) EH EH EH

Anti-neutrino Detector (AD) Target: 20 t, 1.6m  -catcher: 20t, 45cm Buffer: 40t, 45cm Total weight: ~110 t  Three zones modular structure: I. target: Gd-loaded scintillator  -catcher: normal scintillator III. buffer shielding: oil  192 8” PMTs/module  Two optical reflectors at the top and the bottom, Photocathode coverage increased from 5.6% to 12% 13

Two ADs Installed in Hall

Three ADs insalled in Hall 3 Physics Data Taking Started on Dec.24,

Single Rate: Understood  Design: ~50Hz above 1 MeV  Data: ~60Hz above 0.7 MeV, ~40Hz above 1 MeV  From sample purity and MC simulation, each of the following component contribute to singles  ~ 5 Hz from SSV  ~ 10 Hz from LS  ~ 25 Hz from PMT  ~ 5 Hz from rock  All numbers are consistent 16

Neutrino Event: coincidence in time, space and energy Neutrino Detection: Gd-loaded Liquid Scintillator n + p  d +  (2.2 MeV) n + Gd  Gd* +  (8 MeV) 17

Selected Signal Events : Good Agreement with MC Distance between prompt-delayed Prompt energy 18 Time between prompt-delayed

Signals and Backgrounds 19 AD1AD2AD3AD4AD5AD6 Neutrino candidates Accidentals~1.4%~4.5% Fast neutrons~0.1%~0.06% 8 He/ 9 Li~0.4%~0.2% Am-C~0.03%~0.3%  -n ~0.01%~0.04% Sum1.5%4.7%

Predictions  Baseline ±35 mm  Target mass dm/m = 0.47%  Reactor neutrino flux ±0.8%  These three predictions are blinded before we fix our analysis cuts and procedures  They are opened on Feb. 29, 2012  The physics paper is submitted to PRL on March 7,

Reactor Neutrinos  Reactor neutrino spectrum  Thermal power, W th, measured by KIT system, calibrated by KME method  Fission fraction, f i, determined by reactor core simulation  Neutrino spectrum of fission isotopes S i (E ) from measurements  Energy released per fission e i Relative measurement  independent from the neutrino spectrum prediction Kopeikin et al, Physics of Atomic Nuclei, Vol. 67, No. 10, 1892 (2004) 21

Daily Rate  Three halls taking data synchronously allows near-far cancellation of reactor related uncertainties  Rate changes reflect the reactor on/off. 22 Predictions are absolute, multiplied by a normalization factor from the fitting

Electron Anti-neutrino Disappearence Using near to predict far: 23 Determination of α, β: 1) Set R=1 if no oscillation 2) Minimize the residual reactor uncertainty Observed : 9901 neutrinos at far site, Prediction : neutrinos if no oscillation R = ±0.011 (stat) ±0.004 (syst) Spectral distortion Consistent with oscillation

Summary  Electron anti-neutrino disappearance is observed at Daya Bay, together with a spectral distortion  A new type of neutrino oscillation is thus discovered R = ±0.011 (stat) ±0.004 (syst), Sin 2 2  13 =0.092  (stat)  0.005(syst)  2 /NDF = 4.26/4 5.2 σ for non-zero θ 13 24

25 Daya Bay results

RENO experiment L1= 290 m L2 = m

RENO experiment

Reno results

R = Nobs/ N expесt = ±0.009(stat) ± 0/014(syst) Sin 2 (2θ 13 ) = ±0.013(stat) ±0.019(syst)

=0.010(1.00± 0.15) Δm 2 13 = Δm 2 23 = (2.32±0.12/0.08)10 -3 eV 2

Следствия ● Ограничение на стерильное нейтрино Sin 2 (2θ 14 ) < 0.03 ● Возможность изучать СР в лептонном секторе ● Возможность установить иерархию нейтринных маcc определить знак Δ m 2 13 ● Не требуется специальная симметрия нейтринной массовой матрицы (anarchy models) ● Возможность улучшить точность Δm 2 13

Возможность улучшить точность Δm 2 13

?