17 February 2011 Track 3: Value Metrics, Value Models and the Value Proposition 1 Ontology Summit 2011: Making the Case for Ontology Track 3: Value Metrics,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Software testing - strategies
Advertisements

Copyright 2006 MKD Technologies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 1 Applying the Right Process to the Right Environment by Michael.
Cadence Foundation flow and db Tcl commands in Encounter
1 OUT-IN: Organising, Using and Transferring INnovation LLP-LDV/TOI/07/IT/017 THE COURSEWARE Focus Group Manchester, 14 th – 16 th February 2008 Venue:
Sevilla May 2011, WIOD 2 nd Consortium Meeting 1 WP 6 Methodological research related to the database WP 6.4 Multiplier bias from Supply and Use Tables.
Timeline for the oneM2M Partnership Project Timeline and Milestones [Joachim Koss, ETSI] Contribution to CoU V1a, 20 Jan 2012 Doc: Source: ETSI Agenda.
EFORWOOD Tools for Sustainability Impact Assessment of the Forestry-Wood Chain EFORWOOD Tools for Sustainability Impact Assessment of the Forestry-Wood.
HyMeX (*) an experimental program dedicated to the hydrological cycle in Mediterranean
Logical DFM 1 Logical DFDs Objective – To capture the essence of the current system. Start with for totally new systems or where existing system is highly.
Genes and Evolution Comparative Genome Structure and Evolution Synteny- comparison of chromosome order in related species.
BA A = turning point B = position of 3 rd wheel/trace, mid way along beam C= possible counterweight position, above 3 rd wheel/trace C 0.87m Beams 0.9t.
Visual Formalisms Message Sequence Charts Book: Chapter 10.
Programming Aptitude Testing Materials, Data analysis
Differential Amplifiers and common mode feedback
Then/Now You named angle pairs formed by parallel lines and transversals. Use theorems to determine the relationships between specific pairs of angles.
Software change management
Software Engineering COMP 201
October 2nd 2013 * 13:30 – 17:30 * SZA Vienna
Validating and Improving Test- Case Effectiveness Yuri Chernak Presented by Michelle Straughan.
Princess Sumaya University
Karnaugh Map Adjacent Squares
Digital Logic Design Gate-Level Minimization
Karnaugh Map Adjacent Squares
OWASP Mobile Top 10 Beau Woods
1 st Wave Allen plays Atascosita 9 AM, Ct 1 Allen plays Coppell 10 AM, Ct 1 2 nd Wave If Allen is 1 st in Wave 1, Play at 2:30 and 4:30 on Ct 2 (R2G1P1)
1 © EURIDICE Consortium 2008 Kick Off Meeting Island of San Servolo - Venice, Italy 11th to 13th February 2008 WP12 - Domain Knowledge Formalization Kostas.
B AB CD C A D m0m1m3m2 m4 m5m7m6 m12 m8m9m11 m10 m13 m15m14 Input combo mintermExpressio n 0000m0A’B’C’D’ 0001m1A’B’C’D 0010m2A’B’CD’
Linking Next Generation Science Standards to Common Core State Standards.
Figures – Chapter 23. Figure 23.1 Factors affecting software pricing FactorDescription Market opportunityA development organization may quote a low price.
European Computer competence Certificate in eccc standard.
Implementing Sequentially Consistent Programs on Processor Consistent Platforms Lisa Higham and Jalal Kawash University of Calgary, Canada American University.
Validation of Qualitative Models of Genetic Regulatory Networks A Method Based on Formal Verification Techniques Grégory Batt Ph.D. defense -- under supervision.
CVRD ECT Level 3 Workshop RMS Express (Advanced Operations) Module 7 of 9 September 09, 2013.
Computer Architecture CST 250 K-Map Prepared by:Omar Hirzallah.
Princess Sumaya University
KU College of Engineering Elec 204: Digital Systems Design
CENG 241 Digital Design 1 Lecture 2 Amirali Baniasadi
CENG 241 Digital Design 1 Lecture 3 Amirali Baniasadi
Out of the Scientists Garden: A Story of Water and Food Richard Stirzaker.
27-Feb-01 1 Implementing Effective Requirements Practices Presented by Dr. Ralph R. Young Director, Software Engineering Systems and Process Engineering.
Global States and Checkpoints
Stepan Potiyenko ISS Sr.SW Developer.
Software Quality Engineering Roadmap
1 Introduction to Data Quality Management (DQM). 2 What is Quality? Informally Some things are better than others i.e. they are of higher quality. How.
CSE Senior Design II Test Planning Mike O’Dell Based on an earlier presentation by Mike O’Dell, UTA.
Survey Design Training OFFICE OF PLANNING, RESEARCH & INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS CAÑADA COLLEGE.
Integrated Capability Maturity Model (CMMI)
University of Southern California Center for Systems and Software Engineering GQM, GQM+ Supannika Koolmanojwong CSCI577 Spring 2013 (C) USC-CSSE1.
1 IDI, NTNU Programvarekvalitet og prosessforbedring vår 2000, Forrest Shull et al., Univ. Maryland and Reidar Conradi, NTNU (p.t. Univ.
1 Process Engineering A Systems Approach to Process Improvement Jeffrey L. Dutton Jacobs Sverdrup Advanced Systems Group Engineering Performance Improvement.
Centro de Estudos e Sistemas Avançados do Recife PMBOK - Chapter 11 Project Risk Management.
1 Ontology Summit 2013 Track B Terry Longstreth Todd Schneider Ontology Summit 2013 Track B Finding the Scope Terry Longstreth Todd Schneider 24 January.
Team Assignment 15 Team 04 Class K15T2. Agenda 1. Introduction 2. Measurement process 3. GQM 4. Strength Weakness of metrics.
Building Quality into Web Applications - Meeting the Challenges of Testing and Usability Paula Duchnowski CQA, CSTE (608)
Lecture 4 Software Metrics
University of Southern California Center for Systems and Software Engineering Metrics Organizational Guidelines [1] ©USC-CSSE1 [1] Robert Grady, Practical.
1 Ontology Summit 2011 Track 3 Value Metrics & Value Models Ontology Use - Maintenance Todd Schneider Raytheon 17 February 2011.
Cmpe 589 Spring 2006 Lecture 2. Software Engineering Definition –A strategy for producing high quality software.
CS532 TERM PAPER MEASUREMENT IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING NAVEEN KUMAR SOMA.
MALAYSIA Feb 21 –22 February 21.
Multiplication Timed Tests.
1 Ontology Summit 2011 Track 3 Value Metrics & Value Models Synthesis Rex Brooks Starbourne Communications Todd Schneider Raytheon 31 March 2011.
Manfred Huber Based on an earlier presentation by Mike O’Dell, UTA
Systems Analysis Overview.
به نام خدایی که یاد او، مایه ی آرامش واقعی است.
Assessing Multiplication Fact
EDIT User Group - services
IQA 2018 QA Basics September 11, 2018 Day 1 Workshop 1.
The new way of IT – Maturity levels
Metrics Organizational Guidelines [1]
Presentation transcript:

17 February 2011 Track 3: Value Metrics, Value Models and the Value Proposition 1 Ontology Summit 2011: Making the Case for Ontology Track 3: Value Metrics, Value Models & the Value Proposition Ontology Performance Mary Balboni Raytheon

17-Feb-2011Track 3: Value Metrics, Value Models and the Value Proposition - Performance - Mary Balboni2 Ontology Performance How Much/Well does the Ontology or Related Semantic Technologies Improve or Impede Performance? How much does the Cost of Ontology Performance Affect the Value Proposition? How Well Can we Measure this? GOAL Analyze Ontology Technology to better understand the performance impact on systems in multiple domains from the viewpoints of the Developer and End User

17-Feb-2011Track 3: Value Metrics, Value Models and the Value Proposition - Performance - Mary Balboni3 Ontology Performance: GQM Model Using GQM to determine what to look at

17-Feb-2011Track 3: Value Metrics, Value Models and the Value Proposition - Performance - Mary Balboni4 Ontology Performance: GQM Applied Analyze Ontology Technology to better understand the performance impact on systems from the viewpoints of the Developer and End User Can performance improvement be gained? How much does the Cost of Ontology Performance Affect the Value Proposition? Can performance be negatively impacted?

17-Feb-2011Track 3: Value Metrics, Value Models and the Value Proposition - Performance - Mary Balboni5 Ontology Performance: Notional Measures Can performance improvement be gained? M1: Cycle Times M2: Storage Needs M3: Functional Effectiveness / Correctness M4: Ontology Quality (Frequency of Defects) M5: Ontology Maturity (Breath of Model, Validation History) Can performance be negatively impacted? M1: Cycle Times M2: Storage Needs M3: Functional Effectiveness / Correctness M4: Ontology Quality (Frequency of Defects) M5: Ontology Maturity (Breath of Model, Validation History) How much does the Cost of Ontology Performance Affect the Value Proposition? M6: Cost of Ontology Design & Development M7: Cost of Ontology Implementation & Operation M8: Cost of Ontology Validation M9: ROI

17-Feb-2011Track 3: Value Metrics, Value Models and the Value Proposition - Performance - Mary Balboni6 Ontology Performance: Notional Radar

17-Feb-2011Track 3: Value Metrics, Value Models and the Value Proposition - Performance - Mary Balboni7 Ontology Performance: Notional Radar

17-Feb-2011Track 3: Value Metrics, Value Models and the Value Proposition - Performance - Mary Balboni8 Ontology Performance - Qualitative How Well Can we Measure? Tailor Qualitative from specific factors.

17-Feb-2011Track 3: Value Metrics, Value Models and the Value Proposition - Performance - Mary Balboni9 Ontology Performance - Qualitative How Well Can we Measure? Tailor Qualitative from specific factors.

17-Feb-2011Track 3: Value Metrics, Value Models and the Value Proposition - Performance - Mary Balboni10 Ontology Performance Summary Ontology Performance measurement, like other measurements, can be developed using the GQM model May discover measurements in one area overlaps other areas Goodness of measures are subjective, but you can develop a scheme to support qualitative assessments Area of opportunity for more research