1 GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Introduction and Overview Formative Instructional Practices Professional Learning www.gadoe.org/GeorgiaFIP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RIDE – Office of Special Populations
Advertisements

Assessment Literacy: Formative Instructional Practices
Math Content Network Update The Power of Mistakes Student Engagement Culture of Learning Growth Mindset Congruent Tasks.
Coastal Plains RESA Assessment Literacy: Formative Instructional Practices March 27, April 23, April 30, May 7 Session One: Modules 1 & 2 Session Two:
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Introduction and Overview
The Georgia Formative Item Bank
 Reading School Committee January 23,
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning.
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Introduction and Overview
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Assessment for Learning Series Overview and Introduction.
Race to the Top Assessment Toolbox 1. RT3 Assessment Initiatives Purpose – To support teachers in preparing the students for the Common Core Assessment.
August Professional Development 1 Janise Lane, Interim Executive Director of Teaching and Learning Linda Chen, Chief Academic Officer August 25 – 28, 2015.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Using the T-9 Net This resource describes how schools use the T-9 Net to monitor the literacy and numeracy skills of students in Transition, Year 1 and.
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.
Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
“Just can’t live that negative way… Make way for the positive day.” -Bob Marley Positive Vibration.
PARENT COORDINATOR INFORMATION SESSION PARENT ACCOUNTABILITY Wednesday, July 20, 2011 Madelene Chan, Supt. D24 Danielle DiMango, Supt. D25.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction National Center and State Collaborative California Activities Kristen Brown, Ph.D. Common Core.
Georgia Association of School Personnel Administrators May 30,
Division Liaison Update Division Liaison Meeting The College of William and Mary January 7, 2013.
Module 3: Unit 1, Session 3 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 3.
The Instructional Decision-Making Process 1 hour presentation.
SASIT Thomas E. Gluck, Acting Secretary of Education Amy Morton, Deputy Secretary, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education Ed Vollbrecht, Ph.D., Director,
SLOs for Students on GAA January 17, GAA SLO Submissions January 17, 2014 Thank you for coming today. The purpose of the session today.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
Georgia’s Changing Assessment Landscape Melissa Fincher, Ph.D. Associate Superintendent for Assessment and Accountability Georgia Department for Education.
A Mission of Restoration
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Coastal Plains RESA Assessment Literacy: Leading Formative Instructional Practices January 28 and February 25 Session One: Modules 1, 2, 3 Session Two:
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s.
1 NH PACE Tier 2 Leadership PLC Session 1 September 28, 2015.
Formative Assessment Project Webinar #2 - May 29, pm Welcome Focus: Field Test.
1 Georgia’s Changing Assessment Landscape Melissa Fincher Associate Superintendent for Assessment and Accountability Georgia Department for Education GACIS.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
What does it mean to be a RETA Instructor this project? Consortium for 21 st Century Learning C21CL
EVAAS for Teachers: Overview and Teacher Reports Every Student READY.
Summer Series, 2007 Building Capacity to Make Research-Based Practice Common Practice In Georgia Utilizing the Keys to Quality.
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
CMCSS Digital Blended Learning Introduction – Session 1 The Case for Blended Learning The CMCSS Vision And Purpose End of Year 1 (16-17) Expectations.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Imperative: Formative Instructional Practices
Common Core State Standards
Common Core State Standards
Implementing Race to the Top
Georgia’s Changing Assessment Landscape
Presentation transcript:

1 GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Introduction and Overview Formative Instructional Practices Professional Learning

Goals of the Session Share an overview the GaDOE Assessment initiatives Define FIP, communicate the goals of FIP, and provide an overview of Formative Instructional Practices (FIP) Professional Learning Share connections to existing improvement efforts in Georgia Identify best practices that are associated with FIP Provide information about the FIP web page, resources and FIP access codes for districts and buildings Share considerations for implementation 2

Background - Georgia’s Assessment Initiatives Purpose – To provide assessment resources that reflect the rigor of Georgia’s state-mandated content standards – To balance the use of formative and summative assessments in the classroom – To promote student learning – To sustain implementation of Georgia’s rigorous content standards 3

Development of a three-prong toolkit to support teachers and leaders in promoting student learning – *An assessment literacy professional learning opportunity that focuses on implementation of research-based formative instructional practices (FIP) – Initial Pilot January/February 2013 with statewide launch – A set of interim benchmarks in ELA, Math – Initial Pilot Fall 2013 – An expansive bank of formative instructional assessment items/tasks based on CCGPS in ELA and Mathematics as a teacher resource - Phase I Release Fall 2012; Phase II release Fall Georgia’s Assessment Initiatives Continued…

Goals of Georgia FIP Support the development of great teachers and leaders in their work towards College and Career Readiness Refine and augment teaching and learning processes based on research- proven practices Facilitate a quality implementation of Georgia’s state-mandated content standards Increase the alignment between Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Implement the principles for Universal Design for Learning (mastery of the learning process) Support Georgia’s Teacher Keys Effectiveness System (TKES) and (TAPS) Support Georgia’s Leader Keys Effectiveness System (LKES) and (TAPS) Support the work on Student Learning Objectives and Measures

Formative Instructional Practices Defined It is not the instrument that is formative; it is the use of the information gathered (Chappuis, 2009). Formative Instructional Practices (FIP) are intentional behaviors that teachers and students use to obtain information about learning so that decisions can be made about additional learning opportunities. Formative instructional practices are the formal and informal ways that teachers and students gather and respond to evidence of student learning. Georgia’s FIP professional learning has four major components. 1.Clear Learning Targets 2.Collecting, analyzing and using evidence of student learning 3.Effective Feedback 4.Student Ownership of Learning 6

7 The alternative is to use many different assessment methods to provide students, teachers and parents with a continuous stream of evidence of student progress in mastering the knowledge and skills that underpin or lead up to state standards. Stiggins, 2005 Phi Delta Kappan

Formative Instructional Practices (FIP) 8 Formative Assessment/ Diagnostic Formative Assessment Summative Assessment Design Teach Re-Design Teach Re-Design Teach Re-Design Teach Georgia’s Rigorous Curriculum

How GaDOE Started: FIP Advisory Committee Advisory Committee identified based on need to represent various geographic regions of the state 10 small, medium and large districts Participated in a series of face-to-face and webinar meetings to guide planning the implementation Began implementation in January 2013 Provided feedback to DOE on successes and challenges of FIP pilot to incorporate into the statewide implementation in summer

325 educators participated in FIP online learning 176/325 identified themselves as teachers (54%) 12/325 identified themselves as leaders (4%) 10/325 identified themselves as coaches (3%) 113/176 teachers completed modules 1-5 (64%) 196/325 of all enrollees completed FIP (60%) 64/325 in progress with online learning (20%) 65/325 scheduled to begin online learning (20%) 10 FIP Advisory Committee Pilot Metrics June 4, 2013

Educators are Talking about FIP… Spring 2013 Advisory Committee 11 “It was eye opening to see that even educators have a hard time clearly defining what counts as formative instruction and summative instruction.” “This module helped me understand what learning targets are and how they can be helpful to both the teacher as well as the student. It also informed me of how to make learning targets more clear and how to "break down" a standard into smaller and more manageable parts.” “This module did a great job of demonstrating how teachers are to accurately collect and document formative evidences of student learning. The videos and activities made connections that were easy to understand as a teacher.” “I would love to see a requirement tied to this in terms of professional learning in groups within a school and school level leadership. I think this component is critical if this is going to be effective in changing teacher practices when implementing in the classroom.”

FIP Connections Current Improvement Efforts 12

13 FIP Alignment to TKES

FIP Alignment to LKES 14

FIP Connection: Self-assessments 15 TAPS Self-assessment Depending upon the standards that a teacher identifies for growth, the supervisor can offer or recommend applicable FIP online learning modules to consider in the pre-conference. LAPS Self-assessment and Performance Goal Setting Leaders can consider if FIP professional learning is an appropriate compliment for the performance goals they will establish and/or reflect upon how FIP can support the school improvement plan.

FIP Connection: SLO Design (FIP Professional Learning Content Support in Italics) 16 Ten Steps for Designing an Effective SLO Measure Effectiveness/Documents/QG_Teachers%20SLOs%20for%20Teachers% %20FORMATTED.pdf 1. Unpack the standards (Modules 1 & 2) 2. Create a table of specifications (Module 3) 3. Clarify why, when, and where to assess student learning (Module 3) 4. Determine appropriate items to use (Module 3) 5. Determine number of items to use (Module 3) 6. Write valid and reliable items (Module 3) 7. Assemble the measure (Module 3) 8. Construct scoring key and/or rubric (Module 3) 9. Administer the measure (Module 3) 10. Score and analyze results (Module 4)

FIP Connection: SLOs 17 FIP Learning Modules 1 and 2 TKES Standards 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 10 SLOS are directly aligned to the most important content standards that students should learn in a course. FIP Professional learning content on deconstructing standards by target type and establishing a logical learning progression helps teachers plan and deliver focused and differentiated instruction based on the needs of students. Teachers become better prepared to communicate with parents about current academic standing and plans for growth.

FIP Connection: SLOs 18 FIP Learning Modules 3, 4 and 5 TKES Standards 5, 6, 7, 9 and 10 FIP professional learning content supports work efforts for SLOs. It provides teachers a process for developing classroom formative assessments* to monitor progress so that appropriate instructional adjustments can be made in a timely manner. The impact of teaching upon student growth will be observed when post-SLO measures are taken. *Option to use Formative Item Bank in OAS

Let’s Talk About FIP 19

Foundations Modules: Formative Instructional Practices 1. Introduction to Formative Instructional Practices Understand what formative instructional practices are Become familiar with key research findings related to the effects of formative instructional practices on student achievement 2. Clear Learning Targets Understand the benefits of learning targets Know how to ensure learning targets are clear to the teacher Know how to make learning targets clear to students 20

3. Collecting and Documenting Evidence of Student Learning Know how to collect accurate formative evidence of student learning Know how to document formative evidence of student learning 4. Analyzing Evidence and Providing Effective Feedback Know how to use methods of assessment formatively in order to analyze evidence of student learning Understand what makes feedback effective Know how to provide effective feedback 21 Foundations Modules: Formative Instructional Practices

5. Student Ownership of Learning: Peer Feedback, Self-Assessment, and More Know how to prepare students to give each other effective feedback Know how to prepare students to self-assess with a focus on learning targets Know how to prepare students to create specific and challenging goals Know how to prepare students to track, reflect on, and share their learning with others 22

Leadership and Coaching Modules: Formative Instructional Practices 6. Leading Formative Instructional Practices Know how to promote formative instructional practices and support school-wide change Know how to lead quality formative instructional practice implementation in your school Understand the importance of developing a balanced assessment system Target audience: Facilitators, district and school leaders 23

7. Coaching Formative Instructional Practices Know how to plan for the change process and to promote a systemic approach to formative instructional practices. Know how to leverage blended learning and professional learning teams. Understand how to sustain the implementation of formative instructional practices. Know how to provide teachers with effective feedback as they learn about formative instructional practices. Know how to employ resources and strategies that support formative instructional practices. Target audience: Facilitators, instructional coaches, curriculum supervisors, department heads, district and school leaders 24 Leadership and Coaching Modules: Formative Instructional Practices

25 Learning Options for FIP

Learning Paths * Recommended for Optimum Learning Teacher Learning Paths 1.Professional Learning Team (Modules 1-5) * 2.With Friends (Modules 1-5) 3.On my Own (Modules 1-5) Coaches and Teacher-Leader Learning Paths 1. Coaching FIP for Student Success (Modules 1-5, and 7) District, School and Instructional Leader Learning Paths 1.Leading FIP for Student Success (Modules 1-7) * 2.FIP Leadership Essentials (Modules 1 & 6) 26

Learning Components *Recommended for Professional Learning Team (PLT) Pre-Activity Online Module Completion * Confirming Learning (online) management) * Ensures that educators have met the learning targets of the modules. Confirming Practice * Facilitates reflection and discussion about educator practice. Confirming Commitment* Helps educators set goals and take action based on what they’ve learned from the modules. Reflection My Learning Folder Collects evidence of professional learning and implementation. 27

Formative Instructional Practices are Best Practices

LEARNING TARGETS ARE CLEAR Students can answer the question, “Where am I going?” 29 Best Practice

EVIDENCE OF STUDENT LEARNING IS COLLECTED AND DOCUMENTED Students use this evidence to answer the question, “Where am I now?” 30

Best Practice FEEDBACK IS EFFECTIVE Students use effective feedback to answer the question, “Am I on the right path?” 31

Best Practice STUDENTS TAKE OWNERSHIP OF THEIR LEARNING Students can answer the question, “What do I need to do to be successful?” 32

Best Practice Everyone—including teachers, students, leaders, and parents—uses and understands formative instructional practices. 33

Best Practice Schools embrace a collaborative culture that supports teachers’ efforts to improve their practice. Teachers work together to embed formative instructional practices based on Georgia’s curriculum in their classrooms, learn from each other, and develop shared expectations of what students should know and be able to do. 34

Best Practice Parents are clear about the learning targets and understand what their child should know and be able to do. As a result, they can better support their child’s learning at home. 35

Best Practice Leaders model and support the practices they want teachers and students to master. School leaders provide effective feedback, establish clear learning targets, and create structures that foster success. 36

Best Practice Students are fully engaged in their learning. They understand what they are learning and why. They see and are motivated by evidence of their progress. 37

38 Getting Started with FIP Online Professional Learning Access Codes, District Implementation and PLU Credit

Accessing Georgia FIP The district’s Assessment Director or Testing Coordinator serves as the GaDOE FIP liaison. The Assessment Director downloads from the GaDOE Portal the unique and role-specific FIP online access codes for the central office, and for each school. Access codes allow FIP learners to create individual accounts by name, work address, and password to access FIP online learning and/or use the management functions of the online system. If a school in the district has been consolidated or is a new school, work though your district’s assessment director to have this resolved. The assessment director will contact GaDOE for assistance. 39 District Office Administrative/Learner (Online Monitoring/Management) District/Central Office Learner Code (Central Office Staff) School Leader Administrative/Learner Code (Principal) School Learner Code (Teachers) Types of Access Codes

Accessing Georgia FIP Visit to download directions for creating an account as a new user; “New Users-GA FIP Login Directions.” On the Georgia FIP web page, locate, “Login to FIP Professional Learning,” and use the directions for creating an account with your unique FIP Access Code. For more information on use of the administrative and management features in FIP, download the resource from the web page, “Monitoring Tool.” Access to the administrative features in FIP have also been provided for school- level principals through a unique school-level administrative code that is a different code from the access code that teachers will use for online learning in the school. After login, click “My Learning” to access the online modules. IT and login support is available at: or (866) GADOE will begin to assume technical support in 2014 and more information will be 40

minute video

42 New Users Login Directions from FIP Web Page

43 New Users Click, “Create A New Account”

44

45 Access Learning, Create Code Posters, Users Guide and Resources Take FIP Courses Monitor and management online learning

46 Example of School’s FIP Access Code Flyer for Learners to Distribute to Faculty with “New User Directions”

47 Online System User’s Guide

48 Tab for FIP Facilitation Guide

49 Tab for Supplemental Materials and Handouts

50 Facilitation Resource: Prior-to-Meeting “To Do List”

51 Facilitation Resource: Agenda Example

52 Facilitation Resource – Answer Key

Starting FIP in a District Visit the FIP web site: View the video of Dr. Barge and Georgia’s FIP Advisory Committee sharing their experiences with FIP professional learning. Download the files, Overview of Georgia FIP Online Learning, and Getting Started Districts and Schools, to learn about the content for professional learning and implementation considerations. Contact the district’s Assessment Director or Testing Coordinator to determine if the district has planned an implementation for FIP, and/or to obtain the appropriate FIP online access code for your role in the district. 53

Starting FIP in a District Seek approval, if needed, for FIP implementation with key district leadership to build support for implementation. Develop a plan and timeline for implementation and link FIP to existing improvement efforts and to TKES and LKES. Download the alignment of FIP to TKES and LKES from the FIP web page. Think about how FIP can support a Priority, Focus, Alert and Reward school. There are numerous ways to implement FIP in a district. Consider how the RESA can assist with implementing FIP. 54

FIP Sample Implementation Plans 55 Sample Plan #1 District Level: District Assessment Director/Testing Coordinator and district FIP Team present the informational PowerPoint to identified district-level staff who serve as FIP Contact Persons. FIP is implemented in FIP volunteer and/or assigned schools. FIP Contact Persons facilitate all modules, discussion and application of FIP strategies for school-level staff through a synchronous learning schedule.

FIP Sample Implementation Plans 56 Sample Plan #2 District Level: District Assessment Director/Test Coordinator and FIP Team present informational FIP PowerPoint, and Module 1 to district leaders, principals and/or coaches in two different meetings. School Level: Principals take Modules 6 or 7 within a designated time frame. School principals are given the option to decide when to take, and how to lead Modules 1- 5 with teachers using Professional Learning Teams. Principals share their FIP plans with district’s FIP Team, and continually update the district’s Team on school-level implementation.

FIP Sample Implementation Plans 57 Sample Plan #3 RESA Level: Awareness - RESAs can facilitate ongoing activities and sessions to build an awareness of FIP in districts and explain how FIP supports existing educational improvement efforts in Georgia. Build Capacity – RESAs can offer professional learning communities for teachers, coaches and leaders that deepen understanding of the content of FIP and support educators in goal-setting and determining action steps for use of FIP strategies in schools and classrooms.

58 Recommended FIP PLU Credit

Other Considerations 59 1.Involve the technology department from the onset. 2.Identify the participants for FIP Professional Learning: (pilot, volunteers, cluster of schools needing improvement, selected teacher-leaders) 3.Consider the Learning Path Options: (1) Professional Learning Team (PLT), (2) With Friends, or (3) On My Own. (PLT is most successful method) 4.Determine a timeline for completion of each online module that includes: facilitation support, classroom practice, reflection, and discussion. 5.Consider and plan for local professional learning unit credits (PLUs). 6.Determine if funds exist for stipends or honorariums. 7.Organize a communication plan that links FIP to existing work. 8.Identify material needs for professional learning. 9.Use this PowerPoint and other tools on the FIP web pages for assistance. 10.Develop a method for obtaining feedback on implementation, and a monitoring system that includes use of the online administrative features in FIP.

Formative Assessment Initiatives Bringing a Balanced Assessment Focus to the Classroom 60 Assessment Literacy Professional Learning Interim Benchmark Assessments Formative Item Bank Phase I items released into OAS fall 2012; Phase II items to be released in fall 2013 Pilot in winter 2013; Statewide launch in summer 2013 Phase I item pilot in fall 2013; Phase II pilot in winter 2014

Georgia Department of Education Formative Assessment Toolkit Team Dr. Melissa Fincher Associate Superintendent Assessment and Accountability Dr. Melodee Davis Director Assessment Research and Development Dr. Dawn Souter Project Manager. RT3 Formative Item Bank Dr. Jan Reyes Assessment Specialist, RT3 Interim Benchmark Assessments Kelli Harris-Wright, Ed.S. Assessment Specialist, RT3 Assessment Literacy (FIP)