March 15, 2012 APBS, Atlanta, Georgia Megan Cave & Celeste Rossetto Dickey University of Oregon.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School-wide Positive Behavior Support Rob Horner and George Sugai University of Oregon and University of Connecticut OSEP TA Center on Positive Behavior.
Advertisements

Tier Two at CFMS Check-In/Check-Out (CICO) Adapted from Rob Horner, et al.
Check In / Check Out: A Targeted Intervention Rob Horner, George Sugai, Anne Todd, Celeste Rossetto Dickey, Cindy Anderson, Terry Scott University of Oregon.
Check In Check Out: A Targeted Intervention
Effective Behavior Management in the Classroom Setting
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports Check in Check Out Presentation.
Optional PBIS Coaches Meeting November 15, 2010 Tier 2 and Tier 3 Interventions and Supports.
Tier 2/Secondary Interventions
Advanced Topics in PBS: Secondary/Tertiary Interventions George Sugai University of Connecticut Rob Horner University of Oregon.
MES Secondary Interventions
Check-in/ Check-out with PB4L Schools
School-wide Positive Behavior Support Name of School Date.
Group-based Behavior Interventions: Tier 2
Building Effective Classroom Management
Check In – Connect – Check Out Dr. Zaf Khan PBSI Project Director October 25, 2007.
TIER TWO INTERVENTIONS Jim Artesani, Ed.D. 304 Shibles Hall Orono, ME 04469
Sustainability: Tier II Interventions. Overview of Session 1.Essential Features of Tier II (10min) 2.Review of Common Tier II Interventions (10min) 3.Tier.
Response to Intervention in The Social Domain. Response to Intervention (RTI) Response to evidence-based interventions (Elliott, Witt, Kratchowill, &
“Tiering” It Up Tier 2 & 3 Supports Lauren Feigel & LaThomas Willis The Lincoln Center Wyandotte, MI 1/17/2013.
Positive Behavior Supports
Hello, Update, and Goodbye Program Presenters: Pam Hallvik, Administrator Sally Helton, EBIS Coordinator Sally Helton, EBIS Coordinator Nancy Brown, Counselor.
Secondary Behavioral Interventions What do we do if universal supports aren’t enough!
Intensive Positive Behavior Support -- Secondary and Tertiary Behavioral Interventions Bruce Stiller, Ph.D.; Celeste Rossetto Dickey, M.Ed.
Advanced SWIS Facilitator Training October 17, 2007 Rosemont, IL Anne Todd, Nadia Katul Sampson, Celeste Rossetto Dickey University of Oregon.
Building A Tier Two System In An Elementary School: Lessons Learned Tina Windett & Julie Arment Columbia Public Schools, Missouri Tim Lewis & Linda Bradley.
Tier 2 PBIS: Check-In / Check-out
School-wide Positive Behavior Support Renee Bradley, Ph.D. U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs.
1 S200i Formalizing the Tier2/Secondary System Intervening Early through the Behavior Education Plan – A Research Based Example.
Tier 2 Support The Behavior Education Plan. 2 Objectives Identify the BEP and its place in SWPBS Identify daily, weekly, and quarterly features of the.
Porters Point School PBIS Team Members: Jim Marshall, Jordanna Silverberg, Fred Moses, Dan Shepherd, Maureen Belaski, Mary Ann Kadish, Connie Cummings.
Check In – Connect – Check Out A Systematic Approach to Behavior Management for At- Risk Students Dr. Zaf Khan PBSI Project Director MTSU.
E11: Secondary/Tertiary Systems Development, Part 2: Tools & Strategies Michele Capio, Illinois PBIS Network Pam Horn, School District U-46 (IL)
Check In / Check Out Sussex Elementary School’s Duck Creek Club.
Student and Family Engagement within SWPBIS Rob Horner and Celeste Rossetto Dickey University of Oregon Slides available at as well as at.
Check-In/Check-Out Introduction: CICO Point Staff An Intervention for Tier II Students.
MDE- R ESPONDING TO C HALLENGING B EHAVIORS T HROUGH R ESPONSE TO I NTERVENTION.
PBIS Tier 2 Check-In/Check-Out Program Franklin Flyers
Check-In/Check-Out Staff Introduction. CICO (Check-In/Check-Out) Designed for Students with moderate problem behaviors Most appropriate when problem behaviors.
Tier Two and an Evidence-Based Practice: Check-In/Check-Out Janice Morris, Barbara Mitchell and Nicole Reifesel Columbia Public Schools.
Checking in on Check In/Check Out DEBORA LINTNER MO SW-PBS TIER 2/3 CONSULTANT SUSAN LONG ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL SIKESTON 5-6 GRADE CENTER.
Supporting Students At- risk by Implementing a SW Targeted Intervention Teri Lewis-Palmer July 10, 2008.
Secondary Behavior Interventions ABRI Terrance M. Scott, Ph.D.
Strategies to Support Yellow-zone students Specialized Group-based Approach.
Preparing for Advanced Tiers using CICO Calvert County Returning Team Summer Institute Cathy Shwaery, PBIS Maryland Overview.
Dr. Dana Morris Jessica Barrett Alcott Middle School.
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 SRIP – Cohort 9 August 2014.
PBIS Opening Day Check-in/Check-out Re-designing ISS.
Check-in/Check-out koi-education.com. Students who are not successful with Tier 1 interventions alone, need additional behavioral supports.
Assessing the Impact of A Targeted Group Intervention The Middle Part of the Triangle What is BEP? BEP at Indian Head ES.
Washington PBIS Conference Northwest PBIS Network Spokane, WA November 2013.
Tier II Interventions Check-In Check-Out Overview & Review Presented by: Todd Nicholson, MS, NCSP Positive Behavior Intervention Specialist.
CHECK IN-CHECK OUT – A SECONDARY BEHAVIOR PLAN Elizabeth Roberds A PLAN PROPOSED FOR GRISSOM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL – MUNCIE, IN.
Secondary Interventions Applying Function-based Support Adapted from Crone, Horner, & Hawken, 2004 Responding to Problem Behavior in Schools The Behavior.
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
Check-In / Check-Out (CI/CO): Overview for Staff.
Planning for Tier 2. TIER 1, 2, or 3? Are there ANY schools that aren’t motivated to support the difficult, at-risk kids? Answer = NO So, why don’t we.
CICO Daily Progress Report Samples. Standard Daily Progress Report card – Student name – Grade – Date – Daily goal (points & behavior) – Comments – Teacher.
© 2005 by The Guilford Press Check In, Check Out (CICO) Piloting A Tier 2 Intervention.
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 Continuum of Support *
Check In Check Out Technical Assistance. Think and Respond  Where are you at with your development and implementation of CICO?
Secondary Interventions: Check-in/ Check-out as an Example Rob Horner, Anne Todd, Amy Kauffman-Campbell, Jessica Swain-Bradway University of Oregon
PBIS Overview Cedar Hill Elementary. Purposes of Presentation  To provide an overview of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS)  To review.
The Behavior Education Program (BEP): An additional intervention to complement school and classroom managment The Behavior Education Program (BEP): An.
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
Behavior Education Program (BEP): Overview for Staff Leanne S. Hawken, Ph.D. University of Utah.
5.0 Tier Two Practice: Check-In Check-Out
Insert School Picture Elementary. Acknowledgments Staff PBIS Team Principal Etc..
Check In / Check Out: A Targeted Intervention Rob Horner, George Sugai, Anne Todd, Celeste Rossetto Dickey, Cindy Anderson, Terry Scott University of Oregon.
Southwest Junior High School CICO Handbook
Module 5: Overview of CICO and other Tier II Interventions
Presentation transcript:

March 15, 2012 APBS, Atlanta, Georgia Megan Cave & Celeste Rossetto Dickey University of Oregon

 What is CICO? Check & Connect? Behavior Education Program? Hello, Update & Goodbye?  The CICO-SWIS Application  Using Data for Decision Making  Questions

Dr. Rob Horner, Anne Todd & Celeste Rossetto Dickey University of Oregon

 All specialized interventions are more effective, and more durable, if they are done with school-wide behavioral expectations as a foundation. ◦ Check & Connect ◦ Hello, Update & Goodbye (HUG) ◦ Behavior Education Program ◦ Other names

Primary Prevention: School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings Secondary Prevention: Targeted Interventions *Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized *Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior ~80% of Students ~15% ~5% SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT 

Primary Prevention: School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings Secondary Prevention: Targeted Interventions *Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized *Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior ~80% of Students ~15% ~5% SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT  TODAY

 Everyone on staff knows about it ◦ Easy access and quick implementation ◦ Substitute teachers and volunteers included  Always available ◦ no individual changes necessary  Home school connection ◦ Regular reporting of progress  Skills are taught and used ◦ Shape into self management skills

 Improved structure  Prompts are provided throughout the day for correct behavior.  System for linking student with at least one positive adult.  Student chooses to participate.  Student is “set up for success”  First contact each morning is positive.  “Blow-out” days are pre-empted.  First contact each class period (or activity period) is positive, and sets up successful behavioral momentum.  Increase in contingent feedback  Feedback occurs more often.  Feedback is tied to student behavior.  Inappropriate behavior is less likely to be ignored or rewarded.

 Program can be applied in all school locations  Classroom, playground, cafeteria (anywhere there is a supervisor)  Elevated reward for appropriate behavior  Adult and peer attention delivered each target period  Adult attention (and tangible) delivered at end of day  Linking behavior support and academic support  For academic-based, escape-maintained problem behavior incorporate academic support  Linking school and home support  Provide format for positive student/parent contact  Program is organized to move towards a self- management system  Increased options for making choices  Increased ability to self-monitor performance/progress

 Faculty and staff commitment  Is problem behavior a major concern?  Are staff willing to commit 5 min per day?  Is CICO a reasonable option for us?  More than 5 students need extra support  Tier 2 interventions are designed to work with 10-15% of kids in a school  CICO typically “works” with 67% of students needing Tier 2 interventions..  CICO does NOT replace need for individualized supports.  Team available  Team leader  CICO coordinator (morning, afternoon)  Team (meets at least once every two weeks)

 School-wide PBIS in place  School-wide expectations defined and taught  Reward system operating  Clear and consistent consequences for problem behavior  Process for identifying a student who may be appropriate for CICO  Student is not responding to SWPBS expectations  Request for Assistance  Student finds adult attention rewarding  Student is NOT in crisis.

 Daily CICO progress report card  Same expectations for all  Common schedule  All staff taught rules for accepting, completing and returning the card.  Home report process  Can be same as progress card  Can be a unique reporting form

 Application within SWIS  Targeted Intervention  Data Entry & Report Generation  Daily Progress Report standard for all students in CICO Intervention

SYSTEMS PRACTICES DATA Supporting Staff Behavior Supporting Student Behavior OUTCOMES Supporting Social Competence & Academic Achievement Supporting Decision Making

 Practices ◦ Define procedures ◦ Teach procedures ◦ Use daily point card for progress monitoring ◦ Communicate with home on student progress ◦ Acknowledge expected behavior ◦ Correct behavioral error (continuum of consequences) ◦ Use information for decision- making  Systems ◦ Admin. Leadership ◦ Team-based implementation ◦ Defined commitment ◦ Allocation of FTE &Coordinator ◦ Budgeted support ◦ Development of decision- driven information system  Data: ◦ Data entry ◦ Report Generation ◦ Decision Making

Student Recommended for Check In Check Out CICO is Implemented Parent Feedback Regular Teacher Feedback Afternoon Check-out Morning Check-in CICO Coordinator Summarizes Data For Decision Making Bi-weekly Meeting to Assess Student Progress Exit Program Revise Program Check In Check Out (CICO-SWIS)

Comments:_____________________________________________________ Name: ____________________________ Date: ______________ 2 = great 1 = OK 0= hard time Name: ____________________________ Date: ______________ 2 = great 1 = OK 0= hard time Goals8: :30 Lunch12-1:301:30- 3:00 Be Safe0 1 2 Be Respectful Be Responsible TOTAL

 Nine readiness requirements ◦ One of which is a SWIS account ◦ CICO program description ◦ Daily point card compatible with CICO- SWIS data entry format

1. Purpose of Targeted Intervention and expected student outcomes 2. Student screening and selection to program decision rules and procedures 3. Procedures for participating in the targeted intervention 4. Procedures for training staff, students, families, transportation, substitute staff, others 5. Data system for monitoring student progress 6. Decision making cycle and people responsible

Example

Criteria for compatibility 1.Standard for all students? school-wide expectations 3.3 point rating scale? 4.No more than ten check in periods? Apply these criteria to the following examples

CICO Record Name: ____________________________ Date: ______________ 3 = great 2 = OK 1 = hard time SafeResponsibleRespectful Total Points Period 1: Reading Period 2: Math Period 3: Writing Lunch Period 4: Soc. St Period 5: Art/Music/PB Today’s goalToday’s total points: Comments: 1.Standard for all students? Expectations? 3.3 point rating scale? 4.No more than ten check in periods? Example A

Name: Date:Block 1Block 2Block 3Block 4 Safety0 1 2 Organization0 1 2 Achievement0 1 2 Respect0 1 2 Name: Date: Pencil sharpened Homework completed Raise hand to talk Be on timeKeep hands to self 1. Check in Music on MWF PE on T TH Math Lunch Recess Language arts Snack Research projects Standard for all students? Expectations? 3.3 point rating scale? 4.No more than ten check in periods? Example B Example C

1.Standard for all students? Expectations? 3.3 point rating scale? 4.No more than ten check in periods?

GOALS8:30-10Recess 10:15- 11:30 Lunch 12:15- 1:15 1:15-3:00 Be Safe0 1 2 Be Respectful Be Responsible TOTAL 1.Standard for all students? Expectations? 3.3 point rating scale? 4.No more than ten check in periods? Name: Points received Date: Daily Goal _____ Daily goal reached? Yes No

1.Standard for all students? Expectations? 3.3 point rating scale? 4.No more than ten check in periods? GOALS8:30-10Recess 10:15- 11:30 Lunch 12:15- 1:15 1:15-3:00 Be Safe0 1 2 Be Respectful Be Responsible TOTAL5 Name: Points received Date: Daily Goal _____ Daily goal reached? Yes No The Total can make it easier for data entry. (Note: Convert if scale)

CICO-SWIS

Five Available Reports

Individual Student Count Report

What Questions? What Decisions?

Individual Student Period Report

What Questions? What Decisions?

Individual Student Single Period Report

What Questions? What Decisions?

Average Daily Points by Student Report

School- Wide Report

What additional questions would you have?

 Check In Check Out: The Intervention  CICO-SWIS: Readiness & Application  Using CICO-SWIS data to make decisions

 