Assessment Report Public Administration School of Education and Human Services Celia A. Watt, Ph.D., Interim Chair Edward Downey, DPA, Assessment Coordinator.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessment Report School of Arts, Humanities, Social Sciences Department: Art Chair: Timothy Massey Assessment Coordinator: Chris Carson, Timothy.
Advertisements

Assessment Report Computer Science School of Science and Mathematics Kad Lakshmanan Chair Sandeep R. Mitra Assessment Coordinator.
Assessment Report Mathematics Department School of Science and Mathematics Thursday, October 17, 2013 Dr. Sanford Miller, Interim Chair Dr. Jason Morris,
How to Use SBP Curricular Criteria for public health bachelor’s degrees in PHP and SPH Reviews March 2015 Arlington, VA.
Assessment Report School of TAHSS Department: History Chair: Dr. Owen Ireland Assessment Coordinator: Date of Presentation: 10/1/2013.
Assessment Report School of Health And Human Performance Department: Health Science Chair: Patti Follansbee Assessment Coordinator: Katie Cardina.
NASPAA University School of Public Affairs Mailing Address: 1029 Vermont Ave NW Washington DC, Faculty Total Instructional Faculty:
OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT Developing and Implementing an Effective Plan.
Assessment Report School of Health and Human Performance Department: Nursing Chair: Dr. Kathleen Peterson Assessment Coordinator: Dr. Paula Barbel.
Assessment Report School of Health & Human Performance Department: Kinesiology, Sport Studies, & Physical Education (KSSPE) Chair: Dr. Susan.
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
ELAC SLO RETREAT 2009 Veronica Jaramillo, Ph.D. Mona Panchal Anthony Cadavid ELAC SLO RETREAT 2009.
1 UCSC Computer Engineering Objectives, Outcomes, & Feedback Tracy Larrabee Joel Ferguson Richard Hughey.
PPA Advisory Board Meeting, May 12, 2006 Assessment Summary.
NASPAA Accreditation Matching operations with mission: Student Learning Standard 5.1:Universal Required Competencies.
Outcomes, Assessment and Improvement Student Learning Outcomes Implementation at Crafton Hills College.
Assessment Report Department of Environmental Science and Biology School of Sciences and Mathematics Chair: Christopher Norment Assessment Coordinator:
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
Assessment Report School of TAHSS Department: English, Undergraduate Chair: Jennifer Haytock Date of Presentation: 1 October 2013.
CAA’s IBHE Program Review Presentation April 22, 2011.
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
Assessment Report School of Health and Human Performance Department: Recreation and Leisure Studies Chair: Lynda Sperazza, PhD, CPRP Assessment.
Session Goals: To redefine assessment as it relates to our University mission. To visit assessment plan/report templates and ensure understanding for.
Assessment Report School of The Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences________________ Department: Political Science and International Studies.
The Department of Educational Administration Assessment Report School of Education and Human Services Carol Godsave, Chair, Assessment Coordinator.
Helping Your Department Advance and Implement Effective Assessment Plans Presented by: Karen Froslid Jones Director, Institutional Research.
Overhaul of a Graduate Program in Arts Administration Master of Arts in Arts Administration – Initiated in 2003 – Low-residency—one weekend per month (over.
Assessment Report School of TAHSS Department: Modern Languages and Cultures Chair: Andrea Parada Assessment Coordinator: Donna Wilkerson- Barker.
Inter/National Coalition for Electronic Portfolio Research E-Portfolios at Thomas Thomas Edwards Colleen Burnham July 2007.
Overview of the Department’s ABET Criterion 3 Assessment Process.
Assessment Report School of The Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences Department: Theatre and Music Studies Chair: P. Gibson Ralph Assessment.
Assessment Report School of TAHSS Department: English, Graduate Chair: Jennifer Haytock Date of Presentation: 1 October 2013.
LEARNING OUTCOMES WORKSHOP Dr. Jan Hillman University of North Texas January 8, 2007.
Note: Because of slide animation, this ppt is intended to be viewed as a slide show.  While viewing the ppt, it may be helpful to obtain a sample Core.
Assessment Report School of TAHSS Department: Women and Gender Studies Director: Barbara LeSavoy Assessment Coordinator: Barbara LeSavoy Date.
Basic Workshop For Reviewers NQAAC Recognize the developmental engagements Ensure that they operate smoothly and effectively” Ensure that all team members.
Assessment Report Department of Physics School of Science and Mathematics Stanley F. Radford.
Assessment Report School of The Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences Department: Sociology Chair: Julie M. Ford Assessment Coordinator: Elliot.
Standard 5.1 CURRICULUM MAP John Glenn School of Public Affairs: Curriculum Map The Ohio State University as excerpted by the NASPAA Competencies Task.
Department of Secondary Education Program Assessment Report What We Assessed: Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and CA State Teaching Performance.
NCATE for Dummies AKA: Everything You Wanted to Know About NCATE, But Didn’t Want to Ask.
College of Veterinary Medicine UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT WITH CURRICULUM REVISION : HOW WILL WE KNOW IF WE HAVE ACCOMPLISHED OUR GOALS?
Institutional Effectiveness A set of ongoing and systematic actions, processes, steps and practices that include: Planning Assessment of programs and.
New York Institute of Technology
Preparing for North Central Association / Higher Learning Commission (HLC) Accreditation Reviewing Areas of Specialization and Assessing Learning Outcomes.
Module 3: Programmatic Assessment Strategies
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP By: Dr. Shemeka McClung Director Ms. Arnitra Hunter Research Associate Institutional Research.
AL Maaref University The Road Ahead FBA Student Induction Day Hussin Jose Hejase, PhD March 4, 2016.
PDP Presentation Trinity Washington University
Maja Holmes and Margaret Stout West Virginia University
Institutional Student Learning Outcome Assessment Report Fall 2015 Assessment Cycle
AACSB’s Standard 9: Curriculum content
Information Technology (IT)
Employer Engagement in Accreditation
Assessment and Accreditation
Health Care Management Angell Snyder School of Business
SVR: Stage of Assessment SITE VISIT REPORT: Standard 5.1
Curriculum Coordinator: D. Miller Date of Presentation: 1/18/2017
Program/Department School of ___Health, Sciences, and Criminal Justice_______________ Fall 2015 Assessment Report Curriculum Coordinator: Dr. Peggy La.
Curriculum Coordinator: D. Miller Date of Presentation: 1/18/2017
Curriculum Coordinator: Minhua Wang Date of Presentation: 1/18/2017
GMMD Program Canino School of Engineering Technology Fall 2015 Assessment Report
Criminal Justice A.A.S. School of Science, Health and Criminal Justice Fall 2015 Assessment Report
Criminal Justice: Law Enforcement Leadership School of Health, Science and Criminal Justice Fall 2015 Assessment Report Curriculum Coordinator: Lisa Colbert.
Curriculum Coordinator: Marela Fiacco Date : February 29, 2015
PHYSICS CURRICULUM Canino School of Engineering Technology Fall 2015 Assessment Report
Physical Therapist Assistant Program School of Science, Health, and Criminal Justice Fall 2016 Assessment Report Curriculum Coordinator: Deborah Molnar.
Department Chair: Liz Brown Date of Presentation: 01/19/18
Presentation transcript:

Assessment Report Public Administration School of Education and Human Services Celia A. Watt, Ph.D., Interim Chair Edward Downey, DPA, Assessment Coordinator

What was Assessed - Student Learning Outcomes National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration (NASPAA) Standard 5: Matching Operations with the Mission - Student Learning National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration (NASPAA) 5.1 Universal Required Competencies 5.2 Mission-specific Required Competencies 5.3 Mission-specific Elective Competencies 5.4 Professional Competencies

PAD Mission and SLO’s parallel NASPAA Accreditation RequirementsNASPAA Accreditation Requirements The mission of the Master of Public Administration Program, College at Brockport, is to prepare leaders and managers in public, health care, and nonprofit organizations. The program maintains close student faculty interaction that enables graduates to LEAD, PARTICIPATE, ANALYZE, ARTICULATE, and COMMUNICATE in public service: Lead and manage in diverse organizational contexts. Participate and contribute to public policy in the student’s chosen emphasis: Public, Health Care, or Non- Profit Management. Analyze to make informed decisions. Articulate the public service concerns associated with the distribution of scarce resources. Communicate productively in settings characterized by diversity.

What was Assessed - Student Learning Outcomes Standard 5.1 Universal Required Competencies Standard 5.1 Universal Required Competencies Narrative Spreadsheet

5.2 Mission-specific Required Competencies: The program will identify core competencies in other domains that are necessary and appropriate to implement its mission Average class sizes small (not an SLO)

5.3 Mission-specific Elective Competencies The program will define its objectives and competencies for optional concentrations and specializations. Students will be able to describe and work within the emphasis specific institutional, structural, and political contexts of policy making Public Management Emphasis (renamed from General Emphasis)- PAD 641 Foundations of Public Administration Health Care Management Emphasis- PAD 613 Health Care in America Non-Profit Management Emphasis- PAD 646 Foundations of the Nonprofit Sector

5.4 Professional Competencies The program will ensure that students learn to apply their education, such as through experiential exercises and interactions with practitioners across the broad range of public affairs, administration, and policy professions and sectors. Students apply their education by developing a portfolio that reflects on their academic and professional work as related to their abilities to lead, participate, analyze, articulate, and communicate in public service. *696 Portfolio rubric696

How the assessment was accomplished Student Work Assessed: – The portfolio in PAD 696 Portfolio Seminar Measurement strategy: score, rubric, etc. – Rubric Sample: N students (is this a sample or all eligible students) – N=17 (all students in the seminar for Spring 13)

Data Outcome assessed: students learn to apply their education by asking them to develop a portfolio that reflects on their academic and professional work as related to their abilities to LEAD, PARTICIPATE, ANALYZE, ARTICULATE, and COMMUNICATE in public service. List all courses providing assessment data on this outcome (one row for each) Specific Assignments/Task Evaluated in each course listed Results of Assessment: n= ______ (total number of all assessments) [% Exceeding; Meeting/ Approaching; Not Meeting Criterion of Success] What was benchmark or criterion of success? PAD 696 Portfolio Seminar Portfolio (LEAD)Total number of students assessed in the course – all sections (n):_17___ Percent exceeding: 41% Percent meeting: 59% Percent approaching: 0% Percent not meeting: 0% Restate your benchmark: 80% Did you meet your benchmark? Yes √ No

Data Outcome assessed: students learn to apply their education by asking them to develop a portfolio that reflects on their academic and professional work as related to their abilities to LEAD, PARTICIPATE, ANALYZE, ARTICULATE, and COMMUNICATE in public service. List all courses providing assessment data on this outcome (one row for each) Specific Assignments/Task Evaluated in each course listed Results of Assessment: n= ______ (total number of all assessments) [% Exceeding; Meeting/ Approaching; Not Meeting Criterion of Success] What was benchmark or criterion of success? PAD 696 Portfolio Seminar Portfolio (PARTICIPATE)Total number of students assessed in the course – all sections (n):_17___ Percent exceeding: 47% Percent meeting: 53% Percent approaching: 0% Percent not meeting: 0% Restate your benchmark: 80% Did you meet your benchmark? Yes √ No

Data Outcome assessed: students learn to apply their education by asking them to develop a portfolio that reflects on their academic and professional work as related to their abilities to LEAD, PARTICIPATE, ANALYZE, ARTICULATE, and COMMUNICATE in public service. List all courses providing assessment data on this outcome (one row for each) Specific Assignments/Task Evaluated in each course listed Results of Assessment: n= ______ (total number of all assessments) [% Exceeding; Meeting/ Approaching; Not Meeting Criterion of Success] What was benchmark or criterion of success? PAD 696 Portfolio Seminar Portfolio (ANALYZE)Total number of students assessed in the course – all sections (n):_17___ Percent exceeding: 18% Percent meeting: 82% Percent approaching: 0% Percent not meeting: 0% Restate your benchmark: 80% Did you meet your benchmark? Yes √ No

Data Outcome assessed: students learn to apply their education by asking them to develop a portfolio that reflects on their academic and professional work as related to their abilities to LEAD, PARTICIPATE, ANALYZE, ARTICULATE, and COMMUNICATE in public service. List all courses providing assessment data on this outcome (one row for each) Specific Assignments/Task Evaluated in each course listed Results of Assessment: n= ______ (total number of all assessments) [% Exceeding; Meeting/ Approaching; Not Meeting Criterion of Success] What was benchmark or criterion of success? PAD 696 Portfolio Seminar Portfolio (ARTICULATE)Total number of students assessed in the course – all sections (n):_17___ Percent exceeding: 41% Percent meeting: 59% Percent approaching: 0% Percent not meeting: 0% Restate your benchmark: 80% Did you meet your benchmark? Yes √ No

Data Outcome assessed: students learn to apply their education by asking them to develop a portfolio that reflects on their academic and professional work as related to their abilities to LEAD, PARTICIPATE, ANALYZE, ARTICULATE, and COMMUNICATE in public service. List all courses providing assessment data on this outcome (one row for each) Specific Assignments/Task Evaluated in each course listed Results of Assessment: n= ______ (total number of all assessments) [% Exceeding; Meeting/ Approaching; Not Meeting Criterion of Success] What was benchmark or criterion of success? PAD 696 Portfolio Seminar Portfolio (COMMUNICATE)Total number of students assessed in the course – all sections (n):_17___ Percent exceeding: 29% Percent meeting: 71% Percent approaching: 0% Percent not meeting: 0% Restate your benchmark: 80% Did you meet your benchmark? Yes √ No

What the data told us Leading: 41% Exceeding; 59% Meeting Participating: 47% Exceeding; 53% Meeting Analyzing: 18% Exceeding; 82% Meeting Articulating: 41% Exceeding; 59% Meeting Communicating: 29% Exceeding; 71% Meeting Even though the benchmark of meeting and exceeding (80%) was met, the faculty felt like the Exceeding percentages could be better.

Action Plan/Data Driven Decision: How the department did or will “close the loop” The department will add the existing course, PAD 680 Public Policy, to the common curriculum as it reinforces application of all core competencies with emphasis on analyzing and communicating.

What resources were applied or are needed to close the loop Faculty time was required to review the data, discuss the importance of the findings, and develop and implement the plan. No other resources necessary.

P.S.I love my new job!