Demand Response Research and Capabilities at LBNL Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Midwest Demand Response Initiative.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Energy Analysis Department Electricity Markets and Policy Group DOE Smart Grid Investment Grant Program: Dynamic Pricing & Consumer Behavior Studies Chuck.
Advertisements

Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
New Paradigms for Measuring Savings
Smart Buildings for a Smart Grid Technology & Services to Make Buildings Grid Responsive James Dagley, Vice President of Channel Marketing and Strategy.
A National Perspective On Demand Response Ahmad Faruqui, Ph.D. March 3, 2008 California Energy Commission Sacramento, California.
NARUC Summer Committee Meetings:
BG&E’s PeakRewards SM Demand Response Program Successful Approaches for Engaging Customers August 20, 2014.
Parallel session for topics: EE-05 Deep renovation of buildings EE-06 Demand response in blocks of buildings EE-02 Design of new high performance buildings.
Time-of-Use and Critical Peak Pricing
Document number Finding Financial Solutions & Models for Microgrids Maryland Clean Energy Summit Panel Wednesday, October 16, 2013.
California Public Utilities Commission Residential Rate Structure Rulemaking R Workshop Overview Time Variant Pricing (TVP) Workshop Gabe Petlin.
The Benefits of Dynamic Pricing of Default Electricity Service Bernie Neenan UtiliPoint International Prepared for Assessing the Potential for Demand Response.
Automated Demand Response Project History and Future Directions Presentation to the California Maritime Academy Mary Ann Piette Lawrence Berkeley National.
The Smart Grid: Green IT and Data Centers February 2, 2011: 4:10 p.m. Charles O’Donnell, Vice President, Engineering Liebert AC Power Emerson Network.
Automated Demand Response "PG&E" refers to Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a subsidiary of PG&E Corporation. ©2013 Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
Integrating Distributed Energy Resources 2015 Austin Electricity Conference AT&T Conference Center April 9, 2015, Page 1 Daniel Violette, Managing Director,
How Energy Efficiency and Demand Response can Help Air Quality Presentation to the California Electricity and Air Quality Conference October 3, 2006 Mary.
Real-time Pricing for Illinois Consumers Anthony Star Community Energy Cooperative Demand Response Coordinating Committee Webinar December 15, 2006.
California Statewide Pricing Pilot Lessons Learned Roger Levy Demand Response Research Center NARUC Joint Meeting Committee on Energy.
Overview of Residential Pricing/Advanced Metering Pilots Charles Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory SMPPI Board Meeting August 3, 2005.
DNV GL © SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER DNV GL © Second Annual Utility of the Future Pulse Survey Key Findings 1 July 15, 2015 Presentation to C/CAG RMCP.
Introduction & Overview April 11, 2011 Barry Haaser Managing Director.
PacifiCorp Participation in the California ISO. 2 Full participation provides significant benefits beyond those of the Energy Imbalance Market EIM BenefitsFull.
Pricing Enabled by AMI What Types? What are the Benefits? Dr. Steven D. Braithwait Christensen Associates Energy Consulting EUCI Webinar September 12,
Measurement, Verification, and Forecasting Protocols for Demand Response Resources: Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Demand Response Opportunities in Codes & Standards Prepared by: Amanda Gonzalez, Energy Solutions Energy Solutions| 1610 Harrison Street | Oakland, CA.
Overview of OpenADR May 4, 2011 Integrating Demand Response, Efficiency, Renewables and Smart Grid Sila Kiliccote Deputy, Demand Response Research Center.
DOE’s EPACT Report to Congress on Demand Response in Electricity Markets Larry Mansueti Office of Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability U.S. Department.
Energy Action Plan “Report Card” and the AB32 “Umbrella” CFEE ROUNDTABLE CONFERENCE ON ENERGY Julie Fitch California Public Utilities Commission Director.
Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets February 17, 2008.
1 OpenADR Taskforce Chair – Albert Chiu Co-chair – Ed Koch Technical Editors – Bruce Bartell, Gerald Gray.
FERC Assessment of Demand Response & Advanced Metering 2006 APPA Business & Financial Conference September 18, 2006 – Session 11 (PMA) Presented by: Larry.
Summary: Automated Demand Response in Large Facilities Mary Ann Piette, Dave Watson, Naoya Motegi, Building Technologies Dept., LBNL Osman Sezgen, Energy.
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Status Report Demand Responsive Building Program William J. Keese California Energy Commission March 30, 2001.
Charles Goldman E. O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Michael Kintner-Meyer Pacific Northwest National Laboratory DOE Office of.
Energy Efficiency Program Performance Dian M. Grueneich, Commissioner California Public Utilities Commission NARUC Winter Meeting - February 16, 2008 
Energy Analysis Department Cost-Effectiveness Valuation Framework for Demand Response Resources: Guidelines and Suggestions Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley.
California Energy Commission - Public Interest Energy Research Program Demand Response Research Center Research Overview Load Management Informational.
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Demand Response Workshop September 15, Definitions are important Demand response –“Changes in electricity usage by end-use customers from their.
Linking the Wholesale and Retail Markets through Dynamic Retail Pricing Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September.
Workgroup #3 High Impact Energy Efficiency Initiatives John Savage Stan Price.
Kathleen King, Ph.D. Vice President SMART METERING WEST COAST 2007 CONFERENCE, Los Angeles, California August 21, 2007 The Importance of Demand Response.
National Demand Response Action Plan David Kathan Office of Energy Policy and Innovation Federal Energy Regulatory Commission APPA National Conference.
CEC 08-DR-1 Efficiency Committee Workshop 3/3/08.
FERC Perspective on Demand Response David Kathan FERC Midwest Demand Response Initiative Chicago, IL February 9, 2007 The author’s views do not necessarily.
CPUC Role in AB 32 Implementation LIOB – 2 nd June, 2010 San Diego, CA.
+ Transactive Energy – Business Models and Value Realization Session Transactive Energy Conference and Workshop 2013 Portland, Oregon May 23, 2013 Dian.
High-Efficiency Buildings and Demand Response Phillip Price Mary Ann Piette Demand Response Research Center Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Measurement & Verification at the Wholesale Market Level David Kathan FERC NAESB DSM/EE Business Practices Washington, DC April 11, 2007 The author’s views.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON® SM Preferred Resources Pilot August 17, 2015
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION 1 Demand Response Research Center Research Opportunity Notice February 2, 2007 Mary Ann Piette Research Director, DRRC Rick.
DR issues in California discussed last year in March Historical DR in California: some background issues –Twenty years of programs/tariffs I/C and AC cycling.
PG&E Automated Demand Response Program: IDSM Lessons Learned
Dynamic Pricing Case Studies. Digi International.
FERC Staff’s Report on Demand Response and Advanced Metering.
Demand Response Research Center Accomplishments and Future Directions Mary Ann Piette Research Director - Demand Response Research Center State Energy.
Utilities’ Update on Energy Savings Assistance Program Studies Ordered in D LIOB Meeting August 21, 2013 Sacramento, California.
An Overview of Demand Response in California July 2011.
CEC Load Management Standards Workshop March 3, Update on the CPUC’s Demand Response and Advanced Metering Proceedings Bruce Kaneshiro Energy Division.
Institutional Support Vladimir Koritarov Argonne National Laboratory April 2016.
Energy Efficiency as a Resource: What is the Cost of Saved Electricity? Charles Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Missouri Energy Policy Workshop.
Design and Planning Tools John Grosh Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory April 2016.
Mike Jaske California Energy Commission
Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Integrated Resource Planning and Load Flexibility Analysis
Electricity Demand Response and Advanced Metering for Integrated Utilities Arkansas Public Service Commission Lonni Dieck AEP May 24, 2007.
DECISION
California Transportation Electrification Activities
Presentation transcript:

Demand Response Research and Capabilities at LBNL Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Midwest Demand Response Initiative Steering Committee Kick-Off Meeting Chicago, Illinois February 9, 2007

Overview of DR Research at LBNL  Electricity Markets and Policy Group  Conducts research and provides technical assistance to policymakers on demand response –and utility system planning, energy efficiency, renewable energy, power system reliability, and DG  Demand Response Research Center  LBNL manages a multi-institutional center for DR research, funded by the California Energy Commission’s Public Interest Energy Research Program  LBNL projects focus on developing technologies and protocols for Automated Demand Response (Auto-DR) for C/I customers

DR Market Assessment & Valuation  Estimating Demand Response Potential Among Large Commercial and Industrial Customers: A Scoping Study  Develops analytical techniques and identifies data sources for conducting demand response market potential studies  Benefits of Demand Response in Electricity Markets and Recommendations for Achieving Them  A DOE Report to U.S. Congress (Section 1252 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005)  Framework for assessing DR Benefits (and costs); comparative review of existing studies; high-level policy recommendations for developing DR nation-wide

Tracking DR and RTP Program Experience  DR Program Activity and Impacts: Summer 2006  Interviewed ~30 ISO/utility program managers to assess DR program experience; snapshot of “state of DR market”  Real-time Hourly Pricing as a Default Service Tariff  Conducted stakeholder interviews and in-depth review of regulatory records in all five states where RTP hourly pricing had been adopted as the default service for large customers (through Summer 2004)  Characterized experiences with, and potential for, this form of dynamic pricing to serve as a source of demand response  Survey of Utility Experiences with RTP as an Optional Service  Conducted interviews with ~40 utilities offering optional RTP programs to characterize their actual/potential role as a source of DR

DR and RTP Program Evaluation  Niagara Mohawk (National Grid) Day-Ahead RTP for Large C&I Customers  Estimated price elasticities for 120 customers for five years; characterize price responsiveness across customer market segments; and DR potential  In-depth customer interviews; assess factors affecting participation in hourly pricing and price responsiveness  Evaluation of NYISO DR Programs (2001, 2002)  Customer survey: barriers, factors influencing decisions to participate, curtail; role of enabling technologies  Estimated customer price elasticities and market benefits

DR Technical Assistance  Direct Technical Assistance  Technical Advisor to New-England Demand Response Initiative (NEDRI)  IEA Demand Response Resource (DRR) Program and Market Analysis project  ISO-NE DR Program Design  New Jersey Multi-year DR Strategic Plan  NYSERDA DR Programs  Measurement & Verification Methods  Developed M&V Protocol for New England ISO (and NYISO) DR program for non-interval metered customers

LBNL Demand Response Research Center Activities Recent and Ongoing Projects Evaluation of RTP for Large Users Demand Shifting with Thermal Mass Automated Demand Response in Commercial Buildings Project 1 Project 2 Project 3 New Projects Industrial DR – Strategies in Audits Industrial DR in Food Processing DR Behavior Solicitation (2-3 Projects Forthcoming) Project 4 Project 5 Project 6

Auto-DR System Overview Demand Response Automation Server (DRAS) Internet Relay Client & Logic with Integrated Relay (CLIR) Utility Utility or IOU Event Trigger XML Modbus

Auto-DR Results: Peak Demand Savings in 2006 CPP Program Average reduction was 14% during 3 hour peak period Technology performed well: continued use during heat wave

For additional information... Electricity Markets and Policy Group Demand Response Research Center