Selling Residential Solar—A Market Based Approach Presented by: Gerald Bernstein, Stanford Transportation Group and Claire Starry, TDS Economics Presented.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cape Town, May 2010 Luz Aurora ORTIZ SALGADO Ministry of Energy MÉXICO Energy efficiency in Mexico A Program for the Replacement of Home Appliances.
Advertisements

Dr. Wendell A. Porter, P.E.. Our Current Situation Landfill Gas Combined Heat and Power Feed in Tariff, about 20MW of PV total Tiered rate structure Energy.
A tax on the energy utility for excessive residential electricity use.
Community Choice Aggregation Renewable Energy for your Home and Business July 16, 2013.
Cost of Services Pricing Enables a Net Zero Energy World © 2011San Diego Gas & Electric Company. All copyright and trademark rights reserved. 1.
 PACE & RECAP: Financing Renewable Energy Michelle Hickey, ISEA Program Coordinator Illinois Solar Energy Association 1.
Renewable Energy 101: How Schools Can Make the Grade with Green Power.
SolarCurrents TM Rebuild Ypsilanti Julie Londo August 26, 2010.
Overview of Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Program San Antonio Office of Environmental Policy December 16, 2009.
University of Pittsburgh School of Law 2013 Energy Law & Policy Institute October 14, 2012 Citizens for Pennsylvania’s Future (PennFuture). A statewide.
Energy Efficiency and Arizona’s Energy Future Jeff Schlegel Southwest Energy Efficiency Project (SWEEP) April
Improving the quality of life for people in Dorset, now and for the future Pete West Renewable Energy Development Officer Dorset County Council Wessex.
CBA FINAL PROJECT 2002 Gyorgyi Cicas ; Jose L. Aguirre; Po-Hsin Lin CBA OF OPERATING PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM IN PITTSBURGH.
Boxborough and Littleton Solar Program Training 5/15/15 Arnie Epstein – “Solar Coach” Stow Solar Challenge
Golden Mile Transport Meeting 22 April The next evolutionary step for greentomato 2 The greentomato group provides a variety of goods and services.
Public Revenue from Wind Farms May 2008 Susan Skalka.
Solar Power: A National Perspective Julia Judd, Executive Director Solar Electric Power Association.
Lesson 25: Solar Panels and Economics of Solar Power
By Dale A Gulden, Solar Direct CEO. Solar Electric – Basic Components 1. Modules – solar electric collectors. 3 basic types in the marketplace: Mono crystalline,
Solar Energy Presentation Watergate-Emeryville Hattie Carwell March 12, 2009.
Solar Incentives for Arizona Public Service, Salt River Project, Tucson Electric Power.
Photovoltaic - Solar Cell
Zero – Energy Building What constitutes a zero energy building? A building that uses a “net” of zero energy – typically producing excess energy via renewables.
1 State Allocation Board Hearing Solar Energy and Energy Efficiency Project Options for California Schools Mark Johnson, Energy Solutions Manager - Schools.
Welcome and Introductions CoServ Presentation & Member Input.
1 RELIABILITY AFFORDABILITY ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP Bringing Solar to the Community Jennifer Szaro, Orlando Utilities Commission.
California's three large IOUs collectively served 12.7% of their 2007 retail electricity sales with renewable power. – Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E)
LAKELAND ELECTRIC Pricing to Meet Net Meter Rules APPA 2009 Business & Finance Conference Sept 14, 2009 Jeff Sprague Manager Pricing & Rates.
The Greening of the Rooftop Module 8 Green Roofing: Clean Energy Roofs.
Community Energy Independence Initiative Demonstration Project March 14, 2006.
Solar Energy Attraction Operations Support Biltmore.
CSI Phase II: R Solar for Affordable Housing CPUC Intent: Set aside a “minimum” of 10% of budget $216.8M Solar Economics Less Compelling to CARE-Households.
SLO County Solar Roofs Group #2 Mark Bilodeau Chris Heisler Adam Hipp Patrick Luther Allen Trac Jesse Kantor.
Energy and Low Carbon Society Policy in Taiwan Chen Li-chun Faculty of Economics Yamaguchi University Tel/Fax:
Rooftop Solar Photovoltaic Seventh Plan Approach to Analysis CRAC November 13, 2014.
Discussion of Feed-in Tariff Pilot Programs September 18, 2013 Presentation to the Regulatory Flexibility Committee of the Indiana General Assembly 1.
Renewable Energy in New Jersey’s Clean Energy Program Scott Hunter Renewable Energy Program Administrator, Office of Clean Energy in the New Jersey Board.
1 Emerging Renewables Program Solar Conference North State Renewable Energy Chico, CA March 10, 2005 BILL BLACKBURN Lead, Emerging Renewables Program California.
SOLAR POWER SYSTEM FEASIBILITY STUDY,AND REPORT FOR A MUSEUM Presented by Abiola Adeseko Hamid Mohseni Sandeep Tripuraneni Charan Reddy.
Solar Options Opportunities for the County of San Diego.
Incentives and Tax Credits Federal, state, and private incentives and tax credits exist to encourage the use of renewable energies. Federal, state, and.
Components Three Basic Parts to an Active PV System: –Collector/Harvestor –Storage –Distribution More complex systems need –Inverter –Charge Controller/Voltage.
COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATION: TECHNICAL STUDY RESULTS Peninsula Clean Energy September 24,2015.
Cost of Going Solar in DC 4 Ways to Save! 1.DC Rebate $3/watt up to 3KW…. 2.Federal Tax Credit 30% of Total 3.Savings on your energy Bill (Net Metering.
Soaring Heights Communities Family Housing Solar Project (at Davis-Monthan AFB) Presented by John Karelis, Utility Manager,
Renewable Energy in Estonia Raul Potisepp, Estonian Renewable Energy Association
1 California Solar Initiative Low Income Multifamily Program Public Workshop March 17, 2008 San Francisco, CA.
Renewable & Alternative Power Senate Energy, Utilities & Communications Committee Stuart R. Hemphill Director, Renewable and Alternative Power Southern.
Senate Bill 1 and the New Solar Homes Partnership Valerie Hall California Energy Commission December 8,
The Greening of the Rooftop Module 8 Green Roofing: Clean Energy Roofs.
WFEC and Its Rural Electric Cooperative Members Solar Power October 16, 2015 Fall PR-MR & Marketing Meeting.
INVOLAR Microinverters Evaluation of ROI of a 3 kW PV system.
We hear much about energy problems; supply shortages, pollution issues and high prices, but the solutions to these problems are here now in the form of.
INVOLAR Microinverters Evaluation of ROI of a 3 kW PV system.
Session 25 Case Study – Residential System, Part 2 Operation and Analysis December 01, 2015.
Dr. Anastasios Antonakos General Manager NanoDomi 8th International Scientific Conference on “Energy and Climate Change” 7-9 October 2015 Athens, Greece.
Experience you can trust. Californial Industrial Energy Efficiency Potential CALMAC/MAESTRO Meeting San Francisco, CA July 27, 2006 Fred Coito
Finding Our Voice with Shareholders © 2011San Diego Gas & Electric Company. All copyright and trademark rights reserved. Caroline Winn VP Customer Services.
California Energy Commission 2015 IEPR Self-Generation Forecast Sacramento, CA 12/17/2015 Asish Gautam Demand Analysis Office Energy Assessments Division.
PV Panel Investment. Overview  Solar Global Trends and Growth  Solar Process and Net Metering  Sample System Breakdown  Personal System Details.
Assessment of the Economic Impact of Greening Vehicular Transport in Barbados Winston Moore (PhD) and Stacia Howard Antilles Economics November 2015.
The time to jump into SOLAR is … NOW! Lindsay Joye, P.E. Solar Program Manager City of Palo Alto Utilities November 5, 2015.
UTC STUDY OF DISTRIBUTED GENERATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Presentation for the Washington Future Energy Conference October 19, 2011.
Solar in NYC – Pratt SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEMS David Buckner President
Hartek Group is one of India’s fastest growing company with offerings that span across Engineering, Renewables, Technology , Construction , Fuel and Manufacturing.
Phase 3 Solar Feasibility Study Findings and Recommendations
SunPower Residential Financing
State Allocation Board Hearing Solar Energy and Energy Efficiency Project Options for California Schools Mark Johnson, Energy Solutions Manager - Schools.
Residential Water Heater Market in CA
Photovoltaic Systems Engineering Application to PV Systems
Presentation transcript:

Selling Residential Solar—A Market Based Approach Presented by: Gerald Bernstein, Stanford Transportation Group and Claire Starry, TDS Economics Presented to Silicon Valley Chapter National Association for Business Economics October 13, 2009

Introduction  Brief Review of the Status of Solar PV  Costs of Residential Solar PV  Costs of utility-provided electricity  The basic economics (or lack-thereof) of residential solar  High electricity consumers—where to focus if CA is to economically achieve emission-reduction targets

Current Situation: Solar Has A Long Way to Grow

Residential System Component Costs Residential System Costs in California ($/DC W) - Panels$ Inverter$ Balance of System$ Installation Labor$ TOTAL$9.00 Residential typically are 3 – 4 kW, $27,000 - $36,000 Due to oversupply, panel prices are down Due to recession, labor costs are down

Residential Systems with Rebates and Tax Credits (4 kW system) Nominal System Cost: $36,000 Federal Tax Credit (30%) - $10,800 CA Solar Initiative (CSI) Rebate $1.55/W - $ 6,200 San Francisco Rebate ($2,000 - $4,000) - $ 4,000 NET INSTALLATION COST $15,000 (approximate A/C output in SF = 6,000 kWh/yr) Some locations (Berkeley, Sonoma Co) offer upfront loans repaid with 20-year charges on property tax bills New Jersey uses market-based Solar Renewable Energy Credits (SERC) with the utility “buying” credits annually from homeowners Germany’s Feed-In Tariffs have propelled it to #1 worldwide. But… solar has not met its intended purpose of replacing nuclear reactors

Estimating Financial Returns for Residential Solar Installation First step is to compare the costs of purchasing from electric utilities versus the cost of installing rooftop solar systems.

PG&ESDGESCELAWPPASMUD Gas & Electric Low3,7003,8323,7054,2003,6507,920 High5,3005,49410,4756,000 All Electric Low6,4004,8184,7804,2003,65010,920 High10,1008,74212,7936,000 Estimating Financial Returns for Residential Solar Installation The next step is to identify the baseline consumption levels Tier 2 goes to 30% over baseline Tier 3 goes to 100% over baseline Tiers 4 and 5 are those where rates are the highest. Baseline Amounts: kWh per year

Estimating Financial Returns for Residential Solar Installation Estimated IRR for PV Solar Systems for Households Consuming 20,000 kWh per Year and Served by Investor-Owned Utilities Sources: TDS Economics and Stanford Transportation Group

Finding Households that Benefit from Residential Solar Installation Distribution of CA Residential Accounts by Investor-Owned Versus Municipal Utility Accts. 2004MWh 2004 (Millions) (Percent) Investor-Owned Utilities79%78% PG&E36%35% SDGE9%8% SCE33% Publicly-Owned Utilities21%22% LAWP10%9% SMUD4%5% Source: California Energy Commission

Finding Households that Benefit from Residential Solar Installation Distribution of CA Households by Annual Electricity Consumption Source: 2005 RECS Survey, DOE, 2009

Finding Households that Benefit from Residential Solar Installation Criteria used to select solar households: Single family dwelling units. Households served by investor-owned utilities Smallest system installed is 2 kW A household would be willing to install solar only if it can financially justify a 2kW system (generating about 2,500 kWh per year) based on an expected IRR of 5% or higher. For respondents living in single family attached or detached housing with consumption exceeding 14,500 kWh per year with all-electric utilities and 10,500 kWh per year for other households, we assumed that 75% would have a financial incentive to put in sufficient solar power to generate enough electricity to lower their purchases from utilities to 12,000 kWh (all-electric households) or 8,000 kWh (gas and electric households).

Finding Households that Benefit from Residential Solar Installation Estimated Number of Households with Financial Potential to Install Solar Panels Sources: TDS Economics, Stanford Transportation Group Number of Households Amount of Electricity Consumed Potential for Solar Solar as a Percent of Total MillionMillion kWh Percent Total Households12.184,5889,53911% Not Candidates for Solar Power10.359,380-0% Candidates for Solar Power1.825,2089,53938%

 More than 1 million CA households can benefit financially from rooftop solar systems with the potential of installing over 10 times the state’s goal of 577 MW of residential capacity.  The state should focus on the limited group of households with a financial incentive to install solar systems. This would reduce the need for subsidies.  We expect programs to finance solar systems to continue to evolve. Any form of “emission” or “carbon” tax will accelerate solar developments.  But we remain a LONG way from widespread adoption. Conclusion Market Forces Can be Used to Help the State Meet Its Million Roofs Goals