1 NTAG 23/9/04: Progress Report from SFM Sub-Group NTAG2004(35) Paper: n Sub-Group tasked with: Defining sustainable flood management Developing a set.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Implementing information on the costs and benefits of adaptation in a portfolio –based decision framework Alistair Hunt Department of Economics, University.
Advertisements

Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
Key Messages National Riparian Lands Research & Development Program Assessing Community Capacity for Riparian Restoration.
Head teacher Performance Management
Joint Defra/EA FCERM R&D Programme: Strategy and Policy Development Theme overview.
Strategic Environmental Assessment of Scotland’s Climate Change Adaptation Framework Strategic Environmental Assessment of Scotland’s.
The West Sussex Think Family Early Help and Intervention Strategy Smarter Sooner Safer Stronger An overview.
ICS 417: The ethics of ICT 4.2 The Ethics of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in Business by Simon Rogerson IMIS Journal May 1998.
Foresight Flood and Coastal Defence Project Government Office for Science Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills Overview by: Colin Thorne.
References to Economic Instruments in Selected MEAs Matthew Stilwell Matthew Stilwell.
Name of presenter Corporate Climate Change Adaptation Planning Council name Date.
Air Quality and Land Use Planning Land Use Consultants 11 th March 2008 Susanne Underwood.
Sustainable growth and water cycle studies Andy McConkey, principal consultant, Halcrow Paul Hickey, growth and equivalence manager, Anglian Water Gerard.
Western States Energy & Environment Symposium October 27, 2009.
ACTeon Innovation, policy, environment Madrid – WFD Conference April 2006 How to proceed with the Programme of Measures and the River Basin Management.
Opportunities & Implications for Turkish Organisations & Projects
Urban-Nexus – Integrated Urban Management David Ludlow and Michael Buser UWE Sofia November 2011.
Climate change - environmental planning challenges Mark Southgate Head of Planning and Local Government.
Eric R. Johnson Hillsborough County, (Tampa) FL
New Procurement & Delivery Arrangements for the Schools’ Estate Presentation to Strategic Advisory Group 18 April 2005.
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Overview
SNH PERSPECTIVE ON PLANNING AND THE ENVIRONMENT Derek Manson Planning Adviser.
BC Injury Prevention Strategy Working Paper for Discussion.
The common inspection framework: education, skills and early years.
IWRM as a Tool for Adaptation to Climate Change
Managing Wales’ Natural Resources
A Sustainable Wales Better Choices for a Better Future Sustainable Development White Paper A Sustainable Wales - Better Choices for a Better Future.
Natural England State of the Natural Environment, Strategic Direction refresh, and Manifesto Dr Helen Phillips, Chief Executive, Natural England.
Guidance for AONB Partnership Members Welsh Member Training January 26/
Mid Wales LTP Stakeholder Workshop 3 rd October Presentation by Ann Elias and Janice Hughes.
WHO–ITU National eHealth Strategy Toolkit An effective approach to national Strategy Development and Implementation Clayton Hamilton WHO Regional Office.
FBAG Flood Risk Assessment and Mapping. Purpose Review role of FBAG sub-group Summarise research/project agenda.
Marine Planning: The role of the MMO and Partnerships Steve Brooker Head of Marine Planning.
Local Transport Plan 3 Vision and Issues. The Local Transport Plan Will replace LTP2, which expires 31 March must have LTP3 approved and operative.
UNEP Training Resource ManualTopic 1 Slide 1 Aims and objectives of EIA F modify and improve design F ensure efficient resource use F enhance social aspects.
Environment (Wales) Bill Legislation to sustainably manage Wales’ resources.
Current condition and Challenges for the Future Report s (Scotland and Solway Tweed)
Canada’s Ocean Strategy. The Oceans Act In 1997, Canada entrenched its commitment to our oceans by adopting the Oceans Act. In 1997, Canada entrenched.
1 Flood Issues Advisory Committee 5th October 2005 Flood Issues Advisory Committee 5th October 2005 Sustainable Flood Management Pilot Study Adrian Johnson.
Goals and Indicators. Sustainable Measures Goals, Principles, Criteria, and Indicators  Goal – a description of future condition community members wish.
Review of the implementation in England of the Habitats and Wild Birds Directives Nature Directors 23 May 2012 Robin Mortimer, Defra.
Introducing Regulatory Impact Analysis into the Turkish Legal Framework “Training the Trainers” November 2008 RIA in the EU by Lydia Jørgensen, Senior.
STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES.
FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT The next steps. The National Technical Advisory Group On Flooding Issues An Overview and the Future.
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
Community Resilience To Climate Change in Hawai`i 2009 Hawai`i Conservation Conference Hawai`i in a Changing Climate: Ecological, Economic, and Policy.
Irwell Catchment Pilot Katherine Causer January 2012.
Building Resilience Well-being of Future Generations Act and the Environment (Wales) Bill Emily Finney – Resilience Policy, Welsh Government.
1 UNEP/IETC EST Initiative Proposed Cooperation Framework 4 December 2003 Otsu, Japan.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
River Basin Management Planning Cath Preston Senior Planning Officer (River Basin Planning) 2 nd March 2006.
Social value reporting: An integrated approach John Maddocks – CIPFA
FBAG- Catchment Planning Floods Directive and Flooding Bill Flood Risk Management Planning.
DG ENV Environmental assessment procedures for energy infrastructure projects of common interest (PCIs)
Nigel Hannam and David Phillips Parish Conference – 11th September 2013 Balancing Development.
TRAP 5 th interregional meeting & Site Visits Limerick & Lough Derg, Ireland 9 th October 2013 CP3 GP6 Regional Planning Guidelines PP3 – Mid-West Regional.
Organizations of all types and sizes face a range of risks that can affect the achievement of their objectives. Organization's activities Strategic initiatives.
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
Building WFD into impact assessment Richard Sharp Geomorphology IEMA webinar Thursday 31 March 2016.
Projects, Events and Training
CRUE – The Way Forward Vicki Jackson
Slaughden SMP Policy Review
DG Environment, Nature Protection Unit (D3)
Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA)
References to Economic Instruments in Selected MEAs
Natural water Retention Measures
EU Marine Strategy DG Environment B.1.
Scottish Government Responsible for environment & flooding issues
© Fresh Thoughts Consulting
Presentation transcript:

1 NTAG 23/9/04: Progress Report from SFM Sub-Group NTAG2004(35) Paper: n Sub-Group tasked with: Defining sustainable flood management Developing a set of objectives and principles (Output is presented in Annex B) n To support this work, the Sub-Group has also given consideration to: Measuring progress against the objectives & principles through the use of indicators (Output is presented in Annex C & D)

2 SFM Sub-Group Outputs Definition Objectives Principles Overall Social Environmental Economic Future Generations 1. Scope 2. Policy 3. Responsibilities 4. Decision-making 5. Uncertainty 6. Resources 7. Options 8. Environment 9. Multiple Benefits 10. Openness 11. Democracy 12. Simplicity Measurement Indicators

3 SFM Sub-Group : the journey so far... n n Development of draft SFM definition, objectives and principles n n 17th June SNH seminar discussed “What is Sustainable Flood Management?” n n Language and content of definition, objectives & principles modified in light of seminar feedback n n Work on detailed meanings of objectives and principles n n Ideas for ‘valid’ and ‘measurable’ indicators (with reference to SE Sustainability Framework, Defra/EA guidance, and international best practice) n n Paper NTAG2004(35) is key output of this process

4 The SFM Sub-Group recommends that NTAG... n Agrees the definition of SFM (para 5) today n Agrees one overall objective and a further 4 equal objectives (para 7 of Annex B) today n Agrees 12 principles (para 8 of Annex B) today; and n Members offer corporate feedback on the detailed meaning of the objectives (para 13 of Annex D) by 31 October for a further draft.

5 Proposed (Final) Definition [NTAG2004(35) para 5] “Sustainable flood management provides the maximum possible social and economic resilience* against flooding, by protecting and working with the environment, in a way which is fair and affordable both now and in the future.” (* ‘resilience’ means: ‘able to recover quickly and easily’. The Executive uses it to deliver the ‘four As’: Awareness + Avoidance + Alleviation + Assistance.)

6 Purpose of Objectives & Principles n The SFM Definition, objectives and principles are intended for all stakeholders Objectives [Annex B para. 6] … objectives, which will: n act as a long-term vision, which can also encourage interactive learning and education on flood risk management; n etc … Principles n [para. 8] … set out how the objectives might be delivered. n Most of them include elements within the current LA’s duties and responsibilities, but: n in accordance with the long-term vision of the objectives they include wider issues - to encourage learning and education. n Key issue for future development of Guidance for practitioners is to translate the principles into clear practical guidelines.

7 Draft objectives for SFM [Annex B para 7] n Overall objective: Meet needs for resilience against flooding. n To meet this overall objective, the following needs must be balanced: Social – enhance community benefit, with fair outcomes for everyone; Environmental – protect and work with the environment, with respect for all species, habitats and landscapes; Economic – deliver resilience at affordable cost (construction, maintenance, running and renewal); with fair economic outcomes and the protection of local jobs and wealth; Future generations – allow for future uncertainty (the ‘precautionary principle’), with a fair balance between meeting present needs and those of future generations.

8 Draft Principles for SFM [Annex B para 8] n [Scope] This framework of definition, objectives and principles for sustainable flood management (SFM), and the measurement indicators attached, apply equally to all types of flooding: surface, sewer, river, estuarine and coastal. n [Policy] SFM should reflect a strategic approach both nationally and locally, with phasing if appropriate. It should incorporate the WFD principles of integrated management for all water bodies, and planned ‘control at source’ (ie. prevention of risk) through the use of SPP7 planning controls. n [Responsibilities] All stakeholders share responsibility for achieving SFM. They are expected to collaborate constructively to meet SFM objectives, with the lead taken by the appropriate party(ies) according to their statutory, legal, common law or commercial role(s).

n [Decision-making] Sustainability issues should be considered from the earliest stages of investigating options. A whole-life (construction, maintenance, running and renewal) view of the costs and benefits is essential, each option requiring an assessment of sustainability. Decision-making tools will include, but not be limited to, Cost Benefit Analysis and should make the ‘values’ applied explicit. n [Uncertainty] A long-term view of sustainability means taking account of future uncertainties, including climate and societal change. It also requires explicit consideration of the implications of flood events that exceed design limits. n [Resources] Resources should be used sustainably. n [Options] All possible options for flood management should be considered including, through to full evaluation, at least one option that represents a ‘most sustainable benchmark’, addressing all four ‘A’s: Awareness, Avoidance, Alleviation and Assistance, even if regulatory or legal barriers appear to block implementation. Draft Principles for SFM [Annex B para 8]

10 n [Environment] Biodiversity and landscapes should be protected and enhanced (wherever possible) and negative impacts avoided. n [Multiple Benefits] SFM should seek opportunities for multiple benefits wherever possible, and seek other relevant funding sources. n [Openness] The whole SFM process should be transparent; and there should be a common, shared source of information, which all stakeholders can access and learn from. n [Democracy] Implementation of SFM should maximise community engagement. Decisions should be taken at the local level, as far as possible, and reflect local community ‘Agenda 21’ or similar sustainability objectives. n [Simplicity] Implementation of SFM should be understandable, and should aim for ease of delivery, with self-correcting and learning behaviour, and sharing of knowledge. Draft Principles for SFM [Annex B para 8]

11 Detailed Meanings and Measuring Performance of Objectives [Annex D] n n Objectives 2, 3, & 5 each have two components; Objective 4 has three components n n 10 tables presented in Annex D with the following headings for each objective: Detailed meaning Measurement Indicators - ideas for proposal level National Scale Measure - overall measure of progress (notes from Sub-Group members) n n The intended audience for the “Definition & Objectives” is all stakeholders - not only as guidance for practitioners - and so... n n Detailed meanings are proposed to clarify what facts we need to know about any SFM proposals to effectively assess progress against objectives or compliance with principles (i.e. to tell us what we would really need to measure) [validity]. n n Agreement of the detailed meanings will enable the ideas on measurement indicators to be progressed [measurement].

12 Detailed Meanings of Objectives Objective 1 [Annex D] n n Objective 1: Overall - Meet needs for resilience against flooding. n n Detailed Meaning: Reduce the total sum of flooding impacts over time, to an agreed level. Specifically: (i) Personal social impact (death and injury, evacuation, shock, and distress); (ii) Potential damage to property; (iii) Personal (travel) interruptions; and (iv) Lost production and sales.

13 Detailed Meanings of Objectives Objective 2 [Annex D] n n Objective 2(a): Social: Enhance community benefit with fair outcomes for everyone. n n Detailed Meaning: (i) Benefits from physical improvements to the urban and rural environment, (ii) The increase in community responsibility and self-help generated (e.g. the ‘Boscastle effect’ but pre-flooding). The challenge is to establish an indicator that can effectively capture the diversity of ‘social capital’ in perceived benefits and individual responses.

14 Detailed Meanings of Objectives Objective 2 [Annex D] n n Objective 2(b): Social: Enhance community benefit with fair outcomes for everyone. n n Detailed Meaning: This requires that: (i) All those at risk have appropriate access to the benefits of SFM (reduced impacts); and (ii) Payment (whether by Local Authority tax, direct flood- proofing, insurance, etc.) by those at risk should be in proportion to the level of benefits they receive.

15 Detailed Meanings of Objectives Objective 3 [Annex D] n n Objective 3(a): Environment - protect and work with the environment with respect for all species, habitats and landscapes n n Detailed Meaning: The individual elements are to: (i) Protect the water environment (quality and quantity); and (ii) Minimise emissions of greenhouse gases

16 Detailed Meanings of Objectives Objective 3 [Annex D] n n Objective 3(b): Environment - protect and work with the environment with respect for all species, habitats and landscapes n n Detailed Meaning: This includes: (i) Delivering Biodiversity Plan targets, (ii) Protecting and/or improving water courses, ecological habitats and landscapes (geomorphology)

17 Detailed Meanings of Objectives Objective 3 [Annex D] n n Objective 4(a): Economic - deliver resilience at affordable cost (construction, maintenance, running and renewal), with fair economic outcomes, and the protection of local jobs and wealth n n Detailed Meaning: Deliver SFM for lowest whole life cost of alleviation (capital costs, operation & maintenance, replacement, individual response funding and compensation), plus awareness, avoidance, and assistance costs.

18 Detailed Meanings of Objectives Objective 4 [Annex D] n n Objective 4(b): Economic - deliver resilience at affordable cost (construction, maintenance, running and renewal), with fair economic outcomes, and the protection of local jobs and wealth n n Detailed Meaning: Note: Nature causes flooding; human infrastructure and intervention causes its negative impacts [it is difficult to identify flood ‘causers’] This requires: (i) A statement of the main causes of the flood impacts, which are to be reduced; (ii) A statement of who pays the costs; and (iii) A comparison and judgement on ‘fairness’

19 Detailed Meanings of Objectives Objective 4 [Annex D] n n Objective 4(c): Economic - deliver resilience at affordable cost (construction, maintenance, running and renewal), with fair economic outcomes, and the protection of local jobs and wealth n n Detailed Meaning: This includes: (i) the impact on jobs protected, and (ii) wealth generated for local community.

20 Detailed Meanings of Objectives Objective 5 [Annex D] n n Objective 5(a): Future - Allow for future uncertainty (the ‘precautionary principle’) with a fair balance between meeting present needs and those of future generations n n Detailed Meaning: This needs to take account of: (i) Allowance for increased rainfall (as a result of climate change) (ii) Allowance for increased or decreased catchment response (i.e. change in the run-off coefficient (iii) ‘Headroom’ potential, as the net result of both

21 Detailed Meanings of Objectives Objective 5 [Annex D] n n Objective 5(b): Future - Allow for future uncertainty (the ‘precautionary principle’) with a fair balance between meeting present needs and those of future generations n n Detailed Meaning: This must take account of: (i) Flood plain capacity for flood response - in terms of storage capacity and channel capacity (ii) Future affordability of continuing resilience (iii) Fail safe provision for design flood exceedence

22 Recommended Next Steps... n n Following feedback from members, produce a further draft of the indicators for comment n n Seek detailed comments on definition, objectives & principles, indicators from other stakeholders n n Prepare paper by Executive for public consultation n n Members consider how this work might be piloted n n Members consider how to take forward findings of Systems Dynamics research.