Environmental Economics Sedef Akgüngör Class 3. Measuring Benefits Efficiency framework. Are we polluting too much? The answer depends on the MB of pollution.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Costs and Benefits.
Advertisements

Public Goods & Externalities
A Few Basic Principles of Economic Valuation of Ecosystem Services John Loomis Dept. of Ag & Resource Economics Colorado State University’ Fort Collins,
A spillover cost or benefit that accrues from the consumption or production of a good. An externality is an effect on others who did not have a choice.
ECON 6012 Cost Benefit Analysis Memorial University of Newfoundland
1) Introduction Prior to the Exxon Valdez oil spill, the estimation of passive use value, was an area of economic research not well known. However, based.
Economic Analysis March 2004 Maine Economic Principles.
Environmental of Impacts
Assessing Benefits for Environmental Decision Making
Assessing Benefits for Environmental Decision Making Chapter 8 © 2007 Thomson Learning/South-WesternThomas and Callan, Environmental Economics.
BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS
Economics 101: How to Measure Indirect Values Benjamin S. Rashford Agricultural and Applied Economics University of Wyoming.
Valuing the Environment What exactly do economists mean when they talk about “valuing the environment” in monetary terms?
Chapter 23, Ecological Economics, Daly & Farley.  Economists suggest we find monetary values for these goods and then use the market to efficiently allocate.
CONCEPTS of VALUE. FACTORS OF VALUE UTILITY –THE ABILITY OF A PRODUCT TO SATISFY HUMAN WANTS. RELATES TO THE DAMAND SIDE OF THE MARKET. SCARCITY –THE.
317_L24, Mar 11/08, J. Schaafsma 1 Review of the Last Lecture are discussing shadow pricing in the context of cost-benefit analysis noted that shadow pricing.
 Homework #2 due Thursday  Exam #1 on Thursday  Writing Assignment due Oct. 27th.
Efficiency and Surplus How can economics help determine the optimal size of a project or extent of a regulation?
1 Travel Costs Scott Matthews Courses: and Lecture /25/2004.
Evaluating the environment Gauri-Shankar Guha. Dr. Gauri-Shankar Guha ASU - Econ Evaluating the Environment For the individual, economic values.
The Economic Theory of Pollution Control
Agenda Benefits Overview Travel Cost Method Random Utility Models
Travel Costs Lecture 12 October 9, /
AGEC/FNR 406 LECTURE 14 Pesticide Runoff Potential from Field Crops.
AGEC 608 Lecture 14, p. 1 AGEC 608: Lecture 14 Objective: Provide overview of contingent valuation method (CVM) and review strengths and weaknesses of.
The Economic Approach to Environmental and Natural Resources, 3e
Assessing Costs and Benefits of Environmental Policies & Regulations.
Valuation Methods focus on conventional market approaches Session Objectives: Identify key steps in valuing the environment Use selected methods to analyze.
ENVIRONMENTAL RIGHTS ARE HUMAN RIGHTS
 Homework #8 due Next Thursday  Group Outline due Nov. 11 (next Thurs.)
Environmental Economics Market & Policy Failures Harvard Summer School June 29, 2011.
Cost-Benefit Analysis I PAI 723 Economics for Public Decisions 11/19/
Chapter 5 Valuing Benefits and Costs in Secondary Markets
Econ 231: Natural Resources and Environmental Economics SCHOOL OF APPLIED ECONOMICS.
Environmental economics 2. 2 different approaches Ecological paradigm: concerned with the health and survival of ecosystems Economic paradigm: concerned.
Chapter 3 MEASURING RISK Decisions in life ruled by Risk and Cost Take Hwy at 70 or side road at 35? How likely will someone or something be hurt? How.
Cost-Benefit & Risk Analysis in Public Policy
Welfare economics Outline Expressing changes in human well-being (utility) in monetary terms Deciding between monetary measures that are equally theoretically.
Ecosystem Valuation Ecosystems offer benefits to current and future generations. Ecosystem services are defined as the flow of benefits from nature to.
Introduction to Cost-Benefit Analysis: Using Market Prices
Economics and Conservation, 2 Fri. April. 29. REVIEW: Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA) Overview Political observation – CBA was mandated for all new USA policies.
Lecture 11: Valuation of Environmental Amenities
Contingent valuation: how accurate is it when valuing impacts on property values? Judith Callanan RMIT University Melbourne, Australia.
General Equilibrium and the Efficiency of Perfect Competition
Sustainability Issues
6. Values and externalities Joint Nature Conservation Committee.
Risk and Human Health. Environmental Risk Analysis Comparing the risk of a situation to its benefits Allows people to evaluate and deal with consequences.
Ecosystem Valuation Social and Environmental Aspects Kathryn Benson CE 397 November 25, 2003.
Outline of presentation Travel cost method – concept, example, assumptions Consumer surplus related to TCM Visitor’s table Demand curve Concerns regarding.
Science and the Environment. The Environment  What do you think of when your hear the word “environment”?
The way to help planet Earth
Contingent Valuation Methods See Boardman et al., Chapter 14 Interview individuals to elicit their preferences for different states of the world. Based.
Environmental Economics Class 4. Valuing the Environment: Methods Methodologies available for quantifying benefits and costs. Valuation techniques available.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 3 Valuing the Environment: Methods.
Measuring Environmental Benefits. In principle, benefits can be represented by consumer surplus, or the area under the demand curve: Market good sold.
The Value of Ecosystem Services: Principles for Valuing Fish Habitat Daniel D. Huppert School of Marine Affairs University of Washington.
Chapter 27 Dollars and Environmental Sense: Economics of Environmental Issues.
Assessing Benefits for Environmental Decision Making Chapter 7.
Market Failure syllabus Candidates should be able to: Define market failure Assess different types of market failure - externalities, under-provision.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
Project update Each step builds on the previous step Each step builds on the previous step Your problem statement uses your literature review to tell a.
Nonmarket Values Property, ideas and experiences can have “value” even if not exchanged in a market.
Chapter 3 Section 3. Market Failure – A situation in which the market doesn’t distribute resources efficiently. Public Good – A shared good or service.
Economic valuation OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Economic Valuation of Environment: Overview
Economic Valuation of Environmental attributes Larry Dwyer Qantas Professor of Travel and Tourism Economics School of Marketing University of New South.
Introduction to Economics What do you think of when you think of economics?
Economic Valuation of Coastal Resources in Latin America and the Caribbean Lee G. Anderson George R. Parsons University of Delaware.
Think … Share 1 2 Chapter one Environmental Economics Applying Economic tools on Environmental.
A Quick Intro to Non-Market Valuation
Presentation transcript:

Environmental Economics Sedef Akgüngör Class 3

Measuring Benefits Efficiency framework. Are we polluting too much? The answer depends on the MB of pollution reduction and MC of pollution reduction. Determining the level of optimal pollution level. Accurate measures of benefits and costs of pollution reduction.

How much would you be willing to pay to save the snow leopard from extinction? It may surprise you to know that asking questions like this is one of the best ways economists have for working out what the environment is worth. The spontaneous answer you and others give to such a question may determine whether a forest is protected.

The whole project of integrating environmental and economic goals seems to depend on one proposition: that it is possible and desirable to attach monetary values to separate parts of the environment

This proposition is being promoted by a group of economists, who call themselves environmental economists. Responding to environmental crises that have emerged in recent years they have adapted traditional economic models and theories to take account of the environment.

They believe that giving the environment a monetary value is the only way to ensure that decision-makers in government and business consider the environment when they made their decisions.

These environmental economists of the neoclassical school argue that the market would protect the environment if everyone had to take account of these "externalities" or environmental costs. And what is the best way to do that? By putting a price on the environment.

They say that unless the environment is valued in monetary terms it will be neglected. Managers and politicians are used to dealing with monetary values and can more easily relate to them. For instance, the benefits from preserving a wetland can be compared with the benefits of filling it in and building a housing estate if each option is given a monetary value.

Once the various parts of the environment are given a price then all sorts of decisions are affected. National accounts can be adjusted to take account of environmental resources lost in the process of generating wealth. In this way measures such as GNP and GDP will give a better indication of the true wealth of a nation.

Similarly cost-benefit analyses used to decide whether government projects should go ahead can include quantified environmental costs and this means that governments will give more weight to environmental considerations when they decide if the project should go ahead.

Brundtland Comission (1987) and the Rio Convention Agenda 21 have focused on sustainable development issues and putting value on environmental improvements.

Benefits Market benefits –Cleaning up a river: Market benefits: increases in fish harvest, greater number of tourists, fewer medical expenses Nonmarket benefits –Recreational use of the river; enjoyment of the diversity in the river. The question is: How much money would the people be willing to pay?

Putting a Monetary Value on Environmental Goods Is one value better than no value? Is some number better than no number?

Example: Brasil Water Sanitation Example A study in Brasil used a valuation approach that focused on asking people either directly what they are willing to pay, or less directly what their choices would be if they were faced with certain prices for the service in question. The question: “if you are required to pay X, would yu connect to the new suppy or use an alternative supply?”

Example: Korup National Park in Cameroon Africa’s oldest rainforest. Over 1000 species of plant, 1300 animal species (60 occur in nowhere else and 170 are currently listed as endangered). WWF initiated a programme for conservation

Korup Project: Benefits and Costs Cost of conservation Project: –Resource costs : –Foregone forest costs Timber: -353 Forest products: -223 Total costs:: Benefits of Conservation Project –Direct use benefits Use of forest products: 354 Tourism: 680 –Indirect use benefits Protection of fisheries: 1770 Flood control: 265 Soil productivity: 130 Total benefits: 3199 Net benefits: Net benefits when the discount rate is 6% : $ 319

Valuing Benefits for Risk Management The difficulties in estimating physical damages If they can be estimated, the next step is to try to place a monetary value on them. The complexities of assigning monetary value

Types of Values 1. Use value 2. Option value 3. Non use value Total WTP

Use Value: Use value reflects the willingness to pay for direct use of the environmental resource. to use something simply requires one of the senses to be active (sight, sound, touch, taste or smell). Hearing noise pollution, seeing a grizzly bear, eating freshly caught fish, consuming water for drinking or swimming, taking in a vista while hiking and touching your feet to the trail, smelling flowers or smelling foul air. All of these constitute some kind of use of natural resources and the environment. Distinguishing between active use (consumptive) and passive use (nonconsumptive)

Option Value: Option value is the willingness to pay for the future ability to use the environment. This is the value people place on having the option to use or ensuring something exists for potential future use. Do you plan to go to Yellowstone National Park next summer? NO?? Would you ever like to go? Yes?? Place a value on the park to ensure it will still exist when one does want to go.

Nonuse Value: Nonuse value represents an individuals’ willingness to pay to preserve a resource that he or she will never use. These values are often called existence values. This is a very different category of value and, of course, represents the most problematic as well as controversial to monetize. These are less tangible values, but can be quite large.

Total Willingness to Pay (TWP): Total Willingness to Pay = Use Value + Option Value + Nonuse Value.

The Concept of Consumer Surplus Consumer surplus: Difference between what is one willing to pay and what one actually pays. Willingness to pay for one extra unit of pollution reduction Divergence between willingness to pay and willingness to accept.

People are more willing to sacrifice to maintaion the existing quality of the environment than they are to improve environmental quality. –Prospect theory Risk assessment and perception

Contingent Valuation Asking people their WTP or WTA Survey responses are contingent upon the questions aske Sources of possible errors: –Potential for free riding –Strategic bias –Hypothetical nature –Embedding bias

CV: A Sample Survey “This research is designed to more closely examine some of the trade-offs between industrial development, recreation, and the environment in the Lake Powell area. In connection with these objectives, I would like to ask you a few questions to see how you feel about environmental quality and its future in this area. There are plans to construct a large electric generating plant north of Lake Powell. This plant is expected to be at least as large as the Navajo Plant on the south side of the lake. Have you noticed the Navajo Plant or its smokestacks? _____ Yes ____No

Depending on exactly where and how a new plant is constructed, it could have a significant effect on the quality of the environment. If the plant is built near the lake, it could be visible for many miles up and down the lake. If air pollution is not strictly controlled, visibility in the area may be significantly affected. These photographs (interviewer shows photographs) are designed to show how a new powerplant on the north side of the lake might appear.

Situation A shows a possible plant site but assumes that the powerplant would be built at some distant location, not visible from the lake area. In situation B the powerplant is easily seen from the lake, but emits very little smoke; visibility is virtually unaffected. Situation C is intended to show the situation with the greatest impact on the environment of recreationists in the area. It is easily seen from the lake, and the smoke substantially reduces visibility.

Vacationers, of course, spend considerable amounts of money and time and effort to equip themselves with vehicles, boats, camping, and fishing gear, and for traveling to the destination of their choice. It is reasonable to assume that the amount of money you are willing to spend for a recreational experience depends, among other things, on the quality of the experience you expect.

An improved experience would be expected to be of greater value to you than a degraded one. Since it does cost money to improve the environment, we would like to get an estimate of how much a better environment is worth to you.

First, let’s assume that visitors to the Glen Canyon National Recreation Area are to finance environmental improvements by paying an entrance fee to be admitted into the recreation area. This will be the only way to finance such improvements in the area. Let’s also assume that all visitors to the area will pay the same daily fee as you, and all the money collected will be used to finance the environmental improvements shown in the photos.

Would you be willing to pay a $1.00 per day fee to prevent Situation C from occurring, thus preserving Situation A? $2.00 per day? (increment by $1.00 per day until a negative response is obtained, then decrease the bid by 25 cents per day until a positive response is obtained, and record the amount.) _________$/day

Would you be willing to pay a $1.00 per day fee to prevent Situation B from occurring, thus preserving Situation A? (repeat bidding procedure) (Answer only if a zero bid was recorded for either question above.) Did you bid zero because you believe that: ________ the damage is not significant ________ it is unfair or immoral to expect the victim of the damage to have to pay the costs of preventing the damage ________ other

Travel Cost Measure the benefits associated with recreational resources

Example A site used mainly for recreational fishing is threatened by development in the surrounding area. Pollution and other impacts from this development could destroy the fish habitat at the site, resulting in a serious decline in, or total loss of, the site’s ability to provide recreational fishing services. A site used mainly for recreational fishing is threatened by development in the surrounding area. Pollution and other impacts from this development could destroy the fish habitat at the site, resulting in a serious decline in, or total loss of, the site’s ability to provide recreational fishing services. Resource agency staff want to determine the value of programs or actions to protect fish habitat at the site.

The first step involved with the TCM is the creation of a trip generating function. In an actual travel cost study, this stage could not take place before a certain amount of thought and research concerning the goals and form of the study, and a significant amount of data collection work.

Hedonic Regression Changes in prices of related goods to infer the WTP for healthier environment.

Take, for example, the housing market in two cities with different levels of air quality. Demand 1 represents the dirty air city and demand 2 represents the clean air city. The price differential, dP, is the marginal willingness to pay (in higher housing prices) for the difference in air quality.

These price differentials can be estimated using regression methods. Imagine that you collect data on housing prices in a local market (these are recorded in the courthouse after the sale) and the characteristics of the house (square footage, lot size, etc.). You are also able to merge in other variables such as school district, local tax rates, and other “neighborhood” characteristics.

Risk Assessment The purpose of risk assessment is to determine if a substance is harmful to a given population and at what degree of exposure or concentration.

In the context of public health, risk assessment is the process of quantifying the probability of a harmful effect to individuals or populations from certain human activities. In most countries, the use of specific chemicals, or the operations of specific facilities (e.g. power plants, manufacturing plants) is not allowed unless it can be shown that they do not increase the risk of death or illness above a specific threshold. public healthpublic health

The most typical four components in risk assessment are:  1. Hazard identification: does human or ecological exposure cause harm?  2. Dose-response assessment: what is the relationship between the strength and duration of exposure and the detrimental health effect. Age, gender and lifestyle are factored in at this stage as well as information on animal exposure.  3. Exposure assessment: at what intensity is the population exposed to the agent and at what duration and frequency?  4. Risk characterization: what is the overall effect of an agent on a given population based on 1-3 above.