RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW CDR 2009 9/30-10/1 27 EFW Science Overview Professor John R. Wygant (PI) University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Electron Acceleration in the Van Allen Radiation Belts by Fast Magnetosonic Waves Richard B. Horne 1 R. M. Thorne 2, S. A. Glauert 1, N. P. Meredith 1.
Advertisements

1 FIREBIRD Science Overview Marcello Ruffolo Nathan Hyatt Jordan Maxwell 2 August 2013FIREBIRD Science.
EFW Operational Modes RBSP SWG San Antonio September 2014.
ESS 7 Lecture 14 October 31, 2008 Magnetic Storms
Paul T.M. Loto’aniu 1,2 and H.J. Singer 1 NOAA Space Environment Center 1 CIRES, University of Colorado 2 Paul T.M. Loto’aniu 1,2 and H.J. Singer 1 NOAA.
Modeling Generation and Nonlinear Evolution of VLF Waves for Space Applications W.A. Scales Center of Space Science and Engineering Research Virginia Tech.
Modeling Generation and Nonlinear Evolution of Plasma Turbulence for Radiation Belt Remediation Center for Space Science & Engineering Research Virginia.
Over View of CASCADES-2 Fields Data. VLF Data Only presenting from the AFT payload Mostly the sphere-to-sphere channels Future Work –Interpayload interferometry.
Lecture 3 Introduction to Magnetic Storms. An isolated substorm is caused by a brief (30-60 min) pulse of southward IMF. Magnetospheric storms are large,
Plasma Dynamics Lab HIBP Abstract Measurements of the radial equilibrium potential profiles have been successfully obtained with a Heavy Ion Beam Probe.
Magnetospheric Morphology Prepared by Prajwal Kulkarni and Naoshin Haque Stanford University, Stanford, CA IHY Workshop on Advancing VLF through the Global.
Science Questions What is responsible for the "near" prompt onset of convection in the inner magnetosphere? Fast mode rarefraction wave?. How is the dayside.
Tuija I. Pulkkinen Finnish Meteorological Institute Helsinki, Finland
Stuart D. BaleFIELDS iCDR – Science Requirements Solar Probe Plus FIELDS Instrument CDR Science and Instrument Overview Science Requirements Stuart D.
Numerical simulations are used to explore the interaction between solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and the structured, ambient global solar wind flow.
Nonlinear VLF Wave Physics in the Radiation Belts Chris Crabtree Guru Ganguli Erik Tejero Naval Research Laboratory Leonid Rudakov Icarus Research Inc.
EFW Data Products/Processing Van Allen Probe SWG San Antonio September 2104 J.R. Wygant, J. Bonnell, Aaron Breneman, S. Thaller and the EFW Team.
20 September 2005Double Star -Cluster Noordwijk Sept WBD Studies of AKR: Coordinated Observations of Aurora and the SAKR – Ion Hole Connection R.
1 Barry Mauk, Nicola Fox, David Sibeck, Shrikanth Kanekal, Joseph Grebowsky, Ramona Kessel RBSP Project Science Team This document has been reviewed for.
Stuart D. BaleFIELDS iPDR – Science Requirements Solar Probe Plus FIELDS Instrument PDR Science and Instrument Overview Science Requirements Stuart D.
© 2008 The Aerospace Corporation Workshop on Coupling of Thunderstorms and Lightning to Near-Earth Space University of Corsica, June 2008 SAMPEX.
Cluster photoemission Aug 24, 2011.
STAMMS Conference Meeting, Orleans, France May 2003 R. L. Mutel, D. A. Gurnett, I. Christopher, M. Schlax University of Iowa Spatial and Temporal Properties.
Large-Amplitude Electric Fields Associated with Bursty Bulk Flow Braking in the Earth’s Plasma Sheet R. E. Ergun et al., JGR (2014) Speaker: Zhao Duo.
Space Science MO&DA Programs - September Page 1 SS It is known that the aurora is created by intense electron beams which impact the upper atmosphere.
Kinetic-scale electric field structures at plasma boundaries in the inner magnetosphere (including injection fronts) David Malaspina 1, John Wygant 2,
Injections of MeV particles via intense substorm electric fields Lei Dai, John Wygant and EFW team. EFW/BARREL Science team meeting, June, 2014 Minnesota.
On the Role of Electric Field Changes when Calculating Thunderstorm Currents Yu.V. Shlugaev, V.V. Klimenko, E.A. Mareev Institute of Applied Physics RAS,
Observing ion cyclotron waves M. R. Lessard, M. Widholm, P. Riley, H. Kim M. J. Engebretson University of New Hampshire Augsburg College NSF Workshop on.
Scott Thaller Van Allen Probes EFW meeting University of Minnesota June 10-12, 2014.
A. Vaivads, M. André, S. Buchert, N. Cornilleau-Wehrlin, A. Eriksson, A. Fazakerley, Y. Khotyaintsev, B. Lavraud, C. Mouikis, T. Phan, B. N. Rogers, J.-E.
1 MAVEN PFP ICDR May 23-25, 2011 Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN (MAVEN) Mission Particles and Fields Science Critical Design Review May ,
7 3-4 Sept EFW INST+SOC PDR EFW Science Overview Professor John R. Wygant (PI) University of Minnesota.
Catalogued parameters… Current sheet normal vector and velocity, derived using a timing analysis. Later used to calculate an accurate measure of current.
Radiation Storms in the Near Space Environment Mikhail Panasyuk, Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics of Lomonosov Moscow State University.
SWGTemplate- 1 UCB, Nov 15/16, 2006 THEMIS SCIENCE WORKING TEAM MEETING Search Coil Magnetometer (SCM) team Co-i: A. Roux, O. Le Contel Technical Manager(*):
Dec 1, FIELDS Top Level Requirements Review S. Harris (UCB)
Multi-point observations of dispersionless injection fronts inside geostationary orbit: propagation and structure Authors (preliminary) David Malaspina.
End-to-End Overview of Hazardous Radiation Len Fisk University of Michigan.
NASA NAG Structure and Dynamics of the Near Earth Large-Scale Electric Field During Major Geomagnetic Storms P-I John R. Wygant Assoc. Professor.
EFW SOC DATA John Wygant SWG June Redondo Beach.
-1- Solar wind turbulence from radio occultation data Chashei, I.V. Lebedev Physical Institute, Moscow, Russia Efimov, A.I., Institute of Radio Engineering.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW I-PER 21 January EFW Flight Software Summary Peter Harvey Space Sciences.
Radiation Belt Storm Probes and Space Weather D. G. Sibeck LWS Geospace Project Scientist.
Stuart D. BaleFIELDS SOC CDR – Science Requirements Solar Probe Plus FIELDS SOC CDR Science and Instrument Overview Science Requirements Stuart D. Bale.
SST- Solid State Telescope ESA - Electrostatic Analyzer Science Measurement and Operational Requirements.
Nonlinear electric field structures in the inner magnetosphere D. M. Malaspina 1, L. Andersson 1, R. E. Ergun 1, J. R. Wygant 2, J. W. Bonnell 3, C. Kletzing.
The large scale convection electric field, ring current energization, and plasmasphere erosion in the June 1, 2013 storm Scott Thaller Van Allen Probes.
MULTI-INSTRUMENT STUDY OF THE ENERGY STEP STRUCTURES OF O + AND H + IONS IN THE CUSP AND POLAR CAP REGIONS Yulia V. Bogdanova, Berndt Klecker and CIS TEAM.
Kinetic Alfvén Waves in the Inner Magnetosphere Triggered by an Interplanetary Shock David Malaspina 1, Seth Claudepierre 2, Kazue Takahashi 3, Allison.
RBSP MCR EFW- 1 JHUAPL, Jan 30, RBSP-EFW Radiation Belt Storm Probe Electric Field and Waves Instrument (EFW) PI: Prof. John Wygant, UMN
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW I-PER 21 January EFW Systems Engineering Michael Ludlam Space Sciences.
Profiles of density fluctuations in frequency range of (20-110)kHz Core density fluctuations Parallel flow measured by CHERS Core Density Fluctuations.
The Role of VLF Transmitters in Limiting the Earthward Penetration of Ultra-Relativistic Electrons in the Radiation Belts J. C. Foster, D. N. Baker, P.J.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW I-PER 21 January EFW Science Overview Professor John R. Wygant, PI University.
Source and seed populations for relativistic electrons: Their roles in radiation belt changes A. N. Jaynes1, D. N. Baker1, H. J. Singer2, J. V. Rodriguez3,4.
GOES Data Status Mutual Benefits of NASA THEMIS and NOAA GOES
Plasma Wave Excitation Regions in the Earth’s Global Magnetosphere
INSTRUMENT DATA PROCESSING UNIT (IDPU) REQUIREMENTS
Mission overview: two spacecraft that target key radiation belt regions with variable spacing
ARTEMIS – solar wind/ shocks
Solar Wind Core Electrons
Boom Electronics Board (BEB)
Solar Probe Plus FIELDS Instrument PSR - MEP Introduction
Operational Description
THEMIS INSTRUMENT TRAINING
THEMIS Electric Field Instrument
Image Stabilization System (ISS)
10.6 Fourier Transform Mass Spectrometry
Richard B. Horne British Antarctic Survey Cambridge UK
Presentation transcript:

RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1 27 EFW Science Overview Professor John R. Wygant (PI) University of Minnesota

RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1Wygant 28 Level-1 Mission Science Goals Provide understanding, ideally to the point of predictability of how populations of relativistic electrons and penetrating ions in space form or change in response to variable input from the sun Which physical processes produce radiation enhancement events? What are the dominant processes for relativistic electron loss? How do ring current and other geomagnetic processes affect radiation belt behavior? EFW measures DC electric fields, density, and waves responsible for the accelerations, loss, and structure of energetic charged particles

RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1Wygant 29 Level-1 Science Objectives EFW Measurements The RBSP mission will determine local steady and impulsive electric and magnetic fields …These products will enable the the scientific goals of determining convective and impulsive flows, determining properties of shock generated shock fronts… The RBSP mission will derive and determine spatial and temporal variations of electrostatic and electromagnetic field amplitudes, frequency, intensity, propagation direction, spatial distribution and temporal evolution with sufficient fidelity to calculate wave energy, polarization, saturation levels, coherence, wave normal angle, phase velocity, and wave number for a) VLF and ELF waves, and b) random, ULF, and quasi- periodic electromagnetic fluctuations. These products will enable the scientific goals of determining the types and characteristics of plasma waves causing particle energization and loss including wave growth rates; quantifying adiabatic and non-adiabatic mechanisms of energization and loss ; determining conditions that control the production and propagation of waves High time resolution burst electric and magnetic fild measurements will provide understanding of the role in the prompt acceleration and loss of energetic particles of non-linear interactions with discrete large amplitude wave structures.

RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1Wygant 30 EFW Instrument Overview RBSP EFW Features Four spin plane booms (2 x 40 m and 2x 50 m) Two spin axis stacer booms (2x6 m) Spherical sensors and preamplifiers near outboard tip of boom (400 kHz response) Flexible boom cable to power sensor electronics & return signals back to SC Sensors are current biased by instrument command to be within ~ 1 volt of ambient plasma potential. Main electronic box (sensor bias control filtering, A-D conversion, burst memory, diagnostics, mode commanding, TM formatting ) EFW Science quantities include: E-fields:(V1-V2, V3-V4, V5-V6) Interferometric timing: SC-sensor potential (V1s, V2s, V3s, V4s, V5s, V6s) SC Potential : (V1+V2)/2, (V3+V4)/2 Interface to EMFISIS instrument Electrostatic cleanliness spec: variations of potential across spacecraft surfaces smaller than 1 Volt. +Z Not to Scale

RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1Wygant 31 Mechanisms associated with energetic particle acceleration and transport (B. Mauk/APL) Cut-Away

RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1Wygant 32 Science Objective : Measure electric fields associated with a variety of mechanisms “causing particle energization and scattering” in the inner magnetosphere. These mechanisms include: – Energization by the large-scale “steady state and storm time convection E-field”. – Energization by substorm “transient fronts”propagating in from the tail. – “Radial diffusion of energetic particles” mediated by “ULF waves”. – Transport and energization by interplanetary “shock generated transient fronts.” – Adiabatic and non-adiabatic energization by “electromagnetic and electrostatic” waves and (“random”) structures. Level-1 Science and Measurement Objectives (1)

RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1Wygant 33 The shock induced magnetosonic wave created a 5 order of magnitude increase in 13 MeV electron fluxes in <100 seconds resulting in a new radiation belt that lasted two years The large scale electric field produced a ~70 kV potential drop between L=2 & L-4 and injected ring current plasma. dDst/dt= - 40 nT/hr MHD waves: an important mechanism for radially diffusing and energizing particles. CRRES measurements of the E-field during a pass through the inner magnetosphere: interplanetary shock induced electric field, large scale MHD waves, and enhancement in convection electric field. E-Fields in the Active Radiation Belt

RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1Wygant 34 EFW Targeted Energization/Transport Mechanisms and Structures

RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1Wygant 35 Primary Measurement Requirements Flow to Instrument

RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1Wygant 36 Electric Fields & Waves Driving Requirements Spin plane component of E-field at DC-15 Hz (>0.3 mV/m or 10% sensitivity) over a range from 0 to 500 mV/m at R>3.5 Re … (IPLD 38) Spin axis component of E at DC-15 Hz (>4 mV/m or 20% sensitivity) over a range from mV/m at R>3.5Re (IPLD 44) Spacecraft potential measurements providing estimates of cold plasma densities of 0.1 to ~50 cm-3 at 1-s cadence (dn/n<50%) (IPLD 55) Programmable high time resolutions burst recordings of large amplitude (Req.: mV/m capability: 0-4V/m) E- fields ; B-fields and cold electron density variations cm-3 with sensitivity of 10% (derived from SC potential) over frequency range from dc to 250 Hz (IPLD 42,47,71, 59) Burst Interferometric timing of intense ( mV/m) small scale electric field structures and non-linear waves: timing accuracy of.06 ms for velocities of structures over km/s (IPLD 61) Broad Band Filters (8 freq bins-peak or average) power in wave electric field at 8 samples/s. Burst Triggers/Selection Diagnostic; Solitary Wave Counter: Burst Diagnostic ( IPLD 42,47,71,59,61 ) Spectra & Cross Spectra of average/peak electric and magnetic fluctuations from 1 Hz to 300 Hz with a cadence of 1/8 seconds over a range 80 dB as a diagnostic of large amplitude wave properties over orbital scales. (IPLD 66,68). Low noise 3-D E-field waveforms to EMFISIS: 10 Hz to 400 kHz; maximum signal 30 mV/m. For spin plane sensors: range of 100 dB & sensitivities of 3 x V2/m2Hz at 1 kHz and 3 x V2/m2Hz at 100 kHz. For spin axis sensor pairs: range x 10 less & sensitivity x 100 less (IPLD 245, 246)

RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1Wygant 37 Observations of large amplitude turbulent electric fields  E~+/-500 mV/m Duration of spike Hz Polarized perpendicular to B  B~0.5 nT (not shown) Hodograms for E and B Complicated quasi 3D structure full 3D and 3DB Waves electrostatic with phase fronts ~perp to B Large amplitude thermal plasma variations measured from SC potential variations:Result in order of magnitude changes in index of refraction wave time scales: trapping motivates SC potential measurements Position R=5.2, Mlat 25 deg, MLT=0.5 Observed during nearly conjugate ~400 keV electron microburst interval by low altitude SAMPEX. Polar Observations of Intense Waves Motivating High Time Resolution Burst Measurements

RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1Wygant 38 EFW Burst Modes 1 and 2 In order to obtain high time resolution measurements of small scale waves and structures and not exceed its TM allocation the EFW instrument has two Bursts Modes with different memories and different means of selecting and playing back data: 1)Burst 1: Nominal sampling 512 samples/s of 3D E-field and 3D Search Coil (from EMFISIS), Spacecraft Potential Density (Thermal Plasma Fluctuations). 32 Gigabytes of Memory. Filled in ~40 days. During TM contacts low rate survey data is sent to ground. Then over several days survey data is evaluated by EFW scientist for time intervals of substorm injections, shocks, and other structures driving waves. Desired burst times and priority are up-linked and the instrument forms a queue and sends data down. Autonomous modes and commanded time tagged triggers available. (7.5% duty cycle) 2) Burst 2: Interferometric Timing Measurements from Single ended measurements. (6.5 kHz time resolution). Autonomously triggered off large amplitude excursions using on board signals from DCB (~200 Mbytes). Bursts placed in queue on basis of “best trigger quality” and best played first. No human intervention (0.1% duty cycle) 3)Diagnostic context for burst data over orbital scales is provided by spectra and cross spectra of E and B, broad band filters/peak detectors, and solitary wave counters. 4)Information on burst status is provided to other instruments via burst status word via Spacecraft

RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1Wygant 39 EFW Block Diagram

RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1Wygant 40 Functional Block Diagram Potential of sensor relative to SC measured with high input impedance preamplifier near sensor. Current biasing of sensors controls operating point on I/V curve of sphere-plasma sheath decreasing source impedance by 2 orders of magnitude and fixes floating potential of sphere Voltage biasing of surfaces of preamplifier housing (guard and usher) controls flow of photo-current to sensor from booms and housing- decreasing major error source Thin wire to sphere has small surface area--further decreases photo-electrons error source. Pre-amplifier near sphere drives for long cable. Sets 400 kHz freq response of high frequency signal to EMFISIS. Boom Electronics Board (BEB) provides bias signals, power to sensor via cable. Receives E-field signals from 6 sensors.Tranfers signals to Digitial Filter Board in our instrument. Sends 3 differential E-field signals to the EMFISIS instrument (10 Hz to 400 kHz). Digital Filter Board (DFB): analog circuitry create differential signals and high frequency (6.5 kHz)anti-aliasing filtering. Receives Search Coil ( Hz) and Flux gate signals (dc -10 Hz from EMFISIS (3 signals). All Signals sampled by two 16 bit A-D converters providing sufficient dynamic range. Lower Frequency Nyquist Filtering done by algorithms implemented in FPGA on DFB. E and B Spectra, and Cross Spectra between E and B are provided by DFB as context for burst wave forms. Fast Broad Band Filters provide triggers for Bursts and a further high time resolution context.

RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1Wygant 41 Functional Block Diagram (2) Digital Control Board: Commands current and voltage biasing of sensors by BEB Controls DFB sampling formats, filtering, rates. Commands DFB spectra & cross- spectra calculations Controls triggering, storing, and play back of high time resolution burst data in SDRAM and large Flash memory. Supports human selected burst, bursts autonomously triggered by large amplitude signals, and time-tagged bursts. Spin fits from probes provide high quality 2 D electric field vector (removes offsets) in spin plane. This is an input to space weather and provides high quality E-field survey data for burst selection on ground. Supports compression, formating, and transfer of science data to spacecraft. A variety of other engineering functions discussed in detail by Ludlam, Gordon, and Harvey

RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1Wygant 42 EFW Space Weather Data Products (IPLD 574) EFW will provide: 2D Spin Plane Vector Electric Field Cadence: 1 vector/spin (~12 sec) 2 components in despun coordinates Spacecraft Potential (estimate of cold plasma density) 1 scalar per spin (12 sec) Involves on board calculation implemented on previous spacecraft 28 bytes/12 s spin gives 18.66b/s of SWX bit-rate

RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1Wygant 43 BACK-UP SLIDES

RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1Wygant 44 Time Duration of Intervals of Low Frequency Bursting Necessary for Understanding Wave Fields Responsible for Scattering/Acceleration of Energetic Particles In order to obtain this data, we must have a burst memory of sufficient size, adequate telemetry to downlink the data,and a strategy for selecting the appropriate time intervals

RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1Wygant 45 Spin Plane Electric Field Measurement STARD Requirement at different altitudes including validity requirement

RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1Wygant 46 Spin Plane Deployment, Partially Deployed Cable, Pre-Amplifier Housing, Thin Wire, and Sphere

RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1Wygant 47 Measured and model average large scale convection electric field in inner magnetosphere. Traces are for different values of geomagnetic activity. Kp varies: 1-8. Quiet time field accurate to 3.5 Re. CRRES accuracy of large scale electric field measurement on spacecraft comparable to RBSP after ground calibration

RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1Wygant 48 Discussion of accuracy of VxB subtraction Since the SC is moving relative to the Earth there is a motional electric field V xB where V is the spacecraft velocity and B is the measured magnetic field of the Earth which must be subtracted from the measured electric field in order to determine the electric field in the rest frame of the Earth. Angular uncertainties in the attitude of the spacecraft or orientation of electric field or magnetic field or determination of spacecraft velocity measurements create errors in the electric field which must obey MRD/ELE 42. Plots of typical motional electric field and uncertainties in the measured electric field for 1deg and 3 deg attitude errors as a function of radial distance for an ensemble of orbits is presented in the next slide Required limits on angular error are defined in the subsequent slide All errors are at the 3 sigma level Time independent errors can be reduced signficantly (factor of 2-3) by on the ground cross calibration of the measured electric field and V x B for quiet time orbits as indicated by CRRES experience. Time independent errors are dominant contributions to the magnetometer boom angular uncertainties and electric field sensor alignment uncertainties. CRRES was able to achieve an accuracy of ~ 0.1 mV/m after somewhat extensive ground calibration. This calibration is part of “scientific analysis”. The present RBSP EFW requirement is 0.3 mV/m at a distance of 3.5 Re. CRRES pointing accuracies were less stringent than RBSP.

RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1Wygant 49 Aspects of alignment calibration The magnetic field measurement compared to the magnetic field will provide a strong constraint on the alignment of the spacecraft within a rotation angle arround the magnetic field This angle can be constrained by comparison of the measured E to VxB during geomagnetically quite times Kp<2. The orthogonality of the V12 and V34 boom pairs can be constrained by using time intervals when VxB has a significant component in the spin plane. The sine waves measured by the rotating orthogonal booms pairs should be 90 degrees out of phase. Comparison of amplitudes of the sine waves to projection of VxB into spin plane provides calibration of magnitude. We can also use the 40m and 50 m boom baseline difference to calibrate the electric field magnitude. Attitude manveuvers will take place event ~27 days. After the attitude maneuvers it is possible that the sun pulse will provide the most accuracy attitude measurement. Since the sun sensor is most accurate when the spin axis points away from the sun. Many calibrations of time independent boom alignment error quantities are best preformed at these times.

RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1Wygant 50 Contributions to E field accuracy of transformation from spacecraft frame to inertial GSE frame E= Em-VxB Blue high light are dominate contributions

RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1Wygant 51 Effect of Attitude Uncertainty in E-VxB subtraction accuracy

RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1Wygant 52 Large Amplitude Alfven Wave at PSBL with imbedded large amplitude LH “type” waves R=5.2 Re, 0.82 MLT, MLAT~25 deg  E z ~300 mV/m  B y ~100 nT Propagate parallel to B tpwards Earth Vphase~ km/s E-Field (mV/m) (~800 Hz) Z GSM B-Field (nT) Y GSM (8 Hz) Notice:Imbedded bursts of high frequency waves ~1 V/m ptp (greater in other components) 25 duration burst Low freq

RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1Wygant 53 SAMPEX in low altitude orbit encounters outer radiation belts ~10 minutes after Polar about 1 hour in MLT distant SAMPEX observes rapid time variations (0.1-1 seconds) in 500 keV electron fluxes Fluxes vary by almost order of magnitude Consistent with strong scattering of electrons due to waves (similar to Cattell et al. this meeting) Coincides with Polar L-value

RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1Wygant 54

RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1Wygant 55 EFW/EMFISIS Amplitude vs Frequency

RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1Wygant 56 EFW – PRE, BEB, EFW-EMF Motivation (In Words) The EFW Sensors, Preamp, BEB and EFW-EMFISIS interface represent the primary analog signal path for E-field measurements on RBSP. Measuring 0.1 mV/m DC E-fields required accuracies of 0.1% in the magnetosphere: –tens of mV of signal in the presence of tens to hundreds of mV/m of effective common-mode or systematic noise (photocurrents, SC charging), or tens of volts of common mode signal. Non-linear coupling (I-V curve) of EFW sensors to E-field can be optimized through current biasing (factor of 100 decrease in susceptibility to systematic error sources and density fluctuations). Current biasing of sensors drives volts to tens of volts floating potential differences between sensors and SC ground. High effective source impedance (plasma sheath, ten of MΩ), and low-noise and low-leakage current requirements (systematic error reduction again) drive use of low-voltage preamps in floating ground configuration. Deflection and collection of stray photoelectron currents prior to impingement upon sensor also reduces DC biases (WHIP/USHER and GUARD surfaces).

RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1Wygant 57 EFW – PRE, BEB, EFW-EMF Performance Requirements Formal requirements presented in SysEng presentation. Informally: – Measure few tenths of mV/m to few hundreds of mV/m 2D DC E-fields associated with global convection, ULF waves, and shock-driven effects (spin plane). – Measure few few mV/m to few hundreds of mV/m 3D DC E-fields (spin plane and spin axis) associated with same. – Measure 3D E-field fluctuations up to a 6 kHz at amplitudes up to hundreds of mV/m associated with energetic electron acceleration, scattering and transport. – Deliver low-noise analog E-field signals to EMFISIS-WAVES from 10 Hz to 400 kHz to allow for measurement of tens of mV/m E-field fluctuations associated with energetic electron acceleration, scattering, and transport, as well as detection of the upper hybrid line for cold plasma density estimation. – Measure SC potential fluctuations associated with quasi-DC and low-frequency plasma density and fluctuations. These measurement requirements drive the design of the Preamp, the Boom Electronics Board (BEB) and EFW-EMFISIS E-Field interface.

RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1Wygant 58 EFW – PRE, BEB, EFW-EMF Motivation (In Pictures) Sensor I-V curve and sheath impedanceSensor and SC Floating Potentials SC Sensors ambient e-photoelectrons plasma e- photo e-

RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1Wygant 59 This page intentionally almost blank

RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1Wygant 60 This page intentionally almost blank